All Activity

Consider options beyond donor advised funds. By Randy A. Fox The Holistic Guide to Wealth Management Go PRO for members-only access to more Randy Fox. View the full article

Consider options beyond donor advised funds. By Randy A. Fox The Holistic Guide to Wealth Management Go PRO for members-only access to more Randy Fox. View the full article

The CEO of Crypto.com, Kris Marszalek, announced on Thursday that he was laying off 12% of the company’s staff. Marszalek cited AI as the driving factor behind the layoffs. Here’s what you need to know. What’s happened? On Thursday, Crypto.com CEO Kris Marszalek took to X to announce that the company was cutting 12% of its staff. Marszalek cited AI as the reason for the layoffs. In the X post, Marszalek said that Crypto.com was “joining the list of companies integrating enterprise-wide AI” and suggested that those who do not embrace artificial intelligence won’t be around for long. “Companies that do not make this pivot immediately will fail,” Marszalek wrote. “Companies that move slowly will be left behind.” Marszalek said that, as a result of this embrace of AI, Crypto.com would lay off around 12% of its workforce in “roles that do not adapt in our new world,” noting that the layoffs would be “targeted.” Marszalek is hardly the first CEO to blame AI for layoffs. Most recently, Block CEO Jack Dorsey said he would lay off 4,000 employees, primarily due to a shift toward greater reliance on AI. However, some question whether an embrace of AI tools is actually the driving factor behind tech industry layoffs, or whether CEOs are simply using AI as a smokescreen to mask other reasons. Crypto.com recently paid the largest sum ever for a domain name Of course, it’s not hard to believe that Marszalek truly believes his own words about the seismic impact AI will have on companies in the months and years ahead, especially after he purchased the AI.com domain name in February for a record-breaking $70 million—the most ever paid for a domain name. This week’s layoff announcement also comes after the company’s own cryptocurrency, Cronos (CRO), has suffered a dramatic fall in value over the past several months. After rising from a low of around $0.08 in early July, CRO spiked to over $0.32 cents by late August. But since then, the token’s value has crashed by around 70%, falling to around $0.07 as of this writing, according to CoinMarketCap data. Popular cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin and Ether have also seen their values decline since last summer. This isn’t Crypto.com’s first round of layoffs This week’s announced layoffs are not the first time that Crypto.com has cut staff. In June 2022, the firm let go of about 5% of its workforce, totaling about 260 employees. At the time, Marszalek said the layoffs would allow the company to “stay focused on executing against our roadmap and optimizing for profitability as we do so.” Then, in January 2023, Crypto.com announced that it would eliminate approximately 20% of its workforce, citing the fallout from the collapse of cryptocurrency exchange FTX. “We are joining the list of companies integrating enterprise-wide AI,” a Crypto.com spokesperson told Fast Company when reached for comment. “As we continue to prioritize resources around key growth areas and drive efficiencies across our business, we reduced our workforce by approximately 12 percent. All impacted team members have been notified and are receiving resources to support their transition.” The company did not say how many employees were impacted. This story is developing… View the full article

The wholesale lender says it agreed to a $660,000 deal last summer for employees seeking overtime pay, an agreement the plaintiffs say never existed. View the full article

In a notable case underscoring the importance of compliance with federal relief programs, Sean Eric Thompson from Pace, Florida, received a four-year prison sentence for a series of fraudulent activities designed to enrich himself at the expense of small businesses seeking relief during the COVID-19 pandemic. This development serves as a crucial reminder for small business owners regarding the ramifications of misusing government assistance programs. Thompson, 44, previously pleaded guilty to an extensive array of charges, including wire fraud, money laundering, and bankruptcy fraud. The charges stemmed from a scheme in which he fraudulently applied for funds through the Small Business Administration’s Restaurant Revitalization Fund (RRF). This fund aimed to provide necessary financial support to establishments like restaurants and bars that suffered losses due to the pandemic. “Pandemic relief funds were created to support businesses in crisis, not enrich individuals like Mr. Thompson,” stated FBI Jacksonville Special Agent in Charge Jason Carley. His remarks highlight the accountability that comes with these relief programs, emphasizing the goal of safeguarding taxpayer money meant for those in genuine need. In May 2021, Thompson, a part-owner of a business that operated a brewery and restaurant, submitted fraudulent documentation, claiming his business had incurred COVID-related losses of $1,128,233. The SBA disbursed the full amount declared in his application. However, instead of using these funds to stabilize his business, Thompson diverted over $150,000 to his personal investment account, utilizing taxpayer money for personal expenses. This case not only illustrates the legal repercussions of fraud against government programs but also presents critical learning points for small business owners navigating these avenues. The RRF was designed to address immediate financial shortfalls, yet it is crucial that funds are utilized strictly for the intended purposes, ensuring compliance with all rules set forth by the SBA. Non-compliance, as evidenced by Thompson’s case, can lead to severe repercussions, including fines and imprisonment. In August 2023, Thompson filed for bankruptcy, during which he presented materially false statements, omitting the RRF funds and other assets in his disclosures. His bankruptcy testimony further included false claims, revealing the lengths to which he went to conceal his fraud. The case closed with the submission of falsified financial statements to the bankruptcy trustee. “This defendant tried to rip off the federal government by enriching himself with U.S. taxpayer funds intended to help small businesses struggling during the COVID pandemic,” remarked U.S. Attorney John P. Heekin. His office is dedicated to holding fraudsters accountable, reflecting a broader commitment among federal law enforcement to counteract misuse of pandemic relief programs. For small business owners, this serves as a cautionary tale. Awareness about the strict guidelines surrounding federal funding initiatives is vital. Misrepresenting information, even if unintentional, can lead to investigations, loss of funding, and significant legal troubles. Engaging with the SBA or other agencies for clarity on program eligibility, documentation, and applications can mitigate risks associated with compliance. As awareness grows regarding the oversight of pandemic relief programs, the heightened scrutiny from agencies like the SBA Office of Inspector General is evident. Acting Special Agent-in-Charge Jason Xerri stated, “The SBA Office of Inspector General remains committed to aggressively pursuing individuals who exploited pandemic relief programs for personal gain.” This underscores the government’s intent to protect taxpayer funds and ensure that relief reaches businesses genuinely in need. As the repercussions of fraud unfold, small business owners must remain vigilant. Understanding the significance of accurate reporting and the potential challenges posed by compliance issues can safeguard businesses from legal ramifications. The lessons gleaned from cases like Thompson’s will prove invaluable as businesses continue to engage with federal funding initiatives in the years to come. For further details about this case and ongoing efforts to combat fraud, you can view the original U.S. Department of Justice press release here or the SBA article. Image via Google Gemini This article, "Florida Man Sentenced to Four Years for COVID-19 Relief Fraud" was first published on Small Business Trends View the full article

It’s the Friday open thread! The comment section on this post is open for discussion with other readers on any work-related questions that you want to talk about (that includes school). If you want an answer from me, emailing me is still your best bet*, but this is a chance to take your questions to other readers. * If you submitted a question to me recently, please do not repost it here, as it may be in my queue to answer. The post open thread – March 20, 2026 appeared first on Ask a Manager. View the full article

We may earn a commission from links on this page. Deal pricing and availability subject to change after time of publication. Convertible laptops are a versatile and affordable alternative to buying a separate laptop and tablet. They offer touchscreen capability, multiple viewing modes, and greater portability than traditional laptops, which is a perk for commuters. They’re also useful if you want a second screen but don’t want to invest in a full second laptop or desktop. One of the most popular options is the entry-level 14-inch ASUS Chromebook Flip CX1 Convertible Laptop, which is down to a record low of $279.99 (originally $369.99), according to price trackers. Asus Chromebook Flip CX1 2-in-1 $279.99 at Amazon $369.99 Save $90.00 Get Deal Get Deal $279.99 at Amazon $369.99 Save $90.00 It’s one of the most affordable convertible laptops with a 360-degree hinge, a 13-inch touchscreen, and all the essentials for everyday tasks like streaming video, getting work done, multitasking, or serving as a secondary device. That said, it’s not designed for more intensive tasks like design work, competitive gaming, and video editing. It has an Intel Celeron N4500 processor, 8 GB of RAM, and 128 GB of eMMC storage, and lasts up to 11 hours per charge. It can be used in laptop, tent, or tablet mode, adding to its versatility. While it doesn’t have the high-end specs and performance of dedicated computers, this 2-in-1 does come with fingerprint login, a backlit keyboard, dual speakers, and a 1080p webcam. It also has fast-charging USB-C, USB-A, and micro-SD ports, offering more connectivity than many budget Chromebooks. If you’re looking for a model that covers the basics and your priority is versatility and convenience at under $300, the Asus Chromebook Flip CX1 2-in-1 is a strong choice. However, if you need more storage, better brightness and visuals, and a more capable processor, it’s worth stepping up to a slightly more powerful model like the ASUS Chromebook CM14 Flip or the Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5i Chromebook Plus, though those upgrades will come with a higher price tag. Our Best Editor-Vetted Amazon Big Spring Sale Deals Right Now Apple AirPods 4 Active Noise Cancelling Wireless Earbuds — $148.99 (List Price $179.00) Apple iPad 11" 128GB A16 WiFi Tablet (Blue, 2025) — $299.00 (List Price $349.00) Sony WH1000XM6- Best Wireless Noise Canceling Headphones — $398.00 (List Price $459.99) Apple Watch Series 11 (GPS, 42mm, S/M Black Sport Band) — $299.00 (List Price $399.00) Blink Video Doorbell Wireless (Newest Model) + Sync Module Core — $35.99 (List Price $69.99) Ring Indoor Cam Plus 2K Wired Security Camera (White) — $39.99 (List Price $59.99) Fire TV Stick 4K Max Streaming Player With Remote — $34.99 (List Price $59.99) Deals are selected by our commerce team View the full article

