All Activity

The product preserves borrower's first mortgage, and its potentially lower mortgage rate, without requiring the new monthly payments of a traditional HELOC, FOA says. View the full article

One need not be a sadist to enjoy the deeply unflattering body cam footage of Tiger Woods’ recent drunk driving arrest. Even before factoring in anyone’s personal feelings about the peerlessly accomplished but past-his-prime athlete, or their feelings about drunk drivers in general, the photos are internet-gold that lend themselves easily to memes and jokes. Still, there’s an unsavory aftertaste to this schadenfreude fiesta. It’s the same gamey flavor baked into the release last month of body cam footage from Justin Timberlake’s 2024 arrest, also for drunk driving. While there may be a cheap dopamine hit in watching famous people with highly managed public images in a situation where they have no control—especially if it’s a famous person one doesn’t particularly approve of, for whatever reason—this lurid form of entertainment has a steeper price than many observers might realize or admit. What the viral phenomenon costs us is the implicit agreement that, on a really bad day, anyone could be next. It’s surreal to witness a tool of police accountability become a weapon for shaming the people being policed. The tabloidification of arrest footage is not a recent development, though—dash cam video of Reese Witherspoon’s DUI arrest back in 2013, for instance, was such an overcooked spectacle, even a headline from then-reputable CBS News offered the non-commentary that the video “does not disappoint.” The dynamics at play in body cam footage released for our amusement go back way further—and point toward a future where privacy is a fragile privilege The original rotten tomatoes The powerful have been using public humiliation to dissuade would-be law-breakers for hundreds of years. Throughout the 16th and 17th centuries, criminals in England convicted of crimes such as “swearing” and “drunkenness” were made to sit in stocks or stand in pillories in the town square, so their neighbors could jeer at them and throw rotten produce. This result fused the offenders’ punishment with the townspeople’s entertainment. The message was clear: Much better to be the one throwing the tomatoes than the one getting hit. A few hundred years later, public shaming became part of the process for arresting high-profile criminals. The FBI introduced the perp walk in the 1930s, parading a suspect before a gauntlet of news cameras on the way to the courthouse. This ritual served the dual purpose of showing off the police’s heroic efficiency—what’s now known as ‘copaganda’—while also telegraphing the undignified infamy waiting for criminals when they inevitably got caught. Toward the end of the 20th century, the reality-based show Cops emerged, transforming the perp walk into stocks-and-pillories style entertainment for a much larger town square. The long-running show primed Americans to appreciate the high voyeuristic value of arrest footage, well before society found a more important, urgent and useful reason to regularly capture it. Smile, you’re on extremely candid camera A handful of U.S. police departments were piloting body camera programs as early as 2012. Each officer’s POV would be recorded in real time for posterity and, ideally, the facts of how each arrest went down would remain beyond dispute. Voila: Police accountability. These programs flew largely under public radar for the first couple of years, until an officer in Ferguson, Missouri shot and killed teenager Michael Brown in 2014 for the alleged crime of shoplifting a bag of candy and giving chase. Once that tragic shooting captured national attention, the push for body cameras reached a fever pitch. By the following summer, a YouGov/Economist poll claimed that 92% of Democrats and 84% of Republicans were reportedly in favor of them. Although it’s impossible to tell how many incidents of excessive police force the proliferation of body cameras has prevented, some studies indicate that complaints against officers have decreased significantly in tandem with their usage in the field. Whatever amount they’ve improved the lives of citizens, though, is complicated by the secondary purpose the cameras now serve. Widespread use of body cams has created a system where anyone with enough time and gumption can file a Freedom of Information Act request for footage of an arrest and, depending on state laws, receive a copy to use however they see fit. Because obtaining such footage is relatively easy, it’s not just celebrities whose arrest videos are seeing daylight anymore. In recent years, YouTube channels like Police Activity (6.88 million subscribers) have been fishing for arrest footage they can turn into content. Because of their efforts, people like the woman who shoplifted from Target last summer have become unwitting stars of viral videos. A slew of accounts on X are similarly devoted to capturing people in their most vulnerable moments, sometimes while clearly in the depths of a substance-use disorder. Not only does the town-square humiliation of an arrest now carry the permanence of living online, mercenary third parties are able to monetize it. We were warned Public demand for police body cams may have started with the best intentions, but there were always warning signs about their misuse. The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) sounded the alarm early on, publishing a policy paper on body cams in October 2013. In reference to the widely circulated dash cam footage of Reese Witherspoon earlier that year, ACLU senior policy analyst Jay Stanley wrote, “The potential for such merely embarrassing and titillating releases of video is significantly increased by body cams. Therefore, it is vital that any deployment of these cameras be accompanied by good privacy policies so the benefits of the technology are not outweighed by invasions of privacy.” It was foreseeable, even at the dawn of the body cam era, that the footage these devices captured could have a utility beyond accountability; that without redaction rules, retention limits, and release standards, ordinary citizens and celebrities alike could see their worst moments turned into clickbait. What only seems obvious with the benefit of hindsight, though, is that the detriments of body cam footage would flourish under an administration that publicly shames those protesting it by releasing their names and arrest photos online. It might not just be a coincidence. Perhaps Americans’ voyeuristic appetite for scandalous arrest footage has hit a higher level recently as a result of everyone being transfixed by the most famous person in the world constantly evading accountability. If it’s not possible to see Donald The President in an embarrassing perp walk, after all, at least you can watch it happen to Tiger Woods. Of course, on a bad enough day, it’s just as likely Tiger Woods will be watching your arrest video. View the full article

An Ipsos survey of U.S. adults found 63% say ads in AI search results would reduce trust. Early advertiser data offers limited, mixed signals. The post Trust In AI Search Could Drop With Ads, Survey Shows appeared first on Search Engine Journal. View the full article

Creating an effective questionnaire for survey samples is essential for gathering accurate information. Clear and concise questions help respondents understand what you’re asking, which leads to better data quality. It’s important to mix open and closed-ended questions to capture a range of insights. Furthermore, balancing response options can guarantee diverse perspectives are included. As you consider these elements, think about how the structure and flow of your questionnaire might influence participant engagement. What strategies will you implement to improve clarity and reliability? Key Takeaways Design clear and unbiased questions to ensure accurate data collection and interpretation. Use a balanced mix of closed-ended and open-ended questions to capture diverse opinions. Structure the questionnaire logically, starting with engaging questions and placing sensitive topics later. Keep the survey concise, ideally under one page, with a maximum of ten questions. Pre-test the questionnaire to identify and address any ambiguous or biased questions before distribution. Importance of Clear Question Design When you design a questionnaire, the clarity of your questions plays a significant role in gathering accurate data. Clear question design is fundamental; ambiguous or biased questions can lead to misinterpretation and skewed results. Using simple, straightforward language helps guarantee that respondents understand what you’re asking, reducing confusion and increasing the likelihood of thoughtful answers. Maintaining consistent wording and context across similar questions improves comparability, critical for tracking changes in attitudes over time. The questionnaire format is important; the order of your questions can impact responses, as earlier inquiries can shape how respondents interpret later ones. Consequently, a logical flow is imperative. Don’t forget to pre-test your questions through methods like focus groups. This process can reveal potential clarity issues or biases, allowing you to refine your questionnaire. Types of Survey Questions When creating your questionnaire, comprehending the types of survey questions is essential. You’ll typically encounter open-ended questions, which allow respondents to express their thoughts freely, and closed-ended questions, which limit responses to specific options. Each type serves a distinct purpose, so choosing the right format can greatly influence the quality of your data collection. Open-Ended Questions How can open-ended questions improve your survey? Open-ended questions allow respondents to express their thoughts in their own words, providing rich qualitative data that offers insights often missed by closed-ended questions. This approach is particularly useful when exploring complex topics or gathering detailed feedback. To augment the effectiveness of these questions in your questionnaire format for market survey, guarantee clarity and specificity, guiding respondents toward relevant answers. Nevertheless, limit the number of open-ended questions to prevent respondent fatigue and maintain quality responses. Keep in mind that analyzing open-ended responses can be more complex, requiring qualitative coding techniques to identify common themes and patterns. Closed-Ended Questions Closed-ended questions serve as a strong tool in survey design, offering a structured way for respondents to provide feedback. These questions present predefined answers, making it easier for you to analyze and quantify data collected from surveys. Common types include multiple-choice, dichotomous (yes/no), Likert scale, and ranking questions, each serving distinct purposes in your questionnaire template. Multiple-choice questions allow for single or multiple selections, whereas dichotomous questions simplify responses to two options, enhancing clarity. Likert scale questions gauge attitudes by asking respondents to indicate their level of agreement with a statement. When designing a marketing questionnaire, it’s vital to maintain a clear and balanced set of response options to avoid bias and guarantee all relevant perspectives are represented. Crafting Balanced Response Options Crafting balanced response options is vital for obtaining accurate and meaningful survey results, as it helps to represent respondents’ true opinions. When designing your questionnaire sample, include an equal number of positive and negative choices to avoid skewing results. A neutral option, like “Neither agree nor disagree,” allows respondents to express ambivalence, preventing forced choices that can lead to inaccuracies. Consistent scales across questions improve clarity, making it easier to compare responses, which is fundamental for data analysis. Limit the number of response options to four or five to avoid overwhelming respondents, thereby enhancing the quality of their answers. Including an “Other” option is likewise beneficial, as it captures perspectives that may not fit predefined categories. If you’re looking for a practical tool, consider a survey template word free download to help guide you in crafting balanced response options effectively. Structuring Your Questionnaire When you structure your questionnaire effectively, you set the stage for more reliable and insightful responses. Here are key strategies to reflect on: Start with engaging questions: Begin with easy, relatable items that capture interest and encourage participation. Group related questions logically: Organize questions by theme to maintain a coherent flow and help respondents understand the context. Place sensitive questions later: Save demographic or potentially uncomfortable questions for the end to build rapport and trust. Use connecting statements: Clearly guide respondents between sections, ensuring they understand shifts in focus. Testing and Pre-Testing Questions To guarantee your questionnaire effectively captures the information you need, testing and pre-testing questions play a vital role in refining your survey tools. Using qualitative methods like focus groups or cognitive interviews, you can identify ambiguous or biased questions before including them in your final questionnaire template for your research project. This process helps improve clarity and comprehension, ensuring respondents interpret your questions as intended. Conducting pilot tests with a diverse group of participants reveals potential issues with question wording, response options, and the overall flow of your research questionnaire format. Insights gained from pre-testing are significant for improving the validity and reliability of your questionnaire, allowing it to accurately measure the constructs you aim to explore. Regular updates and revisions based on feedback from pre-testing are critical to keeping your questions relevant and aligned with evolving public opinions and trends. Measuring Change Over Time Measuring change over time in attitudes and opinions requires a careful approach to ascertain that the data collected is both reliable and relevant. To effectively build a questionnaire that tracks these changes, consider the following: Consistent Wording: Use the same phrasing for questions across different surveys to ascertain comparability. Panel Studies: Conduct repeated surveys of the same individuals to gather more reliable data on changes in attitudes. Question Types: Employ Likert scale questions, as they provide a structured way for respondents to express their opinions consistently. Methodological Consistency: Maintain the same survey format, whether online or phone, to avoid variations in responses that could skew your results. Addressing Bias in Survey Questions Addressing bias in survey questions is essential for obtaining accurate and truthful data from respondents. Bias in survey questions can arise from leading language that steers respondents toward specific answers instead of their genuine opinions. To minimize this risk, avoid using loaded terms, which can evoke strong emotions or assumptions, thereby skewing results. Furthermore, steer clear of double-barreled questions; these ask about two issues at once, which can confuse respondents and lead to inaccurate answers. Instead, focus on one question at a time. When dealing with sensitive topics, consider including a “prefer not to answer” option, as this can help mitigate social desirability bias by allowing respondents to skip uncomfortable questions. Finally, conduct pilot studies to test different phrasing, revealing how variations in wording can affect responses and helping you identify and eliminate potential biases before the final survey is administered. Ensuring Logical Question Flow When crafting a questionnaire, ensuring logical question flow is vital for guiding respondents through the survey experience. A clear structure helps maintain engagement and accuracy. To achieve this, consider the following: Start with easy questions: Begin with engaging, simple queries to capture interest and set a positive survey tone. Group related questions: Keep similar topics together, allowing smooth shifts and reducing confusion. Build rapport: Introduce less sensitive questions first, creating a sense of comfort before addressing more personal inquiries. Use transition statements: Provide context between sections, helping respondents understand the purpose of upcoming questions. Best Practices for Survey Length and Engagement To create an effective survey, you should focus on keeping it concise, ideally under one page with 10 or fewer questions, to maintain respondent engagement. It’s furthermore important to optimize question order by randomizing them and placing sensitive questions later to build trust. In addition, consider offering engaging incentives, like cash or gift cards, to boost response rates and encourage participation. Keep Surveys Concise Creating a concise survey is crucial for maintaining respondent engagement and collecting quality data. Aim for a one-page format with 10 or fewer questions. Here are some best practices to follow: Prioritize crucial questions at the beginning to capture key information early. Use screening questions at the start to qualify respondents, ensuring only relevant participants continue. Randomize question order to reduce bias and improve engagement, making the survey feel less predictable. Implement incentives, like cash rewards, to boost response rates and keep the survey length manageable. Utilizing a questionnaire template word can help streamline your design, and an example of survey questionnaire format or sample research questionnaire format can guide you in creating effective surveys. Optimize Question Order Optimizing the order of questions in your survey is essential for enhancing engagement and ensuring high-quality responses. Start with simple, engaging questions to capture interest, encouraging respondents to continue. When you’re formulating research questionnaires, group related questions together; this maintains a logical flow and improves comprehension. Sensitive topics should come later in the questionnaire model for research, allowing you to build rapport and trust before tackling uncomfortable issues. Use change statements between sections to signal shifts in topics, making the experience smoother for respondents. Finally, keep your survey concise, ideally ten questions or fewer, to prevent fatigue and abandonment. An effective example of a questionnaire format follows these guidelines, ensuring better quality data collection. Use Engaging Incentives Engaging incentives can greatly improve your survey’s response rates, making them a fundamental element in the design process. Here are some best practices to contemplate: Offer cash or gift cards: Cash is the most effective incentive, as it motivates participation considerably. Tailor the amount: Verify your incentives are substantial enough for your target audience during the maintenance of data quality. Use prepaid incentives: Offering compensation upfront can lead to higher response rates compared to post-survey rewards. Randomize incentives: This helps reduce bias and makes respondents feel fairly treated, as they know the incentive isn’t guaranteed. Incorporating these strategies in your survey questionnaire sample or client questionnaire template can improve engagement and completion rates. Frequently Asked Questions How to Design a Good Survey Questionnaire? To design a good survey questionnaire, start by defining your objectives clearly. Use a mix of question types like multiple-choice and open-ended to gather varied responses. Group related questions logically, beginning with simpler ones to build rapport. Pre-test your questionnaire with a small sample to identify any confusing parts. Aim for brevity, keeping it under five minutes to improve completion rates during ensuring all questions are clear and unbiased. How to Make a Sample Survey Questionnaire? To make a sample survey questionnaire, start by defining your survey’s purpose, ensuring each question aligns with your research objectives. Use a variety of question types, like multiple-choice and open-ended, to gather thorough data. Keep your wording clear and simple, and consider pre-testing your questions to identify issues. Organize your questionnaire logically, grouping similar topics, and include an “Other” option in closed-ended questions to capture diverse responses that may not fit standard categories. What Are 5 Good Survey Questions? You might consider these five effective survey questions: First, ask respondents to rate their satisfaction on a Likert scale from 1 to 5. Next, use a multiple-choice question to identify their preferred product features. Include an open-ended question to gather additional feedback. A demographic question can help segment your data, and finally, offer a “Prefer not to answer” option for sensitive topics. These questions can improve clarity and boost response rates. What Are the Key Elements of a Well-Designed Survey Questionnaire? A well-designed survey questionnaire includes several key elements. First, your questions should be clear and concise, avoiding complex jargon. It’s crucial to balance open and closed-ended questions for depth and ease of analysis. Verify a logical flow by starting with engaging questions and grouping related items. Offering varied response options, like Likert scales, can yield nuanced insights. Finally, pilot testing helps refine your questions and identify biases, enhancing overall quality before distribution. Conclusion In summary, designing an effective questionnaire is essential for gathering reliable survey data. By focusing on clear question design, utilizing diverse question types, and ensuring balanced response options, you can improve participant engagement and accuracy. Structuring your questionnaire logically and pre-testing it will further refine your approach. In the end, addressing potential biases and measuring change over time will enhance the overall quality of your research, leading to more meaningful insights and informed decisions. Image via Google Gemini This article, "Creating an Effective Questionnaire for Survey Samples" was first published on Small Business Trends View the full article

