All Activity

Former Stockton originators are suing their ex-bosses for violating their privacy, in searching their personal accounts to show they were diverting borrowers. View the full article

For the past several months, the food scientists at PepsiCo have been working overtime to dream up new products that meet young consumers’ health and wellness demands. First, there was a new Starbucks coffee protein drink. Then, there were dustless Cheetos. And now, the company’s latest innovation is Doritos Protein. Doritos Protein launched in select retailers this month and come in two different flavors: classic Nacho Cheese and Sweet & Tangy BBQ. One 28 gram serving of these chips contains 10 grams of protein and 150 calories, compared to the meager two grams of protein in a 28 gram, 150 calorie serving of standard Doritos Nacho Cheese. And, unlike regular Doritos, Doritos Protein contain no artificial colors or flavors, relying instead on naturally derived ingredients. Based on taste alone, though, you might not even be able to tell the difference between a standard Dorito and a protein Dorito. Jason Niermann, R&D senior director at PepsiCo Foods North American Snacking, says that was the goal. “We tried dozens of protein snacks that were available in our market, and we did see a lot of trade-offs in products,” Niermann says. “They can be dry, they can be chalky, they can have off flavors. We knew that our consumers have a very high expectation on flavor and crunch. And, as a team, we really wanted to raise the bar on quality and hold ourselves to very high standards that we could be proud of.” How PepsiCo is rethinking its iconic snacks For PepsiCo, Doritos Protein fit into a growing portfolio of snacks and beverages designed to cater to an audience of wellness-obsessed consumers. These innovations range from the new Pepsi Prebiotic Cola to SmartFood Fiber Pop, Quaker Protein oats, Sun Chips Fiber whole grain, and the aforementioned dye-free Cheetos. According to data collected by PepsiCo, 86% of Americans are actively looking to add more protein to their diets, while 70% want their salty snacks to contain protein—marking out a major opportunity for the company to protein-ify its iconic chips. PepsiCo is also actively working to reduce its usage of artificial colors and flavors, in tandem with new initiatives from the The President administration to phase out certain synthetic dyes. Right now, the company is testing natural alternatives to color its core products like Gatorade and Cheetos—a process that it expects to take several years. In the meantime, starting this year, all of the company’s new innovations in the U.S. will be made without artificial colors or flavors. Niermann says designing Doritos Protein under these parameters presented a major challenge: recreating the look and taste of an original Dorito as closely as possible, while making several major tweaks to the recipe. How Doritos got the protein treatment Anyone who’s explored the existing protein bars, shakes, and snacks on the market knows that they have a laundry list of pitfalls. A chalky texture, artificial flavor, and bitter aftertaste are just a few of the issues that can arise when manufacturers try to pack a few extra grams into a protein-centric product. Balancing added protein with flavor is a challenge at the best of times—but working with a beloved snack like Doritos meant that Niermann’s team was under even more pressure to get the flavor spot-on. The key to a successful protein Dorito, Niermann says, was finding the right kind of protein. His team tried plant-based proteins from ingredients like soybeans and chickpeas, as well as various different animal-based proteins. Ultimately, they landed on casein—the main protein present in milk and cheese—as the best-tasting option of the bunch. “Some of the plant proteins can come with off flavors or notes that are just inherent in those raw materials,” Niermann says. “When you compare that with milk-based protein, we felt like it was a great compliment to delivering the bold texture of our product as well as flavor profiles like nacho cheese, which of course already has dairy in it.” Once casein was selected as the protein product, PepsiCo’s food scientists needed to incorporate it into the actual dough used as the base of the Doritos. This was an intensive trial-and-error process that included repeatedly tweaking the ratios of other ingredients—like the Doritos’ core corn powder—to find the right combination. “One of the specific challenges that came into account was the texture of the product and, how do you come up with a Doritos-worthy crunch when milk protein is the number one ingredient?” Niermann says. “And the secondary challenge was, also, how do you retain as many whole chips through the process so you don’t end up with a bunch of crumbs in the bottom of a bag?” To address these challenges, Niermann’s team experimented with variables including the dough’s ingredients, the size of the chips, and the thickness of each individual Dorito. They seasoned the chips with natural ingredients, like cheddar cheese, buttermilk, and romano cheese, and colored them with add-ins including paprika extract and vegetable juice. Then, they called in a team of trained chefs, scientists, and engineers to sample the chip prototypes and evaluate them on a range of sensory qualities, like texture, taste, and smell. Having sampled the Doritos Protein myself, I can attest that they’re probably the best-tasting protein snack I’ve ever encountered. If you presented me with the protein version and the original, I’d be hard-pressed to tell the difference (aside from just a slightly odd aftertaste). One important caveat is the macronutrient profile: Doritos Protein have a lower protein-to-calorie ratio compared to a competitor like Quest, which sells nacho cheese protein chips that contain 18 grams of protein in a 32 gram, 150 calorie portion. Doritos Protein might not be the most “optimized” protein snack—but if you’re craving Doritos, you’re probably after optimization in the first place. View the full article

