All Activity

After nearly two years of pretrial motions, opening arguments are expected to begin Tuesday in the Justice Department’s lawsuit against Live Nation. The case could have dramatic ramifications for the live events business—though that outcome is far from guaranteed. The government alleges that the parent company of Ticketmaster has a chokehold on the concert ticket market, hurting both fans and artists. Live Nation denies that claim, arguing the market is broad and competitive, despite what the Justice Department contends. The fight has been brewing for far longer than two years. Fans have voiced frustration since the 2010 merger between Live Nation and Ticketmaster, when live entertainment prices began climbing steadily. Here’s what you need to know about the trial. What is the Justice Department claiming? The Justice Department initially argued that Live Nation held a monopoly across multiple parts of the live music industry. The company generates revenue from fans through ticket sales and from artists through venue rentals—arrangements that allegedly locked performers into using Ticketmaster to sell tickets. Last month, however, Judge Arun Subramanian dismissed the concert booking monopoly charges. As a result, the trial will focus more narrowly on claims that the company violated the Sherman Antitrust Act by forcing artists who use its venues to also use its promotional services, and by requiring other venues to sign exclusive contracts with Ticketmaster. Live Nation denies the charges. “Calling Ticketmaster a monopoly may be a PR win for the DOJ in the short term, but it will lose in court because it ignores the basic economics of live entertainment,” the company wrote in a statement on its website, “such as the fact that the bulk of service fees go to venues, and that competition has steadily eroded Ticketmaster’s market share and profit margin.” Could Ticketmaster and Live Nation be split up? Technically, yes. Realistically, probably not. While the DOJ is seeking a breakup, courts rarely force companies to split apart. That step is typically taken only when a judge is convinced no other remedy can address the harm. Should the government prevail, a more likely outcome is that Live Nation would be barred from continuing certain business practices deemed anticompetitive. Could this result in lower ticket prices? That’s a bigger question. One of the biggest complaints from fans is the fees that are added to ticket prices. If the Justice Department is successful in abolishing Live Nation’s exclusive agreements with venues, that might impact prices, but there’s no guarantee. Live Nation, for its part, says the case “won’t solve the issues fans care about relating to ticket prices, service fees, and access to in-demand shows.” The company maintains that ticket prices are set by venues and artists. Is Taylor Swift expected to testify in the trial? Sorry, Swifties: Taylor Swift is not listed among the expected witnesses, even though The Eras Tour ticket fiasco helped propel this case into the spotlight. The overwhelming demand for tickets and the meltdown of Ticketmaster’s site left many fans empty-handed and intensified scrutiny of Live Nation—particularly after it delayed its general sale event. Fans were furious and directed their ire at the company, prompting greater government attention. Kid Rock could be a potential witness against Live Nation, though. And othe rpotential witnesses include Minnesota Timberwolves CEO Matthew Caldwell, Roc Nation CEO Desiree Perez, Live Nation Entertainment CEO Michael Rapino and Mumford & Sons keyboardist Ben Lovett When is a decision likely? The trial is expected to last around six weeks. It’s a jury trial, so once the panel finishes deliberating, a verdict will be reached on whether Live Nation violated antitrust laws. If the government wins, the judge will determine the penalties, a process that could take additional time. Should Live Nation lose, it can, of course, appeal the verdict, which would delay any court-ordered changes. And the parties could settle the case before it gets to the jury. Could I get a refund for previous ticket purchases? That depends on the states. If Live Nation loses, several states plan to seek financial penalties. The amounts vary. Michigan, for example, caps civil antitrust penalties at $50,000 per violation. In Florida, penalties can reach as high as $1 million. Even if Live Nation loses, however, consumers shouldn’t expect to see any sort of refund for quite some time—and any payout would likely be modest. View the full article

A list of 21 issues to consider. By Marc Rosenberg CPA Firm Mergers: Your Complete Guide Go PRO for members-only access to more Marc Rosenberg. View the full article

A list of 21 issues to consider. By Marc Rosenberg CPA Firm Mergers: Your Complete Guide Go PRO for members-only access to more Marc Rosenberg. View the full article

America’s three major stock markets, the Dow, Nasdaq, and S&P, are all down sharply in morning trading as of this writing. The wave of red across investors’ monitors is primarily due to one major factor: uncertainty around how far the Iran conflict will travel and how long it will last. Here’s what you need to know about how markets are reacting. What happened? Over the weekend, President Donald The President ordered strikes on Iran, during which the country’s supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, was killed. The death of Iran’s leader and the ongoing conflict in Iran will have significant consequences for the region as a whole for years to come. Yet what those consequences will be is so far unknown. And it’s that uncertainty that is causing stock markets in the United States to fall significantly today, especially after Iran’s Revolutionary Guard Corps announced that the Strait of Hormuz is closed. The Strait of ‌Hormuz is one of the most critical supply routes in the world, with around a fifth of all oil passing through it. Any blockage of the strait could have severe consequences for the global energy trade, and thus the global economy. On top of this, it is looking increasingly likely that the conflict against Iran could go on for some time, with The President not ruling out that US soldiers may need to be put on the ground in Iran. Stock markets sink as Iran uncertainty rises Given all the uncertainty surrounding Iran and oil trade routes, it’s little surprise the markets are reacting negatively at this time. Currently, the Dow, Nasdaq, and S&P are all down significantly: Dow: down 2.5% to $47,669 Nasdaq: down 2.5% to $22,179 S&P 500: down 2.4% to $6,715 Given that stocks and the markets they trade on are historically volatile in the wake of significant geopolitical events, it’s no shock that all three major markets are down. But with today’s fall, it also means that all three major markets are now in the red for the year. As of the time of this writing, the Dow Jones Industrial Average is now down 0.7% for 2026, the NASDAQ Composite is now down 4.4% for the year, and the S&P 500 is down 1.7% since the year began. Crypto and gold fall, too Of course, it’s not just the stock markets that are falling. Major digital currencies are also down as of the time of this writing. Over the past 24 hours, most household name tokens have fallen, including: Bitcoin: down 2.3% to around $67,200 Ethereum: down 3.9% to around $1,952 BNB: down 2.7% to around $626 XRP: down 3.2% to around $1.35 As with the stock markets, it’s little surprise that crypto markets are on the decline today. If there is an asset even more volitile that stocks, it’s cryptocurrencies. And when investors are uncertain, they tend to exit higher-risk assets like crypto to park any gains in “safe haven” assets like gold, which are historically less volatile than securities. However, even gold is having a bad day today. As of the time of this writing, gold has fallen over 4.8% to $5,052. That is a dramatic drop for the precious metal, especially on a day when investor jitters are high. Usually, nervous investors seek gold and other safe-haven assets, such as bonds. One reason gold could be down, however, is due to profit-taking. Gold has had a good run in 2026 so far, rising from around the $4,440 mark in early January to above $5,300 on the first of March. Where gold, crypto, and stocks go from here is anyone’s guess, and the longer uncertainty remains around Iran, the longer that guessing game is likely to persist. View the full article

Two months ago, a state administrative judge in California determined that Tesla broke the law by misleading consumers. The argument: Tesla led them to believe that its cars had real self-driving capabilities, calling them “Autopilot” and “Full Self-Driving” (commonly known as FSD). The issue is that Teslas can’t really drive by themselves; they still require drivers to remain constantly vigilant to prevent catastrophe. The verdict prompted the California Department of Motor Vehicles to threaten a temporary suspension of Tesla’s manufacturing and sales licenses. Two months after the ruling, on February 13, Tesla’s attorneys filed a complaint alleging the state “wrongfully and baselessly” labeled it a false advertiser, brazenly arguing that “it was impossible” to buy or use the “auto-pilot” software “without seeing clear and repeated statements that they do not make the vehicle autonomous.” Yet, their fine-print defense clashes with Musk’s failed promises and stunts, such as when he took his hands off the wheel on CBS’s 60 Minutes in 2018 and proudly declared he was “not doing anything.” Or when he showed fake, staged videos of Autopilot in action. Four days after Tesla’s complaint, California’s DMV backed off its shutdown threats when the company agreed to clean up its marketing, rebranding the $99-a-month subscription to “Full Self-Driving (Supervised)”. Now CNBC reports that Tesla is suing anyway to completely reverse the ruling. Musk is demanding the right to use his futuristic language to sell cars— determined false by the courts—while simultaneously relying on its owners’ manuals to shift the blame to drivers the second the system fails. The move prompted the DMV to declare it will “defend the Administrative Law Judge’s findings and decision in court” to protect the public. Dillon Angulo Long trail of bodies Tesla’s new legal gambit to defend its autonomous driving fantasy clashes with the brutal reality of a deficient technology. Tesla cars still only have a Level 2 autonomy—a mechanism designed to handle basic steering and speed—out of four levels (the fourth is true full autonomy, which so far only Chinese manufacturer BYD has been able to achieve while parking). According to the Tesla accident tracking site Tesla Deaths, in the decade after the release of Autopilot in October 2015 there have been at least 65 fatalities connected to Tesla’s Autopilot system. Of those, an April 2024 NHTSA report investigated and verified 29 fatal crashes. The common thread in these tragedies is a catastrophic failure of the Level 2 advanced driver assistance system to recognize stationary objects or crossing vehicles. In May 2016, Joshua Brown died in Florida when the system failed to notice the white side of an 18-wheeler against a bright sky, leading the National Transportation Safety Board to conclude the software permitted “prolonged disengagement from the driving task.” Incidents continued over the years, culminating in a landmark August 2025 federal jury verdict where Tesla was found 33% liable and ordered to pay $243 million after a 2019 crash in Key Largo, where the driver admitted, “I trusted the technology too much.” While Tesla continues to beta-test its software on public roads with deadly consequences, international competitors are quietly delivering the autonomous future Musk has been promising for a decade. Chinese automaker BYD recently deployed its ‘God’s Eye’ intelligent driving system over-the-air to more than one million cars, introducing a Level 4 autonomous parking feature that allows a vehicle to navigate a lot, find a spot, and park completely unattended. Unlike Tesla’s stubborn reliance on cameras alone, BYD utilizes a robust sensor architecture that includes up to 12 cameras, 12 ultrasonic sensors with 0.4-inch accuracy, millimeter-wave radars, and even lidar on higher trims. BYD is so confident in this technology that it issued a blanket guarantee to cover any damages if the system makes a mistake. They are not the only ones. Volvo, who uses Waymo’s self-driving system, also covers any damages. Tesla, on the other hand, deflects blame to the driver. Failure after failure Musk has been predicting the imminent arrival of FSD every year for over a decade now. The gap between his grand vision and Tesla’s actual engineering output has become a chasm of broken promises and delayed timelines. So much so that I’m beginning to think that, in his head, FSD must mean Full Self-Delusion. Musk promised a steering-wheel-free Cybercab by 2026, but January came and he changed the tune to “before 2027,” saying it was going to be extremely hard to produce them in big numbers. He also claimed that autonomy will begin moving the financial needle by mid-2026 and that the company’s humanoid Optimus robots will soon hit a production rate of one million units per year. Reality tells a drastically different story, with executives warning Musk that the profitability for the robotaxi venture would be “very, very hard outside the U.S.” It’s a reality check that is reflected in the data. According to the latest stats, Waymo’s autonomous cabs currently manage a staggering 17,311 miles between disengagements, while Tesla’s Full Self-Driving struggles to hit just 489 miles before a human has to intervene. Despite these internal warnings and external failures, Musk refuses to change course or adopt better hardware. He famously dismissed lidar—a crucial technology that uses pulsed laser light to map the environment in three dimensions, much like a bat uses echolocation to navigate in the dark—as a “crutch” and a “loser’s technology.” Instead, he opted to strip ultrasonic sensors from Tesla vehicles entirely, a cost-cutting move that has resulted in owners reporting persistent errors with basic parking assist features, particularly when rain, snow, or low light blinds the camera lenses. Tesla seems to be trying to change the narrative and manipulate public perception with words, but the public is increasingly not buying the propaganda. Tesla sales continue to tank quarter after quarter due to stale design, lack of innovation, and Musk’s personal brand failure. While the courts will ultimately decide if the automaker can continue advertising its flawed experimental program by dressing it up in the costume of a fully self-driving machine, the public has spoken. View the full article

