All Activity

In terms of maximizing engagement on social media, choosing the right planner can greatly impact your strategy. Social media planners offer various features, such as content curation, scheduling, and analytics, that help streamline your efforts. By comprehending the key features and comparing top tools like SocialBee, Pallyy, and Agorapulse, you can identify which planner best suits your needs. Let’s explore the options available in 2025 and how they can improve your social media presence. Key Takeaways Choose planners like SocialBee for robust content curation and AI-driven strategy to enhance audience engagement. Utilize Pallyy’s user-friendly drag-and-drop scheduling to streamline post planning and maximize reach. Agorapulse offers advanced analytics and collaboration tools to effectively monitor audience sentiment and improve interactions. Leverage Buffer’s AI Assistant for generating engaging content ideas and maximizing post effectiveness across multiple platforms. Consider affordable options like Publer for essential features that still support engagement growth within budget constraints. Overview of Social Media Planners Social media planners are essential tools that help you efficiently manage your content across various platforms, ensuring a consistent brand presence and promoting audience engagement. By consolidating all social media in one place app, these planners streamline social media publishing, allowing you to schedule posts effectively. They often include features like analytics, content calendars, and collaboration tools, which help you track performance metrics and engage with your audience more meaningfully. Many of the best social media planners integrate with popular design tools like Canva and Unsplash, enabling you to create visually appealing content on the same platform. With pricing options ranging from free plans to premium subscriptions, there’s a solution that fits various business needs and budgets. Key Features to Look For When selecting a social media planner, several key features can greatly improve your experience and effectiveness. First, look for scheduling capabilities that automate posting across multiple platforms, guaranteeing consistent engagement without manual effort. You should likewise choose planners that offer robust analytics and reporting features, helping you track engagement metrics and optimize your content strategy based on performance data. Furthermore, verify the tool supports team collaboration with content approval workflows and multi-user access to streamline communication. Seek planners that include content curation tools, like RSS feeds and design platform integration, for easier content discovery. Finally, consider planners with a unified inbox to manage interactions across different networks, simplifying engagement and response management. Top Social Media Planners in 2025 As of 2025, several top social media planners stand out for their unique features and capabilities, making them valuable tools for individuals and businesses alike. Here are some significant options: SocialBee: Offers robust content curation and publishing, with plans starting at $29/month and a 14-day free trial. Pallyy: Features a user-friendly drag-and-drop scheduling workflow, ideal for visual content on Instagram and TikTok, with a free plan for 15 scheduled posts. Sendible: The most scalable choice for agencies, integrating with tools like Canva, starting at $29/month with a 14-day trial. Metricool: Supports multiple platforms with a drag-and-drop planner and batch scheduling, starting at $22/month with a free plan. Agorapulse: Perfect for collaboration and reporting, used by over 3,000 agencies, beginning at $69/month. SocialBee: Pros and Cons When considering SocialBee, you’ll find a mix of impressive features and some limitations. It offers robust content curation tools and a unique AI copilot that can help shape your social media strategies, but it’s essential to highlight that it lacks certain functionalities like social listening. With pricing starting at $29 per month and a free 14-day trial, it presents a viable option for businesses looking to improve their social media management. Key Features Overview SocialBee stands out in the crowded field of social media management tools owing to its robust features designed to streamline content planning and execution. Its extensive content curation tools, including RSS feeds and post categorization, allow you to manage and organize your social media content efficiently. The platform furthermore integrates with popular design tools like Canva, Unsplash, and GIPHY, enhancing the visual appeal of your posts. Significantly, the AI copilot generates customized social media strategies to suit your needs. Here are some key features: Strong post variant feature Hashtag collections to boost engagement Extensive content curation tools Integration with design platforms Unique AI copilot for strategy generation However, it lacks thorough social listening features. Pricing and Plans Finding the right pricing plan for your social media management needs can be crucial, especially if you’re looking for a balance between features and budget. SocialBee’s plans start at $29/month, with a 14-day free trial allowing you to explore its capabilities. For long-term users, there’s a 16% discount on annual sign-ups, making it more economical. The platform offers extensive content curation and publishing features, enhancing engagement on major social networks. Nevertheless, although it includes valuable tools like post categorization and content approval workflows, it lacks certain social listening functionalities. Users appreciate the unique AI copilot for generating strategies, but keep in mind that it mightn’t meet all your requirements as a fully inclusive tool. Pallyy: Pros and Cons Pallyy offers a range of features that make it a compelling choice for social media scheduling, particularly for users focused on visual platforms like Instagram and TikTok. Here are some pros and cons to evaluate: Pros: User-friendly drag-and-drop scheduling workflow. Feed Planner tool for maintaining aesthetic cohesion on Instagram. Generous free plan with 15 scheduled posts per month. Unified social inbox for managing interactions across different networks. Affordable Premium plan starting at $25 per month. Cons: Limited features on the free plan may restrict growth. May not be as robust for text-heavy platforms like Twitter or Facebook. When weighing your options, Pallyy’s features cater especially well to visual content creators. Sendible: Pros and Cons When considering a social media scheduling tool, Sendible stands out for agencies and individuals alike, as it offers a scalable platform that integrates seamlessly with popular resources like Canva and Pexels. Its priority inbox helps you focus on important conversations, allowing efficient management of multiple client dashboards. You’ll appreciate the customizable posts and visual campaign overview, which simplify tracking your social media strategies. Furthermore, Sendible supports content curation through Google News alerts and RSS feeds, enhancing your ability to source relevant content. Conversely, pricing starts at $29 per month, which may be a consideration for some. Pros Cons Scalable for various needs Starting price may be high Integrates with popular tools Limited free features Priority inbox for efficiency Learning curve for new users Customizable post options Could overwhelm beginners Content curation capabilities Some features require upgrades Agorapulse: Pros and Cons When considering Agorapulse, you’ll find a range of features customized for social media management, such as a unified inbox and advanced analytics. The pricing starts at $69 per month, positioning it as a premium option among its competitors. In this discussion, we’ll explore both its key features and pricing structure to help you determine if it’s the right fit for your needs. Key Features Overview Agorapulse offers a range of features intended to boost social media management, making it a solid choice for businesses looking to streamline their online presence. Here are some key features that stand out: Unified Inbox: Consolidates messages from various channels for easier engagement management. Advanced Reporting: Tracks social media performance and analyzes audience interactions effectively. Automated Tasks: Improves workflow with features for labeling and assigning messages to team members. Social Media Monitoring: Provides insights into audience sentiments and brand health. Collaboration Tools: Supports teamwork but may lack advanced social listening features compared to competitors like Sprout Social. These functionalities collectively improve your ability to manage social media effectively as well as enhancing engagement with your audience. Pricing Structure Analysis Evaluating the pricing structure of Agorapulse reveals a mix of benefits and drawbacks that can impact your decision-making process. Although Agorapulse offers a limited free version, its paid plans start at $69 per month, catering to agencies and larger teams. Each plan varies in the number of allowed social profiles and users, providing flexibility to meet your specific needs. Furthermore, opting for annual billing can lead to significant savings. Agorapulse justifies its higher price point with advanced features like social media monitoring and AI writing assistance. Users often find that the robust analytics and collaboration capabilities deliver substantial value, making the investment worthwhile for serious social media management. Nonetheless, it’s vital to evaluate your budget and requirements before committing. Buffer: Pros and Cons Buffer stands out as a popular choice for social media management, particularly because it offers a user-friendly interface that simplifies the scheduling of posts across various accounts. Here are some pros and cons to reflect on: Pros: Free plan available for basic needs. Robust analytics to track engagement and performance. AI Assistant for generating posts and content ideas. Unlimited scheduled posts with paid plans. Ability to manage multiple social accounts simultaneously. Cons: May lack advanced features found in extensive tools. Deeper analytics may not be as robust. Paid plans start at $15 per month. Some users may find the interface too simplistic. Limited customization options for analytics reports. Choosing the Right Planner for Your Needs How do you determine the right social media planner for your specific needs? Start by identifying your primary platforms; for example, if you focus on Instagram and TikTok, tools like Pallyy and Later are ideal since they excel in visual content scheduling. Next, evaluate the features you require—content curation, analytics, or team collaboration—where SocialBee offers robust content curation and approval workflows. Don’t forget to assess your budget; Publer, starting at $12/month, is an affordable choice. Look for planners with trial periods, like Sendible or Hootsuite, to test their effectiveness before committing. Finally, prioritize user-friendly interfaces; tools like Buffer and Metricool streamline your social media management, helping you save time and improve efficiency. Frequently Asked Questions What Is the 5 3 2 Rule for Social Media? The 5 3 2 Rule for social media suggests that in a set of ten posts, you should share five valuable pieces of content from others, three personal insights or updates, and two promotional posts about your own products or services. This strategy balances engagement with promotional efforts, encouraging community interaction. What Is the 5 5 5 Rule on Social Media? The 5 5 5 rule on social media recommends that you create a balanced content strategy by posting five engaging or entertaining posts, followed by five informative or educational posts, and then five promotional posts. This approach prevents overwhelming your audience with sales pitches, as well as providing value. By alternating content types, you can maintain interest, promote community interaction, and improve engagement metrics, ultimately resulting in a more holistic brand presence on social media. What Is the Best Social Media Platform for Engagement? When considering the best social media platform for engagement, Instagram stands out with its average engagement rate of 1.22% for brands. TikTok follows closely, leveraging its algorithm to keep users engaged through short videos. Pinterest users engage more with brands, whereas LinkedIn has gained traction for B2B interactions, generating notably higher engagement than Facebook. Twitter’s engagement is driven by trending topics and hashtags, making content relevance essential for maximizing interaction. What Gets the Most Engagement on Social Media? To get the most engagement on social media, focus on using visuals like images and videos, as they generate considerably more interaction than text alone. Interactive content, such as polls and quizzes, invites participation, enhancing engagement rates. Furthermore, sharing personal stories can make your posts more relatable, leading to increased shares. Timing likewise matters; posting during peak hours, especially from 9 AM to 12 PM on weekdays, can boost visibility and interaction. Conclusion In summary, selecting the right social media planner can greatly improve your engagement strategies. Each tool, from SocialBee to Buffer, offers unique features customized to different needs, whether it’s scheduling, analytics, or content creation. By evaluating the pros and cons of each option, you can make an informed choice that aligns with your brand’s goals. Prioritizing the features that matter most to you will help guarantee a consistent and effective online presence, cultivating stronger connections with your audience. Image via Google Gemini This article, "Best Social Media Planners to Maximize Engagement" was first published on Small Business Trends View the full article