A few years ago, the reusable water bottle transformed from a humble utilitarian good into a status-signaling piece of arm candy. On TikTok, popular creators were decking out their water bottles with custom accessories and add-ons. Out in the real world, people were coordinating their water bottle colors with their activewear sets. Some consumers were even willing to drop hundreds of dollars for a “luxury” hydration experience. It was a full-on war of the water bottles, and there was a clear leader in the pack of drinkware brands vying for attention: Stanley 1913. For Stanley, a subsidiary of the parent company PMI WW Brands, the great water bottle wars were a business turning point. The 113-year-old brand, which invented the first all-steel vacuum-sealed water bottle, was originally an under-the-radar name beloved mainly by outdoorsmen. After its Quencher water bottle caught the attention of a popular shopping blog called The Buy Guide, though, Stanley launched into the cultural zeitgeist, appearing everywhere from the Barbie movie to the TV show Yellowstone and SNL. Stanley’s revenues skyrocketed from $73 million in 2019 to an estimated $750 million in 2023. Since then, the rising star of reusable water bottles has dimmed somewhat. In an interview with Modern Retail last April, Matt Tucker, a sports equipment analyst at the Chicago-based market research firm Circana, said that sporting goods retailers saw year-over-year declines of bottles and insulated containers each month from September 2024 to February 2025. On a full-year basis in these retailers, he added, the overall category declined from 38% growth in 2023 to 14% growth in 2024. As the water bottle craze dies down, Stanley is looking to new horizons. The brand is betting that it can bring its unique attention to detail to other areas of its consumers’ lives, from the gym to the boardroom. Its first big play is a line of bags that’s taking a few major design lessons from the Quencher—and is already becoming a fan favorite. What’s next for Stanley after the great Quencher frenzy Stanley’s history can be told through three major eras, according to Graham Nearn, chief product and sustainability officer at PMI. The first—and longest—lasted from around 1913 to 2020, when the brand was focused on work and outdoor gear, primarily targeted toward a male audience. Then, from 2020 to 2024, the Quencher’s viral success ushered in a second era for the company focused on its hydration line, which also meant an influx of primarily female customers. For the last couple of years, Stanley has been outlining a plan for its third era in the wake of the Quencher’s explosion. Stanley declined to share financial data on its recent Quencher sales and overall revenue with Fast Company, citing the company’s status as a private entity. But, at a March 2025 event, Stanley 1913 global president Matt Navarro said he was seeing “a settling of the hydration category in the U.S., in particular,” despite overall growth across Stanley’s business from 2020 to 2024. He added that the company’s huge boost in success came from being “a disrupter in a stale space,” and in order to maintain that momentum, it would need to “continue to bring relevant, innovative products to the market.” Nearn says the company has landed on a three-pronged strategy for this next era: Investing in new global markets, like Asia Pacific and Latin America; capturing a more gender-diverse customer base with new products and partnerships (including recent collabs with Lionel Messi and Post Malone); and, finally, launching new products beyond the Quencher. While water bottles will remain a core element of Stanley’s offerings—in fact, the company just launched a new bottle format called the “Clutch” on March 17—Nearn says the company sees an opportunity to turn Stanley into a broader brand that’s known for more than just hydration. “The Quencher was this incredible inflection point for the company and the brand,” Nearn says. “Actually, it was a signal. It was a signal that consumers wanted performance; they wanted self-expression; they wanted our Built for Life warranty; they wanted our quality; but the signal also was they wanted it in other parts of their life. Since 2024, Stanley’s been really on a pivot to giving ourselves the opportunity to create a premium lifestyle brand.” Three design lessons Stanley is taking from the Quencher When deciding the best way to diversify its product mix, Stanley turned to customer interviews and feedback on socials. One