AI won’t make SEO obsolete, but it’ll change how the work gets done. There’s a growing concern that as AI systems improve, they’ll replace the need for human SEO analysis entirely. Early experiments suggest otherwise. While AI can assist with technical tasks and even generate usable outputs, it still depends heavily on detailed human input, structured data, and technical oversight to produce meaningful results. The real shift is toward redistribution. AI is accelerating parts of the workflow, raising the bar for execution, and changing where human expertise matters most. Why AI hasn’t made SEO obsolete AI aims to reduce the need for semi-technical expertise. Where data is highly structured (e.g., coding a Python script), it has an advantage. Even then, human expertise is still required. AI can generate scripts, but without detailed instructions and debugging, the output is often unusable. Generative AI can produce working functions with strong prompts, but it still “thinks” like a machine. That’s why technical practitioners are best positioned to get the most from it. Technical knowledge is also required for AI-assisted SEO tasks like generating product descriptions or alt text at scale. Even with tools like OpenAI’s API, you still need to transform and structure data into rich, usable prompts — for example, turning Product Information Management data into prompt-ready inputs. AI depends on human instructions, and output quality reflects input quality. Thinking in structured terms — IDs, classes, and distinct entities — is key to getting reliable results. It’s what makes the output usable. That makes prompt creation a critical skill. Employers should factor in technical expertise when using AI to drive efficiency. However, don’t celebrate too soon. As AI evolves and absorbs more information, this advantage may be temporary. For now, AI still depends on human expertise to function — which is why SEO isn’t obsolete. Your customers search everywhere. Make sure your brand shows up. The SEO toolkit you know, plus the AI visibility data you need. Start Free Trial Get started with Where AI struggles without human input Data is both AI’s strength and weakness. Early generative AI models relied on curated data within their LLMs. OpenAI’s models couldn’t perform web searches up to and including GPT-4. After GPT-4, AI systems began relying less on internal data and more on web searches for fresh information. Because the web isn’t curated and contains a lot of misinformation, this initially represented a step backward for most AI tools, including ChatGPT and Gemini. This shift also mirrors how traditional algorithms rely on raw information. This raises a key question: Is more information always better for AI? The open web contains both empirical data and subjective opinion, and AI often can’t distinguish between the two. Giving it access to uncurated data has arguably caused more errors and issues in its outputs. Finding the right balance of data remains a challenge. How much data helps or harms performance, and how much curation is needed? While developers continue refining LLMs and connected systems, users still need to load up prompts with as much detail as possible to offset how AI sources and evaluates information. These limitations highlight a core issue: without structured input and human judgment, AI struggles to produce reliable SEO insights. Dig deeper: 6 guiding principles to leverage AI for SEO content production Why full SEO automation is harder than it sounds Basic AI tools can assist with SEO tasks, but full automation is far more complex than it sounds. That said, AI platforms and technologies are evolving rapidly. The first wave of this evolution came as organizations began producing AI agent platforms like Make, N8N, and MindStudio. These platforms provide a canvas for automating workflows, combining inputs, outputs, and AI-driven decision-making. Used well, they can turn from-scratch content creation into structured editorial processes, with efficiency gains that can be significant. However, applying this to real-world SEO work is where complexity sets in. A full technical SEO audit pulls from multiple data sources and environments — crawl data, browser-level diagnostics, and desktop tools. While parts can be automated, stitching everything together into a reliable, end-to-end workflow is difficult and often requires custom infrastructure, API work, and ongoing maintenance. Even with platforms like N8N, full end-to-end automation of complex SEO tasks remains challenging. Simpler, checklist-style audits can be automated, but deeper, more technical work often needs to be simplified to fit automation — which isn’t advisable. In practice, fully automating SEO at depth requires tradeoffs — which is why human expertise is still critical. Dig deeper: AI agents in SEO: A practical workflow walkthrough Get the newsletter search marketers rely on. See terms. AI tools are advancing — but not replacing SEOs More recently, there’s been a wave of local AI applications that let you create your own “brain” on a laptop or desktop. These tools are often code editors with support for popular AI models, along with local structures for saving reusable skills, similar to Claude Projects or ChatGPT Custom GPTs. Tools like Cursor and Claude Code allow you to connect models, generate code, and automate parts of workflows through prompts. It’s possible to use these technologies to vibecode a system that automates a technical SEO audit. I attempted this. While the capability exists, building a system that matches the depth and quality of a manual audit could take months, especially when handling large volumes of data. Initial issues included memory limitations, where AI struggled to retain both the data and its detailed instructions. In some cases, outputs were also misweighted — for example, flagging missing H1s as critical despite finding no instances. These issues could be resolved over time, but they highlight that these tools aren’t automatic shortcuts. Making effective use of them still requires technical expertise, time, testing, and troubleshooting. They lower the barrier to building AI-driven systems, but they don’t eliminate the need for technical expertise. They simply shift the work. What would need to change for SEO to become obsolete For SEO to become obsolete, AI would need to operate independently, reliably, and at scale — without human correction. Generative AI can only act with human input, and it struggles to differentiate between fact and fiction. Some algorithms have reached their limits in terms of commercial viability. This is arguably why Google is trying to convince us that links are redundant before they truly are. Consider AI as an evolution of algorithmic output. These systems can attempt to make analytical determinations based on input data. However, the idea that feeding AI more and more data is an unrestricted path to success is already running into significant limitations. This doesn’t mean technical analysts are entirely safe. Humanity’s ambition for faster, more efficient insights will continue. Initially, AI will be seen as the solution to everything. If one AI falls short, another can critique its results. However, AI requires significant processing power. The real challenge will be finding the balance between AI and simpler algorithms. Algorithms should handle basic tasks, while AI should be used for analysis and insights. This balance between AI and algorithmic efficiency is still years — perhaps decades — away. Only then will AI truly test SEO professionals and create the potential for redundancies. AI’s learning is hindered by the web’s misinformation, providing SEO professionals with temporary insulation. This advantage won’t last forever, but it offers a valuable head start. Dig deeper: How AI will affect the future of search AI adoption won’t make SEO obsolete overnight There are also limitations tied to how society adopts AI. Many technological innovations — like the internet and the calculator — were initially considered “cheating.” Calculators were banned from exam rooms, and the internet was seen as a shortcut compared to traditional research. Yet those perceptions didn’t last. Most technologies, despite rapid advancement, aren’t adopted quickly due to cost and social factors. We value human perspective and often resist tools that threaten how we think or work. The main barrier to AI replacing us is how we perceive it. As long as it’s seen as a threat to our ability to provide, it won’t fully replace human roles. That perception, however, will change over time. As these technologies become normalized, adoption will follow. Governments will adapt, and expectations around human creativity will continue to evolve. Algorithms and Google didn’t end human interaction on the web, and AI won’t eliminate contributions from people. In the medium to long term, adaptation is inevitable. See the complete picture of your search visibility. Track, optimize, and win in Google and AI search from one platform. Start Free Trial Get started with SEO and AI: Technical expertise still matters AI integration with SEO: Contrary to fears, AI won’t make SEO obsolete. Instead, it will reshape how SEO is practiced. AI can automate routine tasks like generating product descriptions and alt text, but its effectiveness still depends on precise, technically sound input. Importance of technical expertise: The ability to craft detailed, technically sound prompts is becoming more valuable. This ensures AI tools are used effectively and reinforces the role of experienced SEO professionals. Data sensitivity in AI performance: AI performance varies significantly depending on the data it processes. Systems using curated datasets behave differently from those relying on open web data. This highlights the importance of data strategy and structured oversight. Evolving roles in SEO: As AI advances, SEO roles are shifting. Professionals are more likely to focus on managing AI systems and refining outputs rather than being replaced by them. Societal acceptance and adaptation: Widespread adoption of AI in SEO depends on how quickly society embraces these tools. As normalization and regulation evolve, so will the role of SEO professionals. Future outlook: Despite AI’s capabilities, the creative, strategic, and complex aspects of SEO still require human insight. The future of SEO is a collaboration between human expertise and machine efficiency. Dig deeper: How to start an SEO program from scratch in the AI age View the full article

On the one hand, the fact that Walmart passed $1 trillion in market cap is notable, but not especially surprising. The company has long been the largest company in the world, measured by revenue. Almost everyone is familiar with the small five-and-dime store that started in one of the most rural towns in America and grew up to become the biggest retailer in the world. On paper, this looks like just another milestone in a 64-year-old success story. But a closer look at how Walmart just hit a market cap reserved almost exclusively for tech giants reveals how the company has changed, even in just the past three years. For the past six decades, Walmart was the king of bricks and mortar. No one would think of it as the underdog, but as more and more shopping moved online, the company faced intense pressure, especially from Amazon. And so, over the past few years, Walmart rebuilt itself into something that looks a lot more like a tech company. It even moved its stock to the Nasdaq, listed next to Apple, Nvidia, Meta, and—of course—Amazon. Here are the three most significant things that led to Walmart’s transformation into a $1 trillion giant: The most tangible part is actually something most people won’t ever see—at least, not directly. In late 2024, Walmart used its AI to overhaul 850 million lines of product data. This is pretty boring stuff—granular details like dimensions, descriptions, and specifications, for nearly every item it sells. In the past, that kind of cleanup would have required 100 times the head count and a decade of manual entry. By doing it with code, Walmart built a foundation in which search results actually match customer intent. It’s the difference between guessing what you’re looking for and using technology to give you exactly what you want. The second part of this story is about where the money was actually coming from. Retailers typically live on a 3 percent margin, while tech companies typically expect much more. To get to a $1 trillion market cap, Walmart had to find a way to make more than a few cents on a gallon of milk. They found it in Walmart Connect, the company’s advertising arm. Over the past three years, this has grown into a high-margin business that looks a lot more like something from Amazon, Google, or Meta. In late 2025, ad sales jumped 53 percent. That’s significant, considering that advertising has margins in the 70 to 80 percent range. And, because 90 percent of Americans live within 10 miles of a Walmart, the company has a “closed-loop” data set. They know what you see on your Vizio TV at home and what you actually put in your cart an hour later. That has turned advertising and Walmart+ membership into roughly one-third of Walmart’s operating income. Finally, the most Amazonian move Walmart made was realizing its 4,700 stores weren’t just places people go to shop, but also conveniently located fulfillment centers. By automating warehouse tasks and investing in AI-driven logistics, Walmart can now offer same-day delivery to 95 percent of U.S. households. The company’s e-commerce push finally became a standalone profitable unit in 2025. By keeping its global workforce steady at 2.1 million while revenue soared, Walmart proved it could scale its business without just adding more stores or employees. This shift became real when Walmart moved its stock from the NYSE to the Nasdaq in December. It was Walmart’s way of telling the market: Value us as a technology-focused growth company, not a grocery chain. It took Sam Walton six decades to build the physical network. But it was a three-year sprint into AI and advertising that turned that network into a trillion-dollar asset. The stores are still there, but the business model underneath them has completely changed. —Jason Aten This article originally appeared on Fast Company’s sister website, Inc.com. Inc. is the voice of the American entrepreneur. We inspire, inform, and document the most fascinating people in business: the risk-takers, the innovators, and the ultra-driven go-getters that represent the most dynamic force in the American economy. View the full article