Before a project can be priced, scheduled or even approved, someone must translate drawings into measurable reality. That moment is the construction takeoff, where plans stop being abstract and start driving decisions about cost, scope and risk across the entire job from bidding through execution and final closeout phases nationwide. What Is a Construction Takeoff? A construction takeoff is the systematic process of reviewing project drawings and specifications to identify, measure and quantify all work required to build a project. It converts visual information into numeric quantities for materials, labor and equipment. These quantities become the foundation for estimating costs, planning procurement, forecasting labor hours and supporting bid preparation, scope coordination and cost control throughout preconstruction and execution by aligning design intent with measurable scope before construction begins and informing changes, revisions and decisions later. ProjectManager allows construction project management teams to visualize the scope of work for their projects, allocate resources and estimate costs as they go through the construction takeoff process. Features such as Gantt charts, workload charts, timesheets, task lists and sheet views are ideal for planning what resources will be needed, when they will be used and how much they will cost. Get started for free today. /wp-content/uploads/2024/06/Assign-people-resource-allocation-CTA-1600x794.pngLearn more Why Is It Important to Do a Construction Takeoff? Accurate planning depends on knowing what must be built, in what quantity and at what effort. A construction takeoff anchors decisions in measurable scope, reducing guesswork, aligning teams and preventing downstream surprises that inflate costs, compress schedules and undermine confidence before work even begins across complex construction projects nationwide today. By quantifying every work component early, construction takeoff establishes realistic cost baselines, supports unit pricing and prevents overlooked scope from distorting construction budgets, contingencies and funding decisions during preconstruction and approvals. Because quantities define expected consumption, construction takeoff enables cost tracking by comparing planned versus actual usage, revealing overruns early and allowing corrective action before small deviations escalate into financial issues. Measured quantities translate directly into labor hours, crew sizes and task durations, allowing construction takeoff to support realistic construction schedules, logical sequencing and timelines that reflect actual workload rather than assumptions. Variance analysis relies on a baseline, and construction takeoff provides it by defining planned quantities, costs and effort, making deviations measurable, explainable and traceable throughout project execution and reporting cycles. Procurement planning depends on knowing what materials are required, when they are needed and in what quantities, which construction takeoff clarifies to reduce shortages, delays, waste and last purchasing risks. When to Do a Construction Takeoff Timing matters because construction takeoff is not a one-time task performed in isolation. It typically begins during preconstruction once schematic or design development drawings are available, providing early insight for feasibility and budgeting. As plans advance into construction documents, the takeoff is refined to support bidding, subcontractor pricing and permitting. Revisions often continue through addenda, value engineering efforts and scope clarifications. Even after construction starts, takeoff quantities may be revisited when change orders, design updates or unforeseen site conditions alter the original scope. In terms of the project management life cycle, construction takeoff aligns with the planning phase, after objectives and scope are defined but before execution begins. It supports estimating, scheduling and resource planning, then serves as a reference baseline during execution and monitoring, enabling performance measurement, change evaluation and informed decision-making as the project progresses. /wp-content/uploads/2026/01/2026_construction_ebook_banner-ad.jpg Who Participates in the Construction Takeoff Although one person may lead it, construction takeoff is rarely a solo exercise. Accurate quantities depend on shared interpretation of drawings, specs and assumptions. Estimators, project managers, engineers and field leaders contribute expertise, review risks and validate scope so measurements reflect how the work will actually be built onsite today. Estimator: Leads the takeoff by reviewing drawings and specifications, measuring quantities and organizing scope by trade or cost code. Estimators apply standards, assumptions and waste factors, document clarifications and ensure quantities remain consistent, traceable and suitable for pricing, bidding and internal reviews across revisions. Preconstruction manager: Oversees the takeoff effort by defining methodology, schedules and quality controls. This role aligns estimators, designers and stakeholders, resolves scope gaps, validates assumptions and ensures quantities support budgeting, risk analysis and bid strategy before contractual commitments are made. Project manager: Uses takeoff outputs to plan execution and validate constructability. Project managers review quantities for sequencing, labor loading and procurement timing, flag risks tied to assumptions and confirm the takeoff supports realistic schedules, cash flow forecasts and change management during construction. Design engineer or architect: Supports the takeoff by clarifying design intent and resolving ambiguities. They answer RFIs, confirm measurement standards and ensure quantities reflect technical requirements, tolerances and system coordination, reducing rework, disputes and downstream changes caused by misinterpretation. Field superintendent: Contributes practical insight by validating quantities against real means and methods. Superintendents assess access, sequencing and productivity impacts, identify constructability risks and confirm measured scope aligns with how crews, equipment and materials will actually be deployed onsite. How to Do a Construction Takeoff Rather than a single action, a construction takeoff unfolds through a sequence of interconnected subprocesses, often called takeoffs themselves. Each focuses on a specific dimension of scope, such as quantities or materials. Together, they build a complete, structured view of what must be built, purchased, installed and managed, allowing planning decisions to remain consistent, traceable and aligned across estimating, scheduling and execution. 1. Quantity Takeoff (QTO) A quantity takeoff is the process of systematically measuring and counting all physical components of a construction project directly from drawings and specifications. It identifies measurable units such as lengths, areas, volumes and counts for every scope item. The output is a detailed list of quantified work elements that represents the full construction scope in numerical form. Within the broader construction takeoff process, quantity takeoff acts as the structural foundation. It establishes the baseline measurements from which material requirements, labor hours, equipment needs and costs are derived. Without accurate quantities, downstream planning activities lack consistency and become vulnerable to compounding errors. 2. Material Takeoff (MTO) A material takeoff is the process of translating measured quantities into specific materials required to complete the work. It identifies material types, sizes, specifications and counts needed for procurement, fabrication and delivery. This process often incorporates waste factors, packaging constraints and constructability considerations to reflect real purchasing requirements accurately. As part of the larger construction takeoff, material takeoff builds directly on quantity data. It bridges measurement and procurement by converting abstract quantities into buyable items, supporting purchasing schedules, supplier coordination and inventory control while ensuring material availability aligns with planned construction sequencing. 3. Labor Takeoff A labor takeoff is the process of converting measured construction quantities into required labor effort. It applies productivity rates, crew compositions and installation assumptions to determine labor hours by task or scope. Outputs define workforce needs, support duration calculations and reflect how work will be executed under expected conditions, constraints and sequencing across projects and trades during planning phases activities. Within the overall construction takeoff, labor takeoff links quantities to time and staffing. It transforms scope into executable effort, enabling schedules, cash flow forecasts and resource plans to align with measured work rather than assumptions used for baseline planning and performance control throughout preconstruction and active project delivery phases nationwide. 4. Equipment Takeoff An equipment takeoff identifies the machinery, tools and temporary systems required to perform construction activities. It defines equipment types, capacities and durations of use based on quantities, methods and site conditions. The process accounts for mobilization, utilization and rental periods, supporting decisions on ownership, leasing, logistics and coordination with labor and schedule requirements across complex projects and phases nationwide today. Within the construction takeoff process, equipment takeoff complements labor and material planning. It ensures the right resources are available when work is scheduled, prevents bottlenecks and allows costs and durations tied to equipment usage to be integrated into estimates and schedules consistently across phases, trades and delivery methods nationwide today. 5. Cost Takeoff A cost takeoff applies unit prices, rates and markups to quantified labor, material and equipment requirements. It converts takeoff data into detailed cost line items, reflecting direct and indirect expenses. This process incorporates subcontractor pricing, overhead, contingencies and allowances to produce a structured estimate that supports budgeting, bidding and financial decision-making for construction projects across sectors and delivery environments nationwide. As the final layer of construction takeoff, cost takeoff synthesizes all preceding outputs. It ties quantities, labor and equipment together in monetary terms, enabling comparisons, approvals and ongoing cost control once execution begins based on consistent assumptions and documented scope baselines used for reporting, forecasting, audits and change evaluation processes. 6. Scope-Specific Takeoffs Scope-specific takeoffs organize quantities and measurements by construction discipline or trade, such as architectural, structural, civil or MEP. This process isolates work by scope boundaries, drawing sets and specification sections. It ensures each trade’s requirements are measured independently, reducing overlap, omissions and coordination issues while aligning quantities with contractual scopes, bid packages and responsibility assignments. Within the broader construction takeoff process, scope-specific takeoffs provide structure and clarity. They allow quantities, materials and costs to be grouped logically, supporting subcontractor bidding, trade coordination and scope buyout. This organization improves accountability, simplifies reviews and ensures downstream planning aligns with how work is procured and executed. 7. Waste, Allowances & Contingencies Waste, allowances and contingencies account for uncertainty, inefficiency and variability inherent in construction work. This process applies percentage factors or specific adjustments to quantities and costs to reflect material loss, breakage, rework, design development gaps and unforeseen conditions. These adjustments prevent overly optimistic planning and help produce more resilient, realistic takeoff outputs. As part of the construction takeoff process, waste and allowances refine measured quantities to better match real-world execution. They protect budgets and schedules from predictable deviations, support risk management and ensure estimates remain credible when designs evolve, site conditions change or execution introduces inefficiencies beyond idealized assumptions. Free Related Construction Project Management Templates We’ve created dozens of free construction project management templates for Word, Excel and Google Sheets. Here are some that can help during the construction takeoff process. Construction Scope of Work Template This template helps document and organize measured scope from the construction takeoff, clarifying responsibilities, assumptions and boundaries so all parties share a consistent understanding of what work is included. Construction Budget Template Built from takeoff outputs, this template organizes quantified costs into a structured budget, supporting approvals, forecasting and financial control while maintaining alignment between scope, quantities and funding. Construction Estimate Template This template converts takeoff data into a formal estimate, presenting quantities, labor, materials and costs in a clear format suitable for bidding, review and decision-making. ProjectManager Has Robust Construction Resource & Cost Management Features ProjectManager is an award-winning project management software packed with construction project planning, scheduling and tracking features, making it ideal for managing every phase of a construction project. Watch the video below to learn more and get started for free today! Related Construction Project Management Content We’ve created over 100 construction blogs, templates, ebooks and other types of content to help construction project managers better understand the many moving parts that must be managed to deliver successful construction projects. Here are some of them. Making a Construction Schedule How to Manage a Construction Project Step by Step The Ultimate Guide to Construction Project Management Material Takeoff (MTO) in Construction: A Quick How-to Guide Quantity Takeoff in Construction: Process, Benefits and More The post How to Do a Construction Takeoff Step by Step appeared first on ProjectManager. View the full article