Creating an effective questionnaire for survey samples is essential for gathering accurate information. Clear and concise questions help respondents understand what you’re asking, which leads to better data quality. It’s important to mix open and closed-ended questions to capture a range of insights. Furthermore, balancing response options can guarantee diverse perspectives are included. As you consider these elements, think about how the structure and flow of your questionnaire might influence participant engagement. What strategies will you implement to improve clarity and reliability? Key Takeaways Design clear and unbiased questions to ensure accurate data collection and interpretation. Use a balanced mix of closed-ended and open-ended questions to capture diverse opinions. Structure the questionnaire logically, starting with engaging questions and placing sensitive topics later. Keep the survey concise, ideally under one page, with a maximum of ten questions. Pre-test the questionnaire to identify and address any ambiguous or biased questions before distribution. Importance of Clear Question Design When you design a questionnaire, the clarity of your questions plays a significant role in gathering accurate data. Clear question design is fundamental; ambiguous or biased questions can lead to misinterpretation and skewed results. Using simple, straightforward language helps guarantee that respondents understand what you’re asking, reducing confusion and increasing the likelihood of thoughtful answers. Maintaining consistent wording and context across similar questions improves comparability, critical for tracking changes in attitudes over time. The questionnaire format is important; the order of your questions can impact responses, as earlier inquiries can shape how respondents interpret later ones. Consequently, a logical flow is imperative. Don’t forget to pre-test your questions through methods like focus groups. This process can reveal potential clarity issues or biases, allowing you to refine your questionnaire. Types of Survey Questions When creating your questionnaire, comprehending the types of survey questions is essential. You’ll typically encounter open-ended questions, which allow respondents to express their thoughts freely, and closed-ended questions, which limit responses to specific options. Each type serves a distinct purpose, so choosing the right format can greatly influence the quality of your data collection. Open-Ended Questions How can open-ended questions improve your survey? Open-ended questions allow respondents to express their thoughts in their own words, providing rich qualitative data that offers insights often missed by closed-ended questions. This approach is particularly useful when exploring complex topics or gathering detailed feedback. To augment the effectiveness of these questions in your questionnaire format for market survey, guarantee clarity and specificity, guiding respondents toward relevant answers. Nevertheless, limit the number of open-ended questions to prevent respondent fatigue and maintain quality responses. Keep in mind that analyzing open-ended responses can be more complex, requiring qualitative coding techniques to identify common themes and patterns. Closed-Ended Questions Closed-ended questions serve as a strong tool in survey design, offering a structured way for respondents to provide feedback. These questions present predefined answers, making it easier for you to analyze and quantify data collected from surveys. Common types include multiple-choice, dichotomous (yes/no), Likert scale, and ranking questions, each serving distinct purposes in your questionnaire template. Multiple-choice questions allow for single or multiple selections, whereas dichotomous questions simplify responses to two options, enhancing clarity. Likert scale questions gauge attitudes by asking respondents to indicate their level of agreement with a statement. When designing a marketing questionnaire, it’s vital to maintain a clear and balanced set of response options to avoid bias and guarantee all relevant perspectives are represented. Crafting Balanced Response Options Crafting balanced response options is vital for obtaining accurate and meaningful survey results, as it helps to represent respondents’ true opinions. When designing your questionnaire sample, include an equal number of positive and negative choices to avoid skewing results. A neutral option, like “Neither agree nor disagree,” allows respondents to express ambivalence, preventing forced choices that can lead to inaccuracies. Consistent scales across questions improve clarity, making it easier to compare responses, which is fundamental for data analysis. Limit the number of response options to four or five to avoid overwhelming respondents, thereby enhancing the quality of their answers. Including an “Other” option is likewise beneficial, as it captures perspectives that may not fit predefined categories. If you’re looking for a practical tool, consider a survey template word free download to help guide you in crafting balanced response options effectively. Structuring Your Questionnaire When you structure your questionnaire effectively, you set the stage for more reliable and insightful responses. Here are key strategies to reflect on: Start with engaging questions: Begin with easy, relatable items that capture interest and encourage participation. Group related questions logically: Organize questions by theme to maintain a coherent flow and help respondents understand the context. Place sensitive questions later: Save demographic or potentially uncomfortable questions for the end to build rapport and trust. Use connecting statements: Clearly guide respondents between sections, ensuring they understand shifts in focus. Testing and Pre-Testing Questions To guarantee your questionnaire effectively captures the information you need, testing and pre-testing questions play a vital role in refining your survey tools. Using qualitative methods like focus groups or cognitive interviews, you can identify ambiguous or biased questions before including them in your final questionnaire template for your research project. This process helps improve clarity and comprehension, ensuring respondents interpret your questions as intended. Conducting pilot tests with a diverse group of participants reveals potential issues with question wording, response options, and the overall flow of your research questionnaire format. Insights gained from pre-testing are significant for improving the validity and reliability of your questionnaire, allowing it to accurately measure the constructs you aim to explore. Regular updates and revisions based on feedback from pre-testing are critical to keeping your questions relevant and aligned with evolving public opinions and trends. Measuring Change Over Time Measuring change over time in attitudes and opinions requires a careful approach to ascertain that the data collected is both reliable and relevant. To effectively build a questionnaire that tracks these changes, consider the following: Consistent Wording: Use the same phrasing for questions across different surveys to ascertain comparability. Panel Studies: Conduct repeated surveys of the same individuals to gather more reliable data on changes in attitudes. Question Types: Employ Likert scale questions, as they provide a structured way for respondents to express their opinions consistently. Methodological Consistency: Maintain the same survey format, whether online or phone, to avoid variations in responses that could skew your results. Addressing Bias in Survey Questions Addressing bias in survey questions is essential for obtaining accurate and truthful data from respondents. Bias in survey questions can arise from leading language that steers respondents toward specific answers instead of their genuine opinions. To minimize this risk, avoid using loaded terms, which can evoke strong emotions or assumptions, thereby skewing results. Furthermore, steer clear of double-barreled questions; these ask about two issues at once, which can confuse respondents and lead to inaccurate answers. Instead, focus on one question at a time. When dealing with sensitive topics, consider including a “prefer not to answer” option, as this can help mitigate social desirability bias by allowing respondents to skip uncomfortable questions. Finally, conduct pilot studies to test different phrasing, revealing how variations in wording can affect responses and helping you identify and eliminate potential biases before the final survey is administered. Ensuring Logical Question Flow When crafting a questionnaire, ensuring logical question flow is vital for guiding respondents through the survey experience. A clear structure helps maintain engagement and accuracy. To achieve this, consider the following: Start with easy questions: Begin with engaging, simple queries to capture interest and set a positive survey tone. Group related questions: Keep similar topics together, allowing smooth shifts and reducing confusion. Build rapport: Introduce less sensitive questions first, creating a sense of comfort before addressing more personal inquiries. Use transition statements: Provide context between sections, helping respondents understand the purpose of upcoming questions. Best Practices for Survey Length and Engagement To create an effective survey, you should focus on keeping it concise, ideally under one page with 10 or fewer questions, to maintain respondent engagement. It’s furthermore important to optimize question order by randomizing them and placing sensitive questions later to build trust. In addition, consider offering engaging incentives, like cash or gift cards, to boost response rates and encourage participation. Keep Surveys Concise Creating a concise survey is crucial for maintaining respondent engagement and collecting quality data. Aim for a one-page format with 10 or fewer questions. Here are some best practices to follow: Prioritize crucial questions at the beginning to capture key information early. Use screening questions at the start to qualify respondents, ensuring only relevant participants continue. Randomize question order to reduce bias and improve engagement, making the survey feel less predictable. Implement incentives, like cash rewards, to boost response rates and keep the survey length manageable. Utilizing a questionnaire template word can help streamline your design, and an example of survey questionnaire format or sample research questionnaire format can guide you in creating effective surveys. Optimize Question Order Optimizing the order of questions in your survey is essential for enhancing engagement and ensuring high-quality responses. Start with simple, engaging questions to capture interest, encouraging respondents to continue. When you’re formulating research questionnaires, group related questions together; this maintains a logical flow and improves comprehension. Sensitive topics should come later in the questionnaire model for research, allowing you to build rapport and trust before tackling uncomfortable issues. Use change statements between sections to signal shifts in topics, making the experience smoother for respondents. Finally, keep your survey concise, ideally ten questions or fewer, to prevent fatigue and abandonment. An effective example of a questionnaire format follows these guidelines, ensuring better quality data collection. Use Engaging Incentives Engaging incentives can greatly improve your survey’s response rates, making them a fundamental element in the design process. Here are some best practices to contemplate: Offer cash or gift cards: Cash is the most effective incentive, as it motivates participation considerably. Tailor the amount: Verify your incentives are substantial enough for your target audience during the maintenance of data quality. Use prepaid incentives: Offering compensation upfront can lead to higher response rates compared to post-survey rewards. Randomize incentives: This helps reduce bias and makes respondents feel fairly treated, as they know the incentive isn’t guaranteed. Incorporating these strategies in your survey questionnaire sample or client questionnaire template can improve engagement and completion rates. Frequently Asked Questions How to Design a Good Survey Questionnaire? To design a good survey questionnaire, start by defining your objectives clearly. Use a mix of question types like multiple-choice and open-ended to gather varied responses. Group related questions logically, beginning with simpler ones to build rapport. Pre-test your questionnaire with a small sample to identify any confusing parts. Aim for brevity, keeping it under five minutes to improve completion rates during ensuring all questions are clear and unbiased. How to Make a Sample Survey Questionnaire? To make a sample survey questionnaire, start by defining your survey’s purpose, ensuring each question aligns with your research objectives. Use a variety of question types, like multiple-choice and open-ended, to gather thorough data. Keep your wording clear and simple, and consider pre-testing your questions to identify issues. Organize your questionnaire logically, grouping similar topics, and include an “Other” option in closed-ended questions to capture diverse responses that may not fit standard categories. What Are 5 Good Survey Questions? You might consider these five effective survey questions: First, ask respondents to rate their satisfaction on a Likert scale from 1 to 5. Next, use a multiple-choice question to identify their preferred product features. Include an open-ended question to gather additional feedback. A demographic question can help segment your data, and finally, offer a “Prefer not to answer” option for sensitive topics. These questions can improve clarity and boost response rates. What Are the Key Elements of a Well-Designed Survey Questionnaire? A well-designed survey questionnaire includes several key elements. First, your questions should be clear and concise, avoiding complex jargon. It’s crucial to balance open and closed-ended questions for depth and ease of analysis. Verify a logical flow by starting with engaging questions and grouping related items. Offering varied response options, like Likert scales, can yield nuanced insights. Finally, pilot testing helps refine your questions and identify biases, enhancing overall quality before distribution. Conclusion In summary, designing an effective questionnaire is essential for gathering reliable survey data. By focusing on clear question design, utilizing diverse question types, and ensuring balanced response options, you can improve participant engagement and accuracy. Structuring your questionnaire logically and pre-testing it will further refine your approach. In the end, addressing potential biases and measuring change over time will enhance the overall quality of your research, leading to more meaningful insights and informed decisions. Image via Google Gemini This article, "Creating an Effective Questionnaire for Survey Samples" was first published on Small Business Trends View the full article