theme kept recurring: Customers loved how the Quencher could move with them everywhere, from home to work and the gym. They wanted more versatile products that would fit within that “connective tissue,” Nearn says, or the parts of the day when they were on the move. Based on that insight, Stanley’s big swing out of the hydration category is Vitalize, the company’s first-ever line of bags. The collection includes a tote, crossbody bag, and backpack (alongside a shaker bottle). In the past, Nearn says, Stanley has experimented with various lines of soft coolers and lunchboxes, but it’s never produced more general bags. Like water bottles, bags are a category that’s become saturated in recent years. In order to make a product that would stand out among the thousands of existing options, Stanley’s product designers—led by Roger Jackson, director of industrial design at PMI—turned to the core attributes that made the Quencher such a success: frictionless transport, i.e. the Quencher’s cupholder-friendly design; versatility, demonstrated by its ability to hold both hot and cold beverages; and personalization, as in the many different bottles colors and add-ons (like charms, straws, and side kits) that made the Quenchers such an aesthetic hit on TikTok. “With the Quencher, I think the superpower that we brought to it was this understanding that people were seeing these products as not just a carrying device for water,” Jackson says. “It was becoming a companion throughout their day.” How Stanley designed its new line of bags The Stanley team started by ensuring that the bags would be compatible with the Quencher’s fixed handle, which Jackson says has been “a tough proposition traditionally for backpacks and bags,” given the Quencher’s atypical shape and size. Both the tote and the backpack come with two large side pockets and an adjustable, buckled strap to hold bottles in, allowing the Quencher’s handle to slot smoothly into an empty space beneath the strap. The adjustable design is made to accommodate Stanley products, but it’s also a clever solution for anyone with a larger water bottle that might not fit into a traditional, rigid side pocket. Another common problem that the team endeavored to solve was “contamination concerns,” Jackson says. Stanley noticed that consumers were often traveling with their electronics and valuables, alongside items like lunchboxes, thermoses, and gym shoes. “A really simple observation is the lack of trust people have in food containment storage boxes—you’ll just see that people chuck them in a Target plastic bag and wrap it up before they put it into their backpack,” Jackson says. “What that tells us is that there’s contamination, there’s leak concerns, and so we wanted to provide a whole separate section for that product. So even if the worst happens, it’s contained in there.” Their design solution, which appears on the backpack and tote, is a zippered bottom compartment that’s completely insulated from the rest of the bag and made of an easily wipeable white nylon. This section is also expandable, so that anything contained in it—whether that be a lunchbox, gym shoes, or a sweaty towel—won’t cramp the rest of the bag’s storage space. All three of the new Vitalize bags are designed so that people can customize them as much as possible. Each product comes with multiple interior compartments for users to fit their electronics, stationery, and an additional tumbler. Even the small crossbody bag has one exterior pocket, three interior pockets, and room to hold a full water bottle. On the outside of the bags, adjustable buckles and clips invite users to attach their keys and charms (based on several TikToks, users are already catching on). Color options in the Vitalize line include on-trend hues like “sage grey,” “rose quartz,” and “twilight.” Already, Nearn says, the team has seen these details paying off. Within a week of Vitalize’s February 17 launch, the tote bag sold out in direct-to-consumer sales, and the line became Amazon’s top new release in gym totes and backpacks. Most of the products have now been restocked on Stanley’s website, though the rose quartz tote is still sold out. Stanley typically takes around three years to brainstorm and prototype new products, so Jackson is hesitant to share any specific details of where the company might go next. Generally, though, he says that sports, lunch, and wellness are all categories that it plans to target as it aims to move beyond the Quencher’s shadow. View the full article