The convergence of trends makes pricing changes imperative. By Jody Padar Go PRO for members-only access to more Jody Padar. View the full article

The convergence of trends makes pricing changes imperative. By Jody Padar Go PRO for members-only access to more Jody Padar. View the full article

Four responses from our expert council. By Martin Bissett Passport to Partnership Go PRO for members-only access to more Martin Bissett. View the full article

Four responses from our expert council. By Martin Bissett Passport to Partnership Go PRO for members-only access to more Martin Bissett. View the full article

UK chancellor’s short speech aimed at projecting economic credibility to voters and investorsView the full article

AI recommendations are inconsistent for some brands and reliable for others because of cascading confidence: entity trust that accumulates or decays at every stage of an algorithmic pipeline. Addressing that reality requires a discipline that spans the full algorithmic trinity through assistive agent optimization (AAO). It also demands three structural shifts: the funnel moves inside the agent, the push layer returns, and the web index loses its monopoly. The mechanics behind that shift sit inside the AI engine pipeline. Here’s how it works. The AI engine pipeline: 10 gates and a feedback loop Every piece of digital content passes through 10 gates before it becomes an AI recommendation. I call this the AI engine pipeline, DSCRI-ARGDW, which stands for: Discovered: The bot finds you exist. Selected: The bot decides you’re worth fetching. Crawled: The bot retrieves your content. Rendered: The bot translates what it fetched into what it can read. Indexed: The algorithm commits your content to memory. Annotated: The algorithm classifies what your content means across dozens of dimensions. Recruited: The algorithm pulls your content to use. Grounded: The engine verifies your content against other sources. Displayed: The engine presents you to the user. Won: The engine gives you the perfect click at the zero-sum moment in AI. After “won” comes an 11th gate that belongs to the brand, not the engine: served. What happens after the decision feeds back into the AI engine pipeline as entity confidence, making the next cycle stronger or weaker. DSCRI is absolute. Are you creating a friction-free path for the bots? ARGDW is relative. How do you compare to your competition? Are you creating a situation in which you’re relatively more “tasty” to the algorithms? Both sides of the AI engine pipeline are sequential. Each gate feeds the next. Content entering DSCRI through the traditional pull path passes through every gate. Content entering through structured feeds or direct data push can skip some or all of the infrastructure gates entirely, arriving at the competitive phase with minimal attenuation. Skipped gates are a huge win, so take that option wherever and whenever you can. You “jump the queue” and start at a later stage without the degraded confidence of the previous ones. That changes the economics of the entire pipeline, and I’ll come back to why. Why the four-step model falls short The four-step model the SEO industry inherited from 1998 — crawl, index, rank, display — collapses five distinct infrastructure processes into “crawl and index” and five distinct competitive processes into “rank and display.” It might feel like I’m overcomplicating this, but I’m not. Each gate has nuance that merits its standalone position. If you have empathy for the bots, algorithms, and engines, remove friction, and make the content digestible, they’ll move you through each gate cleanly and without losing speed. Each gate is an opportunity to fail, and each point of potential failure needs a different diagnosis. The industry has been optimizing a four-room house when it lives in a 10-room building, and the rooms it never enters are the ones where the pipes leak the worst. Most SEO advice operates at the selection, crawling, and rendering gates. Most GEO advice operates at “displayed” and “won,” which is why I’m not a fan of the term. Most teams aren’t yet working on annotation and recruitment, which are actually where the biggest structural advantages are created. Your customers search everywhere. Make sure your brand shows up. The SEO toolkit you know, plus the AI visibility data you need. Start Free Trial Get started with Three audiences you need to cater to and three acts you need to master The AI engine pipeline has an entry condition — discovery — and nine processing gates organized in three acts of three, each with a different primary audience. Act I: Retrieval (selection, crawling, rendering) The primary audience is the bot, and the optimization objective is frictionless accessibility. Act II: Storage (indexing, annotation, recruitment) The primary audience is the algorithm, and the optimization objective is being worth remembering: verifiably relevant, confidently annotated, and worth recruiting over the competition. Act III: Execution (grounding, display, won) The primary audience is the engine and, by extension, the person using the engine, where the optimization objective is being convincing enough that the engine chooses and the person acts. Frictionless for bots, worth remembering for algorithms, and convincing for people. Content must pass every machine gate and still persuade a human at the end. The audiences are nested, not parallel. Content can only reach the algorithm through the bot and can only reach the person through the algorithm. You can have the most impeccable expertise and authority credentials in the world. If the bot can’t process your page cleanly, the algorithm will never see it. This is the nested audience model: bot, then algorithm, then person. Every optimization strategy should start by identifying which audience it serves and whether the upstream audiences are already satisfied. Discovery: The system learns you exist Discovery is binary. Either the system has encountered your URL or it hasn’t. Fabrice Canel, principal program manager at Microsoft responsible for Bing’s crawling infrastructure, confirmed: “You want to be in control of your SEO. You want to be in control of a crawler. And IndexNow, with sitemaps, enable this control.” The entity home website, the canonical web property you control, is the primary discovery anchor. The system doesn’t just ask, “Does this URL exist?” It asks, “Does this URL belong to an entity I already trust?” Content without entity association arrives as an orphan, and orphans wait at the back of the queue. The push layer — IndexNow, MCP, structured feeds — changes the economics of this gate entirely. A later piece in this series is dedicated to what changes when you stop waiting to be found. Act I: The bot decides whether to fetch your content Selection: The system decides whether your content is worth crawling Not everything that’s discovered gets crawled. The system makes a triage decision based on countless signals, including entity authority, freshness, crawl budget, perceived value, and predicted cost. Selection is where entity confidence first translates into a concrete pipeline advantage. The system already has an opinion about you before it crawls a single page. That opinion determines how many of your pages it bothers to look at. Crawling: The bot arrives and fetches your content Every technical SEO understands this gate. Server response time, robots.txt, redirect chains. Foundational, but not differentiating. What most practitioners miss is that the bot doesn’t arrive in a vacuum. Canel confirmed that context from the referring page can be carried forward during crawling. With highly relevant links, the bot carries more context than it would from a link on an unrelated directory. Rendering: The bot builds the page the algorithm will see This is where everything changes and where most teams aren’t yet paying attention. The bot executes JavaScript if it chooses to, builds the Document Object Model (DOM), and produces the full rendered page. But here’s a question you probably haven’t considered: how much of your published content does the bot actually see after this step? If bots don’t execute your code, your content is invisible. More subtly, if they can’t parse your DOM cleanly, that content loses significant value. Google and Bing have extended a favor for years: they render JavaScript. Most AI agent bots don’t. If your content sits behind client-side rendering, a growing proportion of the systems that matter simply never see it. Representatives from both Google and Bing have also discussed the efforts they make to interpret messy HTML. Here’s one way to look at it: search was built on favors, and those favors aren’t being offered by the new players in AI. Importantly, content lost at rendering can’t be recovered at any downstream gate. Every annotation, grounding decision, and display outcome depends on what survives rendering. If rendering is your weakest gate, it’s your F on the report card. Everything downstream inherits that grade. Act II: The algorithm decides whether your content is worth remembering This is where most brands are losing out because most optimization advice doesn’t address the next two gates. And remember, if your content fails to pass any single gate, it’s no longer in the race. Indexing: Where HTML stops being HTML Rendering produces the full page as the bot sees it. Indexing then transforms that DOM into something the system can store. Two things happen here that the industry often misses: The system strips the navigation, header, footer, and sidebar — elements that repeat across multiple pages on your site. These aren’t stored per page. The system’s primary goal is to identify the core content. This is why I’ve talked about the importance of semantic HTML5 for years. It matters at a mechanical level: <nav>, <header>, <footer>, <aside>, <main>, and <article> tell the system where to cut. Without semantic markup, it has to guess. Gary Illyes confirmed at BrightonSEO in 2017, possibly 2018, that this was one of the hardest problems they had at the time. The system chunks and converts. The core content is broken into blocks or passages of text, images with associated text, video, and audio. Each chunk is transformed into a proprietary internal format. Illyes described the result as something like a folder with subfolders, each containing a typed chunk. The page becomes a hierarchical structure of typed content blocks. I call this conversion fidelity: how much semantic information survives the strip, chunk, convert, and store sequence. Rendering fidelity (Gate 3) measures whether the bot could consume your content. Conversion fidelity (Gate 4) measures whether the system preserved it accurately when filing it away. Both fidelity losses are irreversible, but they fail differently. Rendering fidelity fails when JavaScript doesn’t execute or content is too difficult for the bot to parse. Conversion fidelity fails when the system can’t identify which parts of your page are core content, when your structure doesn’t chunk cleanly, or when semantic relationships between elements don’t survive the format conversion. Something we often overlook is that even after a successful crawl, indexing isn’t guaranteed. Content that passes through crawl and render may still not be indexed. That might sound bad enough, but here’s a distinction that should concern you: indexing and annotation are separate processes. Content may be indexed but poorly annotated — stored in the system but semantically misclassified. Non-indexed content is invisible. Misannotated content actively confuses the system about who you are, which can be worse. Annotation: Where entity confidence is built or broken This is the gate most of the industry has yet to address. Think of annotations as sticky notes on the indexed “folders” created at the indexing gate. Indexing algorithms add multiple annotations to every piece of content in the index. I identified 24 annotation dimensions I felt confident sharing with Canel. When I asked him, his response was, “Oh, there is definitely more.” Those 24 dimensions were organized across five annotation layers: Gatekeepers (scope classification). Core identity (semantic extraction). Selection filters (content categorization). Confidence multipliers (reliability assessment). Extraction quality (usability evaluation). There are certainly more layers, and each layer likely includes more dimensions than I’ve mapped. Hundreds, probably thousands. This is an open model. The community is invited to map the dimensions I’ve missed. Annotation is where the system decides the facts: What your content is about. Where it fits into the wider world. How useful it is. Which entity it belongs to. What claims it makes. How those claims relate to claims from other sources. Credibility signals — notability, experience, expertise, authority, trust, transparency — are evaluated here. Topical authority is assessed here, too, along with much more. Annotation operates on what survives rendering and conversion. If critical information was lost at either gate, the annotation system is working with degraded raw material. It annotates what the annotation engine received, not what you originally published. Canel confirmed a principle I suggested that should reshape how we think about this gate: “The bot tags without judging. Filtering happens at query time.” Annotation quality determines your eligibility for every downstream triage. I have a full piece coming on annotation alone. For now, annotation is the gate where most brands silently lose and the one most worth working on. Recruitment: Where the algorithmic trinity decides whether to absorb you This is the first explicitly competitive gate. After annotation, the pipeline feeds into three systems simultaneously. Search engines recruit content for results pages (the document graph). Knowledge graphs recruit structured facts for entity representation (the entity graph). Large language models recruit patterns for training data and grounding retrieval (the concept graph). Before recruitment, the system found, crawled, stored, and classified your content. At recruitment, it decides whether your content is worth keeping over alternatives that serve the same purpose. Being recruited by all three elements of the algorithmic trinity gives you a disproportionate advantage at grounding because the grounding system can find you through multiple retrieval paths, and at display because there are multiple opportunities for