While a side hustle can be a great way to start a business or boost your income, many options do have start-up costs. However, there are several that you can essentially start with just the tools and materials you already have (assuming you have an internet connection). “There are so many ways to get started with no money,” says Shaun Ghavami, founder of 10XBNB, which co-hosts short-term rentals and also offers courses on the topic. “You just need to get creative, and you need a niche.” Ghavami started that way. He launched his co-hosting side hustle with no investment, reaching out to landlords that were not having luck renting their furnished properties and offering to handle their Airbnb listing and act as property manager. He started by charging 20 percent of the Airbnb revenue, but today takes a 35 percent cut. His Vancouver-based company has generated over $5 million in booking fees since its founding in 2020. If managing properties on Airbnb isn’t for you, here are six side hustles that don’t require any upfront investment but still have notable earnings potential. Social-media consultant Companies are always on the lookout for people who can help them turn heads and capture people’s attention in a crowded market. There’s more to a social-media consultant role than just attracting attention, though—you’ll also need to monitor engagement metrics and increase interaction. This is a good choice for people who have their own experience building a following on TikTok, Instagram, LinkedIn, or other social-media outlets. Sites like Upwork and Freelancer.com are a good place to start looking for clients. Outbound lead generation B2B plays are often overlooked when people consider side hustles, which can be an opportunity for someone with the right skills. For this side-hustle business, you’ll identify, attract, and nurture prospective customers for businesses, along with gathering information like contacts, combining data from places like LinkedIn, X, and Meta. You can make the initial outreach to these places and book meetings for your client. You’ll need to be good at research to identify prospective leads. And if you’ve got cold outreach skills, that can be a deal sweetener for prospective clients. Copywriting There are thousands of listings for copywriters on sites like Indeed and LinkedIn. Some companies need help connecting with customers through landing pages or social media. Others need someone to write video scripts. If you can turn around high-quality writing in a short period of time, you’ll quickly find demand for your services. The top niche areas for writers, as of last year, are digital marketing, SaaS/e-commerce, and health/lifestyle. SEO auditing If your skillset includes pushing web pages to the top of Google’s search rankings, there’s definitely demand for that from small- and medium-sized businesses. Launching an SEO audit side hustle involves reviewing client websites and recommending improvements that will boost their visibility. A key part of this gig (which could easily become a full-time startup once you’ve established a track record) is keeping up with changes to search algorithms from Google, Bing, and others. You could also expand into the growing field of generative engine optimization (GEO), which optimizes content to be discovered and cited by chatbots. Industry trend reports People who have strong researching skills can earn extra income by assembling reports focused on sector-specific news and analysis, as well as shifts in consumer preferences or relevant technology. Businesses rely on this sort of information to gain an advantage over their competitors but often don’t have someone on staff tasked to compile it. You’ll also want to create actionable bullet points to include in your report. Focus on a niche area and carefully source your information. AI can be a valuable assistant, but be sure to verify any data it provides, as your reputation is a critical part of running this sort of business. Tours You know your town’s hotspots and points of interest better than anybody, so why not capitalize on that? If you live in a vacation destination, starting a tour business is a great way to pick up extra income and can easily become a full-time business. The trick is coming up with an angle that professional tour companies aren’t already covering. Still, if you’re passionate about parts of your city, you can use platforms like Facebook, Upwork, and Viator to market yourself. Some guides say they average between $100 and $300 per tour, often earning much more. If you don’t live in a tourist town, consider guiding locals in everything from ghost tours to off-roading, depending on your area. —Chris Morris This article originally appeared on Fast Company’s sister website, Inc.com. Inc. is the voice of the American entrepreneur. We inspire, inform, and document the most fascinating people in business: the risk-takers, the innovators, and the ultra-driven go-getters that represent the most dynamic force in the American economy. View the full article

WhatsApp has rolled out a suite of new features aimed at transforming the way users interact with the platform, making it particularly relevant for small business owners juggling multiple demands. As digital communication continues to evolve, these enhancements can help entrepreneurs stay organized, connect more efficiently, and leverage multimedia in their messaging. One of the standout features is the ability to manage storage directly within conversations. For many small business owners, digital clutter can impede productivity. The new “Manage Storage” function allows users to easily identify and delete large files without having to erase entire chat histories. This means you can keep essential conversations intact while freeing up valuable space on your device, a boon for those who are constantly sharing updates, photos, and documents. “Your WhatsApp chats become a record of the moments that matter: conversations with family, laughs with friends, and the photos and videos you couldn’t stop sharing,” WhatsApp highlights, underscoring the platform’s multifaceted role in both personal and professional settings. Another significant upgrade is the cross-platform chat transfer feature. Transitioning between devices often poses a challenge, but now users can move their chat history seamlessly from iOS to Android and vice versa, in addition to within the same platform. For small business owners who may switch devices frequently, this function ensures that conversations, photos, and important files travel with them, thereby eliminating the potential for lost information. Furthermore, small business owners can now manage two WhatsApp accounts on a single iPhone, enabling a clear separation between work communications and personal chats. As WhatsApp noted, “You’ll always know which account you’re in because your profile picture will now be visible in the bottom tab.” This functionality reduces the need to carry multiple devices, streamlining workflow for those balancing multiple responsibilities. The app has also revamped its sticker feature. By suggesting stickers that correspond with typed emojis, WhatsApp caters to those who wish to add a personal touch to their messages. For small businesses engaging on social media, this could enhance brand voice and customer interactions, creating a more engaging user experience. Small business owners should also take note of the capability to edit photos and utilize AI for touch-ups before sending images. This tool allows for a quick polish, making it easier to ensure that any visuals shared in chats are professional and appealing. It’s a small yet impactful shift that can enhance the quality of presentations, proposals, or social media content sent via WhatsApp. Another feature that could be particularly useful is the AI Writing Help. This tool provides suggested responses based on existing conversations, ensuring that messages are effective and well-articulated. For small business owners who may find themselves pressed for time, this could be an invaluable timesaver, allowing them to maintain effective communication without sacrificing content quality. As these features roll out, small business owners should be aware of their potential benefits and challenges. While these advancements aim to streamline tasks, users may need time to adjust to new functionalities, particularly concerning data management strategies. It is essential for businesses to adopt best practices for data security, especially when transferring chat histories and handling multimedia content. WhatsApp’s continuous evolution reflects the growing need for flexible, intuitive communication tools that accommodate the dynamic nature of small businesses. With features designed to reduce clutter and enhance communication, WhatsApp positions itself as a vital resource for entrepreneurs navigating their work-life balance while fostering connections that matter. These features are currently rolling out and will soon be available for all users. To learn more about these updates, visit the original post here. Image via Google Gemini This article, "WhatsApp Unveils New Features to Enhance Chat Experience and Organization" was first published on Small Business Trends View the full article

WhatsApp has rolled out a suite of new features aimed at transforming the way users interact with the platform, making it particularly relevant for small business owners juggling multiple demands. As digital communication continues to evolve, these enhancements can help entrepreneurs stay organized, connect more efficiently, and leverage multimedia in their messaging. One of the standout features is the ability to manage storage directly within conversations. For many small business owners, digital clutter can impede productivity. The new “Manage Storage” function allows users to easily identify and delete large files without having to erase entire chat histories. This means you can keep essential conversations intact while freeing up valuable space on your device, a boon for those who are constantly sharing updates, photos, and documents. “Your WhatsApp chats become a record of the moments that matter: conversations with family, laughs with friends, and the photos and videos you couldn’t stop sharing,” WhatsApp highlights, underscoring the platform’s multifaceted role in both personal and professional settings. Another significant upgrade is the cross-platform chat transfer feature. Transitioning between devices often poses a challenge, but now users can move their chat history seamlessly from iOS to Android and vice versa, in addition to within the same platform. For small business owners who may switch devices frequently, this function ensures that conversations, photos, and important files travel with them, thereby eliminating the potential for lost information. Furthermore, small business owners can now manage two WhatsApp accounts on a single iPhone, enabling a clear separation between work communications and personal chats. As WhatsApp noted, “You’ll always know which account you’re in because your profile picture will now be visible in the bottom tab.” This functionality reduces the need to carry multiple devices, streamlining workflow for those balancing multiple responsibilities. The app has also revamped its sticker feature. By suggesting stickers that correspond with typed emojis, WhatsApp caters to those who wish to add a personal touch to their messages. For small businesses engaging on social media, this could enhance brand voice and customer interactions, creating a more engaging user experience. Small business owners should also take note of the capability to edit photos and utilize AI for touch-ups before sending images. This tool allows for a quick polish, making it easier to ensure that any visuals shared in chats are professional and appealing. It’s a small yet impactful shift that can enhance the quality of presentations, proposals, or social media content sent via WhatsApp. Another feature that could be particularly useful is the AI Writing Help. This tool provides suggested responses based on existing conversations, ensuring that messages are effective and well-articulated. For small business owners who may find themselves pressed for time, this could be an invaluable timesaver, allowing them to maintain effective communication without sacrificing content quality. As these features roll out, small business owners should be aware of their potential benefits and challenges. While these advancements aim to streamline tasks, users may need time to adjust to new functionalities, particularly concerning data management strategies. It is essential for businesses to adopt best practices for data security, especially when transferring chat histories and handling multimedia content. WhatsApp’s continuous evolution reflects the growing need for flexible, intuitive communication tools that accommodate the dynamic nature of small businesses. With features designed to reduce clutter and enhance communication, WhatsApp positions itself as a vital resource for entrepreneurs navigating their work-life balance while fostering connections that matter. These features are currently rolling out and will soon be available for all users. To learn more about these updates, visit the original post here. Image via Google Gemini This article, "WhatsApp Unveils New Features to Enhance Chat Experience and Organization" was first published on Small Business Trends View the full article