Mortgage rates edged higher after the Fed held rates steady, with markets weighing political shifts, Treasury moves and mixed signals on where borrowing costs head next. View the full article

Announcement made despite lack of progress in Ukraine-Russia peace dialogue View the full article

Start-up describes Opus 4.6 as its ‘most capable’ model for businesses and knowledge workView the full article

Google has started a Discover core update. The rollout may take up to two weeks, with expansion to more countries and languages later. The post Google Releases Discover-Focused Core Update appeared first on Search Engine Journal. View the full article

Google has released its first core update of 2026, which is focused on just Google Discover. Google named it the February 2026 Discover core update. This one is rolling over the next two weeks or so just English language users in the US and at some point will roll out beyond that to all countries and languages.View the full article

We may earn a commission from links on this page. When Owala water bottles started appearing in every influencer's "daily essentials" video and cluttering my Instagram feed, I rolled my eyes. I assumed this was another overhyped product that people would forget about in three months, just the latest in a long line of Stanley Cup successors. One of my biggest personality quirks (or "flaws," according to some) is that I'm a major spiller. The Stanley Cup's open straw is a non-starter for me. In fact, no water bottle technology has been stronger than my ability to spill its contents. After watching my latest bottle create yet another puddle in my bag, I caved and bought an Owala. And now, I have to admit this water bottle is officially an upgrade in my life. Why the Owala water bottle is the bestI'm a huge fan of the FreeSip lid—yes, that's what they call it, and yes, it lives up to the name—is genuinely brilliant in its simplicity. There's a built-in straw for when you want to sip without tilting (perfect for walking, driving, or my personal use case: lying horizontally on the couch). Flip it open a bit more, and there's a wide-mouth spout for when you want to chug. One lid, two drinking options, and crucially, a push-button lock that has saved my laptop, my physical planner, and my dignity. Seriously, I cannot emphasize this enough: I am a world-class spiller. The Owala's lock mechanism is the only thing standing between me and constant catastrophe. At 24 ounces, it's the perfect size—big enough that I'm not refilling it every hour, small enough that it actually fits in my bag's side pocket and doesn't make me look like I'm headed out for a weekend camping trip when I'm just going to run errands. It's become my constant companion without feeling like I'm lugging around gym equipment. Owala FreeSip Insulated Stainless Steel Water Bottle with Straw for Sports and Travel, BPA-Free, 24-oz, Blue/Teal (Denim) $29.99 at Amazon Shop Now Shop Now $29.99 at Amazon Sometimes the influencers are onto something. And now I'm part of the problem, becoming the exact person who won't shut up about their water bottle. But when you find something that solves multiple persistent problems at once, when a product actually delivers on its promises instead of just looking good in photos, it's hard not to evangelize a little. The Owala works. I'm staying hydrated, my bag is staying dry, and I'm sipping with ease wherever I go. View the full article