visibility. Recruitment is the structural advantage that separates brands with consistent AI visibility from brands that appear inconsistently. Get the newsletter search marketers rely on. See terms. Act III: The engine presents and the decision-maker commits Grounding: Where AI checks its confidence in the content against real-time evidence This is the gate that separates traditional search from AI recommendations. Ihab Rizk, who works on Microsoft’s Clarity platform, described the grounding lifecycle this way: The user asks a question. The LLM checks its internal confidence. If it’s insufficient, it sends cascading queries, multiple angles of intent designed to triangulate the answer, which many people call fan-out queries. Bots are dispatched to scrape selected pages in real time. The answer is generated from a combination of training data and fresh retrieval. But grounding isn’t just search results, as many people believe. The other two technologies in the algorithmic trinity play a role. The knowledge graph is used to ground facts. AI Overviews explicitly showed information grounded in the knowledge graph. It’s reasonable to assume specialized small language models are used to ground user-facing large language models. The takeaway is that your content’s performance from discovery through recruitment determines whether your pages are in the candidate pool when grounding begins. If your content isn’t indexed, isn’t well annotated, or isn’t associated with a high-confidence entity, it won’t be in the retrieval set for any part of the trinity. The engine will ground its answer on someone else’s content instead. You can’t optimize for grounding if your content never reaches the grounding stage. Display: The output of the pipeline Display is where most AI tracking tools operate. They measure what AI says about you. But by the time you’re measuring display, the decisions were already made upstream, from discovery through grounding. Brands with high cascading confidence appear consistently. Brands with low cascading confidence appear intermittently, the same phenomenon Rand Fishkin demonstrated. Display is where AI meets the user. It also covers the acquisition funnel, which is easy to understand and meaningful for marketers. This is where most businesses focus because it’s visible and sits just before the click. I’ll write a full article on that later in this series. Won: The moment the decision-maker commits Won is the terminal processing gate in the AI engine pipeline. Ten gates of processing, three acts of audience satisfaction, and it comes down to this: Did the system trust you enough to commit? The accumulated confidence at this gate is called “won probability,” the system’s calculated likelihood that committing to you is the right decision. Three resolutions are possible, and they form a spectrum. To understand why that spectrum matters, you need to understand the 95/5 rule. Professor John Dawes at the Ehrenberg-Bass Institute demonstrated that at any given moment, only about 5% of potential buyers are actively in-market. The other 95% aren’t ready to purchase. You sell to the 5%, but the real job of marketing is staying top of mind for the other 95% so that when they decide to move to purchase, on their schedule, not yours, you’re the brand they think of. The three scenarios that follow show how AI takes over the job of being top of mind at the critical moment for the 95%. I call this top of algorithmic mind. The imperfect click: The person browses a list of options, pogo-sticks between results, and decides. Traditional search and what Google called the zero moment of truth. The system doesn’t know who is ready. It shows everyone the same list and hopes. The 95/5 efficiency is low. You’re hitting and hoping, and so is the engine. The perfect click: The AI recommends one solution and the person takes it. I call this the zero-sum moment in AI. This is where we are right now with assistive engines like ChatGPT, Perplexity, and AI Mode. The system has filtered for intent, context, and readiness. It presents one answer to a person moving from the 95% into the 5% with much higher precision. The agential click: The agent commits, either after pausing for human approval, “Shall I book this?” or autonomously. The agent caught the moment of readiness, did the work, and closed it. Maximum precision. This is the ultimate solution to the 95/5 problem: AI catches the exact moment and acts. Search won’t disappear. Most people will always want to browse some of the time. Window shopping is fun, and emotionally charged decisions aren’t something people will always delegate. The trajectory, however, moves from imperfect to perfect to agential. Brands need to optimize for all three outcomes on that spectrum, starting now. Optimizing for agents should already be part of your strategy, as should optimizing for assistive engines and search engines. AAO covers them all. Search engines, AI assistive engines, and assistive agents are your untrained salesforce. Your job is to train them well enough that you’re top of algorithmic mind at the moment the 95% become the 5%, and the AI either: Offers you as an option. Recommends you as the best solution. Actively makes the conversion for you. Dig deeper: SEO in the age of AI: Becoming the trusted answer Served: The pipeline remembers After conversion, the brand takes over. You should optimize the post-won feedback gate. The processing pipeline, the DSCRI-ARGDW spine, gets you to the decision. Served sits outside that spine as the gate that closes the loop, turning the line into a circle. Every “won” that produces a positive outcome strengthens the next cycle’s cascading confidence. Every “won” that produces a negative outcome weakens it. Ten gates get you to the decision. The 11th, served, determines whether the decision repeats and your advantage compounds. This is where the business lives. Acquisition without retention is a leak, both directly and indirectly through the AI engine pipeline feedback loop. Brands that engineer their post-won experience to generate positive evidence, reviews, repeat engagement, low return rates, and completion signals, build a flywheel. Brands that neglect post-won burn confidence with every cycle. Diagnosing failure in the pipeline The three acts — bot, algorithm, engine, or person — describe who you’re speaking to. The two phases describe what kind of test you’re taking. Phase 1: Infrastructure, discovery through indexing Absolute tests. You either pass or fail. A page that can’t be rendered doesn’t get partially indexed. Infrastructure gates are binary: pass or stall. Phase 2: Competitive, annotation through won Relative tests. Winning depends not just on how good your content is but on how good the competition is at the same gate. The practical implication is infrastructure first, competitive second. If your content isn’t being found, rendered, or indexed correctly, fixing annotation quality is wasted effort. You’re decorating a room the building inspector hasn’t cleared. In practice, brands tend to fail in three predictable ways. Opportunity cost (Act I: Bot failures) Your content isn’t in the system, so you have zero opportunity. Cheapest to fix, most expensive to ignore. Competitive loss (Act II: Algorithm failures) Your content is in the system, but competitors’ content is preferred. The brand believes it’s doing everything right while AI systems consistently choose a competitor at recruitment, grounding, and display. Conversion leak (Act III: Engine failures) Your content is presented, but the system hedges or fumbles the recommendation. In short, you lose the sale. Every gate you pass still costs you signal In 2019, I published How Google Universal Search Ranking Works: Darwinism in Search, based on a direct explanation from Google’s Illyes about how Google calculates ranking bids by multiplying individual factor scores. A zero on any factor kills the entire bid. Darwin’s natural selection works the same way: fitness is the product across all dimensions, and a single zero kills the organism. Brent D. Payne made this analogy: “Better to be a straight C student than three As and an F.” As with Google’s bidding system, cascading confidence is multiplicative, not additive. Here’s what that means: Per-gate confidenceSurviving signal at the won gate90%34.9%80%10.7%70%2.8%60%0.6%50%0.1% Illustrative math, not a measurement. The principle is what matters: strengths don’t compensate for weaknesses in a multiplicative chain. A single weak gate destroys everything. Nine gates at 90% plus one at 50% drops you from 34.9% to 19.4%. If that gate drops to 10%, it kills the surviving signal entirely. A near-zero anywhere in a multiplicative chain makes the whole chain near-zero. This is competitive math. If your competitors are all at 50% per gate and you’re at 60%, you win: 0.6% surviving signal against their 0.1%. Not because you’re excellent, but because you’re less bad. Most brands aren’t at 90%. The worse your gates are, the bigger the gap a small improvement opens. Here’s an example. GateDSCRIAReGDiWSurviving SignalDiscoveredSelectedCrawledRenderedIndexedAnnotatedRecruitedGroundedDisplayedWonYour Brand75%80%70%85%75%5%80%70%75%80%0.4%Competitor65%60%65%70%60%60%65%60%65%60%1.8% I chose annotated as the “F” grade in this example for demonstrative purposes. Annotation is the phase-boundary gate. It’s the hinge of the whole pipeline. If the system doesn’t understand what your content is, nothing downstream matters. Applying this Darwinian principle across a 10-gate pipeline, where confidence is measurable at every transition, is my diagnostic model. I recently filed a patent for the mechanical implementation. Improving gates versus skipping them There are two ways to increase your surviving signal through the pipeline, and they aren’t equal. Improving your gates Better rendering, cleaner markup, faster servers, and schema help the system classify your content more accurately. These are real gains, single-digit to low double-digit percentage improvements in surviving signal. For many brands and SEOs, this is maintenance rather than transformation. It matters, and most brands aren’t doing it well, but it’s incremental. Skipping gates entirely Structured feeds, Google Merchant Center and OpenAI Product Feed Specification, bypass discovery, selection, crawling, and rendering altogether, delivering your content to the competitive phase with minimal attenuation. MCP connections skip even further, making data available from recruitment onward with triple-digit percentage advantages over the pull path. If you’re only improving gates, you’re leaving an order of magnitude on the table. The highest-value target is always the weakest gate Improving your best gate from 95% to 98% is nearly invisible in the pipeline math. Improving your worst gate from 50% to 80% transforms your entire surviving signal. That’s the Darwinian principle at work: fitness is multiplicative, the weakest dimension determines the outcome, and strengths elsewhere can’t compensate. Most teams are optimizing the wrong gate. Technical SEO, content marketing, and GEO each address different gates. Each is necessary, but none is sufficient because the pipeline requires all 10 to perform. Teams pouring budget into the two or three gates they understand are ignoring the ones that are actually killing their signal. Then there’s the single-system mistake. At recruitment, the pipeline feeds into three graphs, the algorithmic trinity. Missing one graph means one entire retrieval path doesn’t include you. You can be perfectly optimized for search engine recruitment and completely absent from the knowledge graph and the LLM training corpus. In a multiplicative system, that gap compounds with every cycle. Most of the AI tracking industry is measuring outputs without diagnosing inputs, tracking what AI says about you at display when the decisions were already made upstream. That’s like checking your blood pressure without diagnosing the underlying condition. The tools to do this properly are emerging. Authoritas, for example, can inspect the network requests behind ChatGPT to understand which content is actually formulating answers. But the real work is at the gates upstream of display, where your content either passed or stalled before the engine ever opened its mouth. See the complete picture of your search visibility. Track, optimize, and win in Google and AI search from one platform. Start Free Trial Get started with Audit your pipeline: Earliest failure first The correct audit order is pipeline order. Start at discovery and work forward. If content isn’t being discovered, nothing downstream matters. If it’s discovered but not selected for crawling, rendering fixes are wasted effort. If it’s crawled but renders poorly, every annotation and grounding decision downstream inherits that degradation. This is your new plan: Find the weakest gate. Fix it. Repeat. The inconsistency Fishkin documented is a training deficit. The AI engine pipeline is trainable. The training compounds. The walled gardens increase their lock-in with every cycle. The brand that trains its AI salesforce better than the competition doesn’t just win the next recommendation. It makes the next one easier to win, and the one after that, until the gap widens to the point where competitors can’t close it without starting from scratch. Without entity understanding, nothing else in this pipeline works. The system needs to know who you are before it can evaluate what you publish. Get that right, build from the brand up through the funnel, and the compounding does the rest. Next: The five infrastructure gates the industry compressed into ‘crawl and index’ The next piece opens the infrastructure gates in full: rendering fidelity, conversion fidelity, JavaScript as a favor, not a standard, structured data as the native language of the infrastructure phase, and the investment comparison that puts numbers on improving gates versus skipping them entirely. The sequential audit shows where your content is dying before the algorithm ever sees it, and once you see the leaks, you can start plugging them in the order that moves your surviving signal the most. This is the third piece in my AI authority series. The first, “Rand Fishkin proved AI recommendations are inconsistent – here’s why and how to fix it,” introduced cascading confidence. The second, “AAO: Why assistive agent optimization is the next evolution of SEO” named the discipline. View the full article