After years of working with clients across various industries at Dreamix, certain patterns repeat. Not the technical work—that varies enormously—but in the conversations that happen before the work begins. The assumptions clients bring into a vendor selection process often shape the outcome more than the technology choices that follow. Three of those assumptions are worth questioning before signing anything. 1. Don’t design the team before scoping the problem. A client arrives with a fixed requirement for five senior engineers, a specific tech stack, and product availability by a certain date. The project scope comes later. I understand their reasoning. Senior engineers are scarce and expensive, and securing them early feels like getting ahead of the problem. What this actually does, however, is optimize for the wrong variable. Clients are the experts on their business—what needs to be solved, what success looks like, what the constraints are. Translating that into the right team composition is a different kind of expertise. Mixing the two up or doing them out of order often creates problems that show up later. Senior engineers are built for complexity—ambiguous problems, high-stakes architectural decisions, situations where experience is the differentiating factor. When the work turns out to be well-defined and execution-focused, that same engineer is likely to disengage. We had one case at Dreamix where a client strongly insisted on a heavily senior team before proper scoping was done. We expressed our reservations, but eventually went along with it. Within months, the lead engineer was visibly demotivated—the work wasn’t complex enough. What began as the client’s ideal scenario became a retention problem, then a restructure. By the time we brought in a more suitable team, the project lost weeks, and a significant amount of institutional knowledge walked out with that engineer. 2. Don’t assume the solution is AI before validating the problem. Boards are pushing AI initiatives downward, and by the time they reach a vendor conversation, they’ve often hardened into requirements. The problem is that not every process that looks like an AI use case actually is one. We regularly encounter clients who arrive with an AI brief that, after proper analysis, turns out to describe a rule-based problem—one that a straightforward workflow can solve more reliably, at lower cost, and with less maintenance. Sometimes the response to that assessment is: “Can we still call it AI?” When the problem genuinely calls for AI, that’s a different conversation entirely. The vendors best positioned to advise here are those whose teams are actively working with AI—building with it, testing its limits, following where the technology is heading. That hands-on exposure is what makes the difference between a recommendation grounded in real experience and one based on what a client wants to hear. A 2025 MIT study found that 95% of enterprise AI pilots deliver little to no measurable impact on profitability, while the 5% that do succeed share one characteristic: They focused on a single, concrete pain point rather than broad adoption. A vendor who talks you into AI when you don’t need it is optimizing for their engagement, not your outcome. 3. Don’t leave the business outcomes undefined at kickoff. Purely technical teams have a tendency to pursue quality beyond what the business actually requires. A system performing at 90% accuracy sounds insufficient until you learn that the previous baseline was 80%. At that point, 90% is already a significant result, and pushing to 95% means spending time and budget on a standard no one asked for. We had exactly that conversation with a client. The engineering instinct was to keep improving the model, but tracking business results alongside technical ones prompted us to check in first. What we’d already delivered was, in their words, transformational. The more valuable next step was releasing it, not refining it. Before the build starts, align with your vendor on what success looks like in business terms. What gap are you closing? What are the must-have features versus the ones that can wait? What is the timeline, and why does hitting it matter? THE VENDOR CONVERSATION IS PART OF THE WORK These three mistakes usually happen before the first line of code is written, and they set the conditions for everything that follows. A good vendor partnership runs in both directions. Clients who come with clearly defined business outcomes and openness to pushback tend to get better results, because they create the conditions for honest advice. Denis Danov is CTO of Dreamix. View the full article

AI inspires strong feelings. Some love it, some hate it, few are indifferent. But, usually, AI's biggest proponents are the companies that make and sell the tech. You expect OpenAI to tout ChatGPT's benefits, or Google to talk-up how useful Gemini is. For a company like these to say that their AI tools are nothing but a plaything would be a ludicrous concept—and yet, that's apparently what Microsoft did. As reported by TechCrunch, Microsoft's terms of service for Copilot aren't too laudatory of the AI tech or its capabilities. The policy, which was last updated on October 24, 2025, says the following: “Copilot is for entertainment purposes only...It can make mistakes, and it may not work as intended. Don’t rely on Copilot for important advice. Use Copilot at your own risk.” To be fair, most—if not all—AI companies put a warning like this on their tools. You'll see it with ChatGPT and Gemini, urging you to exercise caution when using AI for, well, anything. The tech is not perfect, and may quite literally make things up. As such, the alerts are there to remind you that the results you get may not be accurate—and if you're using the tech for something important, you should probably check the bot's work yourself. But the noteworthy thing here is that first line: "Copilot is for entertainment purposes only." That's pretty rich, considering the fact the company has not only infused most of its apps and services (as well as Windows itself) with Copilot features, but it actively advertises Copilot as a tool for work. Copilot is a part of the entire Microsoft 365 worksuite now—to say that a "core" element to apps like PowerPoint, Outlook, and Teams is just "entertainment" undermines Microsoft's sales pitch (while emboldening its critics). It also comes at the same time the company is removing what it calls "unnecessary" Copilot features from its products. To be fair, Microsoft is not standing by this description. In a comment to PCMag, a company rep shared that Microsoft will be updating "legacy language." The full quote reads: "The ‘entertainment purposes’ phrasing is legacy language from when Copilot originally launched as a search companion service in Bing. As the product has evolved, that language is no longer reflective of how Copilot is used today and will be altered with our next update." Generative AI features were definitely more entertainment focused that productivity focused following ChatGPT's launch in late 2022 (I tested the chatbot by asking it to write me stories and poems). But the AI race has been in full swing for about three years at this point: Copilot is no longer a companion to Bing; it's one of the major AI tools out there. For Microsoft to not catch this "legacy language" is a bit emblematic of the company as a whole at this point. Microsoft wants users to take its AI tech seriously, but it’s overlooking the little details that actually matter to those users. What we’re left with is not a clean, well-optimized version of Windows, but one stuffed with AI features few actually wanted—features that are, apparently, for entertainment purposes only. View the full article

The White House's proposed 2027 budget would slash funding to the Community Development Financial Institutions Fund, the latest in an ongoing campaign from the The President administration to dismantle the politically popular program. View the full article

In the first twenty-four hours of the war with Iran, the United States struck a thousand targets. By the end of the week, the total exceeded three thousand — twice as many as in the “shock and awe” phase of the 2003 invasion of Iraq, according to Pete Hegseth. This unprecedented number of strikes was made possible by artificial intelligence. U.S. Central Command (CENTCOM) insists that humans remain in the loop on every targeting decision, and that the AI is there to help them to make “smarter decisions faster.” But exactly what role humans can play when the systems are operating at this pace is unclear. Israel’s use of AI-enabled targeting in its war on Hamas may offer some insights. An investigation last year reported that the Israeli military had deployed an AI system called Lavender to identify suspected militants in Gaza. The official line is that all targeting decisions involved human assessment. But according to one of Lavender’s operators, as the humans involved came to trust the system, they limited their own checks to nothing more than confirming that the target was a male. “I would invest 20 seconds for each target,” the operator said. “I had zero added-value as a human, apart from being a stamp of approval. It saved a lot of time.” The same pattern has already taken hold in business. In 2023, ProPublica revealed that Cigna, one of America’s largest health insurers, had deployed an algorithm to flag claims for denial. Its physicians, who were legally required to exercise their clinical judgment, signed off on the algorithm’s decisions in batches, spending an average of 1.2 seconds on each case. One doctor denied more than 60,000 claims in a single month. “We literally click and submit,” a former Cigna doctor said. “It takes all of 10 seconds to do 50 at a time.” Twenty seconds to approve a strike; 1.2 seconds to deny a claim. The human is in the loop. Humanity is not. Difficulty by Design The novelist Milan Kundera writes of the terrifying weight of being confronted with the enduring seriousness of our actions. But while lightness might seem attractive in the face of this impossibly heavy burden, it is ultimately unbearable. Disconnection from the weightiness of our decisions deprives them of substance, of meaning. Some things are important enough that we ought to feel their weight. It ought to take time to decide to kill a person or deny a healthcare claim. It ought to be difficult to figure out which buildings to bomb. AI makes those decisions quicker and easier – but some decisions ought to be hard. And when AI lifts the weight, when it takes away the burden of making decisions about who lives and who dies, this is not progress. This is moral degradation. AI promises to lift the burden of difficult and cognitively demanding work — it makes the work lighter. In many domains, that is genuine progress. But some things are important enough that we ought to feel their weight. It ought to take time to decide to kill a person or deny a healthcare claim. It ought to be difficult to figure out which buildings to bomb. In such decisions, the difficulty serves a function — it is a feature, not a bug. It is a mechanism that forces institutions to reckon with what they are doing. And when AI removes that weight, the institution doesn’t become more efficient. It becomes numb. If the human in the loop is spending mere seconds on each decision, then the question of whether the system is autonomous or human-supervised becomes largely semantic. We need to insist on humanity in the loop as well. In cases like these, the human must be allowed to be human, even if that means they are slower, less accurate, and less efficient. That is the cost we pay for something absolutely necessary: We need the human to feel the weight of the decisions they are making, because difficulty creates the friction that makes people pause, question, and push back. Institutional Culture When hard decisions become easy, the institution itself changes. People stop questioning because there is nothing that feels worth questioning — the system has already decided and the human’s role is to confirm. Dissent drops because dissent requires friction, and friction has been engineered out. Accountability is undermined because everyone knows that it’s the computer that’s making the decisions. The Cigna physician who denied 60,000 claims in a month was not cruel. They had been placed in a system where denying a claim required no more effort than clicking a button. The system did something more insidious than corrupt their judgment — it made it unnecessary. That is why the Cigna case is not a story about a single bad actor. Rather, it is a story about what happens to any institution that systematically engineers the weight out of its hardest decisions. The Cost of Hollowing Out Accountability Hollowed-out accountability has a cost that shows up in three places for businesses. First, liability. An algorithm cannot be sued, fired, or held responsible for its errors. The organization that deployed it can. Rubber-stamp oversight is not a legal gray area — it is a liability waiting for lawyers to mobilize. Second, institutional fragility. When humans stop genuinely engaging with decisions, they stop learning from them. When the machine always seems to get things right, no one develops the kind of judgment needed to determine when it is actually wrong. Organizations that optimize humans out of their decision loops become dependent on systems they no longer fully understand. And this leads to brittleness in precisely the moments that demand resilience. Third, trust. Customers, employees, and regulators may want to know whether an AI made a decision. But they will definitely want to know if anyone is truly responsible for it. The answer, in too many organizations, is no, and that answer has deep consequences for the organization’s relationships with those it is answerable to. The Weight Test Before using AI to make any decision process easier, leaders should ask four questions: 1. What institutional behaviors does the current difficulty of this decision produce — e.g., scrutiny, escalation, dissent — and what is the cost of losing them? 2. If something goes wrong, can we identify someone who wrestled with the decision — or only someone who clicked approve? 3. How would we know if the humans in this process have become rubber stamps? What would we measure, and are we measuring it? 4. If the people affected by this decision learned exactly how it was made and how long the human spent on it, would the institution be comfortable defending that process in public? These questions won’t appear in any AI vendor’s implementation checklist. That is precisely why they matter. Conclusion We are told that AI liberates us — from drudgery, from slow processes, from the burden of hard decisions. And often it does. But not every burden is a problem to be solved. Sometimes, the burdens are the point. The weight a commander should feel before authorizing a strike, the effort a physician expends before denying care — these are not inefficiencies to be optimized away. They are the mechanisms that keep institutions honest about the power they exercise. Of course, organizations that engineer that weight away will be faster and lighter. For a while, it may even appear like they are winning. But these organizations will also be the ones that discover, too late, that the difficulty was the price of being the one who decides — and the moment an organization stops paying it, it has no business deciding at all. View the full article