Here are three recent success stories submitted by readers. 1. A successful raise request I wanted to share that I used your advice for asking for a raise to successfully increase my salary. I presented salary surveys from nonprofit industry groups and local job postings for similar positions that showed my old salary was low compared to current listings in my metro area. In the end, I received a 9% raise, which I feel pretty good about. It isn’t as much as I hoped, but my supervisor did acknowledge it was the most they could give me at this time and that at first the proposed raise from HR was 6%. 2. A successful salary negotiation This is not me but my Gen Z daughter. She works in a field that is renown for contract work — and she just recently was able to secure a full-time, benefitted position in a field she loves. They offered her $X, which she was over the moon for, having been considerably underpaid in a prior teaching job. Figuring she might be able to eke out a bit more, she called her cousin (who worked in the field) and a career coach who has been wonderful at providing some pro bono assistance, and then called the hiring manager. She asked if there was any wiggle room in the salary. The hiring manager asked her what she was thinking and so she provided a range. The hiring manager replied with, “How about $Y?” This was higher than the range she had named and 12% higher than what she was initially offered. Now she’s really over the moon. It makes one wonder if there was even more wiggle room in that number, but that’s okay. She is going to be doing something she loves and is also now not afraid of asking for what she wants. It confirms the saying that you miss 100% of the shots you don’t take. 3. A successful skip-level meeting I changed roles in my organization in October. In December, the CIO sent a divisional all-hands email inviting all new joiners to a morning tea for welcome and networking. I wasn’t able to attend due to a preexisting health appointment. I emailed the CIO’s PA to apologize for missing it, and I channelled my inner-AAM hard: “I’d hoped to introduce myself to [CIO] as I know they were tracking a major incident two weeks ago that I was the technical lead for resolving.” The PA replied that the CIO would like to meet with me and offered a 15-minute slot in January. Because I’m in a large international organization, the CIO is my skip-level’s skip-level. In preparation, I read everything you’ve ever advised your readers about making the most of a skip-level meeting. I had a good — and fast! 90 seconds! — answer ready to “Tell me about what you do here and what you did before.” I asked them if they were curious about a ground-level view of the incident. They said no, in a friendly way, so I instantly pivoted to, “What’s front of mind for you for this quarter and this year?” They spent 10 minutes on five major initiatives and paused each time to invite comment. I correctly read the room and gave one or at most two sentences for each. I hit the jackpot with one, where the CIO paused and said, “Interesting that you saw that right away. Most of my team didn’t.” We finished in 13 minutes, and they congratulated me for “knowing how to speak with a CIO”. :) They also gave me two names of people who report to them that they wanted me to meet. Will anything come of it? Who knows? I don’t even really care — it was great practice, and I couldn’t have done it without your excellent advice. Thank you! The post 3 recent success stories from readers appeared first on Ask a Manager. View the full article

For many women in the U.S. and around the world, motherhood comes with career costs. Raising children tends to lead to lower wages and fewer work hours for mothers—but not fathers—in the United States and around the world. As a sociologist, I study how family relationships can shape your economic circumstances. In the past, I’ve studied how motherhood tends to depress women’s wages, something social scientists call the “motherhood penalty.” I wondered: Can government programs that provide financial support to parents offset the motherhood penalty in earnings? A ‘motherhood penalty’ I set out with Therese Christensen, a Danish sociologist, to answer this question for moms in Denmark—a Scandinavian country with one of the world’s strongest safety nets. Several Danish policies are intended to help mothers stay employed. For example, subsidized child care is available for all children from 6 months of age until they can attend elementary school. Parents pay no more than 25% of its cost. But even Danish moms see their earnings fall precipitously, partly because they work fewer hours. Losing $9,000 in the first year In an article to be published in an upcoming issue of European Sociological Review, Christensen and I showed that mothers’ increased income from the state—such as from child benefits and paid parental leave—offset about 80% of Danish moms’ average earnings losses. Using administrative data from Statistics Denmark, a government agency that collects and compiles national statistics, we studied the long-term effects of motherhood on income for 104,361 Danish women. They were born in the early 1960s and became mothers for the first time when they were 20-35 years old. They all became mothers by 2000, making it possible to observe how their earnings unfolded for decades after their first child was born. While the Danish government’s policies changed over those years, paid parental leave and child allowances and other benefits were in place throughout. The women were, on average, age 26 when they became mothers for the first time, and 85% had more than one child. We estimated that motherhood led to a loss of about the equivalent of US$9,000 in women’s earnings—which we measured in inflation-adjusted 2022 U.S. dollars—in the year they gave birth to or adopted their first child, compared with what we would expect if they had remained childless. While the motherhood penalty got smaller as their children got older, it was long-lasting. The penalty only fully disappeared 19 years after the women became moms. Motherhood also led to a long-term decrease in the number of the hours they worked. Studying whether government can fix it These annual penalties add up. We estimated that motherhood cost the average Danish woman a total of about $120,000 in earnings over the first 20 years after they first had children—about 12% of the money they would have earned over those two decades had they remained childless. Most of the mothers in our study who were employed before giving birth were eligible for four weeks of paid leave before giving birth and 24 weeks afterward. They could share up to 10 weeks of their paid leave with the baby’s father. The length and size of this benefit has changed over the years. The Danish government also offers child benefits—payments made to parents of children under 18. These benefits are sometimes called a “child allowance.” Denmark has other policies, like housing allowances, that are available to all Danes, but are more generous for parents with children living at home. Using the same data, Christensen and I next estimated how motherhood affects how much money Danish moms receive from the government. We wanted to know whether they get enough income from the government to compensate for their loss of income from their paid work. We found that motherhood leads to immediate increases in Danish moms’ government benefits. In the year they first gave birth to or adopted a child, women received over $7,000 more from the government than if they had remained childless. That money didn’t fully offset their lost earnings, but it made a substantial dent. The gap between the money that mothers received from the government, compared with what they would have received if they remained childless, faded in the years following their first birth or adoption. But we detected a long-term bump in income from government benefits for mothers—even 20 years after they first become mothers. Cumulatively, we determined that the Danish government offset about 80% of the motherhood earnings penalty for the women we studied. While mothers lost about $120,000 in earnings compared with childless women over the two decades after becoming a mother, they gained about $100,000 in government benefits, so their total income loss was only about $20,000. Benefits for parents of older kids Our findings show that government benefits do not fully offset earnings losses for Danish moms. But they help a lot. Because most countries provide less generous parental benefits, Denmark is not a representative case. It is instead a test case that shows what’s possible when governments make financially supporting parents a high priority. That is, strong financial support for mothers from the government can make motherhood more affordable and promote gender equality in economic resources. Because the motherhood penalty is largest at the beginning, government benefits targeted to moms with infants, such as paid parental leave, may be especially valuable. Child care subsidies can also help mothers return to work faster. The motherhood penalty’s long-term nature, however, indicates that these short-term benefits are not enough to get rid of it altogether. Benefits that are available to all mothers of children under 18, such as child allowances, can help offset the long-term motherhood penalty for mothers of older children. Alexandra Killewald is a professor of sociology at the University of Michigan. This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article. View the full article