An inflationary energy shock has drained optimism over UK rate cuts and hammered popular hedge fund tradesView the full article

AI bots could outnumber humans on the web by 2027, according to Cloudflare CEO Matthew Prince, as agent-driven browsing explodes alongside generative AI adoption. Prince made the prediction at SXSW, warning that bots are already reshaping how the internet is used — and how it’s monetized. Why we care. Search is shifting from human clicks to AI-generated answers. If bots become the web’s primary “users,” you’ll need to reshape your strategy to ensure AI systems can access, trust, and use your content. The details. Prince said AI agents generate far more web activity than humans because they gather information differently. A person shopping might visit five sites. An AI agent could hit thousands. “If a human were doing a task… you might go to five websites. Your agent… will often go to a thousand times the number of sites.” “So it might go to 5,000 sites. And that’s real traffic, and that’s real load.” He also noted the web’s baseline is shifting fast. “For a long time, the internet was about 20% bot traffic.” “We suspect that in 2027 the amount of bot traffic online will exceed the amount of human traffic.” Prince said this growth isn’t spiking like COVID-era traffic. It’s rising steadily with no end in sight. Between the lines. Prince compared AI to past shifts like mobile and social. The difference: users may no longer visit websites directly. Instead, they rely on AI interfaces that aggregate and answer. “The business model of the internet was… create content, drive traffic, and then sell things… That was the business model.” “That breaks down because… bots don’t click on ads.” “Customers are trusting the output from the helpful robot. They’re not clicking through the footnotes.” AI sandboxes. AI agents also change how computing works behind the scenes. Prince described a future where “sandboxes” — temporary environments for AI agents — spin up and shut down instantly, potentially millions of times per second. “You can… as easily as you open a new tab in your browser… spin up new code which can then run and service the agents.” “We think that there will be literally millions of times a second these sort of sandboxes… being created… and then torn back down.” The result: sustained pressure on internet infrastructure. “We’re seeing internet traffic grow and grow and grow. And we don’t see anything that’s going to slow it down or stop it.” The business impact. Companies are already split on how to respond to AI agents. Prince pointed to diverging strategies across major retailers. “There are three radically different strategies about how they are going to interact with the bots.” At the core is a bigger risk: losing the customer relationship. “The nature of bots is going to be that it disintermediates the relationship between you and your customer.” “Agents… don’t care about brand.” For publishers. Prince argued AI could both hurt and help media. While AI reduces direct traffic and breaks ad-based models, AI companies need unique, original data — especially local and hard-to-replicate information — and may pay for it. “Traffic has always been a really bad proxy for value.” “What they actually want is… unique local interesting information they can’t get elsewhere.” He pointed to local media as an example. “If you don’t have the Park Record, then you don’t get that information.” “We may make more off licensing our content to AI companies than we do off digital advertising.” For small businesses. Prince was more blunt. AI agents optimize for price, quality and efficiency — not brand loyalty or proximity. “My bot doesn’t care.” “My bot is going to figure out actually who is the best… and route that traffic.” That could erode traditional advantages. “The shortcuts of trust that small business had in the past… are going to be much more difficult.” “The natural tendency of AI is towards that level of aggregation.” What to watch. The next phase of the web will hinge on control and compensation. Prince said: “There has to be some exchange of value.” “We’ve got to figure out… what’s going to pay for it.” Prince said the core question is still unresolved: “What is the future business model of the internet?… I don’t know what it’s going to be, but it’s going to change.” The SXSW interview. The Internet After Search View the full article

Nearly 90,000 bottles of children’s ibuprofen have been recalled across the United States, according to an enforcement report this week from the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Strides Pharma Inc. has recalled 89,952 bottles of Children’s Ibuprofen Oral Suspension following customer complaints of a “gel-like mass and black particles” in the medicine. The India-based company had manufactured the ibuprofen for Taro Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc. based in Hawthorne, New York. The recall comes from Strides Pharma’s Bridgewater, New Jersey, subsidiary. Strides Pharma initiated the recall on March 2, with the FDA labeling it a Class II recall on Monday, March 16. A Class II indicates a situation in which use or exposure to the product could cause “temporary or medically reversible adverse health consequences” with a very small possibility of serious adverse health consequences. Wondering if your medicine is impacted? Here’s all the information we have on the ibuprofen recall. What products are affected? The impacted medication is Children’s Ibuprofen Oral Suspension, USP, 100 mg per 5mL, in 4 FL OZ (120 mL) bottles. Two lots are included in the recall: 7261973A: Best by January 31, 2027 7261974A: Best by January 31, 2027 Where and when was the product sold? Right now, all we know is that the children’s ibuprofen bottles were distributed nationwide. The FDA report states that a letter was sent out to the public, but there’s no press release and specific details about how individuals were notified are not included in the report. Media outlets only began reporting on the recall this week—despite that March 2 start date. Fast Company reached out to Strides Pharma and Taro Pharmaceuticals for more information and will update this story if we hear back. What should I do if I have this product? Do not use any recalled ibuprofen if you have it. There’s no information yet about the potential for a refund or other next steps. This story is developing… View the full article

The dangerous heat wave shattering March records all over the U.S. Southwest is more than just another extreme weather blip. It’s the latest next-level weather wildness that is occurring ever more frequently as Earth’s warming builds. Experts said unprecedented and deadly weather extremes that sometimes strike at abnormal times and in unusual places are putting more people in danger. For example, the Southwest is used to coping with deadly heat, but not months ahead of schedule, including a 110-degree Fahrenheit (43.3 Celsius) reading in the Arizona desert on Thursday that smashed the highest March temperature recorded in the U.S. On Thursday, sites in Arizona and southern California had preliminary readings of 109 F (about 43 C), which would be the hottest March day on record for the United States. “This is what climate change looks like in real time: extremes pushing beyond the bounds we once thought possible,” said University of Victoria climate scientist Andrew Weaver. “What used to be unprecedented events are now recurring features of a warming world.” March’s heat would have been virtually impossible without human-caused climate change, according to a report Friday by World Weather Attribution, an international group of scientists who study the causes of extreme weather events. More than a dozen scientists, meteorologists and disaster experts queried by The Associated Press put the March heat wave in a kind of ultra-extreme classification with such events as the 2021 Pacific Northwest heat wave, the 2022 Pakistan floods and killer hurricanes Helene, Harvey and Sandy. The area of the U.S. being hit by extreme weather in the past five years has doubled from 20 years ago, according to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s Climate Extremes Index, which includes various types of wild weather, such as heat and cold waves, downpours and drought. The United States is breaking 77% more hot weather records now than in the 1970s and 19% more than the 2010s, according to an AP analysis of NOAA records. In the United States, the number and average cost of inflation-adjusted billion-dollar weather disasters in the last couple years is twice as high as just 10 years ago and nearly four times higher than 30 years ago, according to records kept by NOAA and Climate Central, a nonprofit group of scientists and communicators who research and report on climate change. Trying to keep up with extremes and failing “It’s really hard to even keep up with how extreme our extremes are becoming,” said Climate Central Chief Meteorologist Bernadette Woods Placky. “It’s changing our risk, it’s change our relationship with weather, it’s putting more people in risky situations and at times we’re not used to. So yes, we are pushing extremes to new levels across all different types of weather.” For government officials who have to deal with disaster it’s been a huge problem. Craig Fugate, who directed the Federal Emergency Management Agency until 2017, said he saw extremes increasing. “We were operating outside the historical playbook more and more. Flood maps, surge models, heat records — events kept showing up outside the envelope we built systems around. That’s just what we saw,” Fugate said via email. He added: “We built communities on about 100 years of past weather and assumed that was a good guide going forward. That assumption is starting to break. And the clearest signal isn’t the science debate. It’s insurers walking away.” ‘Virtually impossible’ without climate change Climate scientists at World Weather Attribution did a flash analysis — which is not peer-reviewed yet — of whether climate change was a factor in this Southwest heat wave. They compared this week’s expected temperatures to what’s been observed in the area in March since 1900 and computer models of a world with climate change. They found that “events as warm as in March 2026 would have been virtually impossible without human-induced climate change.” That warming, from the burning of coal, oil and natural gas, added between 4.7 degrees to 7.2 degrees F (2.6 to 4 degrees C) to the temperatures being felt, the report found. “What we can very confidently say is that human-caused warming has increased the temperatures that we’re seeing as a result of this heat dome, and it’s going to be pushing those temperatures from what would have been very uncomfortable into potentially dangerous,” said report co-author Clair Barnes, an Imperial College of London attribution scientist. Examples abound of high heat and extreme weather The Southwest heat wave is solidly in the category of “giant events,” with temperatures up to 30 degrees Fahrenheit (16.7 degrees Celsius) above normal, said Stanford University climate scientist Chris Field. He listed five others in the last six years: a 2020 Siberia heat wave, the 2021 Pacific Northwest heat wave that had British Columbia warmer than Death Valley, the summer of 2022 in North America, China and Europe, a 2023 western Mediterranean heat wave and a 2023 South Asian heat wave with high humidity. And that doesn’t include the East Antarctica heat wave of 2022 when temperatures were 81 degrees (45 degrees Celsius) warmer than normal. That’s the biggest anomaly recorded, said weather historian Chris Burt, author of the book “Extreme Weather.” Worsening wild weather influenced by climate change isn’t just superhot days, but includes deadly hurricanes, droughts and downpours, scientists told AP. Devastating floods hit West Africa in 2022 and again in 2024. Iran is in the midst of a six-year drought. And the deadly Typhoon Haiyan hitting the Philippines in 2013 shocked the world. Superstorm Sandy, which in 2012 flooded New York City and neighbors, had tropical storm-force winds that covered an area nearly one-fifth the area of the contiguous United States. It spawned 12-foot seas over 1.4 million square miles, about half the size of the U.S., with energy equivalent to five Hiroshima-sized atomic bombs, said Yale Climate Connections meteorologist Jeff Masters. And don’t forget wildfires that are worsened by heat and drought, so recent extremes should include 2025’s Palisades and Eaton wildfires, which were the costliest weather disaster in the United States last year, said Climate Central meteorologist and economist Adam Smith. “This is due to climate change, that we see more extreme events, and more intense ones and have so many records being broken,” said Friederike Otto, an Imperial College of London climate scientist who coordinates World Weather Attribution. The Associated Press’ climate and environmental coverage receives financial support from multiple private foundations. AP is solely responsible for all content. Find AP’s standards for working with philanthropies, a list of supporters and funded coverage areas at AP.org. —Seth Borenstein, AP Science Writer View the full article