A reader writes: I work in a cubicle office and bring a trained, medically necessary service dog named “Betty” to the office with me. I allow her to socialize with coworkers on breaks, and she is very loved in the office for how friendly and adorable she is. She also adores her coworkers and thinks everyone is her best friend. Unfortunately, a new coworker, “Sarah,” has been repeatedly ignoring service dog boundaries with Betty over the last six months. These boundary violations include taking Betty out of my cube while I’m on work calls or distracted, removing her leash in public work areas without asking, entering my cube without permission to interact with her, and petting her or interacting with her when I step away from my desk. This has started to impact Betty’s training as she’s now having separation anxiety behaviors when I leave in order to get attention. Sarah would respond to this behavior, which escalated it, despite being asked repeatedly not to. Things were at their worst today when Sarah not only removed Betty’s leash but also attempted to remove her service dog gear. I asked her to stop but this didn’t work, and I had to physically push her hands away from Betty. I have had multiple conversations with Sarah about her behavior with little success. When I point out a specific behavior, Sarah will then start doing a new one or find different ways to circumvent the boundary and continue her interactions with Betty. This appears to be a pattern with Sarah, as there are other areas where she struggles to incorporate feedback. All my conversations with Sarah so far have been verbal and in the moment, as we are equals and I don’t feel it is my place to supervise her behavior. I did message my supervisor about the concerns when they started escalating and we had a one-on-one about it. My supervisor then spoke with Sarah’s supervisor about the issues and a one-on-one was had with Sarah about a month ago. Despite this, the behavior has not gotten better and seems to be getting worse. I have had a previous negative experience with HR where I was blamed for not handling a verbally aggressive and threatening coworker with clearer boundaries before escalating to them. This time I want to make sure that I’m doing everything I can and should before I escalate things to HR again. I also don’t want to ruin the atmosphere of the office by cutting off all contact to Betty due to one coworker being unable to follow boundaries. What should I do in this instance to handle it professionally and not step on toes or upset HR? – Trying to keep my working dog working Your need for Betty to safely and effectively do her job The Presidents Sarah’s interest in interacting with a dog. Because of that, Sarah probably needs to be told she can’t interact with Betty, period, since she hasn’t been able to follow clear instructions about her. Being able to play with someone else’s dog is not a right; it’s a privilege that the dog and the dog’s person can grant or revoke. Sarah has forfeited it by repeatedly ignoring your clear instructions (and, apparently, her manager’s instructions too). The next step should be to talk to your manager again and let her know that the previous discussion with Sarah didn’t solve the problem and, in fact, things have been escalating. She might be assuming that everything has been fine since Sarah’s manager got involved, so you’ve got to let her know that’s not the case. Tell her everything you said here, including that Sarah removed Betty’s leash and tried to remove her service dog gear (!) and that you’ve had to physically push her hands away from Betty, as well as that you’ve had multiple conversations with Sarah about it but nothing has worked. Then use these words: “I need the company to stop Sarah from interfering with my medically necessary service dog. At this point she is creating a safety concern for me, and I need the company to step in.” If your manager doesn’t conclude on her own that at this point Sarah needs to be banned from interacting with Betty at all, you should say it yourself: “At this point I can’t trust her to safely interact with Betty and I would like her to stop interacting with Betty entirely.” You should also explicitly tell your manager that you are concerned about going to HR because they previously told you that you should have handled an aggressive coworker on your own before bringing the situation to them. (For what it’s worth, that doesn’t sound like something that should be an issue here because you have tried to handle it on your own, multiple times. But you should let your boss know you’re worried about that.) The post my coworker won’t stop interfering with my service dog appeared first on Ask a Manager. View the full article

Manchester City Council asks Democracy Volunteers for report detailing ‘claims and any evidence’ over Gorton and Denton poll allegationsView the full article

Bringing someone new into your team is exciting, but without structure, even strong hires can lose momentum fast. The right onboarding templates turn first impressions into clear direction, measurable goals and confident execution. Keep reading to explore practical employee onboarding templates that help managers across industries organize expectations, accelerate ramp-up and build accountability from day one. Whenever you’re ready to start managing projects, give ProjectManager a try. ProjectManager is an award-winning project management software designed to plan, schedule and track projects from start to finish. Build detailed project schedules, allocate resources, monitor costs and compare estimates against actual performance using a complete set of powerful project management tools. Get started for free today. /wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Light-mode-portfolio-dashboard-CTA-1600x851.pngLearn more 1. 30-60-90 Day Plan Template During a new hire’s first three months, clarity around priorities determines how quickly they gain traction. A 30-60-90 day plan breaks the employee onboarding process into defined phases, outlining short-term goals, learning priorities, performance milestones and expected deliverables so both manager and employee share the same action plan from day one. /wp-content/uploads/2024/11/30-60-90-day-template-full-table-600x359.png This 30-60-90 day plan template organizes each phase into SMART goals, action steps, deliverables, key performance indicators and resource requirements. During the first 30 days, the focus centers on understanding team dynamics and reviewing project documentation. By 60 days, attention shifts to process improvements and cross-functional collaboration. At 90 days, the employee tracks milestone completion, performance outcomes and stakeholder reporting to demonstrate measurable impact. 2. Professional Development Plan Template Long-term performance improves when development is planned instead of assumed. A professional development plan outlines how an employee will strengthen skills, close performance gaps and grow into greater responsibility over time, connecting current competencies with future expectations and aligning individual progress with the broader employee onboarding process and team performance goals. /wp-content/uploads/2025/02/professional-development-plan-template-600x551.png This professional development plan template starts with personal information and a current skills assessment to establish a realistic baseline. From there, it guides the employee through defining development goals, mapping specific action steps and setting a clear timeline. Built-in sections for resources, performance indicators and evaluation ensure progress is measurable, supported and regularly reviewed rather than forgotten after the first draft. 3. Performance Review Template At the end of any review period, structured feedback becomes essential for maintaining standards and improving results. A performance review evaluates how an employee has performed over a defined timeframe, measuring outcomes against expectations, goals and core competencies while reinforcing alignment within the employee onboarding process. /wp-content/uploads/2025/02/performance-review-template-600x491.png This performance review template begins with employee information and a defined review period to establish context. It then walks managers through structured performance criteria such as job knowledge, quality of work, productivity and teamwork. Dedicated sections for goals achieved, future objectives, overall ratings and signatures ensure feedback is documented, actionable and formally acknowledged by both parties. 4. Performance Improvement Plan Template When performance gaps become visible, formal structure protects both accountability and fairness. A performance improvement plan documents the specific steps an employee must take to correct deficiencies within a defined timeframe, clarifying measurable standards and reinforcing expectations during critical stages of the employee onboarding process. /wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Performance-improvement-plan-screenshot-600x727.png This performance improvement plan template begins by stating the purpose and outlining specific performance issues tied to job standards. It then guides managers to set SMART goals, define a clear action plan and establish an improvement timeline. Sections for support resources, evaluation criteria and documented consequences ensure accountability, while final assessment and signatures formally close the loop. 5. Employee Schedule Template Clear visibility into work hours prevents confusion, overlap and staffing gaps from the start. An employee schedule outlines when team members are expected to work, including shift start times, end times and days off, helping new hires understand how their availability aligns with operational demands and team coverage requirements. /wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Employee-Schedule-Template-600x148.png This employee schedule template organizes weekly shifts by employee name and day of the week, displaying start times, end times and total hours. Managers can quickly assign coverage, track off days and balance workloads across the team. For new hires, it provides immediate visibility into their shift structure and reinforces accountability from the start. 6. Training Record Template Tracking completed training is critical for compliance, skill development and risk management. A training record documents the courses, certifications and professional development activities an employee completes over time, ensuring that required safety, technical and soft skills training are properly recorded within the employee onboarding process. /wp-content/uploads/2025/10/Training-Record-Template-600x183.png This training record template centralizes employee details alongside course information, training type, provider, start and completion dates, certification status and expiration deadlines. Managers can quickly monitor compliance requirements, identify upcoming renewals and track in-progress training. Revision dates and approval fields add governance, making the document reliable for audits, performance reviews and workforce planning. 7. Skills Matrix Template Understanding team capability at a glance makes workforce planning far more strategic. A skills matrix maps employees against the competencies required for their roles, making strengths and gaps visible while supporting training decisions, resource allocation and structured onboarding templates across departments. /wp-content/uploads/2025/04/skills-matrix-template-600x109.png This skills matrix template lists each employee alongside key skills, proficiency assessment sources and required skill levels. It highlights skill gaps and recommends targeted actions such as certifications or workshops. By comparing current capability with expected performance standards, managers can plan training, allocate resources strategically and strengthen team capacity with measurable development steps. 9. Team Charter Template Before a team begins executing work, alignment around purpose and authority must be documented. A team charter formalizes the project background, mission, scope, roles and operating rules so everyone understands expectations, decision-making authority and success criteria within the employee onboarding process and broader project environment. /wp-content/uploads/2021/03/Team-Charter-Screenshot-600x437.jpg This team charter template captures foundational details such as team name, leadership, project duration and stakeholder context, then structures key sections covering mission, budget, resources, roles, scope, milestones and communication guidelines. By requiring documented responsibilities, performance measures and dated signatures, it creates accountability, clarifies authority and prevents confusion once project execution begins. ProjectManager Is an Award-Winning Project Management Software ProjectManager offers robust project management features such as Gantt charts, task lists, workload management charts, timesheets and real-time dashboards and reports. In addition to that, it’s also equipped with AI project insights, online team collaboration features and unlimited file storage that further help project managers ensure nothing falls through the cracks. Watch the video to learn more! If you need a tool to manage projects from start to finish, then signup for our software now at ProjectManager. Our online software can help project managers plan, track and oversee projects as they unfold. Sign up for a free 30-day trial today! The post 9 Free Employee Onboarding Templates for Excel and Word appeared first on ProjectManager. View the full article

Crude has surged as flows through Strait of Hormuz dry up, but so far reaction is muted compared with past oil shocks View the full article