If you rank your own product #1 in “best of” listicles, it’s not just a search-quality issue — it may violate FTC rules that took effect in October 2024. Driving the news. As Lily Ray noted on LinkedIn, the FTC’s Consumer Review Rule (16 CFR Part 465) prohibits several deceptive practices tied to reviews and testimonials, including: Presenting company-controlled content as independent reviews. Publishing reviews of products or services never actually used. Attributing reviews to people who didn’t write them. Penalties can reach up to $53,088 per violation, and each page may count separately. Ray also shared a reference table she generated with the help of Claude: Why now. “Best X” and “Top 10 Y” listicles have surged as a GEO tactic over the past couple of years. These pages often perform well in search and increasingly influence AI-generated answers. The backstory. Before the rule was formalized, Ray said at least one company faced legal action for publishing hundreds of “best of” pages that: Ranked its own services #1. Included fabricated competitor reviews. Used fake reviews on third-party platforms. The Better Business Bureau later censured the company for unsubstantiated claims. What’s happening. Many modern listicles follow a similar pattern: A brand publishes a “best tools” list. Includes competitors it hasn’t tested. Uses subjective or invented scoring systems. Ranks itself #1. These listicles may imply independence or firsthand evaluation when neither exists. The nuance. You can publish comparison content that includes your own product. However, based on FTC guidance, risk increases when: You imply objectivity, but promote your own product. You present reviews not based on real experience. You fail to clearly disclose material relationships. What Google is saying. Google is aware of the low-quality listicle trend. In a statement to The Verge, a Google spokesperson said the company applies protections against manipulation in Search and Gemini, and reiterated its guidance: create content for people and ensure it’s understandable to search systems. Why we care. What has worked as a visibility tactic may carry risk on two fronts — regulators and a potential Google Search algorithm change. That means this popular GEO tactic could decline quickly as its effectiveness drops. Caveat. I’m not a lawyer. Consult your own legal counsel if you’re concerned about using this tactic. View the full article

This week NASA is making us proud. In a time of escalating war and strife, at least a part of humanity still remembers what progress looks like. The post Breaking: Artemis 2’s four astronauts & ‘Integrity’ capsule become the most remote Wi-Fi & WiGig users in history appeared first on Wi-Fi NOW Global. View the full article

For most of modern financial history, retail investors were treated as background noise. Institutions moved the market. Hedge funds set the tone. Analysts shaped narratives. Individual investors followed. That era is over. Retail investors made up 35% of the market in April 2025, an all-time high. According to a 2024 report, almost 80% of the market is high-frequency algorithmic trading. Combine these numbers, and it is theoretically possible that all of the market could be trading a popular stock on social media that gets quickly amplified upwards by momentum trading algorithms. This is not a trend. It is a structural shift. And it is quietly reshaping how markets function. THE MEME STOCK ERA WAS ONLY THE BEGINNING The rise of retail influence is often framed through the GameStop and AMC lens. Those trades were loud, chaotic, and impossible to ignore. They introduced a new market force, proving that coordinated retail capital could overwhelm even the most sophisticated institutional positioning. But that moment was only the spark. What followed has been far more important. Retail investors did not disappear when the short squeezes ended. They evolved. Today’s retail investor is not simply chasing volatility. They are researching, modeling, tracking sentiment, and identifying long term winners. They are forming conviction around emerging technologies and future-facing companies long before traditional valuation frameworks can properly price them. Tesla is a perfect example. For years, analysts dismissed it as overvalued. Retail investors saw something different. They saw autonomy, energy infrastructure, and a complete rethinking of transportation. Palantir followed a similar path. Institutional skepticism gave way only after retail investors had already built massive long-term positions based on belief in the company’s data platform and government scale. In both cases, retail did not follow Wall Street. Wall Street followed retail. RETAIL IS NOW THE FIRST MOVER What makes this era different is speed. Information now travels instantly, research is distributed globally, and sentiment forms in real time. When retail conviction builds, it builds fast. Across platforms, like mine—Prospero.ai—that tracks options flows, sentiment data, institutional positioning, and retail engagement, a clear pattern is emerging. We are seeing that retail is no longer late to the trade. In many cases, they are early. Increasingly, they are looking for trusted signal sources to help validate conviction in a market moving at internet speed. THE AMPLIFICATION EFFECT This market dynamic has increasingly been discussed across financial media. I have discussed it myself on national financial media outlets including Schwab Network, Yahoo Finance, Morningstar, Benzinga, Forbes, CNN, and of course Fast Company. But there is recent data from those appearances that has not yet been publicly discussed. At first, the implications were easy to dismiss. Markets move for many reasons, and no serious investor would argue that a single voice can move price action on its own. But the deeper the data was examined, the clearer it became that influence is now shaping real-time sentiment in a measurable way. Let me give two clear examples. On December 2, I spoke at The Modern Investor Summit in London, one of the largest retail investor conferences globally. I shared that AST SpaceMobile (ASTS) was my top 2026 stock pick. This satellite company based in Midland, Texas, is building the first network capable of streaming 5G voice, text, and video directly to everyday smartphones without additional hardware. The company has already secured commercial partnerships with AT&T, Verizon, Vodafone, Rakuten, and the United States government. At the time of the conference, ASTS had fallen more than 50% from its October highs. But on the event day, the stock surged more than 30%. The rally faded over the following week and the stock resumed its decline. Then something interesting happened. On December 17, ASTS sharply reversed, beginning a powerful run. That run followed a live interview I gave on Schwab Network, where I again stated that ASTS was our top 2026 stock pick based on its fundamentals and signal strength. Over the next month, the stock climbed 87.15%. During that same interview, I discussed Centrus Energy (LEU), our second ranked 2026 pick. LEU had just completed a 20% pullback. It bottomed on December 17. The trading day after the interview, and in the next month, the stock rose 49.73%. Could this be a coincidence? Possibly. But we can verify that every major public appearance now generates immediate spikes in online discussion, social distribution, and retail engagement. We consistently see follow-on interest build within hours, not weeks. This is what modern attention-driven market dynamics look like. Retail investors move fast. They share information instantly. When conviction forms, capital follows. In a market where retail now represents more than a third of all inflows, attention has become leverage. And that is a structural change Wall Street is still learning to price in. This is not just about trust I’ve earned with retail investors, although that helps. This is about the market shifts. Not only is more capital deployed by retail, but in 2022 42% of hedge funds used social media data and 65% said they expected to use it in 2023. It is hard to get clear isolated numbers on social after that, but most observers would agree the trend is clear: Retail investors are accelerating their impact. Even now, talking heads rarely care about how accessible their investment thesis is to everyday people. But the rewards are larger now and growing for people who can simplify ideas and share data points that are easy to understand and apply. A MARKET THAT IS BEING REWRITTEN We live in a world where retail traders are moving markets more than any time in history. This is not a passing cycle. It is the result of technology, access, and transparency converging. The tools once reserved for hedge funds are now in individuals’ hands. Data that once took days to reach the public now moves in seconds. And the next generation of investors is comfortable making decisions based on forward-looking narratives rather than backward-looking balance sheets. This is how paradigm shifts happen. The market is no longer a closed system controlled by a small group of gatekeepers. It is becoming a living network shaped by millions of independent thinkers acting together. Retail investors are leading, not just participating, and the smartest institutions are already adapting. In the next decade of investing, the real edge will not come from having more capital. It will come from understanding the crowd. George Kailas is CEO of Prospero.ai. View the full article

Effective communication is essential for enhancing collaboration within teams. By implementing activities like Virtual Coffee Chats and the Blind Drawing Challenge, you can encourage casual interactions and promote active listening. Furthermore, addressing challenges through The Elephant in the Room creates a safe space for dialogue. Engaging in the Barter Puzzle encourages negotiation skills, whereas collaborative storytelling with Once Upon a Time boosts communication abilities. These strategies can markedly strengthen team dynamics and productivity. Want to explore how each activity works? Key Takeaways Virtual Coffee Chats foster casual conversations, enhancing team trust and camaraderie in remote or hybrid environments. Blind Drawing Challenge improves communication skills through a fun exercise where participants describe and draw images without visual aids. The Elephant in the Room encourages anonymous sharing of challenges, promoting openness and constructive problem-solving within teams. Barter Puzzle enhances collaboration as teams negotiate and trade puzzle pieces, emphasizing effective communication and collective effort. Once Upon a Time boosts creativity and active listening through collaborative storytelling, addressing work-related themes and strengthening team bonds. Virtual Coffee Chats Virtual coffee chats serve as an effective strategy for enhancing team communication, especially in remote or hybrid work settings. These informal gatherings encourage natural conversations among team members, nurturing trust and camaraderie. By utilizing platforms like CoffeePals, you can randomly pair employees, promoting connections that mightn’t happen in typical work environments. To stimulate engaging discussions, consider using light prompts, such as asking participants to share their most energizing moments from the past week. Scheduling these chats weekly or biweekly creates a consistent opportunity for interaction, which is essential for maintaining engagement and communication within dispersed teams. Furthermore, incorporating communication games for adults during these chats can help break the ice and deepen relationships. In the end, these virtual coffee chats greatly improve team cohesion and morale, contributing to a more connected and productive workplace. Blind Drawing Challenge Building on the informal connections established through virtual coffee chats, the Blind Drawing Challenge offers a unique way to improve team communication. This engaging activity boosts your listening skills and clarity by having one person describe an image as another draws it without seeing the reference. You can conduct this exercise in both virtual and in-person settings, making it versatile for teams of various sizes. By restricting clarifying questions and peeking, the challenge increases difficulty, compelling you to focus on precise instructions and active listening. For remote teams, utilizing virtual whiteboards like Miro or FigJam can facilitate collaboration, in spite of physical distance. This activity not only encourages vital communication skills but also promotes teamwork. It can lead to meaningful discussions about the challenges of conveying ideas clearly, in the end strengthening your team’s overall communication and collaboration abilities, making it an effective choice among communication skills activities. The Elephant in the Room Addressing difficult topics can greatly improve team dynamics, and the Elephant in the Room activity serves as a strong tool for this purpose. This exercise allows team members to anonymously share challenges that may impact collaboration, nurturing a culture of openness. By encouraging respectful discussions around sensitive issues, you boost psychological safety and enable constructive problem-solving. Here are some key benefits of this activity: Promotes honest dialogue among team members Builds resilience and adaptability within the team Strengthens interpersonal relationships and trust Identifies actionable solutions through facilitated discussions Implementing this among your communication skills activities for adults can lead to stronger team cohesion and a commitment to continuous improvement. Barter Puzzle The Barter Puzzle activity is an engaging way to improve team communication and collaboration, typically involving 6 to 12 participants. In this exercise, each team receives puzzle pieces that belong to other teams, requiring effective communication and strategic trading to complete their own puzzles first. This setup emphasizes collaboration and negotiation skills, as teams must articulate their needs clearly to achieve a shared goal. By designating a “negotiator,” you can streamline communication and guarantee that the trading of puzzle pieces is organized and efficient. This activity stands out among communication games for work, as it not only improves problem-solving abilities but additionally cultivates trust and camaraderie among team members through collective effort. As teams work together, they gain insights into the importance of collaboration, which can translate into improved dynamics in your workplace. Once Upon a Time Once you immerse yourself in the “Once Upon a Time” activity, you’ll find it serves as an effective tool for enhancing team communication and creativity. This engaging communication game allows team members to collaboratively build a story, starting with a single sentence. Each participant adds to the narrative, which not merely sparks creativity but also cultivates teamwork. Benefits of the “Once Upon a Time” activity include: Versatility: Suitable for any group size and can be done in-person or virtually. Relevance: Incorporate work-related themes to address real challenges in a fun way. Active Listening: Participants must pay attention and think quickly, improving communication skills. Engagement: The unpredictable story development encourages spontaneity, making it enjoyable and strengthening team bonds. Frequently Asked Questions How to Enhance Collaboration and Communication as a Team? To improve collaboration and communication as a team, start by establishing regular check-ins, which keep everyone aligned on goals and progress. Encourage open dialogue through activities like brainstorming sessions, where team members can share ideas freely. Incorporate team-building exercises that promote problem-solving skills, such as Escape Rooms. Furthermore, leverage technology for virtual meetings to maintain engagement, and guarantee that all voices are heard, nurturing an inclusive environment that strengthens collaboration. What Are the 7 C’s of Communication Activities? The 7 C’s of communication are Clear, Concise, Concrete, Correct, Considerate, Complete, and Courteous. Each principle plays a crucial role in guaranteeing effective communication. You should aim for clarity to avoid misinterpretations, be concise to respect others’ time, and provide concrete examples to improve comprehension. Being correct guarantees accuracy, whereas consideration promotes respect. Finally, complete communication delivers all necessary information, and courteous interactions build positive relationships, fundamental for teamwork. What Are the 5 C’s of Collaboration? The 5 C’s of collaboration are Communication, Collaboration, Creativity, Critical Thinking, and Conflict Resolution. Communication guarantees clear dialogue among team members. Collaboration nurtures unity by working toward shared goals. Creativity promotes innovative solutions through diverse perspectives. Critical Thinking involves analyzing information for informed decision-making. Finally, Conflict Resolution equips teams with strategies for addressing disagreements constructively. Together, these components improve team dynamics and overall effectiveness, allowing teams to navigate challenges more efficiently. What Are the 3 C’s of Communication Collaboration? The 3 C’s of communication collaboration are Clarity, Conciseness, and Constructiveness. Clarity guarantees your messages are understood, minimizing misunderstandings. Conciseness keeps your communication brief, allowing team members to quickly grasp key points and take action. Constructiveness focuses on giving positive feedback and solutions, creating a supportive environment that advances teamwork and problem-solving. Conclusion Incorporating these five vital communication activities can greatly improve collaboration within your team. Virtual Coffee Chats create informal connections, whereas the Blind Drawing Challenge encourages creativity through listening. The Elephant in the Room promotes open discussions about challenges, nurturing psychological safety. Engaging in the Barter Puzzle boosts negotiation skills and teamwork, and Once Upon a Time builds communication through storytelling. By integrating these activities, you can strengthen relationships and create a more cohesive and effective team environment. Image via Google Gemini This article, "5 Essential Team Communication Activities to Enhance Collaboration" was first published on Small Business Trends View the full article