Think about how we commonly seek to motivate human performance in our workplaces: Employees are treated as costs to be minimized rather than people to be invested in. Performance is managed through fear of consequences. Supervisors closely monitor daily tasks, requiring frequent check-ins or reports. Being available at all hours is treated as evidence of commitment. Directives flow one way—downward. Feedback is delivered as judgment rather than support. In practice, if not in intention, we still manage people more like machines than human beings. How did we get here—and, more importantly, why have we never left? Most of what we call “modern management” isn’t modern at all. It was born on factory floors over a century ago, in an era when work was often dehumanizing: repetitive, physical and performed by people who needed a paycheck and had little choice but to show up. It was Frederick Winslow Taylor—the father of scientific management—who gave it shape. He believed workers were inherently unmotivated and therefore had to be told exactly what to do, how to do it, and when. Control and even micromanagement was seen as essential to driving performance. The problem isn’t that Taylor was wrong for his time. The problem is that we’re still using his model in a completely different era of work. Today’s workplace runs on judgment, adaptability, creativity, collaboration, and discretionary effort—none of which can be commanded or controlled. When the nature of work changes this fundamentally, the philosophy we use to lead people must change with it. So far, it really hasn’t. A Deeply Entrenched Mindset Over time, Taylor’s ideas became the blueprint for how organizations everywhere learned to manage people. They shaped how business schools taught leadership, how organizations were structured, and perhaps most powerfully, how one generation of managers trained the next. The underlying assumption—that people are fundamentally unmotivated and need to be pushed, watched, and held accountable through oversight and intimidation—became so entrenched, it stopped feeling like an assumption at all. It started feeling like common sense. But it was never really common sense. As far back as the 1920s, the Hawthorne studies revealed that workers became more productive simply when they felt noticed and valued. People, it turns out, want to contribute. They want to grow. They want to do good work—when given the conditions to do so. Despite these findings, little changed because Taylor’s ideas had already become so deeply rooted in business that his assumptions were no longer questioned. His rigid ideology was simply passed on from one generation of managers to the next. What The Research Has Been Telling Us For Decades The research that has accumulated over the past several decades makes one thing unmistakably clear: the fear that giving people more autonomy, trust, and support will come at the expense of performance is empirically and patently wrong. We now know it’s just the opposite. In 2011, London Business School professor Alex Edmans tracked Fortune’s “100 Best Companies to Work For” over 28 years and found they outperformed their peers by as much as 3.8% annually in stock returns. What distinguished these organizations wasn’t perks or pay—it was how their leaders treated people. They communicated transparently. They empowered rather than micromanaged. They invested in growth. They built cultures where people felt trusted, valued, and respected as human beings. Treating people well, Edmans concluded, isn’t charity—it’s a widely undervalued competitive advantage. The Conference Board, drawing on decades of human capital research, points consistently in the same direction—leaders who communicate with empathy, build trust, and show genuine care for their people drive stronger commitment, lower turnover, and better organizational outcomes. Harvard Business School professor Amy Edmondson’s landmark research has demonstrated that psychological safety—the belief that one can speak up, take risks, and make mistakes without fear of punishment or humiliation—is also one of the most enabling conditions for high performance. This includes emotional safety—the confidence that you can bring your whole self to work, express what you genuinely think and feel, and be accepted for who you are across every dimension of your life. And it includes belonging—the felt sense of being genuinely connected to the people you work alongside and truly valued as part of the team. When those conditions exist, people don’t just feel better, they think more creatively, take smarter risks, and collaborate more openly. When they don’t, people hold back. And when people hold back, performance plateaus or declines. Most recently, the University of Oxford’s Wellbeing Research Centre confirmed in a sweeping meta-analysis of 339 studies covering nearly 1.9 million workers that employee well-being and performance go hand in hand. Their conclusion was clear: higher employee well-being drives more sustainable performance and stronger shareholder returns. The reality is all of this research—and much more—has been widely communicated. Which means what we’re facing isn’t a lack of evidence. It’s a classic knowing-doing gap. Researcher after researcher, institution after institution, has arrived at the same conclusion. The evidence isn’t emerging—it’s overwhelming. Bottom line, when employees feel genuinely valued and cared for, they bring a level of commitment and discretionary effort that no compliance system can replicate. The only unanswered question is whether leaders and organizations will ever be willing to act on this knowledge and fundamentally rethink how they lead. The Choice Every Leader (You) Gets to Make Because the research is both voluminous and irrefutable, what only remains now is a choice. Continue operating from assumptions built for factories in the 1900s—or lead people the way human beings have always deserved, and to which they respond at their best. At the end of the day, no matter how talented your people are, it’s the system you create that determines what they can achieve. As W. Edwards Deming put it: “A bad system will beat a good person every time.” The question is simple, yet profound: will we sustain outdated practices, or design workplaces that cultivate trust, contribution, and human potential? The evidence, the research, and decades of my own leadership experience all point in one direction. The choice is ours and ours alone. View the full article