Starting a franchise company requires careful planning and execution. First, you’ll want to assess your business’s readiness for franchising, ensuring it’s profitable and scalable. Next, developing a compliant Franchise Disclosure Document (FDD) is essential for legal protections. You’ll additionally need to create a detailed operations manual and a solid sales strategy to attract potential franchisees. Comprehending these steps will set a strong foundation, but there’s much more to contemplate as you move forward. Key Takeaways Assess your business’s profitability and operational systems to ensure they are replicable for franchisees. Develop a comprehensive Franchise Disclosure Document (FDD) that complies with legal requirements and includes necessary disclosures. Define your franchise model, including the type (single-unit, multi-unit, etc.) and establish clear financial structures for investment and royalties. Create a strategic franchise sales plan targeting ideal franchisee characteristics and outlining marketing initiatives. Prepare a detailed business plan that includes startup costs, funding requirements, and revenue projections to secure financing. Understanding Franchising: What You Need to Know When you consider starting a franchise company, it’s vital to comprehend the fundamentals of franchising, as this business model can greatly impact your growth potential. Franchising involves a franchisor licensing their brand and operational systems to franchisees, allowing them to operate under an established brand. This arrangement usually requires franchisees to pay royalties, typically 4-8% of their revenues, which supports the brand’s marketing and infrastructure. To learn how to create a franchise, familiarize yourself with legal requirements, including the Franchise Disclosure Document (FDD), which outlines 23 key disclosure items. This document informs prospective franchisees about their rights and obligations. Grasping these elements is significant as you commence on your path to start a franchise company successfully. Assessing Your Business Readiness for Franchising Evaluating your business readiness for franchising is an essential step in the process to expand your brand through this model. Start by reviewing your profitability and operational systems; they need to be replicable for franchisees. Analyze market demand for your product or service to guarantee sufficient interest exists for multiple locations. Consider your willingness to give up some control, as franchisees will manage their own sites within your guidelines. It’s likewise important to evaluate your brand’s scalability and how well it can maintain quality across locations, which is critical for customer trust. Finally, confirm you’re prepared to provide ongoing training and support to franchisees, as their success directly impacts the overall success of your franchise system. Developing a Compliant Franchise Disclosure Document (FDD) Developing a compliant Franchise Disclosure Document (FDD) is fundamental to ensuring your franchise meets legal requirements and attracts potential franchisees. The FDD includes 23 specific disclosure items that provide critical information about your franchise system, such as fees, obligations, and the franchise agreement. You must deliver the FDD to prospective franchisees at least 14 days before they sign any agreements or make payments, giving them ample time to review it. If you’re franchising in multiple states, you’ll need to include state-specific addendums and modifications, so consulting legal assistance is imperative. Remember to update the FDD annually to reflect any changes in your franchise system, as failure to comply can lead to legal penalties and hinder franchise sales. Creating Your Franchise Model and Structure Creating a solid franchise model and structure is a crucial step in building a successful franchise system. You should start by defining your franchise type, whether it’s a single-unit, multi-unit, area development, or master franchise, as each has unique rights and responsibilities. Next, develop a thorough operations manual, covering procedures, training, marketing, and quality standards, typically ranging from 100-300 pages. Don’t forget to establish a clear financial structure detailing initial investments and ongoing royalty fees, usually between 4-8% of revenues. Protecting your intellectual property is vital, so register trademarks with the USPTO to safeguard your brand identity. Finally, make sure your Franchise Disclosure Document (FDD) is prepared and updated annually to comply with federal and state laws. Crafting Your Franchise Operations Manual An effective franchise operations manual is vital for guaranteeing consistency and efficiency across all franchise locations. This manual typically ranges from 100 to 300 pages, detailing procedures, training, marketing, and quality standards. It should clearly outline your brand’s purpose, goals, and operational standards. Section Content Overview Importance Operational Protocols Daily operations and procedures Guarantees consistency across franchises Customer Service Guidelines Interaction standards Improves customer satisfaction Compliance Requirements Legal and regulatory standards Maintains brand integrity Regular updates are significant to reflect changes in business practices or regulations. A well-crafted manual aids franchisees in maintaining brand standards and serves as a valuable training resource for new staff, improving overall franchise performance. Establishing a Franchise Sales Strategy To establish a successful franchise sales strategy, you need to start by identifying your target market, focusing on the characteristics that make an ideal franchisee. Next, allocate your budget wisely to support your sales efforts and guarantee you’re equipped to attract the right candidates. Finally, develop a strong value proposition that clearly communicates what sets your franchise apart from the competition, making it easier for potential franchisees to see the benefits of joining your brand. Target Market Identification How can you effectively identify your target market when establishing a franchise sales strategy? Start by evaluating potential franchisees on their financial capability, entrepreneurial experience, and alignment with your brand values. Conduct market research to uncover demographic trends and local business climates that could influence your selections. Set specific sales goals for the next 6 to 12 months and outline the ideal characteristics of your prospective franchisees. Utilize franchise validation by engaging with current franchisees to gain insights into their needs. Finally, differentiate your offering with a compelling value proposition to attract suitable candidates. Characteristics Importance Financial Capability Guarantees sustainability Entrepreneurial Experience Increases success rates Brand Alignment Strengthens brand identity Market Research Informs strategic decisions Budget Allocation Strategy When establishing a budget allocation strategy for your franchise sales, it’s essential to take into account various components that will influence your overall success. Start by allocating funds for marketing initiatives, franchise development, and ongoing support, typically ranging from $18,500 to $84,500, depending on service providers. Set clear franchise sales goals for the next 6 to 12 months to guide your budget and track progress. Identify the ideal characteristics of prospective franchisees, tailoring your marketing strategies to attract them, and guarantee your budget reflects these demographics. Consider investing in a franchise sales website and promotional materials that clearly convey your brand story. Regularly review and adjust your budget based on sales performance and market conditions to stay aligned with your goals. Value Proposition Development Developing a strong value proposition is key to establishing an effective franchise sales strategy. It sets your franchise apart from competitors by clearly outlining unique benefits, such as proprietary products or exceptional support systems. Identifying the ideal prospective franchisee characteristics—like motivation, financial capability, and brand alignment—is crucial for enhancing unit-level economics. Your franchise development budget, ranging from $18,500 to $84,500, should cover marketing initiatives, sales websites, and public relations to attract potential franchisees effectively. Establish clear sales goals for the next 6 to 12 months, using metrics like leads generated and franchise agreements signed to measure success. Avoid common marketing mistakes, such as diluted brand messaging, to create a compelling sales narrative that resonates with your audience. Selecting the Right Franchise Location Selecting the right franchise location is crucial for the success of your business, as it directly impacts customer traffic and overall profitability. Start by analyzing traffic patterns and demographics in potential areas using tools like Esri’s Business Analyst and Placer.ai. Confirm the location aligns with your customer acquisition strategies. Familiarize yourself with the territory parameters in the Franchise Disclosure Document (FDD) to avoid conflicts with existing franchisees. Engage with your franchisor for guidance, as they often have established criteria for ideal locations. Before committing, obtain franchisor approval to verify the site meets brand standards and operational requirements. Moreover, consider the proximity to complementary businesses, as this can improve customer traffic and create a supportive business environment around your franchise. Securing Funding for Your Franchise When you’re looking to secure funding for your franchise, preparing a solid business plan is crucial. This plan should clearly outline your initial investment needs, including franchise fees, equipment, and working capital, as lenders will expect this documentation for loan approval. Furthermore, consider various financing options, such as bank loans and SBA loans, to guarantee you have the necessary funds to launch your franchise successfully. Funding Options Available Securing funding for your franchise is a vital step in the startup process, and comprehending the various options available can greatly boost your chances of success. Franchise startup costs typically range from $50,000 to $100,000, so you’ll need a solid financial plan. You can explore traditional bank loans, Small Business Administration (SBA) loans, or Home Equity Lines of Credit (HELOC) to finance your venture. Each option has different requirements and benefits. Moreover, it’s important to maintain cash reserves for initial operating expenses, as new franchises often take 2-3 years to reach the break-even point. Presenting a well-structured business plan can improve your chances of securing financing by clearly outlining your investment breakdown and revenue projections. Preparing Business Plan A well-prepared business plan serves as a cornerstone for securing funding for your franchise. It provides potential investors and lenders with a clear overview of the opportunity, market analysis, and operational strategies. Make certain to include a detailed financial projections section, covering initial investment costs, revenue forecasts, cash flow statements, and a break-even analysis. Here’s a simple table to outline vital components: Component Details Funding Requirements Specify the amount needed Intended Use of Funds Explain how funds will be utilized Revenue Forecasts Project expected income Cash Flow Statements Show cash inflow and outflow Break-even Analysis Determine when profits will begin Regularly update your plan to reflect market changes and guarantee alignment with growth objectives. Legal Considerations in Franchising Comprehending the legal factors in franchising is crucial for anyone looking to start a franchise company. You’ll need to navigate various laws and guarantee compliance. Here are key points to contemplate: Franchise Disclosure Document (FDD): You must prepare an FDD containing 23 mandatory disclosure items and provide it to prospective franchisees at least 14 days before they sign agreements or make payments. Legal Assistance: Seek help from legal experts to prepare the FDD and franchise agreements, as laws can be complex and vary by state. State Registration: Fourteen states require FDD registration before selling franchises, each with unique requirements and fees. Proper Classification: Misclassifying a franchise as a licensing agreement can lead to severe legal issues, so guarantee adherence to legal standards. Building a Support Network for Your Franchise After addressing the legal considerations that come with starting a franchise, it’s important to recognize the role of a strong support network in your franchise’s success. Engaging with organizations like the International Franchise Association can provide valuable networking opportunities and resources. Collaborating with a licensed franchise attorney helps you navigate legal intricacies and prepare crucial documents, such as the Franchise Disclosure Document (FDD). Building relationships with existing franchisees offers insights into best practices and challenges, creating a supportive community. Networking at franchise events and conferences allows you to share experiences and learn from industry experts. Finally, utilizing online franchise portals connects you with potential franchisees and industry influencers, broadening your outreach and visibility within the franchise ecosystem. Frequently Asked Questions How Do I Start My Own Franchise? To start your own franchise, first assess your business’s readiness by analyzing profitability and market demand. Create a Franchise Disclosure Document (FDD) that outlines fees and obligations, ensuring it complies with legal requirements. Register your FDD in states that mandate it, then develop an operations manual to guide franchisees. Finally, prepare for initial investments, which typically range from $50,000 to $100,000, ensuring you have the resources needed for successful franchise operations. What Are the 4 P’s of Franchising? The 4 P’s of franchising are essential for success. First, Product guarantees that you offer a consistent, high-quality core item across all locations, building customer trust. Next, Process involves standardized systems for operations and marketing, which promote uniformity. People emphasizes the importance of having a well-trained team to maintain brand integrity. Finally, Profit highlights the need for a sustainable financial model that benefits both you and your franchisees through effective cost management. What Is the 7 Day Rule for Franchise? The 7-Day Rule requires franchisors to provide you with the Franchise Disclosure Document (FDD) and related agreements at least seven days before you sign any contracts or make payments. This rule guarantees you have ample time to review significant details about your potential investment, including obligations, fees, and risks. Noncompliance can lead to serious legal penalties for the franchisor, emphasizing the importance of adhering to this regulation for your protection. Why Is It Only $10,000 to Open a Chick-Fil-A? Opening a Chick-Fil-A franchise costs only $10,000 because of the company’s unique business model. Chick-Fil-A covers most startup expenses, such as equipment and training, greatly lowering your financial burden. Even though the initial fee is low, franchisees pay a 15% royalty on sales, which includes marketing support. The selection process emphasizes candidates’ alignment with the brand’s values and customer service standards, ensuring you’re committed to the company’s operational excellence. Conclusion Starting a franchise company requires careful planning and execution. By evaluating your business’s readiness, developing a compliant Franchise Disclosure Document, and creating a solid operational framework, you set the foundation for success. Securing funding and comprehending legal requirements are essential, as is building a strong support network for franchisees. Regularly reviewing performance metrics and adjusting strategies will help maintain brand standards and encourage growth. With diligence and strategic planning, you can establish a thriving franchise business. Image via Google Gemini This article, "How to Start a Franchise Company – A Step-by-Step Guide" was first published on Small Business Trends View the full article