Effective communication is essential for enhancing collaboration within teams. By implementing activities like Virtual Coffee Chats and the Blind Drawing Challenge, you can encourage casual interactions and promote active listening. Furthermore, addressing challenges through The Elephant in the Room creates a safe space for dialogue. Engaging in the Barter Puzzle encourages negotiation skills, whereas collaborative storytelling with Once Upon a Time boosts communication abilities. These strategies can markedly strengthen team dynamics and productivity. Want to explore how each activity works? Key Takeaways Virtual Coffee Chats foster casual conversations, enhancing team trust and camaraderie in remote or hybrid environments. Blind Drawing Challenge improves communication skills through a fun exercise where participants describe and draw images without visual aids. The Elephant in the Room encourages anonymous sharing of challenges, promoting openness and constructive problem-solving within teams. Barter Puzzle enhances collaboration as teams negotiate and trade puzzle pieces, emphasizing effective communication and collective effort. Once Upon a Time boosts creativity and active listening through collaborative storytelling, addressing work-related themes and strengthening team bonds. Virtual Coffee Chats Virtual coffee chats serve as an effective strategy for enhancing team communication, especially in remote or hybrid work settings. These informal gatherings encourage natural conversations among team members, nurturing trust and camaraderie. By utilizing platforms like CoffeePals, you can randomly pair employees, promoting connections that mightn’t happen in typical work environments. To stimulate engaging discussions, consider using light prompts, such as asking participants to share their most energizing moments from the past week. Scheduling these chats weekly or biweekly creates a consistent opportunity for interaction, which is essential for maintaining engagement and communication within dispersed teams. Furthermore, incorporating communication games for adults during these chats can help break the ice and deepen relationships. In the end, these virtual coffee chats greatly improve team cohesion and morale, contributing to a more connected and productive workplace. Blind Drawing Challenge Building on the informal connections established through virtual coffee chats, the Blind Drawing Challenge offers a unique way to improve team communication. This engaging activity boosts your listening skills and clarity by having one person describe an image as another draws it without seeing the reference. You can conduct this exercise in both virtual and in-person settings, making it versatile for teams of various sizes. By restricting clarifying questions and peeking, the challenge increases difficulty, compelling you to focus on precise instructions and active listening. For remote teams, utilizing virtual whiteboards like Miro or FigJam can facilitate collaboration, in spite of physical distance. This activity not only encourages vital communication skills but also promotes teamwork. It can lead to meaningful discussions about the challenges of conveying ideas clearly, in the end strengthening your team’s overall communication and collaboration abilities, making it an effective choice among communication skills activities. The Elephant in the Room Addressing difficult topics can greatly improve team dynamics, and the Elephant in the Room activity serves as a strong tool for this purpose. This exercise allows team members to anonymously share challenges that may impact collaboration, nurturing a culture of openness. By encouraging respectful discussions around sensitive issues, you boost psychological safety and enable constructive problem-solving. Here are some key benefits of this activity: Promotes honest dialogue among team members Builds resilience and adaptability within the team Strengthens interpersonal relationships and trust Identifies actionable solutions through facilitated discussions Implementing this among your communication skills activities for adults can lead to stronger team cohesion and a commitment to continuous improvement. Barter Puzzle The Barter Puzzle activity is an engaging way to improve team communication and collaboration, typically involving 6 to 12 participants. In this exercise, each team receives puzzle pieces that belong to other teams, requiring effective communication and strategic trading to complete their own puzzles first. This setup emphasizes collaboration and negotiation skills, as teams must articulate their needs clearly to achieve a shared goal. By designating a “negotiator,” you can streamline communication and guarantee that the trading of puzzle pieces is organized and efficient. This activity stands out among communication games for work, as it not only improves problem-solving abilities but additionally cultivates trust and camaraderie among team members through collective effort. As teams work together, they gain insights into the importance of collaboration, which can translate into improved dynamics in your workplace. Once Upon a Time Once you immerse yourself in the “Once Upon a Time” activity, you’ll find it serves as an effective tool for enhancing team communication and creativity. This engaging communication game allows team members to collaboratively build a story, starting with a single sentence. Each participant adds to the narrative, which not merely sparks creativity but also cultivates teamwork. Benefits of the “Once Upon a Time” activity include: Versatility: Suitable for any group size and can be done in-person or virtually. Relevance: Incorporate work-related themes to address real challenges in a fun way. Active Listening: Participants must pay attention and think quickly, improving communication skills. Engagement: The unpredictable story development encourages spontaneity, making it enjoyable and strengthening team bonds. Frequently Asked Questions How to Enhance Collaboration and Communication as a Team? To improve collaboration and communication as a team, start by establishing regular check-ins, which keep everyone aligned on goals and progress. Encourage open dialogue through activities like brainstorming sessions, where team members can share ideas freely. Incorporate team-building exercises that promote problem-solving skills, such as Escape Rooms. Furthermore, leverage technology for virtual meetings to maintain engagement, and guarantee that all voices are heard, nurturing an inclusive environment that strengthens collaboration. What Are the 7 C’s of Communication Activities? The 7 C’s of communication are Clear, Concise, Concrete, Correct, Considerate, Complete, and Courteous. Each principle plays a crucial role in guaranteeing effective communication. You should aim for clarity to avoid misinterpretations, be concise to respect others’ time, and provide concrete examples to improve comprehension. Being correct guarantees accuracy, whereas consideration promotes respect. Finally, complete communication delivers all necessary information, and courteous interactions build positive relationships, fundamental for teamwork. What Are the 5 C’s of Collaboration? The 5 C’s of collaboration are Communication, Collaboration, Creativity, Critical Thinking, and Conflict Resolution. Communication guarantees clear dialogue among team members. Collaboration nurtures unity by working toward shared goals. Creativity promotes innovative solutions through diverse perspectives. Critical Thinking involves analyzing information for informed decision-making. Finally, Conflict Resolution equips teams with strategies for addressing disagreements constructively. Together, these components improve team dynamics and overall effectiveness, allowing teams to navigate challenges more efficiently. What Are the 3 C’s of Communication Collaboration? The 3 C’s of communication collaboration are Clarity, Conciseness, and Constructiveness. Clarity guarantees your messages are understood, minimizing misunderstandings. Conciseness keeps your communication brief, allowing team members to quickly grasp key points and take action. Constructiveness focuses on giving positive feedback and solutions, creating a supportive environment that advances teamwork and problem-solving. Conclusion Incorporating these five vital communication activities can greatly improve collaboration within your team. Virtual Coffee Chats create informal connections, whereas the Blind Drawing Challenge encourages creativity through listening. The Elephant in the Room promotes open discussions about challenges, nurturing psychological safety. Engaging in the Barter Puzzle boosts negotiation skills and teamwork, and Once Upon a Time builds communication through storytelling. By integrating these activities, you can strengthen relationships and create a more cohesive and effective team environment. Image via Google Gemini This article, "5 Essential Team Communication Activities to Enhance Collaboration" was first published on Small Business Trends View the full article

What’s behind a new wave of apps in the Apple App store? It’s probably two words: vibe coding. Apple’s App Store was flooded with 235,800 new apps in the first quarter of this year—an increase of 84% over the same time last year, according to new data published by The Information—after steady declines of 48% from 2016 to 2024. That builds on a trend from last year, in which developers created a whopping 600,000 new apps, leaving people wondering what is behind the big push. It turns out—perhaps not surprisingly, with artificial intelligence tools making it easier to create an app more quickly—that there’s more apps flooding into Apple’s App store. What’s this have to do with vibe coding? “Vibe coding” is using generative artificial intelligence to write code, which is how developers write computer programs. Andrej Karpathy, co-founder of OpenAI, coined the term last February, explaining on X, “there’s a new kind of coding I call ‘vibe coding’, where you fully give in to the vibes, embrace exponentials, and forget that the code even exists. It’s possible because the LLMs (e.g. Cursor Composer w Sonnet) are getting too good.” Today, Anthropic’s Claude Code is an industry favorite for creating vibe coded apps. However, that doesn’t mean Apple is welcoming all vibe coding apps into its store. Citing security concerns, Apple has been cracking down on AI apps, even blocking Replit. And it’s removed Anything, an AI-app builder that says it will “turn your words into mobile apps, sites, tools, and products—built with code,” which was pulled from the App Store on March 30, returned on April 3, and is gone again today, according to Apple Insider. The apps still have to go through Apple’s review process, where it screens for malware, privacy violations and apps that access sensitive data like your camera, contacts, or location without permission—one reason consumers trust Apple and the iPhone, according to CNBC. Apple tells Fast Company that while it is excited to see developers joining the program, submitting new apps, and delivering performance and bug updates faster than ever before, it does have guidelines clearly outlined in App Review Guideline 2.5.2, which state: “Apps should be self-contained in their bundles, and may not read or write data outside the designated container area, nor may they download, install, or execute code which introduces or changes features or functionality of the app, including other apps. Educational apps designed to teach, develop, or allow students to test executable code may, in limited circumstances, download code provided that such code is not used for other purposes. Such apps must make the source code provided by the app completely viewable and editable by the user.” On average, Apple tells Fast Company its App Review team consistently processes 90% of app submissions within 48 hours, and over the last 12 weeks alone, the team has processed over 200,000 app submissions a week, while maintaining an average review time of 1.5 days. View the full article