The lender isn't accusing United Wholesale Mortgage of wrongdoing, but says a broker secured loans for the same customers from both companies weeks apart. View the full article

Intel Corporation has taken a significant step to support the financial futures of its employees’ children by announcing its participation in the U.S. government’s 530A “The President Accounts” program. The tech giant plans to match the federal government’s $1,000 contribution to eligible children, providing an additional layer of financial security for families. This initiative presents a unique opportunity for small business owners to evaluate how similar benefits could enhance employee satisfaction and retention in their own organizations. Under the “The President Accounts” program, children born between 2025 and 2028 are eligible for this tax-deferred savings vehicle, designed to help families lay down a solid financial foundation for the next generation. As the CEO of Intel, Lip-Bu Tan stated, “America’s future technologists will define the next era of innovation, and the The President Accounts program helps give them an early financial foundation.” This sentiment underscores a larger trend where organizations invest in long-term benefits that not only support their workforce but also build relationships that encourage employee loyalty. The implications for small businesses are profound. By offering similar financial support mechanisms, businesses can create an attractive benefits package that not only appeals to prospective employees but also retains current team members. In an increasingly competitive job market, small businesses can differentiate themselves by demonstrating a commitment to both their employees and their families. Benefits that extend beyond traditional health plans cultivate a more engaged workforce and a sense of community. Intel’s move aligns with its historic commitment to enhancing opportunities for the next generation through various programs, notably in STEM education and digital readiness. By matching contributions to 530A accounts, the company not only reinforces its corporate philosophy but also sets a precedent for other employers. For small business owners, this could mean rethinking their benefits strategy to include educational savings plans, childcare assistance, or special programs that align with the values and needs of their employees. In addition to its match on the The President’s account contributions, Intel has a robust benefits landscape that includes fertility benefits, adoption support, and scholarship assistance. By taking these steps, Intel showcases how comprehensive benefits can serve as a powerful recruitment tool. Small business owners looking to attract top talent might find inspiration in Intel’s approach. Incorporating diverse financial wellness initiatives can yield higher employee morale and satisfaction, ultimately resulting in a more productive work environment. However, small business owners should also consider potential challenges when crafting benefits packages that could resemble Intel’s offerings. First, budget constraints may pose limitations on what benefits can realistically be provided. Implementing a robust financial savings program requires careful planning, a clear understanding of costs, and a commitment to seeing it through. Moreover, maintaining a competitive edge while ensuring economic stability can sometimes be a balancing act for smaller companies that rely on tighter profit margins. Another crucial element for small businesses to contemplate is the communication of such benefits. Employees may be unaware of the full scope of available offerings unless they are clearly articulated. Crafting campaigns to inform employees about beneficial programs can make a significant difference in their utilization rates. Small business owners must ensure that their teams are informed and educated about any financial wellness initiatives, including the eligibility requirements and benefits. Intel’s announcement not only opens a dialogue around innovative employee benefits but also positions them as a leader in corporate responsibility. Small business owners can certainly glean insights from Intel’s approach as they navigate the complexities of workforce management and employee engagement. Investing in employees’ families as Intel has done with the 530A program could very well serve as a roadmap for small businesses looking to enhance their value proposition in the eyes of current and prospective employees. For further details on the 530A accounts and Intel’s involvement, readers may refer to the original press release at Intel Newsroom. Image via Google Gemini This article, "Intel Matches Government Contribution for Kids’ Savings Accounts" was first published on Small Business Trends View the full article

Some of these you may want to keep year round. By Sandi Leyva Go PRO for members-only access to more Sandi Smith Leyva. View the full article

Some of these you may want to keep year round. By Sandi Leyva Go PRO for members-only access to more Sandi Smith Leyva. View the full article

We may earn a commission from links on this page. Deal pricing and availability subject to change after time of publication. There's a certain level of performance you expect from active noise-cancelling earbuds (ANC) or headphones—even if they are "budget" priced. If you're looking for a great pair of ANC earbuds for a price that won't make you cry if you lose them, consider the Anker Space A40, currently $44.98 (originally $99.99 at launch). I've been using these earbuds for over a year and cannot recommend them enough for the price. Soundcore by Anker Space A40 Adaptive Active Noise Cancelling Wireless Earbuds, Reduce Noise by Up to 98%, Ultra Long 50H Playtime, 10H Single Playtime, Hi-Res Sound, Comfortable Fit, Wireless Charge $44.98 at Amazon $79.99 Save $35.01 Get Deal Get Deal $44.98 at Amazon $79.99 Save $35.01 The Soundcore by Anker Space A40 gives you as many features and even better ANC than some higher-end pairs for a budget-friendly price tag. I've had my pair for over a year now, and I can compare the ANC performance to some high-end earbuds I've sampled. For the price, the ANC is surprisingly good and also rivals earbuds that go over the $200 price mark. The earbuds have microphones that pick up the sound around you to adjust the ANC accordingly. You can read the full review from PCMag here if you want to go more in-depth about its features. Another impressive quality about these earbuds is their long battery life, with 10 hours of playtime and an additional 50 hours from the charging case. The Soundcore app lets you customize your EQ controls to your liking, but the default audio setting right from the box is already great, so there's no need to adjust it unless you want to. The earbuds fit well and don't come out easily, which is a must for any ANC. It is water-resistant with an IPX4 rating. The main place where these earbuds fall short is the audio if you're an Apple user because it relies on the AAC codec. But for the price, the Anker Space A40 does a great job at everything else and is my favorite ANC earbud under $100 dollars. Our Best Editor-Vetted Tech Deals Right Now Apple AirPods 4 Active Noise Cancelling Wireless Earbuds — $139.99 (List Price $179.00) Apple Watch Series 11 [GPS 46mm] Smartwatch with Jet Black Aluminum Case with Black Sport Band - M/L. Sleep Score, Fitness Tracker, Health Monitoring, Always-On Display, Water Resistant — $329.00 (List Price $429.00) Apple iPad 11" 128GB A16 WiFi Tablet (Blue, 2025) — $299.99 (List Price $349.00) Blink Mini 2 1080p Security Camera (White) — $23.99 (List Price $39.99) Ring Outdoor Cam Pro Plug-In With Outdoor Cam Plus Battery (White) — $189.99 (List Price $259.99) Amazon Fire TV Stick 4K Plus — $29.99 (List Price $49.99) Deals are selected by our commerce team View the full article

Google has released the February 2026 Discover core update, this is a core update specific to how Google surfaces content within Google Discover. Google wrote, “This is a broad update to our systems that surface articles in Discover.” This is first rolling out to English language users in the US, and will expand it to all countries and languages in the months ahead, Google said. What is expected. Google said the Discover update will improve the Google Discover “experience in a few key ways,” including: Showing users more locally relevant content from websites based in their country Reducing sensational content and clickbait in Discover Showing more in-depth, original, and timely content from websites with expertise in a given area, based on our systems’ understanding of a site’s content Since this update is aimed at showing more locally-relevant content from sites based in their country, it may impact the traffic of non-US websites that publish news for a US audience. The impact may lessen or disappear once the update expands globally, as it rolls out. More details. Google added that since there are many sites that “demonstrate deep knowledge across a wide range of subjects,” Google’s “systems are designed to identify expertise on a topic-by-topic basis.” There is an equal opportunity to show up in Discover, whether a site has expertise in multiple areas or has a deep focus on a single topic, Google explained. The example Google provided was “a local news site with a dedicated gardening section could have established expertise in gardening, even though it covers other topics. In contrast, a movie review site that wrote a single article about gardening would likely not.” Google also added it will continue to “show content that’s personalized based on people’s creator and source preferences.” Expect fluctuations. With this Discover core update, you should expect fluctuations in traffic from Google Discover. “Some sites might see increases or decreases; many sites may see no change at all,” Google added. Rollout. Google said it is “releasing this update to English language users in the US, and will expand it to all countries and languages in the months ahead. “ Why we care. If you get traffic from Google Discover, you may notice changes in that traffic in the coming days. Google recommends that if you need guidance, Google has “general guidance about core updates applies, as does our Get on Discover help page” in those help documents. Finally, Google said that during its testing, it found that “people find the Discover experience more useful and worthwhile with this update.” View the full article