Starting a franchise company requires careful planning and execution. First, you’ll want to assess your business’s readiness for franchising, ensuring it’s profitable and scalable. Next, developing a compliant Franchise Disclosure Document (FDD) is essential for legal protections. You’ll additionally need to create a detailed operations manual and a solid sales strategy to attract potential franchisees. Comprehending these steps will set a strong foundation, but there’s much more to contemplate as you move forward. Key Takeaways Assess your business’s profitability and operational systems to ensure they are replicable for franchisees. Develop a comprehensive Franchise Disclosure Document (FDD) that complies with legal requirements and includes necessary disclosures. Define your franchise model, including the type (single-unit, multi-unit, etc.) and establish clear financial structures for investment and royalties. Create a strategic franchise sales plan targeting ideal franchisee characteristics and outlining marketing initiatives. Prepare a detailed business plan that includes startup costs, funding requirements, and revenue projections to secure financing. Understanding Franchising: What You Need to Know When you consider starting a franchise company, it’s vital to comprehend the fundamentals of franchising, as this business model can greatly impact your growth potential. Franchising involves a franchisor licensing their brand and operational systems to franchisees, allowing them to operate under an established brand. This arrangement usually requires franchisees to pay royalties, typically 4-8% of their revenues, which supports the brand’s marketing and infrastructure. To learn how to create a franchise, familiarize yourself with legal requirements, including the Franchise Disclosure Document (FDD), which outlines 23 key disclosure items. This document informs prospective franchisees about their rights and obligations. Grasping these elements is significant as you commence on your path to start a franchise company successfully. Assessing Your Business Readiness for Franchising Evaluating your business readiness for franchising is an essential step in the process to expand your brand through this model. Start by reviewing your profitability and operational systems; they need to be replicable for franchisees. Analyze market demand for your product or service to guarantee sufficient interest exists for multiple locations. Consider your willingness to give up some control, as franchisees will manage their own sites within your guidelines. It’s likewise important to evaluate your brand’s scalability and how well it can maintain quality across locations, which is critical for customer trust. Finally, confirm you’re prepared to provide ongoing training and support to franchisees, as their success directly impacts the overall success of your franchise system. Developing a Compliant Franchise Disclosure Document (FDD) Developing a compliant Franchise Disclosure Document (FDD) is fundamental to ensuring your franchise meets legal requirements and attracts potential franchisees. The FDD includes 23 specific disclosure items that provide critical information about your franchise system, such as fees, obligations, and the franchise agreement. You must deliver the FDD to prospective franchisees at least 14 days before they sign any agreements or make payments, giving them ample time to review it. If you’re franchising in multiple states, you’ll need to include state-specific addendums and modifications, so consulting legal assistance is imperative. Remember to update the FDD annually to reflect any changes in your franchise system, as failure to comply can lead to legal penalties and hinder franchise sales. Creating Your Franchise Model and Structure Creating a solid franchise model and structure is a crucial step in building a successful franchise system. You should start by defining your franchise type, whether it’s a single-unit, multi-unit, area development, or master franchise, as each has unique rights and responsibilities. Next, develop a thorough operations manual, covering procedures, training, marketing, and quality standards, typically ranging from 100-300 pages. Don’t forget to establish a clear financial structure detailing initial investments and ongoing royalty fees, usually between 4-8% of revenues. Protecting your intellectual property is vital, so register trademarks with the USPTO to safeguard your brand identity. Finally, make sure your Franchise Disclosure Document (FDD) is prepared and updated annually to comply with federal and state laws. Crafting Your Franchise Operations Manual An effective franchise operations manual is vital for guaranteeing consistency and efficiency across all franchise locations. This manual typically ranges from 100 to 300 pages, detailing procedures, training, marketing, and quality standards. It should clearly outline your brand’s purpose, goals, and operational standards. Section Content Overview Importance Operational Protocols Daily operations and procedures Guarantees consistency across franchises Customer Service Guidelines Interaction standards Improves customer satisfaction Compliance Requirements Legal and regulatory standards Maintains brand integrity Regular updates are significant to reflect changes in business practices or regulations. A well-crafted manual aids franchisees in maintaining brand standards and serves as a valuable training resource for new staff, improving overall franchise performance. Establishing a Franchise Sales Strategy To establish a successful franchise sales strategy, you need to start by identifying your target market, focusing on the characteristics that make an ideal franchisee. Next, allocate your budget wisely to support your sales efforts and guarantee you’re equipped to attract the right candidates. Finally, develop a strong value proposition that clearly communicates what sets your franchise apart from the competition, making it easier for potential franchisees to see the benefits of joining your brand. Target Market Identification How can you effectively identify your target market when establishing a franchise sales strategy? Start by evaluating potential franchisees on their financial capability, entrepreneurial experience, and alignment with your brand values. Conduct market research to uncover demographic trends and local business climates that could influence your selections. Set specific sales goals for the next 6 to 12 months and outline the ideal characteristics of your prospective franchisees. Utilize franchise validation by engaging with current franchisees to gain insights into their needs. Finally, differentiate your offering with a compelling value proposition to attract suitable candidates. Characteristics Importance Financial Capability Guarantees sustainability Entrepreneurial Experience Increases success rates Brand Alignment Strengthens brand identity Market Research Informs strategic decisions Budget Allocation Strategy When establishing a budget allocation strategy for your franchise sales, it’s essential to take into account various components that will influence your overall success. Start by allocating funds for marketing initiatives, franchise development, and ongoing support, typically ranging from $18,500 to $84,500, depending on service providers. Set clear franchise sales goals for the next 6 to 12 months to guide your budget and track progress. Identify the ideal characteristics of prospective franchisees, tailoring your marketing strategies to attract them, and guarantee your budget reflects these demographics. Consider investing in a franchise sales website and promotional materials that clearly convey your brand story. Regularly review and adjust your budget based on sales performance and market conditions to stay aligned with your goals. Value Proposition Development Developing a strong value proposition is key to establishing an effective franchise sales strategy. It sets your franchise apart from competitors by clearly outlining unique benefits, such as proprietary products or exceptional support systems. Identifying the ideal prospective franchisee characteristics—like motivation, financial capability, and brand alignment—is crucial for enhancing unit-level economics. Your franchise development budget, ranging from $18,500 to $84,500, should cover marketing initiatives, sales websites, and public relations to attract potential franchisees effectively. Establish clear sales goals for the next 6 to 12 months, using metrics like leads generated and franchise agreements signed to measure success. Avoid common marketing mistakes, such as diluted brand messaging, to create a compelling sales narrative that resonates with your audience. Selecting the Right Franchise Location Selecting the right franchise location is crucial for the success of your business, as it directly impacts customer traffic and overall profitability. Start by analyzing traffic patterns and demographics in potential areas using tools like Esri’s Business Analyst and Placer.ai. Confirm the location aligns with your customer acquisition strategies. Familiarize yourself with the territory parameters in the Franchise Disclosure Document (FDD) to avoid conflicts with existing franchisees. Engage with your franchisor for guidance, as they often have established criteria for ideal locations. Before committing, obtain franchisor approval to verify the site meets brand standards and operational requirements. Moreover, consider the proximity to complementary businesses, as this can improve customer traffic and create a supportive business environment around your franchise. Securing Funding for Your Franchise When you’re looking to secure funding for your franchise, preparing a solid business plan is crucial. This plan should clearly outline your initial investment needs, including franchise fees, equipment, and working capital, as lenders will expect this documentation for loan approval. Furthermore, consider various financing options, such as bank loans and SBA loans, to guarantee you have the necessary funds to launch your franchise successfully. Funding Options Available Securing funding for your franchise is a vital step in the startup process, and comprehending the various options available can greatly boost your chances of success. Franchise startup costs typically range from $50,000 to $100,000, so you’ll need a solid financial plan. You can explore traditional bank loans, Small Business Administration (SBA) loans, or Home Equity Lines of Credit (HELOC) to finance your venture. Each option has different requirements and benefits. Moreover, it’s important to maintain cash reserves for initial operating expenses, as new franchises often take 2-3 years to reach the break-even point. Presenting a well-structured business plan can improve your chances of securing financing by clearly outlining your investment breakdown and revenue projections. Preparing Business Plan A well-prepared business plan serves as a cornerstone for securing funding for your franchise. It provides potential investors and lenders with a clear overview of the opportunity, market analysis, and operational strategies. Make certain to include a detailed financial projections section, covering initial investment costs, revenue forecasts, cash flow statements, and a break-even analysis. Here’s a simple table to outline vital components: Component Details Funding Requirements Specify the amount needed Intended Use of Funds Explain how funds will be utilized Revenue Forecasts Project expected income Cash Flow Statements Show cash inflow and outflow Break-even Analysis Determine when profits will begin Regularly update your plan to reflect market changes and guarantee alignment with growth objectives. Legal Considerations in Franchising Comprehending the legal factors in franchising is crucial for anyone looking to start a franchise company. You’ll need to navigate various laws and guarantee compliance. Here are key points to contemplate: Franchise Disclosure Document (FDD): You must prepare an FDD containing 23 mandatory disclosure items and provide it to prospective franchisees at least 14 days before they sign agreements or make payments. Legal Assistance: Seek help from legal experts to prepare the FDD and franchise agreements, as laws can be complex and vary by state. State Registration: Fourteen states require FDD registration before selling franchises, each with unique requirements and fees. Proper Classification: Misclassifying a franchise as a licensing agreement can lead to severe legal issues, so guarantee adherence to legal standards. Building a Support Network for Your Franchise After addressing the legal considerations that come with starting a franchise, it’s important to recognize the role of a strong support network in your franchise’s success. Engaging with organizations like the International Franchise Association can provide valuable networking opportunities and resources. Collaborating with a licensed franchise attorney helps you navigate legal intricacies and prepare crucial documents, such as the Franchise Disclosure Document (FDD). Building relationships with existing franchisees offers insights into best practices and challenges, creating a supportive community. Networking at franchise events and conferences allows you to share experiences and learn from industry experts. Finally, utilizing online franchise portals connects you with potential franchisees and industry influencers, broadening your outreach and visibility within the franchise ecosystem. Frequently Asked Questions How Do I Start My Own Franchise? To start your own franchise, first assess your business’s readiness by analyzing profitability and market demand. Create a Franchise Disclosure Document (FDD) that outlines fees and obligations, ensuring it complies with legal requirements. Register your FDD in states that mandate it, then develop an operations manual to guide franchisees. Finally, prepare for initial investments, which typically range from $50,000 to $100,000, ensuring you have the resources needed for successful franchise operations. What Are the 4 P’s of Franchising? The 4 P’s of franchising are essential for success. First, Product guarantees that you offer a consistent, high-quality core item across all locations, building customer trust. Next, Process involves standardized systems for operations and marketing, which promote uniformity. People emphasizes the importance of having a well-trained team to maintain brand integrity. Finally, Profit highlights the need for a sustainable financial model that benefits both you and your franchisees through effective cost management. What Is the 7 Day Rule for Franchise? The 7-Day Rule requires franchisors to provide you with the Franchise Disclosure Document (FDD) and related agreements at least seven days before you sign any contracts or make payments. This rule guarantees you have ample time to review significant details about your potential investment, including obligations, fees, and risks. Noncompliance can lead to serious legal penalties for the franchisor, emphasizing the importance of adhering to this regulation for your protection. Why Is It Only $10,000 to Open a Chick-Fil-A? Opening a Chick-Fil-A franchise costs only $10,000 because of the company’s unique business model. Chick-Fil-A covers most startup expenses, such as equipment and training, greatly lowering your financial burden. Even though the initial fee is low, franchisees pay a 15% royalty on sales, which includes marketing support. The selection process emphasizes candidates’ alignment with the brand’s values and customer service standards, ensuring you’re committed to the company’s operational excellence. Conclusion Starting a franchise company requires careful planning and execution. By evaluating your business’s readiness, developing a compliant Franchise Disclosure Document, and creating a solid operational framework, you set the foundation for success. Securing funding and comprehending legal requirements are essential, as is building a strong support network for franchisees. Regularly reviewing performance metrics and adjusting strategies will help maintain brand standards and encourage growth. With diligence and strategic planning, you can establish a thriving franchise business. Image via Google Gemini This article, "How to Start a Franchise Company – A Step-by-Step Guide" was first published on Small Business Trends View the full article