As American astronauts fly to the moon for the first time in 50 years, the test flight has gone off without a hitch, almost. Happily, this time around, the “Houston, we’ve had a problem” moment came with much lower stakes than Apollo 13’s oxygen leak. NASA’s Artemis II is the first crewed mission featuring a proper toilet – a major upgrade from the Apollo-era days of astronauts chasing runaway bodily emissions in zero gravity. Historically, waste capture was handled by a crude system of plastic bags attached to spacesuits, a headache for astronauts already contending with the many life-threatening challenges of space travel. So far, the high tech toilet has come with some problems of its own. Toilet troubles Shortly after launching, a blinking fault light signaled that the toilet was acting up. That problem caused the space loo to be closed for repairs during the mission’s first six hours, a short interval of time but long enough to force at least one astronaut to resort to relieving themselves the old-fashioned way, into a bag connected to a funnel. In a press conference last week, Artemis flight director Judd Frieling explained that the toilet didn’t have the right amount of water in its dispenser to keep the pump wet enough to work. “Once we figured out that we didn’t put enough water in, we put more in there, [and] made sure… the pump was primed, and then the toilet came right back up.” Self-described “space plumber” Christina Koch, one of the four Artemis II astronauts, implemented the fix. “The Artemis II crew, working closely with mission control in Houston, were able to restore the Orion spacecraft’s toilet to normal operations following the proximity operations demonstration,” NASA’s Joseph Zakrzewski wrote in a mission update on Thursday. The waste management system caused problems again by Saturday, when it wasn’t able to successfully vent collected waste into space. Frieling told reporters over the weekend that the issue was likely caused by frozen urine blocking the line. To help thaw the line, mission control decided to rotate the Orion so the frozen zone faced the sun, a solution that partially unclogged it. That freed the space toilet up for solid waste, but astronauts were still directed to pee into a backup system known as the Collapsible Contingency Urinal (CCU) until around midnight when the line was fully cleared out. “You are go for all types of use of the toilet,” NASA’s Jacki Mahaffey told the crew around midnight on Saturday night. The Collapsable Contingency Urinal (CCU) now being used on Artemis 2 after a toilet malfunction. Essentially an open container (reusable, sealable, and drainable) that controls the urine-air interface using capillary forces like my Space Cup does coffee. When you are in cislunar… pic.twitter.com/LsQLYYxXcK — Don Pettit (@astro_Pettit) April 4, 2026 Boldly going on the Orion In 2020, NASA introduced the Universal Waste Management System (UWMS), a space commode that offers astronauts an approximation of a normal terrestrial toilet. The International Space Station got its own high-tech toilet upgrade that year on a resupply mission, but the technology remained untested on spacecraft like the Orion, which just set the record for the greatest distance humans have ever traveled from Earth. If curiosity is killing you, the crew offered a “live look” outside the Orion as crewmembers executed a wastewater dump around the 9 minute mark of the Artemis II’s day three highlights video on YouTube. Artemis II Mission Management Team, NASA’s Space Launch System Program Manager John Honeycutt addressed the intense curiosity in the unfolding space toilet drama during a Sunday press event. “I think the fixation on the toilet is kind of human nature,” he said. “Everybody knows how important that is to us here on Earth. And it’s harder to manage in space.” View the full article

We may earn a commission from links on this page. Deal pricing and availability subject to change after time of publication. A smart thermostat is a key part of keeping any smart home comfortable, but it's important to invest in the home's safety, too. The Ecobee Comfort and Security Bundle combines the best of both worlds, and right now, it’s 28% off at $244.99 (originally $339.98) on Amazon. Ecobee Comfort and Security Bundle $244.99 at Amazon $339.98 Save $94.99 Get Deal Get Deal $244.99 at Amazon $339.98 Save $94.99 This bundle includes the Ecobee Smart Thermostat Premium, along with door and window sensors that double as motion and occupancy detectors, sending alerts when a door or window is opened. When combined with an Ecobee Smart Security subscription, these sensors can detect unexpected movements while your home is armed. You can also place them near valuables for added peace of mind. The thermostat itself tracks both occupancy and temperature in different rooms, using smart tech to prioritize the spaces you’re actually using. It also learns your schedule and automatically adjusts the temperature, making it ideal for people who don’t want to constantly fiddle with settings. Unlike cheaper smart thermostats, it tracks indoor air quality and uses the data to send you alerts and filter reminders. This bundle works with Alexa, Apple HomeKit, and Google Assistant, giving you control via voice, touchscreen, or the Ecobee app. The upfront cost is higher due to multiple devices and features, so if all you need is a basic thermostat with scheduling or remote control, this might be overkill (the same logic applies to smaller apartments and condos, which might not need multi-room sensors). Additionally, some security features, such as monitoring and video storage, require a recurring paid subscription. Still, if you’re looking for more than just a thermostat, the Ecobee Comfort and Security Bundle is a major smart home upgrade that’s particularly useful for larger homes or those with multiple floors, and a great entry point for building a smart home ecosystem. Our Best Editor-Vetted Tech Deals Right Now Apple AirPods Pro 3 Noise Cancelling Heart Rate Wireless Earbuds — $224.00 (List Price $249.00) Apple iPad 11" 128GB A16 WiFi Tablet (Blue, 2025) — $299.99 (List Price $349.00) Samsung Galaxy Tab A11+ 128GB Wi-Fi 11" Tablet (Gray) — $209.99 (List Price $249.99) Apple Watch Series 11 (GPS, 42mm, S/M Black Sport Band) — $329.00 (List Price $399.00) Sony WH-1000XM5 — $248.00 (List Price $399.99) Deals are selected by our commerce team View the full article

Over the weekend, Mario, Luigi, Bowser, and the rest of Nintendo’s iconic crew traipsed around the solar system and smashed their way to the top of the box office in The Super Mario Galaxy Movie. It’s the latest sign that Hollywood and moviegoers have changed their tune on video game adaptations. The Super Mario Galaxy Movie (a sequel to 2023’s The Super Mario Bros. Movie) opened on April 8, just in time for the lead-up to Easter weekend. According to studio estimates cited by CNBC, the Illumination and Nintendo co-production earned $130.9 million over the weekend and $190.1 million in its first five days in North American theaters. Tack on an estimated $182.4 million from overseas markets, and the film grossed around $372.5 million worldwide. It was a head-turning initial run that qualifies as the biggest box office debut since Avatar: Fire and Ash opened in 2025, and the second biggest for a movie based on a video game, trailing only The Super Mario Bros. Movie. More broadly, it’s another example in a recent series of financially lucrative video game movies—and it shows that the subgenre might be officially getting a box office redemption arc. An uphill battle for video game adaptations Less than a decade ago, video-game-to-movie adaptations were considered a gamble at best and a surefire road to fan disappointment at worst. Around the late 2010s, plenty of studios had tried their hands at a video game movie, but no one had seemed to quite turn the genre into a winning formula, despite its obvious potential for mining recognizable IP. Several memorable box office flops had soured audiences on the concept, including 1993’s catastrophic live-action Super Mario Bros., the total bomb that was 2005’s Alone in the Dark, and 2016’s lackluster Assassin’s Creed. Other attempts, like 2016’s Warcraft, saw middling success in North American markets but stronger showings overseas. Box office hits like 2001’s Lara Croft: Tomb Raider and 2016’s The Angry Birds Movie were rare successes in a sea of underperforming brethren. One 2017 article in the Guardian addressed the elephant in the room head-on: “Movie adaptations of video games are still mostly terrible,” its headline read. “Why has no one cracked the code?” For every Lara Croft: Tomb Raider and The Angry Birds Movie there were an equal number of big flops, the story argued. “Studios clearly feel that the international box office returns are enough to justify the investment [but] they are all hoping to be the lucky winner to crack the code and become the next superhero-like genre to break out and generate billions of dollars,” Paul Dergarabedian, a senior media analyst at Comscore, explained in the piece. “[It] just hasn’t happened, yet.” In recent years, that long-awaited breakout moment appears to have arrived. The great video game movie Renaissance Looking back, the first sign was 2019’s Pokémon Detective Pikachu. The film, starring a live-action Ryan Reynolds alongside an animated Pikachu, grossed about $433 million worldwide during its run in theaters, earning the spot as the largest video game movie debut of all time up until that point. For both studios and theaters, the movie served as proof that it was possible to successfully adapt beloved video game IP into something that both kids and parents would be interested in watching. Since then, it seems, the floodgates have officially opened. Sonic the Hedgehog has gotten three movie adaptations from 2020 to 2023, each of which was a major financial success. In 2023, The Super Mario Bros. Movie made more than $375 million around the world during its opening weekend and netted a whopping $1.36 billion after its full run. Most recently, in 2025, A Minecraft Movie not only scored nearly $1 billion worldwide, but also captured the cultural zeitgeist through a series of meme-able moments that turned every screening into a new marketing opportunity. Now, The Super Mario Galaxy Movie seems poised to be the next video-game-to-movie success story. Already, its broken box office records in 2026 and helped AMC to notch one of its most lucrative weekends of all time. “It’s exactly the kind of broad, crowd-pleasing release that brings people into theatres,” Adam Aron, AMC’s CEO, said of the film in a statement to ABC News. In 2017, Dergarabedian predicted that the video game film genre would need a “consistent string of hits” to justify it as a true blockbuster genre. And in 2026, that threshold is finally within reach. That’s not to say that all of these films will be critically acclaimed—A Minecraft Movie and The Super Mario Galaxy Movie both have sub-50% ratings on Rotten Tomatoes, for example—but when it comes to butts in seats, video game IP is paying off for Hollywood at last. View the full article

We may earn a commission from links on this page. Deal pricing and availability subject to change after time of publication. Apple announced new products in March, including the new MacBook Air with the M5 chip. This MacBook comes in the 13-inch and 15-inch size, and with other upgrades to the hardware. If you're interested in the new MacBook, Amazon is the place to buy: It's the only major retailer offering both sizes with a $150 discount. The 13-inch MacBook Air is $949.99 ($1,099), and the 15-inch MacBook Air is $,1149.99 (originally $1,299). Built for AI, 13.6-inch Liquid Retina Display, 16GB Unified Memory, 512GB SSD, 12MP Center Stage Camera, Touch ID, Wi-Fi 7 Apple 2026 MacBook Air 13-inch Laptop with M5 chip $949.99 at Amazon $1,099.00 Save $149.01 Get Deal Get Deal $949.99 at Amazon $1,099.00 Save $149.01 Built for AI, 15.3-inch Liquid Retina Display, 16GB Unified Memory, 512GB SSD, 12MP Center Stage Camera, Touch ID, Wi-Fi 7 Apple 2026 MacBook Air 15-inch Laptop with M5 chip $1,149.99 at Amazon $1,299.00 Save $149.01 Get Deal Get Deal $1,149.99 at Amazon $1,299.00 Save $149.01 SEE -1 MORE The M5 MacBook Air is tempting, starting at $949.99, but you shouldn't be swayed if you already own an M4; the rest of the laptop is virtually the same. Of course, the basic starting model doubles the storage to 512GB, which is nice and only $100 more than the listing price when the M4 was released. But considering the $150 discount, this is a great option for someone upgrading from the M2, M1, or getting their first MacBook. The M5 chip is powerful and makes the performance much smoother, according to Mashable's review. The aluminum design is as good as you'd expect from Apple's most popular portable laptop, keeping it lightweight and thin. It comes with a Liquid Retina display, Touch ID, a 12MP Center Stage Camera, and Magic Keyboard. The speakers continue to be excellent, despite their small size. The real question here is whether to go for the older M4 MacBook Air or pay for the newer M5 chip. Both are incredible laptops and likely have more power than you'll realistically need, so if you're getting money from your emergency fund to pay for the MacBook, go with the M4, but if money isn't an issue, the M5 will outlive the M4 for a few years, and the hardware upgrades are always welcome. Considering the price difference between them isn't that much, the M5 is currently a better deal. Our Best Editor-Vetted Tech Deals Right Now Apple AirPods Pro 3 Noise Cancelling Heart Rate Wireless Earbuds — $224.00 (List Price $249.00) Apple iPad 11" 128GB A16 WiFi Tablet (Blue, 2025) — $299.99 (List Price $349.00) Samsung Galaxy Tab A11+ 128GB Wi-Fi 11" Tablet (Gray) — $209.99 (List Price $249.99) Apple Watch Series 11 (GPS, 42mm, S/M Black Sport Band) — $329.00 (List Price $399.00) Sony WH-1000XM5 — $248.00 (List Price $399.99) Deals are selected by our commerce team View the full article