Passenger jet flying from Montreal collided with ground vehicle View the full article

UK ministers to discuss response to energy prices after US president shares ‘Saturday Night Live’ sketch View the full article

French group swoops on fast-growing UK food and drink company to push deeper into ‘complete nutrition’ marketView the full article

Investors see UK economy as one of the most exposed to an inflation shock View the full article

K-12 teachers and students across the country are increasingly using AI in and out of classrooms, whether it is teachers turning to AI to refine lesson plans or students asking AI to help them research a particular topic. An estimated 85% of K-12 public school teachers recently reported that they used AI during the 2024-2025 school year, often for curriculum and content development. In 2023, 13% of teens said they used ChatGPT to complete their schoolwork, while 26% of them said in 2025 that they were using ChatGPT for this purpose. Similarly, 86% of K-12 students shared in 2025 that they have used AI in general. An estimated 50% of students reported that they use it for schoolwork, such as for learning more about topics outside of what was taught in class, tutoring on specific subjects, receiving help with a homework assignment, or asking for college advice. However, policies and training have not kept pace with how frequently teachers and students are using AI. Only 35% of school district leaders reported in 2025 that they provided students with any AI training, according to the global policy think tank RAND Corp. Additionally, 45% of principals reported school or district policies or guidance on the use of AI in schools, according to these findings. Another challenge is that students are also using AI for potentially dangerous uses. There are recent examples of students who self-harmed or died by suicide after they used AI for mental health support. A 2025 study found that when a chatbot responded to 60 simulated scenarios that posed mental health questions, the chatbots sometimes made harmful proposals—such as cutting off all human contact for a month or dropping out of school. So, is it safe for young students to use AI? Does using AI provide better learning outcomes for students when compared to traditional instruction? Does AI help teachers reduce their workload? The answers to these questions are complicated. It is not yet clear how AI influences learning in K-12 settings or when and how it is best for teachers and students to use AI. Some clear pros As an associate professor of inclusive teacher education, I’m trying to answer some of these big questions about AI and K-12 education. Some university centers that I’ve worked with, such as the Center for Innovation, Design, and Digital Learning at the University of Kansas, are conducting research on how AI can be used to support students with learning disabilities. In 2025, 57% of special education teachers said they use AI to help develop individualized plans, often called an individualized education program, for their students with learning disabilities. I believe there is no doubt that AI can, in some ways, reduce barriers and support students with disabilities. In my own research, for example, my coauthors and I show that AI can help students learn by adapting assignments to meet their personal learning needs and pace. It can also help teachers reduce their time spent grading or editing assignments. There remain concerns over student privacy and whether AI systems will reinforce bias, but special-education teachers are testing the benefits of generative AI. The missing evidence Among the broader available research and evidence on AI and K-12 education, some studies from 2019 through 2022 show that AI might help students learn and stay motivated by providing a personalized learning experience. However, the evidence appears less promising when considering how students learn after they use AI and then stop using it. For example, Guilherme Lichand, an economics scholar at the Stanford Accelerator for Learning, found in 2026 that when students use AI and then are told they can no longer use it for their studies, students actually perform worse than those who never used AI. This shows that additional research on how AI influences students’ long-term learning and development is necessary. The Brookings Institution also recently warned in a 2026 AI and K-12 education report that the risks of using generative AI in education overshadow its benefits. These risks include weakened relationships between students and teachers, as well as students’ safety. A 2025 report by the nonprofit Center for Democracy and Technology also shows that an average of 71% of K-12 teachers reported that when students use AI to complete their schoolwork, it is hard for the teachers to understand whether student work is their own. Similarly, almost two-thirds of parents of K-12 students said in 2025 that AI is weakening important academic skills that their child needs to learn, such as writing, reading comprehension, and critical thinking. Lessons from the past AI is being introduced to K-12 classrooms faster than evidence and understanding can support. But schools have rushed to incorporate educational technologies into their classrooms before. During the COVID-19 pandemic, for example, schools needed to quickly equip teachers and students with online platforms for remote learning. But the rush also challenged educators to learn how to effectively teach and provide individual support for each student, and to ensure that all students, including students with disabilities, could participate in remote learning. Similarly, not long ago, some educators thought that social media and smartphones would bring the next frontier in education, with the idea that these technologies could increase student engagement. Yet we now know the dangers that both social media and smartphones pose for children. Slowing down how students especially are using AI in the classroom does not mean rejecting it altogether. I think it means being responsible, especially when there is a good chance children’s academic skills, behaviors, or emotions are at risk. New evidence on AI and education is coming from scholars like me and my colleagues. There is little doubt that AI and future technologies are game changers in society and education. I think it is also critical that we slow down and follow the evidence that is available. Speed is a choice, and education deserves intention. Tal Slemrod is an associate professor of special education at California State University, Chico. This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article. View the full article