We may earn a commission from links on this page. Deal pricing and availability subject to change after time of publication. If you’re starting a home tool set or looking to graduate from a beginner set of hand tools to expand the variety of DIY projects you can tackle, a quality set of wrenches and drivers is key. Everyone who does DIY and home repair projects knows that a comprehensive set of bits and sockets will save you hours of aggravation while you’re working. This 104-piece Craftsman tool set is a good investment because it has a variety of sockets, ratchets, and driver tips. CRAFTSMAN 104Pc Mechanic Tool Set (CMMT45104) $79.98 at Amazon $164.00 Save $84.02 Get Deal Get Deal $79.98 at Amazon $164.00 Save $84.02 What comes in the boxThis Craftsman 104-piece mechanics tool set comes with a 3/8-inch ratchet, a 1/4-inch ratchet, a hand driver handle, 48 standard sockets, 12 deep sockets, 16 Allen wrenches, two extension bits, a corner adapter, 22 driver bits, and a classic red Craftsman tool box. The ratchets are low profile, allowing them to be used in tight spaces. The sockets come in SAE sizes 5/32-inch through 1/2-inch and metric sizes 4 mm through 21 mm. The bits include flat head, Phillip’s head, Robert’s bits, and star tip. The tool box comes with drawer organizers so there’s a spot for every tool. The driver handle and the ratchets are all standard sizes, so you’ll be able to use them with other sockets and bits or replacements if you lose any parts. Hand tools can be expensive, and getting a set that includes a wide range of bits and sockets will save you trips to the hardware store while you’re working on a project because it allows you to tackle a variety of fastener types from screws to bolts. This set has 104 pieces, and it’s 51% off at $79.98, making each tool less than $1 apiece. As a bonus, this set comes with the classic red Craftsman tool box, which on its own can cost between $50 and $75. Why I recommend Craftsman toolsCraftsman is known for the lifetime warranty on their hand tools, and everything in this tool set is covered by that besides the tool box and the drawer inserts. Although their tools are often covered by a warranty, I have only used it once on a 20-year-old ratchet that finally slipped its gears; most of the time, you’ll be free from the hassle of even needing to get a replacement. In addition to the warranty, Craftsman tools are known for being durable. I had a mechanics tool set very similar to this one that I got as a teenager, and I still have most of the tools that came with it, save for a few that went missing over the years. I’ve used the sockets for car repair, to fix a heat pump, to assemble carts with wheels, and on a variety of construction projects, and I’ve had very few issues with them. Craftsman tools have a good reputation for durability and the sets that come in the red portable tool boxes are a classic for home DIY shops. Having a simple and efficient way to pack up your tools when you’re working on an outdoor project or away from home will make your tool set much more accessible, and you’ll use it more if you can quickly grab it and go. Our Best Editor-Vetted Tech Deals Right Now Apple AirPods 4 Active Noise Cancelling Wireless Earbuds — $119.00 (List Price $179.00) Samsung Galaxy S26, Unlocked Android Smartphone + $100 Gift Card, 512GB, Powerful Processor, Galaxy AI, Immersive Viewing, Durable Battery, 2026, Black — $899.99 (List Price $1,199.99) Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro AI Noise Cancelling 2.0 Wireless Earbuds (Black) + $30 Amazon Gift Card — $249.99 (List Price $279.99) Google Pixel 10a 128GB 6.3" Unlocked Smartphone + $100 Gift Card — $499.00 (List Price $599.00) Apple iPad 11" 128GB A16 WiFi Tablet (Blue, 2025) — $329.00 (List Price $349.00) Apple Watch Series 11 [GPS 46mm] Smartwatch with Jet Black Aluminum Case with Black Sport Band - M/L. Sleep Score, Fitness Tracker, Health Monitoring, Always-On Display, Water Resistant — $329.00 (List Price $429.00) Amazon Fire TV Soundbar — $99.99 (List Price $119.99) Deals are selected by our commerce team View the full article

China’s progress in building a modern economy, evident in its kung-fu fighting robots and self-parking cars, is hitting limits as a downturn in its housing industry drags on, small businesses suffer and young people struggle to find jobs. The gap between Chinese leader Xi Jinping’s high-tech, artificial intelligence-driven ambitions and the hard realities of slowing growth is the backdrop for the annual meeting of the country’s largely ceremonial national legislature, the National People’s Congress, which begins Thursday. During the meetings, which draw about 3,000 deputies to Beijing, top leaders will outline China’s annual target for growth and the congress will endorse a five-year blueprint of policy priorities until 2030. “What we’ll see is the trade-off between whether it’s going to be industry and tech, or looking after domestic demand,” said Alexander Davey, an analyst at the Mercator Institute for China Studies. “These are the two priorities that are juggling for Xi Jinping right now.” China’s economy is losing momentum In a city in southern China’s Guangdong, families were cutting back on big purchases during last month’s Lunar New Year holidays. Even for auspicious houseplants like orchids, used as a symbol of abundance and prosperity, prices were slashed by as much as 40% from last year. The penny pinching has small business owners complaining about hard times. China reported it reached “around 5%” economic growth in 2025, but economists question some official data. The relatively robust pace of growth was supported by strong manufacturing as exports surged, despite U.S. President Donald The President’s tariff hikes and other disruptions to trade. “Hitting the 2025 growth target is hardly reassuring as the Chinese economy is losing growth momentum, with rising imbalances and enormous structural problems being papered over by a surge in export-driven growth,” Eswar Prasad, a professor of economics and trade policy at Cornell University, told The Associated Press in emailed comments. Property slump persists A downturn in China’s housing market began several years ago and piecemeal efforts to revive the industry have made only fitful progress. Dozens of property developers defaulted on their debts as authorities cracked down on excessive borrowing. With overall home prices down 20% or more from 2021, a recovery remains elusive. The meltdown in one of the country’s biggest industries eliminated hundreds of thousands of jobs and with 12.7 million graduates entering the job market this year, more than 16% of young Chinese are unemployed. Some just are giving up and opting out of the rat race, or “lying flat.” Families whose main assets are their homes have grown cautious about spending, weakening consumer demand and confounding longstanding efforts to shift the economy to greater reliance on domestic investment. The congress may bring some fresh moves to beef up social welfare and other support, measures economists say are overdue and necessary for sustained, steady growth. China sticks to exports Reliance on exports is what help keeps China’s economy buzzing, at least for now. China recorded a $1.2 trillion trade surplus in 2025, as exports kept its factories humming. Despite the China-U.S. trade war, it has been shipping more to regions including Europe and Latin America. But it’s facing pushback from its trading partners. Under leader Xi, China has prioritized developing advanced technologies such as AI, robotics, computer chips, electric vehicles and renewable energy. Massive state support has companies churning out more EVs, TVs, solar panels and other products than China and its trading partners need. “To achieve those goals, the government is going to have to continue to provide subsidies and preferential support for high-tech and strategic industries,” said Leah Fahy, a China economist at Capital Economics. “(That) will, in turn, continue to fuel overcapacity.” In a recent report, the International Monetary Fund urged China to cut massive state subsidies and other support for industries that many Western countries say give its companies an unfair advantage over foreign rivals. At the same time, social welfare and other areas of the economy lag behind. The focus on what the ruling Communist Party has dubbed “high quality development” is bound to continue under the five-year plan for 2026-2030 that lawmakers are due to endorse at the congress. Over the past few decades, China’s transformation into a manufacturing superpower was underpinned by booming construction of homes, office buildings, roads, ports and railways. But tech supply chains are narrower, providing fewer jobs. So the trickle down effect is much weaker, said Lynn Song, chief economist for Greater China at ING Bank. “If anything, the more successful the so-called future industries become, the more they will draw resources away from the traditional sectors that still provide the bulk of employment and livelihoods for most people,” said Henry Gao, a professor of law at Singapore Management University. Xi is expected to consolidate more power The annual congress is an impressive show. Thousands of delegates fill the Great Hall of the People in central Beijing. A military band performs and delegates from various ethnic groups attend in traditional clothing. For all the pomp, the meeting is largely a set piece. The congress lasts only one week and its near-unanimous votes on the final day formalize decisions made ahead of time by party leaders. It’s a show of unity reaffirming the polices and direction they have set. Increasingly that leadership has centered on one person, Xi, who has consolidated power since taking the helm in 2012. Now 72, he is one of modern China’s most powerful leaders. Some analysts think Xi will emulate Mao Zedong, the revolutionary leader who founded communist China, and rule for life. Annual reports presented at the congress are replete with references to the party’s crucial role, “with Comrade Xi Jinping at its core.” Xi’s military purge is under the spotlight After ascending to power, Xi doubled down on longstanding anti-corruption campaigns, forcing many officials to step down to face investigation and prosecution, including top military brass. Days before the congress opened, the national legislature removed nine military officers from its ranks, widening a years long military purge. Last month, Gen. Zhang Youxia, the highest ranking military member just below Xi, was ousted over suspected disciplinary violations. Xi’s actions may weaken China’s military readiness in coming years, but he is also ensuring the force would be more politically reliable in the longer run, a report by Center for Strategic and International Studies think tank suggested. The anti-corruption drives have eradicated potential political rivals, and his iron grasp on power makes it much less likely other officials will challenge his vision to build China into a self-sufficient tech leader and 21st-century global power. AP Business Writer Elaine Kurtenbach contributed. —Chan Ho-Him and Ken Moritsugu, Associated Press View the full article