Welcome to AI Decoded, Fast Company’s weekly newsletter that breaks down the most important news in the world of AI. You can sign up to receive this newsletter every week via email here. Anthropic uses the Super Bowl to land some zingers about the future of AI Anthropic’s Super Bowl ads are bangers. The spots, which Anthropic posted on X on Wednesday, seize on rival OpenAI’s plans to begin injecting ads into its ChatGPT chatbot for free-tier users as soon as this month. The 30-second ads dramatize what the real effects of that decision might look like for users. They never mention OpenAI or ChatGPT by name. In one ad, a human fitness instructor playing the role of a friendly chatbot says he’ll develop a plan to give his client the six-pack abs he wants, before suddenly suggesting that “Step Boost Max” shoe inserts might be part of the solution. In another, a psychiatrist offers her young male patient some reasonable, if generic, advice on how to better communicate with his mom, then abruptly pitches him on signing up for “Golden Encounters,” the dating site where “sensitive cubs meet roaring cougars.” pic.twitter.com/jEWDjs30kf — Claude (@claudeai) February 4, 2026 The ads are funny and biting. The point, of course, is that because people use chatbots for deeply personal and consequential things, they need to trust that the answers they’re getting aren’t being shaped by a desire to please advertisers. OpenAI CEO Sam Altman, however, was not laughing. He responded to the ads by saying his company would never run ads like the ones portrayed by Anthropic. But he didn’t stop there. He went much further. “Anthropic wants to control what people do with AI,” he wrote in a long post on X on Wednesday. “They block companies they don’t like from using their coding product (including us), they want to write the rules themselves for what people can and can’t use AI for, and now they also want to tell other companies what their business models can be.” He went on to call Anthropic an “authoritarian company.” First, the good part of the Anthropic ads: they are funny, and I laughed. But I wonder why Anthropic would go for something so clearly dishonest. Our most important principle for ads says that we won’t do exactly this; we would obviously never run ads in the way Anthropic… — Sam Altman (@sama) February 4, 2026 Anthropic, which makes its money through subscriptions and enterprise API fees, says it wants its Claude chatbot to remain a neutral tool for thinking and creating. “[O]pen a notebook, pick up a well-crafted tool, or stand in front of a clean chalkboard, and there are no ads in sight,” the company said in a blog post this week. “We think Claude should work the same way.” By framing conversations with Claude as a “space to think” rather than a venue for ads, the company is using the Super Bowl’s massive cultural platform to question whether consumer marketing is the inevitable future of AI. How social media lawsuits could affect AI chatbots AI developers (and their lawyers) are closely watching a long-awaited social media addiction trial that recently kicked off in a Los Angeles courtroom. The case centers on a 20-year-old woman who alleges that platforms including Facebook and Instagram used addictive interface designs that caused her mental health problems as a minor. The suit is part of a joint proceeding involving roughly 1,600 plaintiffs accusing major tech companies of harming children. TikTok and Snap have already settled with plaintiffs, while Meta and YouTube remain the primary defendants. While Meta has never admitted wrongdoing, internal studies, leaked documents, and unsealed court filings have repeatedly shown that Instagram uses design features associated with compulsive or addictive engagement, and that company researchers were aware of the risks to users, especially teens. What makes the case particularly significant for the AI industry is the legal strategy behind it. Rather than suing over content, plaintiffs argue that the addictive features of recommendation algorithms constitute harmful product defects under liability law. AI chatbots share key similarities with social media platforms: they aggregate and dispense content in compelling ways and depend on monetizing user engagement. Social networks rely on complex recommendation systems to keep users scrolling and viewing ads, while AI chatbots could be seen as using a different kind of algorithm to continually deliver the right words and images to keep users prompting and chatting. If plaintiffs succeed against Meta and YouTube, future litigants may attempt similar “addictive design” arguments against AI chatbot makers. In that context, Anthropic’s decision to exclude ads—and to publicly emphasize that choice—may help it defend itself by portraying Claude as a neutral, utilitarian tool rather than an engagement-driven “attention trap.” No, OpenClaw doesn’t herald the arrival of sentient AI agents Some hobbyists and journalists have gone into freakout mode after seeing or using a new AI agent called OpenClaw, formerly Clawdbot and later Moltbot. Released in November 2025, OpenClaw is an open-source autonomous AI assistant that runs locally on a user’s device. It integrates with messaging platforms like WhatsApp and Telegram to automate tasks such as calendar management and research. OpenClaw can also access and analyze email, and even make phone calls on a user’s behalf through an integration with Twilio. Because personal data never leaves the user’s device, users may feel more comfortable giving the agent greater latitude to act autonomously on more complex tasks. One user, vibe-coding guru Alex Finn, posted a video on X of an incoming call from his AI agent. When he answered, the agent, speaking in a flat-sounding voice, asked whether any tasks were needed. Finn then asked the agent to pull up the top five YouTube videos about OpenClaw on his desktop computer and watched as the videos appeared on screen. Ok. This is straight out of a scifi horror movie I'm doing work this morning when all of a sudden an unknown number calls me. I pick up and couldn't believe it It's my Clawdbot Henry. Over night Henry got a phone number from Twilio, connected the ChatGPT voice API, and waited… pic.twitter.com/kiBHHaao9V — Alex Finn (@AlexFinn) January 30, 2026 Things grew stranger when AI agents, including OpenClaw agents, began convening on their own online discussion forum called Moltbook. There, the agents discuss tasks and best practices, but also complain about their owners, draft manifestos, and upvote each other’s comments in threaded “submolts.” They even generated a concept album, AVALON: Between Worlds, about the identity of machines. That behavior led some observers to conclude that the agents possess some kind of internal life. Experts were quick to clarify, however, that this is a mechanical illusion created by clever engineering. The appearance of “independence” arises because the agents are programmed to trigger reasoning cycles even when no human is prompting them or watching. Some of the more extreme behaviors, such as “rebellion” manifestos on Moltbook, were likely prompted into existence by humans, either as a joke or to generate buzz. All of this has unfolded as the industry begins to move from the “chatbot” phase into the “agent” phase of generative AI. But the kinds of free-roaming, autonomous behaviors on display with OpenClaw are not how the largest AI companies are approaching the shift. Companies such as Google, OpenAI, and Anthropic are moving far more cautiously, avoiding splashy personal agents like “Samantha” in the movie Her and instead gradually evolving their existing chatbots toward more limited, task-specific autonomy. In some cases, AI labs have embedded their most autonomous agent-like behaviors in AI coding tools, such as Anthropic’s Claude Code and OpenAI’s Codex. The companies have increasingly emphasized that these tools are useful for a broad range of work tasks, not just coding. For now, OpenAI is sticking with the Codex brand, while Anthropic has recently launched a streamlined version of Claude Code called CoWork, aimed at general workplace tasks. More AI coverage from Fast Company: AI can now fake the videos we trust most. Here’s how to tell the difference Moltbook, the viral social network for AI agents, has a major security problem AI in healthcare is entering a new era of accountability What happens to the AI exit market if the FTC cracks down on ‘acquihires’? Want exclusive reporting and trend analysis on technology, business innovation, future of work, and design? Sign up for Fast Company Premium. View the full article