Fans of the Bachelor franchise are accustomed to hearing that the upcoming season will be the most “shocking” one ever. But this time, it’s the events leading up to the season that have been hard to believe. In fact, the life of season 22’s Bachelorette became so controversial, the latest season won’t even make it on air. On Thursday, just days before the newest season of The Bachelorette, starring Taylor Frankie Paul, star of The Secret Lives of Mormon Wives, was scheduled to premiere, ABC pulled the plug. The shocking news came shortly after TMZ published a video from 2023 which showed Paul kicking, hitting, and throwing chairs at her ex-boyfriend, Dakota Mortensen. “In light of the newly released video just surfaced today, we have made the decision to not move forward with the new season of The Bachelorette at this time, and our focus is on supporting the family,” a Disney Entertainment Television spokesperson said in a statement. Investigation was already underway While the video of Paul was troubling, it wasn’t the first hint of controversy to surface before the latest season of ABC’s hit reality dating show. It comes after reports that the filming of Mormon Wives was paused amid an ongoing domestic violence investigation into Paul and Mortensen. Days ago, a spokesperson for the Draper police confirmed to People the “domestic assault investigation” involving the two is active and said “allegations have been made in both directions.” A spokesperson for Paul told NBC News in a statement that Paul is “very grateful for ABC’s support as she prioritizes her family’s safety and security.” The statement continued, “After years of silently suffering extensive mental and physical abuse as well as threats of retaliation, Taylor is finally gaining the strength to face her accuser and taking steps to ensure that she and her children are protected from any further harm.” The statement also noted that Paul is preparing to share her story with the world. Paul was previously arrested in 2023 for alleged domestic violence and pleaded guilty to one count of aggravated assault. A franchise with ongoing controversy As for the Bachelor franchise, it’s far from the only controversy in recent years. Last year, after ABC opted out of filming a new season of The Bachelorette season altogether. The decision came as two of the franchise’s executive producers exited amid allegations of a “toxic workplace.” The franchise has been accused of a long history of racist practices, most visibly, a lack of diversity. The network let go of long-time host Chris Harrison in 2021 after a controversial conversation with Rachel Lindsay, the first Black Bachelorette. Zooming out, the abrupt cancellation underscores how fragile even one of TV’s most durable reality franchises has become. Once built on fairy-tale endings and predictable drama, The Bachelor universe is now grappling with a steady drumbeat of off-screen controversies that are increasingly impossible to separate from what airs on screen. View the full article

David Solomon’s comments in annual shareholder letter underscore Wall Street’s wariness around non-bank lendingView the full article

You could be ranking in Position 1 and still be completely invisible. I know that sounds counterintuitive. But here’s what’s actually happening: A potential customer opens ChatGPT or Perplexity and asks, “What’s the best [tool/agency/platform] for [your category]?” Your competitor gets mentioned. You don’t. Your No. 1 ranking did absolutely nothing to help you. This is the new SEO reality, and it’s catching many smart marketers off guard. LLMs synthesize consensus across multiple sources, rather than relying on a single source. This means you need corroborating mentions distributed across the web. The game has shifted from ranking to consensus, and if you don’t understand that difference, you’re already losing ground. Let me break down what’s actually happening and, more importantly, what you can do about it. From rankings to consensus: What changed and why Traditional SEO had a clear logic: rank high, get clicks, drive traffic. In this retrieval-based system, Google found pages and users chose which ones to visit. AI-driven search doesn’t work that way. Systems like Google’s AI Overviews, ChatGPT, and Perplexity are now constructing answers. They pull from dozens of sources, identify which claims appear consistently across credible publishers, and synthesize a single response. The data backs up just how significant this shift is: organic CTRs for queries featuring AI Overviews have dropped 61% since mid-2024. Even on queries without AI Overviews, organic CTRs fell 41%. Users are simply clicking less, everywhere. The technical engine behind this is retrieval-augmented generation (RAG). The AI retrieves content from across the web, gathers potentially dozens of sources, identifies the claims that repeat most consistently across credible publishers, and generates a response based on that consensus. Your goal isn’t just to publish a great page. It’s to be one of those sources. Repeatedly. Your customers search everywhere. Make sure your brand shows up. The SEO toolkit you know, plus the AI visibility data you need. Start Free Trial Get started with What the consensus layer actually is Think of the consensus layer as the degree to which multiple AI systems produce consistent, repeatable outputs about your brand. It’s about pattern recognition at scale. When AI systems encounter your brand described the same way across multiple credible sources, in the same category, with the same expertise, and with the same problems you solve, they build confidence. When they don’t see that pattern? You become a statistical outlier, and outliers get filtered out. This happens because AI systems are engineered to prevent hallucinations. Their primary defense is corroboration: if multiple independent sources say the same thing, the AI assigns higher confidence to that claim. If only one source says it, the AI can become cautious or ignore it entirely. This creates a rule most marketers haven’t fully internalized yet: isolated authority isn’t enough. You need distributed credibility. I’ve seen this firsthand. A client ranking first for a competitive keyword, with solid traffic and strong domain authority, was invisible across ChatGPT. Why? Because that page existed in isolation. No corroboration, no distributed mentions, no external validation. As Will Scott wrote: “Brands aren’t losing visibility because they dropped from position three to seven. They’re losing it because they were never cited in the AI answer at all.” Dig deeper: The infinite tail: When search demand moves beyond keywords The signals that actually build consensus So what signals do AI systems actually use? Here’s where to focus your energy. Traditional authority is table stakes, not a finish line Backlinks, domain authority, and topical depth remain foundational. But they’re no longer sufficient on their own. They get you in the game; consensus is what wins it. Unlinked brand mentions matter more than most marketers realize AI systems scan the web for brand references, even when those mentions aren’t linked. Unlinked mentions are growing in importance as signals for both traditional search and AI visibility. A mention in an industry publication with no link is still a consensus signal. Nearly 9 out of 10 webpages cited by ChatGPT appear outside the top 20 organic results for the same queries, per a Semrush study. This tells you everything you need to know about how different this game is. Publisher diversity signals broader credibility Being mentioned repeatedly on the same domain doesn’t build consensus. Being mentioned across a range of credible, independent publishers does. Diversity tells AI systems your authority isn’t contained to one corner of the web. It’s recognized broadly across your industry. Community platforms are consensus gold Reddit, Quora, and niche forums are becoming major consensus signals. AI systems increasingly pull from community discussions because they represent real user opinions and experiences. With Reddit dominating the SERPs, positive brand mentions in relevant subreddits contribute meaningfully to how AI systems perceive you. You can’t fake your way into genuine community trust, you have to earn it. Entity clarity makes retrieval easier Search engines use knowledge graphs to understand entities and how they relate to each other. If your brand is inconsistently described across platforms or your category is ambiguous, AI systems struggle to incorporate you into their answers. Structured data, schema markup, and JSON-LD are critical here. Google has explicitly stated that “structured data is critical for modern search engines.” The clearer your entity profile, the easier it is for AI to retrieve and cite you. Get the newsletter search marketers rely on. See terms. How to actually build consensus Alright, let’s get tactical. Before you start building, you need to know where you stand. Start with an LLM audit Open ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, and Google AI Overviews, and start asking questions the way your customers would. “What’s the best [tool/service] for [problem you solve]?” “Who are the leading [your category] providers?” “What do people say about [your brand name]?” Pay attention to three things: Is your brand mentioned at all? If it is, is the information accurate and up to date? How are you being described relative to competitors? You may find outdated information, missing context, or, worse, a competitor owning the narrative in your category entirely. This audit becomes your baseline. It tells you what gaps to close, what misinformation to correct, and where your consensus footprint is weakest. Only once you know that, should you start building. Establish your owned media foundation Your site needs to be technically sound and semantically clear. Use structured data. Establish explicit entity definitions, who you are, what you do, and what problems you solve. Reinforce those same entities and relationships across multiple pages within your site. Topic clusters, pillar pages supported by related subtopic content, create semantic reinforcement that signals depth and expertise. Without a strong foundation, nothing else sticks. Treat earned media as consensus amplification Press coverage, guest posts, podcast appearances, and expert citations distribute your authority across the web. More than links, digital PR is now about narrative control. One placement won’t move the needle. A sustained, coordinated presence across trusted publications will. Monitor your brand-to-links ratio, unlinked mentions alongside traditional link building is now the balanced strategy to pursue. Publish original research This is the highest-leverage consensus tactic most brands are underinvesting in. When you create genuinely novel data, an industry benchmark, a proprietary survey, original research, other publishers reference it naturally, journalists cite it, and AI systems incorporate it into answers. Establish yourself as the source for benchmark data in your niche, and you’ll earn citations for years. Invest in expert-led content AI systems are trained on vast amounts of text, including articles, research, and interviews. When your team members are consistently positioned as recognized experts, quoted in articles, cited in reports, and contributing bylined pieces, they become recognized entities that AI systems trust. Optimize author profiles with structured data, consistent bylines, and entity markup to reinforce this. Participate genuinely in communities This doesn’t mean dropping links in Reddit threads. It means answering questions, contributing knowledge, and building a reputation where your audience already hangs out. When users recommend your brand organically because they find it genuinely valuable, that’s your strongest consensus signal. Dig deeper: Why surface-level SEO tactics won’t build lasting AI search visibility Measuring what actually matters now Traditional rankings tell you where you stand in search results. They don’t tell you whether AI systems are citing you. You need new metrics, and as more SEOs are recognizing, success metrics are shifting from clicks and traffic to visibility and share of voice. Start by systematically testing high-value queries across Google AI Overviews, ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Gemini. Note when your brand appears, how it’s described, and which sources get cited alongside you. Track share of voice in AI responses, how often your brand gets mentioned relative to competitors in AI-generated answers. If competitors are consistently appearing and you’re not, you’re losing the consensus battle regardless of how your rankings look. Also monitor cross-domain mention density (how many unique domains reference your brand) and entity co-occurrence (how often your brand appears alongside relevant topics, competitors, and concepts). These give you a real picture of your consensus footprint and where the gaps are. See the complete picture of your search visibility. Track, optimize, and win in Google and AI search from one platform. Start Free Trial Get started with The new SEO playbook The brands winning in AI-driven search aren’t necessarily the ones with the best content or the highest domain authority. They’re the ones building distributed credibility, authority that appears consistently across owned media, earned media, and community platforms. As Google’s Danny Sullivan said, “Good SEO is good GEO.” The fundamentals haven’t disappeared, but they’re now table stakes, not differentiators. The new formula is: authority + consensus + distribution. Integrate SEO, digital PR, and community engagement into one cohesive strategy. Building a distributed network of authority, mentions, citations, and community validation that takes time to construct, and is nearly impossible for competitors to dismantle overnight. That’s the visibility moat worth building, and the clock is ticking. Dig deeper: Content alone isn’t enough: Why SEO now requires distribution View the full article

