Here’s How Samsung’s Galaxy A Series Compares to the iPhone 16e

Less than a month after Apple released its own "budget" iPhone, the iPhone 16e, Samsung is out with a new midrange Galaxy A series update for 2025. And unlike Apple's $599 phone, the Galaxy A26, an admittedly more budget-friendly device, starts at just $300. The Galaxy A56 on the other hand, a more direct iPhone 16e competitor, will be $500 when it launches later this year, yet nets you double the storage as the 16e.

If you're thinking about picking up any of these phones, you might be curious about how they all compare on paper. While we'll need to wait for reviewers to get their hands on these devices before we truly know how they stack up, it's helpful to see the specs and price points side-by-side.

iPhone 16e

Credit: Apple

What was once the iPhone SE is now called the iPhone 16e, and at a $599 starting price for the 128GB model, it's expensive for a midrange phone. But if you can stretch your budget, you do get a lot for that money.

Yes, it has a notch and not a Dynamic Island, but you get a 6.1-inch screen, Apple's latest and greatest A18 chip (that's only missing one GPU core when compared to the iPhone 16 model), 8GB of RAM, Apple Intelligence, a 48MP single camera setup, and a long battery life.

That said, since you're paying less than you would for the standard iPhone 16 or any of its upgrades, you do miss out on some bonuses. The screen is still only 60Hz; there's no always-on display; and you lose an ultra-wide lens, in addition to camera features like Cinematic mode and the new Photographic Styles. Apple even took out MagSafe.

At its core, though, it's a solid iPhone. Apple is known for supporting its devices for years, and the fact that this has 8GB of RAM and the A18 chip means that the iPhone 16e will continue to stay fast and fresh for a good while.

Samsung Galaxy A26, A36, and A56

Credit: Samsung

There are three new phones to talk about here. The A26, starting at $300, the A36, starting at $400, and the A56, starting at $500. For the sake of this comparison, I will mostly focus on the A56, as it's the closest in scope to the 16e, but there are reasons to consider the other options, especially the $400 A36.

All three phones run One UI 7.0, which includes new software features like the Now Bar and a redesigned interface that looks quite a bit like iOS. And while the complete Galaxy AI suite is reserved for Samsung's flagship phones, the A series devices do get Google's Circle-to-Search, Filters, Best Face, Auto Trim, and Samsung's AI Object Eraser tools. Samsung is calling this suite of features "Awesome Intelligence," which I'm sure won't be confusing to anyone. Samsung is also promising six generations of OS upgrades, and six years of security updates, which is up there with Google's seven-year updates promise for Pixel devices.

As specs, go, all three phones get a 5,000 mAh battery, but the 45-watt fast wired charging is only available for the A36 and the A56. It's a similar story with the display too: the A36 and A56 both feature a 6.7-inch AMOLED display with a 120Hz refresh rate, a 1080 x 2340 resolution, and Corning Gorilla Victus+ Glass protection (not present on the iPhone 16e). The A26, though gets a smaller 6.5-inch screen, featuring the same 120Hz refresh rate, and the FHD+ display. The screen goes up to 1,200 nits when you're outside, and can push to 1,900 nits using the Vision Booster feature. The iPhone 16e, meanwhile, is locked to 800 nits.

All three devices feature different processors and RAM configurations, with the best chip saved for the A56. The A26 features Samsung's Exynos 1380 chipset, 6GB RAM, and 128GB storage, while the A36 uses Qualcomm's Snapdragon Gen 3 processor, 6GB RAM, and 128GB storage. The A56 comes with the Exynos 1580 chip, 8 or 12GB RAM (depending on the configuration), and 128 or 256GB storage.

When it comes to raw performance, however, the iPhone 16e easily beats out the A56. Based on early (leaked) testing data compiled by ZoneofTech, the Exynos 1580 in the Galaxy A56 scores 1353 in single-core and 3832 in multi-core performance. The A18 chip, on the other hand, scores 3317 in single-core, and a whopping 8165 in multi-core performance. That's more than double the raw performance on the 16e.

Credit: ZoneofTech

The body shape differs slightly between the three devices. The A26 has a plastic frame and body, compared to the more "premium" metals found on the other two devices. All three phones feature thin bezels around, but a prominent chin, so the bottom bezel is slightly thicker than the other three sides.

There's a triple camera setup on every A series phone, compared to Apple's single 48 MP unit. All three Samsung units get the same 50 MP wide-angle lens. The A56 gets a 12 MP ultra-wide, and a 5 MP macro lens, while the A36 gets a 8 MP ultra-wide, and a 5 MP macro lens. The cheaper A26 gets 8MP ultra-wide and a 2 MP macro lens. All A series phones can take advantage of AI photography features like Best Take, which merges faces from different photos to create a better single image. There's also Samsung's Object Eraser tool which is better than Apple's Cleanup utility. The A56 and A36 can also record content in HDR from the main sensor.

The 5,000 mAh battery in the A series devices is rated for 29 hours of video playback, while the iPhone 16e manages 26 hours on a single charge. Those might not reflect real-life battery tests, however, so we'll need to watch for reviewers before we know how these batteries really compare.

In fact, that's true for a lot of features across these devices. We'll simply need to see how the A series' cameras and chips stack up against the iPhone 16e in real-world use before we can make any definitive calls here. But, for now, it's helpful to compare the specs and data we do have.

The Galaxy A36 5G will be available March 26th in Black and Lavender, and an exclusive Lime color at Best Buy. While the A26 goes on sale March 27th and is only available in a Black color. But the A56 will be out in the US later this year, no details on the color options yet.

View the full article