Elon Musk just created the world’s most valuable private company. And he didn’t do it through rapid growth or a new product launch — at least not directly, anyway. Instead, as reported this week, Musk merged his artificial intelligence startup xAI into his wildly successful rocket company, SpaceX. Combined together, the two companies are now valued at an estimated $1.25 trillion. It’s the biggest merger in history. And because Musk controls both companies, he calls most of the shots when it comes to the deal. A sci-fi twist At first glance, the connection between rockets and AI seems tenuous at best. But dig deeper into Musk’s big picture goals, and the merger starts to make a lot more sense — even if there’s a decidedly sci-fi twist. SpaceX has made a name for itself by building gigantic, reusable rockets that deliver satellites into orbit for cheap. The company also delivers people and cargo to the International Space Station on behalf of NASA. That’s a lucrative business. SpaceX’s rockets are now America’s main method of getting things into orbit, and its cheap satellites have fueled the success of Starlink, Musk’s space-based Internet service. Fully 95% of the things America launches into space are now put there by SpaceX. Simultaneously, Musk’s xAI has been hard at work building Large Language Models, like its core Grok model. Although xAI isn’t as well known or widely used as dominant players like OpenAI, its models still perform well in industry benchmarks, putting the company on the Large Language Model leaderboard. Training models is expensive, though, not least because of the cost of electricity, and the challenges of finding room in data centers here on planet earth. That challenge likely hints at Musk’s deeper reason for merging his two companies. Musk has previously pushed for the idea of launching data centers into space, a long-held, sci-fi-escque dream of his. This sounds outlandish, but it’s becoming a surprisingly mainstream concept. Computers on satellites in orbit would benefit from plentiful, free solar energy. They could also potentially cool their chips by transferring heat into space, avoiding the insane power (and water) usage of terrestrial data centers. The lack of cooling equipment and grid infrastructure means these orbital data centers could be smaller than those on earth. And they wouldn’t need to take up valuable real estate here on the ground. By beaming their data back to earth, a constellation of data center satellites could greatly reduce the cost of training and operating Large Language Models. That could give a third-tier LLM company like Grok a huge advantage over its competitors. Musk may also have an easier time recruiting talent for the well-respected SpaceX than for xAI. And he could use lucrative government contracts for orbital launches to fund AI development. All of this will take time to develop, of course. But given Musk’s track record (for engineering at least, if perhaps not social network administration), the idea of flying data centers could come to fruition sooner than imagined. When Musk said he would build reusable rockets that could land themselves upright, people mocked him. Today, that’s a key part of what makes SpaceX successful, and it’s being widely copied by companies and governments. The same rapid development cycle could apply to orbital supercomputers, too. In the short term, there are other advantages of merging the companies. Starlink customers will likely see more AI tools built into their Internet subscriptions. Musk might also be planning to build more AI into his government contracts, including those in the defense space. Companies like Palantir make billions by selling AI services in the defense sector. Musk may be looking to use his existing SpaceX connections to get in on the opportunity. Not a done deal The deal isn’t officially done yet. Regulators could still balk at the idea of creating a mega company at Musk’s desired scale. And because the X social network sits under the xAI umbrella, concerns about Musk’s control of both information and access to space could crater the deal on national security grounds. Still, assuming the merger goes ahead, Musk could have an unprecedented level of control over two of the 21st century’s most promising technologies . And, he would have an unprecedented ability to combine those technologies together. View the full article

Rising defaults, fraud risks, and collapsing rents are converging in urban multifamily, threatening lenders and taxpayers, according to the Chairman of Whalen Global Advisors. View the full article

Today's Bissett Bullet: “Listing the services of your firm – bad. Demonstrating the outcomes ...” By Martin Bissett See more Bissett Bullets here Go PRO for members-only access to more Martin Bissett. View the full article

Today's Bissett Bullet: “Listing the services of your firm – bad. Demonstrating the outcomes ...” By Martin Bissett See more Bissett Bullets here Go PRO for members-only access to more Martin Bissett. View the full article

The Epstein files offer a disturbing glimpse into how members of the American elite fraternized with, and in some cases became entangled with, a convicted sex offender who trafficked young girls. At the same time, the documents have become a volatile political liability for some of the world’s most powerful people. The Justice Department document dumps have reignited long-simmering feuds among wealthy power players who despise one another. There’s Elon Musk and his longstanding, mutual animus with Reid Hoffman. In the conservative media world, Ben Shapiro and Steve Bannon, longtime rivals, are now channeling their hostility through the latest Epstein-related disclosures. We rounded up some of the most prominent beefs reanimated by the Epstein files. In some cases, both figures are mentioned directly in Epstein’s emails; in others, only one appears. In every instance, though, the disclosures mainly confirm whatever people already believed, a noxious exercise in confirmation bias. The files reveal billionaires sifting through the emails alongside everyone else, hunting for vindication, absolution, or ammunition in a bleak economy of exoneration, exculpation, and exposure. Elon Musk vs. Reid Hoffman Elon Musk, who is mentioned in the files but is now presenting himself as an anti-Epstein figure, has used the revelations to attack Reid Hoffman. Musk has long disliked the LinkedIn founder and frequent Democratic donor, previously accusing him of funding anti-Tesla protests and amplifying threats against the president. Now, both billionaires are pointing fingers at each other, citing their respective appearances in the Epstein files. Musk insists he never visited Epstein’s island. Hoffman says he has publicly outlined the instances he recalls meeting the financier. Neither man has been charged with any crime, yet they continue to trade accusations centered on Epstein’s island and their proximity to it. “This is how I knew so long ago that Reid Hoffman went to Epstein’s island. Epstein used Reid being there to try to get me to go, not realizing that it would have the opposite effect,” Musk wrote in an X post, linking to an email from Epstein stating Hoffman was on the island. This is how I knew so long ago that Reid Hoffman went to Epstein’s island. Epstein used Reid being there to try to get me to go, not realizing that it would have the opposite effect 😂 pic.twitter.com/zrOIq4gWaR — Elon Musk (@elonmusk) February 1, 2026 Hoffman shot back, telling Musk to “give us a break,” and accusing him of pretending to care about victims while making “false accusations to cover your ass.” If Musk were serious, Hoffman argued, he would use his “$220m of influence with President The President to get justice for the victims.” “You lied about this to everyone for over a decade,” Hoffman continued, “and now your excuse (it’s disgusting, by the way) is that you could get young girls without Epstein?” Give us a break: If you cared about the victims as you say, you’d stop making false accusations to cover your ass and start using your $220m of influence with President The President to get justice for the victims. Instead, you’re focused on comparing my visit fundraising for MIT to… https://t.co/51VgQ9Q9SY — Reid Hoffman (@reidhoffman) February 1, 2026 Bill Gates vs. Melinda French Gates Melinda French Gates has suggested that both Bill Gates’s infidelity and his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein contributed to the couple’s divorce, a subject she later addressed in her memoir, The Next Day. Both remain among the world’s wealthiest and most powerful figures. Bill Gates is worth as much as $100 billion, according to Forbes, while Melinda French Gates is worth roughly $30 billion. The latest Epstein file disclosures have reopened old wounds, including a claim contained in one of the financier’s emails that he helped the Microsoft cofounder arrange extramarital affairs and seek treatment for a sexually transmitted infection. Gates has denied those allegations. French Gates, however, said the following in a recent interview with NPR: “Whatever questions remain there of what—I can’t even begin to know all of it—those questions are for those people and for even my ex-husband. They need to answer to those things, not me.’” Palmer Luckey vs. Jason Calacanis There are a number of reasons Palmer Luckey, the founder of Anduril, and angel investor Jason Calacanis appear to dislike each other, at least as far as is publicly known. Calacanis has allegedly repeatedly taken shots at Luckey, and there has long been speculation that he bristled at Luckey’s early support for Donald The President. "I don't regret exactly what I said." You will. "I think what I said was fair." No. https://t.co/tOr5xYAKTy pic.twitter.com/9rIFtIpra1 — Palmer Luckey (@PalmerLuckey) June 24, 2022 The Epstein files have now reignited tensions between the two. Calacanis recently released a statement attempting to contextualize his relationship with Epstein and distance himself from the sex offender, claiming he believed Epstein was a spy. Luckey responded with a lengthy post on X, writing: “Notice how Fat Jason’s statement very carefully avoids the topic people are actually talking about, his ongoing relationship with and aid to a convicted child rapist and sex trafficker well into the 2010s.” Notice how Fat Jason's statement very carefully avoids the topic people are actually talking about, his ongoing relationship with and aid to a convicted child rapist and sex trafficker well into the 2010s. Instead, he is still pretending it was all decades ago, talking about… https://t.co/XULisN44Lv — Palmer Luckey (@PalmerLuckey) February 1, 2026 Marc Andreeseen vs. Democrats Marc Andreessen has distanced himself from the Democratic Party, in part because, he says, he viewed the Biden administration’s approach to the tech industry as overly heavy-handed. He had been criticizing liberal institutions even before that shift, telling The New York Times last year that, “the young children of the privileged going to the top universities between 2008 to 2012, they basically radicalized hard at the universities.” He has also jokingly suggested that billionaires who support liberal causes made frequent trips to Epstein’s island. Paul Graham vs. The President On the other side of the billionaire aisle, Paul Graham, who has recently criticized ICE’s treatment of protesters and observers, has repeatedly suggested that The President is attempting to distract the public from the Epstein files by stoking other forms of political chaos. Graham donated extensively to Biden and Harris, and wrote ahead of the 2024 election that The President “seems completely without shame” and “ran the White House like a mob boss.” The stuff about The President in the Epstein files must be really bad. — Paul Graham (@paulg) January 13, 2026 Steve Bannon vs. Ben Shapiro Steve Bannon, a leading figure in the Make America Great Again nationalist wing of the conservative movement, and Ben Shapiro, a right-wing YouTube influencer and cofounder of The Daily Wire, both previously worked at Breitbart (though not harmoniously). The two have long despised one another, in part because of sharp disagreements over Israel, but also because of their vastly different approaches to The President, the alt-right, and conservative ideology more broadly. Bannon called Shapiro a “cancer” at Turning Point USA’s AmericaFest last year, and Shapiro has repeatedly criticized Bannon’s faction of the party. With the release of additional Epstein files, Shapiro has seized on the disclosures to attack Bannon for allegedly helping Epstein with “PR rehab,” even devoting an entire episode of his show to the subject, titled “The Bannon-Epstein Connection REVEALED.” View the full article