When you’re starting a business, choosing the right structure is essential. It impacts your personal liability, tax obligations, and how much administrative work you’ll face. Each option, from sole proprietorships to LLCs, offers different levels of protection and flexibility. Comprehending these factors can greatly influence your long-term growth and success. So, what should you consider to guarantee you’re making the best choice for your goals? Key Takeaways Assess personal liability exposure; different structures offer varying levels of protection for personal assets against business debts. Consider tax implications; some structures allow for pass-through taxation, while others face double taxation. Evaluate management flexibility; LLCs provide more operational freedom compared to corporations that have strict regulatory requirements. Examine growth potential; corporations can raise capital through stock issuance, whereas sole proprietorships face limitations with personal assets. Seek professional advice; consulting attorneys and accountants ensures informed decisions regarding liability, tax benefits, and compliance requirements. Understanding Business Structures When you’re starting a business, grasping the various business structures available is crucial, as each option can greatly affect your liability, taxes, and overall control of the operation. Sole proprietorships are the simplest to set up, requiring little paperwork but exposing your personal assets to business liabilities. If you want personal liability protection, consider forming an LLC; it allows profits to pass through to your individual tax return, making it popular among small business owners. Conversely, corporations, including C corporations and S corporations, provide limited liability but come with more complex administrative requirements and tax obligations. Partnerships can vary, with general partners facing personal liability and limited partners having their liability capped at their investment amount. Importance of Choosing the Right Structure Choosing the right business structure is crucial for managing tax implications and liability protection. It directly affects your personal assets, as some structures shield you from business risks whereas others expose you to them. Furthermore, comprehending the different tax treatments can help you maximize benefits and minimize obligations, making your choice even more significant for long-term success. Tax Implications and Benefits Selecting the right business structure is crucial, as it directly affects your tax obligations and potential benefits. Different structures, like sole proprietorships and partnerships, often allow for pass-through taxation, meaning the business income appears on your personal tax return, avoiding double taxation found in C Corporations. These structures can additionally provide a 20% tax deduction on qualified business income, greatly lowering your tax burden. LLCs provide flexibility, letting you choose between pass-through taxation and corporate taxation based on your financial strategies. Conversely, S Corporations likewise allow pass-through taxation but have limits on the number of shareholders and ownership restrictions. Comprehending these tax implications and benefits can help you make informed decisions for your business. Liability Protection Considerations Grasping liability protection is imperative, as the structure you choose for your business can greatly affect your personal financial security. Sole proprietorships and general partnerships offer no liability protection, leaving you exposed to personal financial risk for business debts and legal claims. Conversely, forming an LLC provides critical personal asset protection, ensuring you’re not personally liable for business liabilities. This means that in the event of a lawsuit or business failure, your personal assets remain safe. Furthermore, LLCs allow profits to be taxed as personal income, which creates a favorable tax situation without sacrificing liability protection. Comprehending these implications is fundamental, as inadequate protection can lead to significant personal financial loss. Sole Proprietorship: Pros and Cons When considering a sole proprietorship, you’ll find it’s one of the easiest business structures to set up, requiring just a few simple steps. Nonetheless, as you benefit from pass-through taxation and minimal startup costs, it’s essential to understand the personal liability risks you face, as your assets aren’t protected from business debts. This balance of ease and risk makes it important to weigh your options carefully before committing to this structure. Ease of Setup Establishing a sole proprietorship is often the most straightforward option for entrepreneurs looking to start a business, as it requires minimal steps and formalities. With no formal state-filing requirements, you can enjoy the ease of setup, greatly lowering your startup costs compared to corporations or LLCs. To operate under a different name, you’ll just need to obtain an assumed name certificate (DBA). Moreover, reporting business profits on your individual tax return using Schedule C simplifies tax filing. If you decide to cease operations, dissolving a sole proprietorship is just as easy, requiring no complicated legal processes. Personal Liability Risk Even though the simplicity of a sole proprietorship can be appealing for startup entrepreneurs, it’s important to contemplate the significant personal liability risks associated with this business structure. In a sole proprietorship, you face unlimited personal liability, meaning your personal assets are at risk if your business incurs debts or faces lawsuits. Unfortunately, this lack of liability protection can be detrimental, especially in industries prone to legal issues. If you pass away, your business likewise ceases to exist, complicating any future operations or transfers. Consequently, before committing to a sole proprietorship, assess whether you’re comfortable with these risks and consider if you need more robust liability protection through alternative business structures. Tax Implications Tax implications play a crucial role in determining the viability of a sole proprietorship as a business structure. As a sole proprietor, you report business income on your personal tax return, typically using Schedule C on Form 1040. Meanwhile, there’s no corporate tax, you’re subject to self-employment taxes on profits, which can reach 15.3%. Nevertheless, recent tax reforms allow a 20% deduction on qualified business income, helping to lower your tax liability. It’s important to keep in mind that you can’t retain profits without incurring personal taxes, as all earnings are taxed in the year they’re earned. Factor Sole Proprietorship Corporate Structure Tax Reporting Personal tax return Corporate tax return Corporate Tax None Applicable Self-Employment Tax Yes (up to 15.3%) No Profit Retention Not possible without personal tax Possible General Partnerships: Key Features When you enter into a general partnership, you and your partners share ownership, profits, and responsibilities, forming a collaborative business structure that can be both beneficial and challenging. This type of partnership typically relies on a partnership agreement, which outlines the terms and conditions governing the relationship. One significant consideration is that all partners face unlimited personal liability for the business’s debts and obligations, meaning your personal assets could be at risk if financial issues arise. Even though general partnerships don’t require formal state registration, if you operate under a name different from your surnames, you’ll need to file an assumed name certificate. Moreover, profits are reported on individual tax returns, often allowing for tax deductions. Limited Partnerships Explained Limited partnerships are a unique business structure that combines elements of both general partnerships and corporations, offering distinct advantages for investors. In a limited partnership, you’ll find at least one general partner who manages the business and carries unlimited liability, alongside one or more limited partners whose liability is restricted to their investment amount. To establish this structure, a formal partnership agreement is crucial, outlining partners’ rights, responsibilities, and profit-sharing arrangements. Furthermore, a certificate of formation must be filed with the Secretary of State in your jurisdiction. Limited partnerships are often utilized in real estate and private equity sectors, providing liability protection for limited partners, making them an appealing choice for those wishing to manage investment risks effectively. Limited Liability Companies (LLCs) Overview As you explore business structures, you’ll find that Limited Liability Companies (LLCs) stand out owing to their blend of personal asset protection and operational flexibility. LLCs protect your personal assets, ensuring you’re not liable for business debts. They additionally allow for pass-through taxation, meaning profits go directly on your tax returns, avoiding double taxation. To form an LLC, you’ll file a certificate of formation with your state, which includes moderate setup costs. Here’s a quick comparison of LLCs as a business structure example: Feature LLCs Personal Liability Protection Yes Tax Treatment Options Yes (pass-through default) Management Flexibility High Member Restrictions None Understanding how to incorporate a small business as an LLC can lead to a more secure and flexible operation. C Corporations: Structure and Taxation C Corporations offer significant advantages, particularly in liability protection for shareholders, which keeps personal assets safe from business debts. Nevertheless, they likewise face the challenge of double taxation, where profits are taxed at both the corporate and personal levels. With no limit on the number of shareholders, C Corporations can attract substantial investment, but they must similarly adhere to strict regulatory requirements. Double Taxation Impact Comprehending the double taxation impact is crucial when considering a C Corporation structure for your business. C Corporations face double taxation, meaning corporate profits are taxed at a rate of 21% at the corporate level and again when dividends are distributed to shareholders. This can greatly affect your overall profitability, as you’ll be paying taxes on both the corporation’s earnings and the dividends you receive. Although C Corporations can attract a diverse range of investors by issuing multiple classes of stock, the double taxation issue remains a critical consideration. To minimize these tax implications, you might choose to reinvest profits back into the business instead of distributing them as dividends, deferring tax liabilities for yourself and other shareholders. Shareholder Limitations Even though many business owners may consider various structures, comprehending the shareholder limitations of C Corporations can greatly influence your decision. One major advantage is that C Corporations can have an unlimited number of shareholders, allowing you to attract equity investments from a diverse range of individuals and entities, including foreign investors. Unlike S Corporations, which are restricted to 100 shareholders, C Corporations provide more flexibility. Furthermore, you can issue multiple classes of stock, offering different rights and privileges to various investors. Although C Corporations do have double taxation, shareholders benefit from limited liability protection, meaning their personal assets are typically safe from the corporation’s debts or liabilities, making this structure appealing for many business ventures. Liability Protection Benefits When you choose a C Corporation as your business structure, one of the