On July 16th, 1945, when the world’s first nuclear explosion shook the plains of New Mexico, J. Robert Oppenheimer, who led the project, quoted the Bhagavad Gita, “Now I am become Death, the destroyer of worlds.” And indeed, he had. The world was never truly the same after nuclear power became a reality. Today, however, we have lost that reverence for the power of technology. Instead of proceeding deliberately and with caution, we rush ahead. In his Techno-Optimist Manifesto, tech investor Marc Andreessen implied that AI regulation was a form of murder. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth punished Anthropic when it tried to impose limits on its own technology. Clearly, we’ve been here before and shown that we can meet the challenge. We contained the nuclear threat and put useful limits on the use of genomics, while still allowing the technology to develop. Yet when we’ve failed to heed warnings, as we did with financial engineering, we’ve paid a heavy price. That choice between recklessness and prudence, is what we have before us now. How We Put The Nuclear Genie Back In The Bottle The story of nuclear weapons didn’t start with Oppenheimer, not by a long shot. In fact, if we were going to attribute the Manhattan Project to a single person, it would probably be a Hungarian immigrant physicist named Leo Szilard, who was one of the first to conceive of the possibility of a nuclear chain reaction. In 1939, upon hearing of the discovery of nuclear fission in Germany he, along with fellow Hungarian émigré Eugene Wigner, decided that the authorities needed to be warned. Szilard then composed a letter warning of the possibility of a nuclear bomb. The letter was eventually signed by Albert Einstein and sent to President Roosevelt. That’s what led to the Manhattan Project that developed the nuclear bomb. Yet after the explosions at Hiroshima and Nagasaki, many of the scientists who worked to develop the bomb wanted to educate the public of its dangers. In 1955, the philosopher Bertrand Russell issued a manifesto signed by a number of scientific luminaries. This led to a series of conferences at Pugwash, Nova Scotia were convened to discuss different approaches to protect the world from weapons of mass destruction. These efforts involved far more than talk. They helped to shape the non-proliferation agenda and led to concrete achievements such as the Partial Test Ban Treaty. In fact, these contributions were so crucially important that the organizers of the Pugwash conferences were awarded the Nobel Peace Prize in 1995, and they continue even today. Putting Limits On What We Do With The Code Of Life While the nuclear age started with a bang, the genetic age began with a simple article in the scientific journal Nature, written by two relatively unknown scientists named James Watson and Francis Crick. To the untrained eye, it seemed like a run-of-the-mill paper about the structure of an obscure molecule. Yet the final sentence belied an earthshaking insight. “It has not escaped our notice that the specific pairing we have postulated immediately suggests a possible copying mechanism for the genetic material.” It was one of those rare watershed moments when an entirely new branch of science arose from a single event. The field progressed quickly and, roughly 20 years later, a brilliant researcher named Paul Berg discovered that you could merge human DNA with that from other living things, creating new genetic material that didn’t exist in nature. Much like Oppenheimer, Berg understood that, due to his work, humanity stood on a precipice and it wasn’t quite clear where the edge was. He organized a conference at Asilomar State Beach in California to establish guidelines. Importantly, participation wasn’t limited to scientists. A wide swath of stakeholders were invited, including public officials, members of the media, and ethical specialists. The result, now known as the Berg Letter, called for a moratorium on the riskiest experiments until the dangers were better understood. These norms were respected for decades. Today, we’re undergoing another revolution in genomics and synthetic biology. New technologies, such as CRISPR and mRNA techniques, have opened up incredible possibilities, but also serious dangers. Yet here again, pioneers in the field like Jennifer Doudna are taking the lead in devising sensible guardrails and using the technology responsibly. Carol’s Journey In 2019, a Facebook researcher set up a fictitious account for “Carol Smith,” a politically conservative mother from Wilmington, North Carolina. Carol then liked a few mainstream, but conservative-leaning pages. Within days, Facebook’s algorithm sent her down a rabbit hole of QAnon conspiracies and white supremacist content. According to whistleblower complaints, top Facebook executives, including Mark Zuckerberg, were notified that their platform was radicalizing its users, but chose profits and growth over safety. This was not an isolated incident, but part of an established pattern of how Facebook does business. In 2016, Nobel Laureate Maria Ressa warned company leaders that Facebook was being exploited by bot networks to influence elections. The Wall Street Journal published a series of reports showing that the company knew that its product was harming its users, especially teenage girls, but took no action to mitigate the damage. More recently, a court of law confirmed the accusations and found the firm liable for damages. The contrast between Silicon Valley and other technological breakthroughs is startling. It was, after all, the nuclear scientists who alerted us to the dangers of nuclear energy, just as it was the biologists who raised the alarm about recombinant DNA. We’ve proved time and time again that technology can be contained and its dangers mitigated. Yet with massive profits at stake, Silicon Valley executives have shown that they are unwilling to do the same. It’s The Institutions, Stupid In 1945, Vannevar Bush published a long essay in The Atlantic entitled As We May Think, which envisioned a “memex,” a machine that sounded strikingly like the internet of today. He wrote: “Consider a future device … in which an individual stores all his books, records, and communications, and which is mechanized so that it may be consulted with exceeding speed and flexibility. It is an enlarged intimate supplement to his memory.” Yet in envisioning the future he saw both possibility and peril. He predicted much of what we use the Internet for today, including doctors being able to track down symptoms of obscure cases and lawyers being able to quickly retrieve relevant case law. Yet he also foresaw much of what we struggle with, such as information overload and the use of technology for war. Bush was, at the time, a figure something akin to Elon Musk, but if anything more prominent. An engineer of the highest order, he invented a proto-computer at MIT. He also co-founded the company Raytheon, oversaw the U.S. government scientific programs during World War II, including the development of the atomic bomb, radar, and penicillin. Yet probably more than anything else, he was a master at designing institutions. When the war was winding down, President Roosevelt asked him to deliver a report about how to continue America’s scientific prowess. That report, Science, The Endless Frontier, delivered to President Truman in 1945, laid out the basic architecture of programs, such as the National Science Foundation, that would transform the US into a technological superpower. To paraphrase James Carville, it’s the institutions, stupid. If we are going to seize the promise of AI and other cutting-edge areas such as quantum computing and synthetic biology, while minimizing the peril, we need structures to organize our collective will for the common good, or we will end up subjugating our will to the technologies we fail to govern. The choices made by those who came before shaped the world we live in today. The choices we make now will shape the world we leave behind. View the full article

A reader writes: I’d like advice for keeping your sanity when acting as someone’s PTO back-up. I had a former coworker who I was paired with for many of our responsibilities. When she took time off, she would set her Teams message to “do not disturb” for two days prior to going on PTO and two days after returning. This would add an extra four days to the time I had to cover for her because no one could get ahold of her and I was the default. However, when I took time off and she received a request for me, she would just tell them, “You will have to wait until Jane is back.” Nothing happened when I tried to talk my manager about it. A current coworker just puts my name down in his out of office message and doesn’t bother to give me a heads-up. I asked for that to stop and it hasn’t happened since. The last two weeks or so, I covered for another coworker who was out of the country for two weeks. He is a totally lovely person, and I was happy to do it for him. He did leave some big issues unresolved, which I had to push through while he was gone. Here is my issue with this: he is a director and has oversight for X, I am a manager and have oversight for Y, so I don’t know the ins and outs of X. The only thing in common is that the same vendor provides X and Y. Every single person who reached out while he was out expected the same level of knowledge, decision-making, and follow-up from me that he is able to provide. I did what I could, but it took so much time that my own work took a back seat. He is now back, but I am still dealing with follow-ups and fallout. My prior management always had expectations around what you could leave unfinished or having an “out of office” plan and limiting it to “urgent” issues only. My current manager does not. How do you set appropriate boundaries around being someone’s PTO coverage when management does not? Both with the person you are covering for and managing the expectations of those reaching out? I wrote back and asked, “When you say nothing happened when you tried to talk to your manager about the first coworker, what exactly did you say and what was her response?” When I talked to my manager, I explained what my coworker was doing and how it extended the PTO coverage beyond the actual days she was out of the office. I also explained that she didn’t reciprocate when I was out. My manager just said, “Oh, really?” I’m not sure if she said anything to the coworker, but nothing ever changed until I left for another position within the company. The coworker was somewhat of the “golden one” with management, so I am sure this just ended up that they didn’t want to rock the boat with her. Did you directly ask your manager for what you wanted — as in, “I’m going to let Jane know that I can cover for her on the days that she’s gone but not for the two days before she leaves and the two days after she’s back — okay with you?” Also, ideally before you went on your next vacation, you’d say to your boss, “Can you ensure Jane will cover for me while I’m gone? In the past she hasn’t, but my understanding is that we’re supposed to cover for each other.” If your manager gave you another vague response like “Oh, really?” you could say, “Yes. I haven’t been able to resolve it on my own, so could you talk to her about how coverage should be handled?” And if your manager’s stance was that Jane wasn’t doing anything wrong, then you might as well see how much room there was to do the same thing on your end — or at least the part about telling people they’d need to wait for Jane to return if they needed something particularly onerous. (This assumes you and Jane were in relatively comparable roles; it wouldn’t work if her work was more urgent to have covered than yours was.) With the coworker you covered for where people expected you to have the same level of knowledge as he did: when you’re covering for someone, it’s generally fine to say, when needed, “I don’t have all the context (or authority) on this that Maxwell does so he’ll need to handle it when he’s back” or, if it can’t wait, to escalate it to someone above you for help. It’s also okay to say, “I’m just covering for Maxwell while he’s out, so I can do X to keep this moving but Y will need to wait until he’s back.” If that isn’t enough for what the situation requires, you should loop in your boss to figure out how to proceed. It might be that much of your work really does need to take a back seat while you were covering for this colleague, but that should be a conversation you’re having with your boss if so. That would also mean that the next time Maxwell asks you to cover for him, you should explicitly cite what happened last time and ask for his help in keeping your coverage to essential items only. He might have no idea that happened, and before he leaves he might need to better set expectations with the people who are likely to contact him. In general, though, you’re right that it’s normal for workplaces to have expectations around what you can leave unfinished when you’re away and often to limit coverage to urgent issues only. If your manager expects that covering for an absent coworker means “you do 100% of their job, just like they would do it when they’re here,” that’s pretty ridiculous — it would mean that someone else would need to cover for you while you were covering for your coworker! But there’s a decent chance that you can manage this by being assertive with your coworker before they go on vacation about what you can and can’t handle and explicitly asking them to set the correct expectations with their contacts before they leave. If that doesn’t work, then the conversation to have with your boss is, “If I need to take over 100% of Jane’s work while she’s gone, then we’d need someone covering for me during that time! Assuming that’s not practical, and since I can’t fully cover both jobs at once, my plan is to prioritize XYZ and leave things like ABC until she’s back.” The post am I supposed to cover 100% of a coworker’s job when they’re out? appeared first on Ask a Manager. View the full article

Human-written content dominates Google’s top rankings, appearing in the No. 1 position 80% of the time versus just 9% for purely AI-generated pages, based on a Semrush analysis of 42,000 blog posts. The details. Semrush analyzed 20,000 keywords and their top 10 results, classifying content with an AI detector. Human-written pages outperformed AI and mixed content across all top 10 positions. The gap was widest at Position 1, where human content was 8x more likely to rank. AI content appeared more often lower on Page 1, nearly doubling from Positions 1 to 4. Yes, but. AI detection tools are widely known to be inconsistent and can misclassify human and AI-written content, creating some possible “fuzziness” in these classifications. Why we care. AI-generated content works, until it doesn’t. Yes, AI can help you rank, but this data suggests human insight still drives the best performance. For competitive queries, originality, expertise, and editorial judgment remain your unfair advantages. Perception vs. data. 72% of SEOs said AI content performs as well as or better than human content, yet ranking data showed a clear human advantage at the top. How teams use AI. No surprise, AI is widely adopted and often used in a hybrid approach: 87% of teams keep humans heavily involved in content creation. 64% use a human-led, AI-assisted workflow. AI is most common in research, drafting, and optimization. Use drops sharply for multimedia, localization, and higher-judgment tasks. What’s driving adoption. AI accelerates output, but doesn’t reliably improve it. 70% cite faster production as AI’s top benefit. Only 19% say it improves content quality. About the data: The analysis examined 42,000 blog pages from 200,000 URLs tied to 20,000 keywords, using GPTZero to classify content. It also includes a survey of 224 SEO professionals working in content and search. The study. Does AI content rank well in search? [Survey + Data study] View the full article