In a year of tremendous uncertainty, one of the few constants has been the swift uptick in gold and silver prices. Both metals have reached record high after record high as investors turn to safe-haven assets. Yet, as war escalates across the Middle East, the prices of silver and gold are currently falling. Most notably, silver fell over 11% on Tuesday and is down over 7% to about $82.50 per ounce at the time of publication. That’s more than a 5% drop over the last five days and close to 3% down for the past month. Silver’s all-time high price came on January 29, with a whopping $129.64 per ounce. Even with the significant drop from that peak, silver is still over 161% up year-over-year (YOY) and more than 16% up for 2026. Meanwhile, gold is down over 3% on Tuesday to about $5,145 per ounce at the time of publication. Its record-high of $5,594.82 coincided with silver’s best price. Why are silver and gold prices dropping? Both metals, especially gold, rose on Monday following the weekend’s attacks in the Middle East. But factors such as a stronger U.S. dollar and the potential for rising interest rates have dampened the appeal of non-yielding assets, like silver. Profit-taking is also likely at play for silver—the metal’s worth has been volatile since its peak in January. View the full article

Apple is continuing to announce new products ahead of its big March 4 event. Yesterday, it was the iPhone 17e and M4 iPad Air. Today, it's all about the Mac. Apple made a number of announcements: a new M5 MacBook Air, M5 Pro and M5 Max MacBook Pros, and new Studio Display options for anyone who wants to take out a mortgage on their external displays. All of these new products will be available preorder tomorrow, and go on sale March 11. M5 MacBook AirThis first announcement isn't all that exciting, but it does make sense for Apple. The company is now shipping MacBook Airs with the M5 chip, following the M5 MacBook Pro it launched in October. That doesn't come with any real design or feature changes: These are largely the same 13 and 15-inch MacBook Airs you can buy with M4. However, you do get Apple's latest-gen chip, which comes with performance upgrades. M5 comes with a 10-core CPU and four "super" cores and six efficiency cores, up to a 10-core GPU, a 16-core neural engine for AI processing, and 153GB/s memory bandwidth. Apple says that M5 can process AI tasks up to four times faster than M4, and comes with 28% more memory bandwidth. While those are the direct comparisons with M4, many of Apple's stats in its press release compare the M5 to M1, likely for two reasons. The year-over-year gains between chips aren't huge, and, because of that, people tend to hold onto M-series Macs for a long time. Apple is likely trying to target M1 MacBook Air users who might be starting to think about an upgrade. The biggest change aside from M5 is the starting storage amount: The M5 MacBook Air now comes with 512GB of storage in the base model, so 256GB is no longer an option. That's good news, as the latter can run out fast, but it does mean the MacBook Air now starts at $1,099, rather than the $999 the machine has been known for. You can configure the new Airs with up to 4TB of storage, too, if you need it, though any storage you get is going to be faster than previous MacBook Airs. Apple says the new SSDs are 2x faster in regard to both read and write speeds. The M5 chip also supports Wi-Fi 7 and Bluetooth 6, which is an upgrade over M4's support for Wi-Fi 6E and Bluetooth 5.3. Apple is shipping the new Airs with a 40W "Dynamic Power Adapter" that can charge up to 60W. M5 Pro and M5 Max MacBook ProsIf you're looking for the fastest MacBooks money can buy, turn your attention to the MacBook Pros. This is bigger news than the MacBook Air, as Apple already shipped products with the M5 chip. Now, the company is debuting M5 Pro and M5 Max for the first time in the new MacBook Pros—though, once again, these chips are really the only thing new about these machines. Still, that's a big deal, if you take Apple at its word. The company says that M5 Pro and M5 Max have the world's fastest CPU Core ("using shipping competitive systems and select industry-standard benchmarks"), and are built using Apple's new "Fusion Architecture." That means these chips combine two dies on one chip, with a CPU up to 18 cores and a GPU up to 20 cores (M5 Pro) or 40 cores (M5 Max). M5 Pro can be configured with up to 64GB of RAM and 4TB of storage, while M5 Max can go up to 128GB of RAM and 8TB of storage. The name of the game for Apple here is AI processing. The company says that M5 Pro can generate AI images 3.7 times faster than M4 Pro, and process LLM prompts 3.9 times faster. Meanwhile, M5 Max can generate AI images 3.8 times faster than M4 Max, and LLM prompt processing is four times faster. The gains are even larger when compared to M1 Pro and M1 Max, of course, which Apple highlights for similar reasons to the M5 MacBook Air: M1 Pro and M1 Max MacBook Pro owners are holding onto their laptops. As with the M5 MacBook Air, Apple is doubling the read/write speeds of the SSDs in these MacBook Pros. The base model M5 Pro MacBook Pro now comes with a 1TB SSD, while the M5 Max comes with 2TB. It also comes with Wi-Fi 7 and Bluetooth 6 support. Those upgrades come at an increased base cost, however: The 14-inch M5 Pro MacBook Pro now starts at $2,199, while the 16-inch MacBook Pro with M5 Pro starts at $2,699—$200 more than before. Studio Display and Studio Display XDRApple also announced refreshes to its external displays—Studio Display and Studio Display XDR. The Studio Display refresh is rather minor: It now comes with a 12MP Center Stage camera, with some image enhancements and support for Desk View—Apple's feature that lets you show off your desk with just the webcam. It also has improved microphones and speakers, and Thunderbolt 5 support. But the display itself is much the same as the previous model, and still starts at $1,599. If you want features like a high refresh rate 120Hz display, you'll need to look to the Studio Display XDR. This display packs Apple's "pro" features: It comes with a 27-inch 5K display with mini-LED, and can reach 1,000 nits of brightness (2,000 nits in HDR). Those features come at a cost, however: $3,299, to be exact. View the full article

Builderius page builder announced an experimental AI integration that enables it to apply changes inside the builder. The post Builderius WordPress Page Builder Integrates Claude AI appeared first on Search Engine Journal. View the full article

Meta is updating its ad measurement framework, aiming to simplify attribution in what it calls a “social-first” advertising world. What’s happening. Meta is narrowing its definition of click-through attribution for website and in-store conversions. Going forward, only link clicks — not likes, shares, saves or other interactions — will count toward click-through attribution. The change is designed to reduce discrepancies between Meta Ads Manager and third-party tools like Google Analytics. Between the lines. Social media has overtaken search as the world’s largest ad channel, according to WARC, but many attribution systems were built for search-era behaviors. On social platforms, engagement extends beyond link clicks. Historically, Meta counted all click types toward click-through conversions, while many third-party tools only counted link clicks — creating reporting misalignment. What’s changing. Conversions previously attributed to non-link interactions will now fall under a renamed “engage-through attribution” (formerly engaged-view attribution). Meta is also shortening the video engaged-view window from 10 seconds to 5 seconds, reflecting faster conversion behavior — particularly on Reels. The company says 46% of Reels purchase conversions happen within the first two seconds of attention. Why we care. This update makes it easier to see which actions actually drive conversions, reducing confusion between Meta reporting and third-party analytics like Google Analytics. By separating link clicks from other social interactions, marketers get a clearer view of campaign performance, while the new engage-through attribution captures the value of likes, shares, and saves. This gives advertisers more confidence in their data and helps them make smarter, more impactful Third-party tie-ins. Meta is partnering with analytics providers like Northbeam and Triple Whale to incorporate both clicks and views into attribution models, aiming to give advertisers a more complete performance picture. The rollout. Changes will begin later this month for campaigns optimizing toward website or in-store conversions. Billing will not change, but reporting inside Ads Manager may shift as attribution definitions update. The bottom line. Meta is attempting to balance clearer, search-aligned click reporting with better visibility into uniquely social interactions — giving advertisers cleaner comparisons across platforms while still capturing the incremental impact of engagement-driven conversions. Dig deeper. Simplifying Ad Measurement for a Social-First World View the full article

One of the great tales from basketball lore is how coach Phil Jackson led teams like the Bulls and the Lakers to dynasty status. Working with legends like Michael Jordan and Kobe Bryant, he might have let the all-stars run the show. Instead, his success hinged on transparency. Jackson gave players clear, constructive feedback. For example, he urged Jordan to cut back on scoring and involve his teammates more, recognizing that team success required more than a scoring leader. It’s a valuable lesson for business leaders today. Feedback can be tough to give. It can be uncomfortable. But withholding honest feedback is a disservice—to employees and to the company. As CEO of Jotform, I encourage managers to treat feedback as an operating system embedded in daily work, rather than something delivered as an occasional event. Here’s why. Feedback’s compounding impact Feedback goes beyond merely improving how an employee completes an isolated task or project. You might be surprised to discover how the benefits endure, compounding over time. For starters, offering feedback boosts employee engagement. According to research from Gallup, 80% of employees who reported receiving meaningful feedback in the past week were fully engaged. In a world where professionals are anxious about the threat of AI, it’s understandable that getting a sense of how they’re performing is encouraging. If I’ve learned anything in two decades as a business owner, it’s that engaged employees are not only more motivated, they also tend to stick with the company. Even when feedback leans negative, it signals that the company is invested in employees and their growth. As Harvard Business Review points out, feedback helps employees find meaning in their work. On a basic level, constructive feedback aids mastery. Put simply, mastering a skill feels good. If you’ve ever picked up a second language or perfected a new recipe, you understand that validating sensation. When given thoughtfully, feedback shows how an employee’s contribution fits into the bigger picture. It can make daily tasks, including inevitable busywork, feel more purposeful. For leaders, the challenge remains: how to make feedback more effective and meaningful. Here’s how leading teams make it work. How to deliver feedback that actually works When feedback is limited to annual reviews or when it’s only prompted by missteps and errors, it becomes a source of dread. Like a Pavlovian response, employees learn to associate a summons to the leader’s office with bad news. They brace themselves for a difficult conversation. When managers shift feedback from reactive to routine by proactively including it in regular workflows, meetings, and project cycles, the idea of receiving feedback becomes less fraught. At my company, regular feedback helps employees become accustomed to both positive and negative comments on their performance and view them more as coaching than reprimands (we do this using Jotform’s online feedback forms, of course). Frequent feedback tends to buoy performance, too. Indeed, employees are 3.6 times more likely to strongly agree that they are motivated to do outstanding work when their manager provides daily (rather than annual) feedback, according to Gallup. For the sake of employees’ nervous systems, it’s good practice to standardize and communicate how leaders deliver feedback—whether through a quick face-to-face check-in, a scheduled phone call, or a standing weekly Slack chat. When feedback follows a consistent structure and cadence, expectations become clearer, and employees know what to anticipate. Everyone receives the same level of attention, which reduces anxiety and helps minimize perceptions of bias. When giving feedback, smart leaders leverage data and AI insights to spot patterns. That way, teams know that feedback is based on real, objective information, not just subjective opinions. For example, you can tap into operational metrics, like error rates and customer response times, and use AI tools to analyze trends and tease out patterns in employee performance over time. One final observation from my experience: the lion’s share of employees actively want more feedback. Younger generations, in particular, are eager for more regular insight into how they’re doing. They recognize that it’s key to advancement and career growth. Thankfully, they also recognize the value of hearing from human leaders. Whether on the basketball court or in the office, they aren’t convinced they can learn everything they need to know through AI tools like ChatGPT—not yet, at least. Leaders can deliver the kind of feedback that boosts careers and strengthens teams. View the full article

Here is a recap of what happened in the search forums today...View the full article