most significant benefits you’ll encounter is the limited liability protection it offers. This means you’re not personally responsible for the corporation’s debts, which safeguards your personal assets. Comprehending how a corporation works and what is considered a corporation can clarify these advantages. Aspect Details Liability Protection Benefits Protects personal assets from debts Shareholder Flexibility Unlimited number of shareholders Taxation Subject to double taxation Investment Options Multiple classes of stock available With this structure, personal assets remain secure, even in lawsuits against the business, making C Corporations a solid choice for liability protection benefits. S Corporations: Benefits and Limitations Comprehending the benefits and limitations of S Corporations is crucial for business owners looking to optimize their tax strategies and protect their assets. S Corporations offer pass-through taxation, allowing profits to be reported on shareholders’ personal tax returns, which helps avoid double taxation. To qualify, your business must have no more than 100 shareholders, all U.S. citizens or residents, and issue only one class of stock. Furthermore, you can benefit from substantial tax savings, as S Corporations can deduct up to 20% of qualified business income under the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. On the other hand, you must comply with strict IRS regulations, including timely filing of Form 2553 and adhering to specific operational guidelines. Liability Protections: What You Need to Know Liability protection is a vital consideration for anyone starting or operating a business, as it helps shield personal assets from business-related risks. Choosing the right business structure is important since corporations and Limited Liability Companies (LLCs) typically offer personal asset protection, meaning you’re usually not personally liable for business debts or legal actions. Conversely, sole proprietorships and general partnerships expose you to personal liability, putting your assets at risk. Limited partners in a limited partnership enjoy liability protection limited to their investment, which can likewise safeguard personal assets. In high-risk industries where lawsuits are more likely, having adequate liability protection is imperative for your financial security, so assess your personal risk tolerance when selecting a business structure. Desired Tax Treatment: Flow-Through vs. C Corporations When choosing a business structure, comprehension of the tax implications of flow-through entities versus C corporations is vital. Flow-through entities, like sole proprietorships and S corporations, allow you to report business income directly on your personal tax return, which can improve tax efficiency. Conversely, C corporations face double taxation, impacting their overall attractiveness to investors and necessitating careful consideration based on your business goals. Flow-Through Entities Explained Flow-through entities, such as sole proprietorships, partnerships, and S corporations, offer a distinct tax advantage by allowing business income, deductions, and credits to flow directly onto the owners’ personal tax returns. This structure helps you avoid double taxation, a common issue with C corporations. You may qualify for a 20% deduction on qualified business income under recent tax reforms. The tax implications of selling your business interest vary considerably between flow-through entities and C corporations. Collaborating with tax professionals can improve your tax planning strategies and maximize benefits. Choosing the right business structure is vital for optimizing your tax situation and determining how profits are taxed, making flow-through entities an attractive option for many entrepreneurs. C Corporations Tax Implications C Corporations represent a unique business structure that comes with specific tax implications, particularly when compared to flow-through entities. One significant aspect is double taxation; C Corporations face taxes at the corporate level, currently at 21%, and shareholders pay taxes on dividends. This can result in a higher overall tax burden compared to simpler flow-through models. Nevertheless, C Corporations can retain earnings for reinvestment without immediate tax consequences for shareholders. Key Factors C Corporations Tax Treatment Double Taxation Business Liabilities Protects Personal Assets Stock Classes Multiple Classes Available Regulatory Requirements Strict Record-Keeping Administrative Complexity Higher than Flow-Through This structure likewise provides a clear separation of business liabilities, safeguarding personal assets from business debts. Choosing Based on Goals Choosing the right business structure hinges on your specific financial goals and the tax treatment you prefer. You need to weigh the benefits of flow-through entities like LLCs and S corporations against C corporations, which are subject to double taxation. Here are some key points to evaluate: Flow-through entities let income and losses pass directly to your personal tax return, possibly allowing a 20% tax deduction. C corporations face a 21% tax at the corporate level, plus additional taxes on dividends. S corporations avoid double taxation but have restrictions like a 100-shareholder limit. Consulting with tax professionals is crucial to navigate these intricacies and guarantee your chosen structure aligns with your long-term goals. Administrative Requirements for Each Structure When you’re deciding on a business structure, grasping the administrative requirements for each option is crucial. Sole proprietorships have minimal requirements, usually needing just an assumed name certificate if you’re using a different name. General partnerships require a partnership agreement and possibly a DBA certificate. If you choose an LLC biz, you’ll need to file a certificate of formation and comply with ongoing requirements, like annual reports. A corporation business organization, whether C or S, involves more complexity, including detailed record-keeping and annual meetings. Limited partnerships and Limited Liability Partnerships (LLPs) likewise necessitate filing a certificate of formation and having a formal partnership agreement, along with maintaining compliance. Each structure has its unique administrative duties, so choose wisely. Ownership and Capital Requirements How do ownership and capital requirements affect your business decisions? The ownership structure you choose influences your ability to raise funds and attract investors. Here are some key points to reflect on: Corporations can issue shares, making it easier to secure external capital. Sole proprietorships often depend on personal assets, limiting growth potential. Limited partnerships allow capital influx from partners without management duties. Your business entity’s capital requirements will likewise dictate how much funding you’ll need. For instance, S Corporations have a cap of 100 shareholders, which can hinder capital-raising compared to C Corporations. In the end, comprehending these factors helps you align your ownership structure with your financial goals, ensuring your business can thrive in a competitive market. Long-Term Considerations for Business Growth Selecting the right business structure is essential for long-term growth and expansion, as it impacts your ability to adapt as your company evolves. If you aim for significant growth, consider forming a corporation; it allows you to issue stock and attract investors without limiting shareholder numbers. Conversely, LLCs offer flexibility in management while protecting your personal assets, making them appealing for businesses that want to grow without increasing risk exposure. Sole proprietorships and partnerships can hinder growth because of personal liability and the need for unanimous consent on major decisions. Evaluating the long-term viability of your chosen business structure is imperative, as shifting to a different entity later can lead to complex legal and financial challenges. Seeking Professional Advice for Entity Selection Why should you consult professionals when choosing a business structure? Seeking professional advice is crucial for making informed decisions that align with your goals. Experienced attorneys and accountants can provide insights customized to your unique circumstances, ensuring you select the best option for your needs. They assess tax implications, helping you maximize benefits and minimize liabilities. Legal experts clarify liability protections, safeguarding your personal assets from business risks. Accountants evaluate administrative requirements and ongoing compliance obligations, preventing potential pitfalls. Frequently Asked Questions What Factors Should You Consider When Choosing a Business Structure? When choosing a business structure, you should consider personal liability protection, as some structures expose your assets to risk. Evaluate tax implications too; some options like LLCs offer pass-through taxation, whereas others face double taxation. Think about growth potential; corporations attract investors more easily. You’ll likewise want to assess administrative complexity; sole proprietorships require less paperwork than corporations. Finally, determine your desired level of control, as it varies across different structures. What Are the Key Factors to Consider While Selecting a Structure? When selecting a business structure, you need to contemplate several key factors. First, think about the level of liability protection each structure offers, as some expose your personal assets. Next, evaluate the tax implications, as different structures have varying taxation methods. Moreover, assess the administrative complexity, including setup and ongoing requirements. Finally, consider your operational control and long-term growth plans, as these will influence your ability to attract investment and expand. What Are the 4 Types of Business Structures? There are four primary types of business structures you can choose from: sole proprietorships, partnerships, limited liability companies (LLCs), and corporations. A sole proprietorship is the simplest, owned by one person. Partnerships involve two or more people sharing profits and responsibilities. LLCs provide personal liability protection during allowing profits to pass through to your personal tax returns. Corporations, either S or C, offer limited liability but differ in taxation and shareholder regulations. What Are the Important Factors in Choosing an Organizational Type? When you’re selecting an organizational type, consider liability protection, tax implications, ease of establishment, administrative requirements, and capital raising potential. Liability protection safeguards your personal assets, whereas tax implications affect your overall financial burden. Some structures are easier to establish than others, with sole proprietorships being the simplest. Furthermore, consider ongoing compliance requirements and how easily you can attract investors, as this impacts your business’s growth and sustainability. Conclusion In summary, selecting the right business structure is essential for your venture’s success. Each option, from sole proprietorships to limited partnerships, offers distinct advantages and challenges regarding liability, taxation, and management. By carefully evaluating these factors, along with your long-term goals, you can make an informed decision that supports your business aspirations. Don’t hesitate to consult with legal and financial professionals, as their expertise can guide you in choosing the most suitable structure for your needs. Image via Google Gemini and ArtSmart This article, "Key Factors in Choosing a Business Structure" was first published on Small Business Trends View the full article