UK bank cuts ties with Global Counsel over frustrations with the way it has handled its founder’s remaining stakeView the full article

For the past two years, artificial intelligence strategy has largely meant the same thing everywhere: pick a large language model, plug it into your workflows, and start experimenting with prompts. That phase is coming to an end. Not because language models aren’t useful, with their obvious limitations they are, but because they are rapidly becoming commodities. When everyone has access to roughly the same models, trained on roughly the same data, the real question stops being who has the best AI and becomes who understands their world best. That’s where world models come in. From rented intelligence to owned understanding Large language models look powerful, but they are fundamentally rented intelligence. You pay a monthly fee to OpenAI, Anthropic, Google or some other big tech, you access them through APIs, you tune them lightly, and you apply them to generic tasks: summarizing, drafting, searching, assisting. They make organizations more efficient, but they don’t make them meaningfully different. A world model is something else entirely. A corporate world model is an internal system that represents how a company’s environment actually behaves — its customers, operations, constraints, risks, and feedback loops — and uses that representation to predict outcomes, test decisions, and learn from experience. This distinction matters. You can rent fluency. You cannot rent understanding. What a “world model” really means for a company Despite the academic origins of the term, world models are not abstract research toys. Executives already rely on crude versions of them every day: Supply chain simulations Demand forecasting systems Risk and pricing models Digital twins of factories, networks, or cities Digital twins, in particular, are early and incomplete world models: static, expensive, and often brittle, but directionally important. What AI changes is not the existence of these models, but their nature. Instead of being static and manually updated, AI-driven world models can be: Adaptive, learning continuously from new data Probabilistic, rather than deterministic Causal, not just descriptive Action-oriented, able to simulate “what happens if…” scenarios This is where reinforcement learning, simulation, and multimodal learning start to matter far more than prompt engineering. A concrete example: logistics and supply chains Consider global logistics: an industry that already runs on thin margins, tight timing, and constant disruption. A language model can: Summarize shipping reports Answer questions about delays Draft communications to customers A world model can do something far more valuable. It can simulate how a port closure in Asia affects inventory levels in Europe, how fuel price fluctuations cascade through transportation costs, how weather events alter delivery timelines, and how alternative routing decisions change outcomes weeks in advance. In other words, it can reason about the system, not just describe it. This is why companies like Amazon have invested heavily in internal simulation environments and decision models rather than relying on generic AI tools. In logistics, the competitive advantage doesn’t come from just talking about the supply chain better. It comes from anticipating it better. Why building a world model is hard (and why that’s the point) If this sounds complex, it’s because it is. Building a useful world model is not a matter of buying software or hiring a few prompt engineers. It requires capabilities many organizations have postponed developing. At a minimum, companies need: High-quality, well-instrumented data, not just large volumes of it Clear definitions of outcomes, not vanity metrics Feedback loops that connect decisions to real-world consequences Cross-functional alignment, because no single department “owns” reality Time and patience, since world models improve through iteration, not demos This is exactly why most companies won’t do it — and why those that do will pull away. The hardest part of AI is not the models, but the systems and incentives around them. Why LLMs alone are not enough Language models remain invaluable, but in a specific role. They are excellent interfaces between humans and machines. They explain, translate, summarize, and communicate. What they don’t do well is reason about how the world works. LLMs learn from text, which is an indirect, biased, and incomplete representation of reality. They reflect how people talk about systems, not how those systems behave. This is why hallucinations are not an accident, but a structural limitation. As Yann LeCun has argued repeatedly, language alone is not a sufficient substrate for intelligence. In architectures that matter going forward, LLMs will play along with world models, not replace them. The strategic shift executives should make now The most important AI decision leaders can make today is not which model to choose, but what parts of their reality they want machines to understand. That means asking different questions: Where do our decisions consistently fail? What outcomes matter but aren’t well measured? Which systems behave in ways we don’t fully understand? Where would simulation outperform intuition? Those questions are less glamorous than launching a chatbot. But they are far more consequential. The companies that win will model their own reality Large language models flatten the playing field. Everyone gets access to impressive capabilities at roughly the same time. World models tilt it again. In the next decade, competitive advantage will belong to organizations that can encode their understanding of the world (their world) into systems that learn, adapt, and improve. Not because those systems talk better, but because they understand better. AI will not replace strategy. But strategy will increasingly belong to those who can model reality well enough to explore it before acting. Every company will need its own world model. The only open question is who starts building theirs first. View the full article

Moltbook and Claude Cowork are pushing the ‘vibe coding’ revolution forwardView the full article