Adobe will shut down the SEO feature in Marketo Engage at the end of March 2026, according to its February 2026 release notes. The tool will be deprecated on March 31, and you must export any existing SEO data before then. (This page includes links to the export instructions.) The SEO tile will be removed from the platform on April 1. What happened? Adobe’s Keith Gluck said deprecating low-use features lets the Marketo Engage team focus on other areas of the platform. For your SEO needs, Adobe announced in 2025 that it was acquiring Semrush, a full-featured SEO and visibility tool. (Reminder: Semrush owns Third Door Media, the publisher of Search Engine Land.) The deprecation came as no surprise if you follow Marketo news closely. Reports suggest few people fully configured the SEO tool, and its features didn’t seem to be a priority for the Marketo Engage product team in recent years. With LLMs rapidly changing the search landscape, it was time to say goodbye. The arrival of Semrush into the Adobe family provided the perfect opportunity. View the full article

Some senior Labour figures want the party to drop promises not to rejoin customs union or single marketView the full article

Three teenagers in Tennessee sued Elon Musk’s xAI this week, claiming the company’s image-generation tools were used to morph real photos of them into explicitly sexual images. The high school students, who are seeking to proceed under pseudonyms, filed the lawsuit in California, where xAI — Musk’s artificial intelligence company — has its headquarters. They are seeking class-action status in order to represent what the lawsuit says are thousands of victims like themselves who either are minors or were minors when sexually explicit images of them were created. According to the lawsuit, Jane Doe 1 was alerted anonymously in December that someone was distributing sexually explicit images of her on a social media website. “At least five of these files, one video and four images, depicted her actual face and body in settings with which she was familiar, but morphed into sexually explicit poses,” the lawsuit states. It claims the person distributing the images knew Doe and used xAI’s image generation tools to turn real photos of her into sexually abusive ones. One of the images was taken from a homecoming photo. Another was taken from a high school yearbook. The person distributing the images also created explicit images of at least 18 other girls, two of whom are co-plaintiffs in the lawsuit. In late December, local police arrested the perpetrator and confiscated his phone. They found that he had uploaded the images to several platforms where he traded them for sexually explicit images of other minors. Other AI companies have prohibited their image-generators from producing any sexually explicit content, even of adults. Musk saw this as a business opportunity and promoted the ability of xAI’s Grok chatbot to create “spicy” content, the lawsuit claims. However, there is currently no way to prevent the generation of explicit images of adults while completely blocking the generation of images of children, the lawsuit claims. It also claims that xAI knew Grok would be able to produce sexually explicit images of children but released it anyway. The lawsuit claims the person who distributed images of the plaintiffs used an application that licensed the xAI technology or “otherwise purchased its access to Grok, and was used as a cut-out or middleman.” XAI did not respond to an email from The Associated Press seeking comment. But a Jan. 14 post about the controversy on the social media platform X said: “We remain committed to making X a safe platform for everyone and continue to have zero tolerance for any forms of child sexual exploitation, non-consensual nudity, and unwanted sexual content. “We take action to remove high-priority violative content, including Child Sexual Abuse Material (CSAM) and non-consensual nudity, taking appropriate action against accounts that violate our X Rules. We also report accounts seeking Child Sexual Exploitation materials to law enforcement authorities as necessary.” Meanwhile, the students in the lawsuit said they worry that the images created of them will live forever on the internet. They fear stalking because their real first names and the name of their school are attached to the files. They worry that their friends and classmates have seen the photos and videos, which appear to be real, and they worry about who will see them in the future. Jane Doe 1 said she has suffered from anxiety, depression, stress. “She has difficulty eating and sleeping and suffers from recurring nightmares,” the lawsuit states. Jane Doe 2 “has begun self-isolating and avoiding being on her school campus, and even dreads attending her own graduation.” Jane Doe 3 suffers from constant fear and anxiety that someone will see the AI-generated images and recognize her face, according to the lawsuit. —Travis Loller, Associated Press View the full article

We may earn a commission from links on this page. Deal pricing and availability subject to change after time of publication. The Beats Powerbeats Pro 2 launched in February 2025 at $249.99, putting them in direct competition with the AirPods Pro 2. They’re currently down to $99.99 on Woot—a $150 drop, or about 60% off—and the lowest price recorded so far, according to price trackers. The deal is expected to last three days or until the stock runs out. Shipping is free for Prime members (or $6 otherwise), but Woot does not deliver to Alaska, Hawaii, or P.O. box addresses. Beats Powerbeats Pro 2 $99.99 $249.99 Save $150.00 Get Deal Get Deal $99.99 $249.99 Save $150.00 These are built for workouts first, and you can feel that in the design. The nickel-titanium alloy ear hooks curve around your ears and stay put, whether you’re running, lifting, or just moving around a lot, without that rigid, over-tight feeling some sports earbuds have. Plus, you get four ear tip sizes, which help create a proper seal for active noise cancellation and better sound. There’s also a transparency mode, which is useful if you run outdoors and need to hear traffic. As for the controls, the Powerbeats 2 Pro have physical buttons on each earbud, which makes them easier to use mid-workout when your hands are sweaty. They’re rated IPX4, so sweat or a bit of rain isn’t going to be an issue. Getting them up and running is straightforward, and if you want a step-by-step walkthrough, Lifehacker has a detailed guide that covers how to set up and fine-tune every feature on the Powerbeats Pro 2. Sound-wise, they lean toward a punchier, bass-forward profile, which works well if your playlists are heavy on hip-hop or electronic music, but might feel a little too thumpy if you prefer something flatter. And since there’s no equalizer, you’re stuck with the default tuning. The heart rate tracking sounds like a nice bonus, but it doesn’t always stay consistent, especially if your phone is juggling music and workout apps at the same time, according to our senior health editor, Beth Skwarecki. On the plus side, you get around eight to 10 hours on a single charge, and the case stretches that to roughly 45 hours, so you’re not constantly thinking about battery life. Our Best Editor-Vetted Tech Deals Right Now Apple AirPods 4 Active Noise Cancelling Wireless Earbuds — $148.99 (List Price $179.00) Apple iPad 11" 128GB A16 WiFi Tablet (Blue, 2025) — $299.00 (List Price $349.00) Sony WH1000XM6- Best Wireless Noise Canceling Headphones — $398.00 (List Price $459.99) Apple Watch Series 11 (GPS, 42mm, S/M Black Sport Band) — $299.00 (List Price $399.00) Blink Video Doorbell Wireless (Newest Model) + Sync Module Core — $35.99 (List Price $69.99) Ring Indoor Cam Plus 2K Wired Security Camera (White) — $39.99 (List Price $59.99) Fire TV Stick 4K Max Streaming Player With Remote — $34.99 (List Price $59.99) Deals are selected by our commerce team View the full article

If your law firm’s referrals aren’t converting, validation may be the problem. Referred prospects don’t go straight from recommendation to contact. They research, compare, and verify what they were told — on your website, in search results, and through AI tools. These are your highest-value leads — pre-sold through trusted recommendations and expected to be your easiest conversions. But when that validation falls short, even they lose momentum. This is the referral validation gap: the moments during online research when trust is broken rather than built. Here’s where referral validation fails and how to fix it. While this article focuses on law firms, the same dynamics apply to any referral-based business. The four types of referral validation failure Referral loss follows predictable patterns — and once you can spot them, you can fix them. Credibility gaps: When your digital presence doesn’t match the expectations set by the referral. Specificity gaps: When your content doesn’t reflect the specific problem the prospect was referred for. Authority gaps: When third-party or AI validation fails to confirm your expertise. Friction gaps: When prospects are ready to act but encounter unnecessary barriers to conversion. 1. Credibility gaps In under three seconds, a website visitor forms a first impression. If your site doesn’t immediately validate what the referrer said about you — if it looks outdated, generic, or fails to showcase the specific expertise they praised — that trust becomes conditional. A referred prospect arrives expecting professionalism, confidence, and authority, only to encounter uncertainty. Thin attorney bios, generic claims (“experienced,” “trusted,” “results-driven”) without proof, or outdated design can all create hesitation. The referral earned you consideration. Your digital presence determines what happens next. The prospect’s reaction is simple: This doesn’t look like what I was expecting. That moment of doubt is often enough to end the process. What you can do about it Implement practice area-specific landing pages with targeted H1s, schema markup for your specialties, and prominent visual trust signals (credentials, case results, awards) above the fold. Ensure mobile page speed stays under two seconds with Core Web Vitals optimization. Your customers search everywhere. Make sure your brand shows up. The SEO toolkit you know, plus the AI visibility data you need. Start Free Trial Get started with 2. Specificity gaps Referrals are almost always problem-specific. The website they’re referred to rarely is. Imagine a prospect referred for a complex custody dispute lands on a homepage about “family law.” A business owner referred for a ground lease negotiation sees “commercial real estate services.” Nothing is technically wrong. But nothing confirms the recommendation. When a site fails to mirror the exact issue that prompted the referral, the prospect starts to question it: Does this firm actually specialize in my problem, or was the referral overstated? At the same time, prospects are actively looking for proof — case results, credentials, relevant experience. If that evidence is buried, disconnected, or requires more than two clicks to find, momentum drops quickly. What you can do about it Create practice area-specific case study pages with structured data markup. Implement FAQ schema tied to common referral scenarios. Ensure content directly reflects the search intent behind the referral, and use internal linking to guide visitors from homepage → specific expertise → proof points within two clicks. 3. Authority gaps Referral prospects are asking questions like: “Is this firm actually good at complex custody cases?” or “Do they have experience with ground lease negotiations in New York?” — increasingly through AI search tools. If AI tools can’t find credible, structured information on your site to validate the referral, they won’t confirm it. And if competitors provide clearer answers, those are the sources AI will surface. This creates an immediate form of negative validation. The prospect starts to question the recommendation: If they’re so good, why aren’t they showing up here? If a competitor has invested in content that’s structured for citation, the AI will quote them, reference their work, and position them as the authority, even though the prospect came to you through a trusted referral. You can’t claim authority. AI systems will either confirm or contradict it. What to do about it Forward-thinking firms are now monitoring a new metric: AI search share of voice — the percentage of relevant AI-generated answers that mention or cite your firm compared to competitors. Start by: Identifying the 10-15 questions prospects most commonly ask about your practice areas. Running those queries regularly through ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Google AI Overviews. Documenting which firms appear, how often, and in what context. Tracking whether you’re cited as a source, mentioned, or absent entirely. If your firm’s content, credentials, and case results aren’t structured for AI parsing and citation, you’re invisible in these crucial validation moments regardless of how strong the initial referral was. Once you’ve identified where your competitors are outperforming you, create in-depth topic clusters around your specialties, and build authoritative content that answers the questions prospects ask AI tools. 4. Friction gaps Friction gaps occur after trust has already been established, but conversion still hasn’t happened. Common examples include: No obvious next step above the fold. Forms that are difficult to complete on mobile. No immediate way to call, text, or book. At this stage, prospects are ready to act. But any delay introduces doubt and gives them time to reconsider or move on. You’ve earned the referral. Your site validated your expertise. The prospect is ready to hire you — but can’t quickly figure out how to take the next step. This is the final failure point in the referral validation gap: when a motivated, pre-sold prospect abandons because the conversion path is unclear, inconvenient, or unnecessarily complicated. You need to remove every obstacle between “I want to hire this firm” and “I’ve made contact.” What to do about it A referred prospect should be able to answer these questions within three seconds of landing on any page: How do I contact this firm right now? What happens when I do? Is this going to be easy or painful? Test it yourself: open your site on your phone and start a timer. Can you initiate contact within a few seconds without scrolling? Try it from a homepage, attorney bio, and practice area page. If the answer is no, you’re losing prospects at the finish line. Get the newsletter search marketers rely on. See terms. Your roadmap to close the referral validation gap Closing the referral validation gap doesn’t require a complete digital overhaul on day one. Strategic, phased implementation will allow you to see quick wins while building toward comprehensive optimization. Let’s look at the steps you can take. Quick wins: Remove immediate friction These are some changes that require minimal investment but can immediately reduce referral abandonment: Adding a prominent click-to-call button in mobile header (and ensuring that it’s visible without scrolling). Testing form completion on mobile devices and reducing any fields to essential only. Ensuring page load speed under two seconds on mobile (test via PageSpeed Insights). Verifying that “Contact Us” is visible on every page without scrolling. Adding a secondary CTA option (for example, many prospects prefer “Schedule Consultation” over “Contact”). Testing that your firm’s phone number is clickable on mobile across entire site. Medium-term: Build validation infrastructure These initiatives can require more investment but, over time, can generate a sustainable competitive advantage: Creating dedicated landing pages for each significant practice area. Structuring each page with: a specific H1 tag, a detailed service description, any relevant credentials, relevant case results, an FAQ section, and a clear CTA. Implementing schema markup (e.g., LegalService, Attorney, and FAQPage) on each landing page. Building out an internal linking strategy that guides visitors from homepage → specific expertise → proof points in two clicks maximum. Developing 3-5 detailed case studies per practice area (these can be anonymized where required). Writing blog posts that address the specific questions prospects ask during the research phase. Ensuring all content includes author attribution with credentials to build E-E-A-T signals. Long-term: Dominate AI search validation These strategic initiatives can position your firm for sustained advantage in an AI-driven search environment: Creating entity-based content that AI models can parse and cite (e.g., detailed attorney bios, practice area guides, or legal topic explanations). Developing topic clusters: pillar pages for major practice areas with supporting cluster content that addresses related queries. Optimizing content for the natural language queries that prospects ask AI tools. Building citation-worthy resources such as comprehensive guides, state-specific legal explanations, and process walkthroughs. Identifying 15-20 high-value queries prospects use to validate referrals. Monitoring how your firm appears in ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Google AI Overview responses monthly. Tracking competitor mentions and citation patterns. Adjusting content strategy based on AI search visibility gaps. But, most importantly, don’t let this roadmap overwhelm you. The firms that successfully close the referral validation gap don’t do it by accomplishing everything all at once. Instead, they start with a single, crucial decision: acknowledging that the gap exists. And then they take the first step to fix it. Once you accept that your best leads are researching you — on your website and through AI tools — and making judgments based on what they find (or don’t find), your path forward for fixing that gap will become clear. See the complete picture of your search visibility. Track, optimize, and win in Google and AI search from one platform. Start Free Trial Get started with 2026 is your firm’s inflection point Prospects are getting their answers without ever visiting your website. The gap between digital presence and digital authority is widening — and for firms that wait, it becomes unbridgeable. Closing the referral validation gap isn’t just about improving conversion rates. It means: Capitalizing on your highest-value leads. Reducing customer acquisition costs. Building a compounding advantage. Creating momentum in an AI-driven search environment. Firms that master this will pull ahead. Those that don’t will watch their best leads slip away — one validation failure at a time. A referral gets you consideration. Your digital presence determines what happens next. Closing the referral validation gap turns trust into conversion. View the full article

Investigation follows failure of Mayfair-based lender and linked companies owned by founder Paresh RajaView the full article

Iran defiantly insisted Friday that it would deny its enemies their security and that it was still building missiles nearly three weeks into U.S.-Israeli strikes that have killed a slew of Tehran’s top leaders and hammered its weapons and energy industries. Iran fired on Israel and energy sites in neighboring Gulf Arab states as many in the region marked one of the holiest days on the Muslim calendar. With little information coming out of Iran, it was not clear how much damage its arms, nuclear or energy facilities have sustained since the war began Feb. 28 or even who was truly in charge of the country. But Iran has showed it is still capable of attacks that are choking off oil supplies and scrambling the global economy, raising food and fuel prices far beyond the Middle East. The U.S. and Israel have given a wide range of objectives in the conflict, from hoping to foment an uprising that topples Iran’s leadership to eliminating its nuclear and missile programs. There have been no public signs of any such uprising and it’s not clear what capabilities Iran retains, and so it remains unclear how or when the war will end. Iran remains defiant despite weeks of attacks U.S. and Israeli leaders have said that weeks of strikes have decimated Iran’s military. Airstrikes have also killed its supreme leader, the secretary of Iran’s Supreme National Security Council and a raft of other top-ranking military and political leaders. On Thursday, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu claimed Iran’s navy was sunk and its air force in tatters, while adding that its ability to produce ballistic missiles had been taken out. But the country’s paramilitary Revolutionary Guard insisted in comments released Friday that they were still in production. “We are producing missiles even during war conditions, which is amazing, and there is no particular problem in stockpiling,” spokesman Gen. Ali Mohammad Naeini was quoted as saying in Iran’s state-run IRAN newspaper. Naeini added that Iran had no intention of seeking a quick end to the war. “These people expect the war to continue until the enemy is completely exhausted,” he said. Underscoring the tremendous pressure Iran’s leadership is under, a short time after the statement was released, Iranian state television said Naeini was killed in an airstrike. The country’s new Supreme Leader Ayatollah Mojtaba Khamenei also released a rare statement, saying Iran’s enemies need to have their “security” taken away. Khamenei hasn’t been seen since he succeeded his father, the 86-year-old Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, who was killed in an Israeli airstrike on the first day of the war. A refinery comes under attack in Kuwait and explosions shake Dubai Iran has stepped up its attacks on energy sites in Gulf Arab states after Israel bombed Iran’s massive South Pars offshore natural gas field earlier in the week. Two waves of Iranian drones attacked a Kuwaiti oil refinery early Friday, sparking a fire. The Mina Al-Ahmadi refinery, which can process some 730,000 barrels of oil per day, is one of the largest in the Middle East. It was damaged Thursday in another Iranian attack. Bahrain’s Interior Ministry said a fire broke out after shrapnel from an intercepted projectile landed on a warehouse, and Saudi Arabia reported shooting down multiple drones targeting its oil-rich Eastern Province. Heavy explosions shook Dubai as air defenses intercepted incoming fire over the city, where people were observing Eid al-Fitr, the end of the holy Muslim fasting month of Ramadan. In Iran, meanwhile, many were marking Nowruz, the Persian new year — even as Israel said it had launched new strikes, and explosions were heard over Tehran. Loud explosions could also be heard in Jerusalem after the Israeli army warned of incoming Iranian missiles. In addition to steadily striking Iran, Israel has regularly hit Lebanon, targeting Iran-backed Hezbollah militants. On Friday, it broadened its attacks to Syria, saying it hit infrastructure there in response to what it described as attacks on the minority Druze population in southern Sweida province. Syria’s state-run SANA news agency did not immediately acknowledge the attack. More than 1,300 people have been killed in Iran during the war. Israeli strikes in Lebanon have displaced more than 1 million people, according to the Lebanese government, which says more than 1,000 people have been killed. Israel says it has killed more than 500 Hezbollah militants. In Israel, 15 people have been killed by Iranian missile fire. Four people were also killed in the occupied West Bank by an Iranian missile strike. At least 13 U.S. military members have been killed. The war is raising risks to the world economy Iran’s attacks on energy infrastructure in the Gulf combined with its stranglehold on shipping in the Strait of Hormuz, a strategic waterway through which a fifth of the world’s oil and other critical goods are transported, has raised concerns of a global energy crisis. Brent crude oil, the international standard, has soared during the fighting, and was around $107 in morning trading on Friday, up more than 47% since the start of the war. Surging fuel prices come at a moment when many world leaders were already struggling to bring down high prices on food and many consumer goods. Asia is getting hit the hardest as most of the oil and gas exiting the Strait of Hormuz is transported there. But the price shocks are reverberating throughout the world economy. Key raw materials — like helium used in making computer chips and sulfur, a raw material in fertilizer — have been obstructed and could be in short supply soon, raising the prices of goods all the way down the supply chain. Rising reported from Bangkok. Associated Press writers Giovanna Dell’Orto in Miami and Sam Mednick in Jerusalem contributed to this report. —Jon Gambrell and David Rising, Associated Press View the full article

Agency’s head Fatih Birol says recovery of oil and gasfields in Gulf region could take more than six monthsView the full article