Police treating arson attack on vehicles belonging to charity organisation in north London as a hate crime View the full article

No one’s doing it like the BritsView the full article

In today’s digital world, your online reputation can make or break your business. Negative reviews, poor search results, and damaging content can deter potential customers. Comprehending and addressing these issues is vital for your brand’s success. Many effective services exist to help you repair and manage your reputation. From content suppression to local SEO integration, these strategies can greatly improve your online image. Let’s explore the fundamental services that can help restore your reputation and elevate your business credibility. Key Takeaways NetReputation: Offers a structured five-step process for effective content suppression and ongoing monitoring of your online presence. NP Digital: Combines local SEO with tailored reputation management strategies to enhance visibility and brand perception. Better Reputation: Focuses on the removal and suppression of negative online content to improve overall brand reputation. Reputation Rhino: Provides affordable reputation management packages, making it accessible for small businesses and solo entrepreneurs. Crisis Intervention Services: Specialized services to manage urgent reputation crises, often costing between $5,000 and over $20,000 for comprehensive solutions. Understanding the Importance of Online Reputation Repair Grasping the importance of online reputation repair is fundamental for any business today, especially since negative information can considerably impact customer decisions. A damaged online reputation can cause you to lose up to 22% of potential customers, which highlights the financial implications of negative search results. With about 97% of consumers searching for local businesses online, managing your online presence becomes significant. You need effective reputation management for individuals to guarantee your business stands out positively. Remember, negative online reviews can deter 60% of potential customers, so proactive steps to repair personal reputation are crucial. Trust plays a significant role in consumer choices, as 90% of people value online reviews as much as personal recommendations. As a result, engaging in reputation repair not only protects against revenue loss but likewise helps build strong customer relationships and promotes brand loyalty, making it a fundamental strategy for success in today’s digital scenery. Common Causes of Reputation Damage Reputation damage can stem from various sources, and comprehension of these causes is vital for your business’s longevity. Viral complaints can quickly escalate, creating significant public relations challenges if not addressed immediately. Furthermore, fake reviews and legal issues can mislead customers and tarnish your brand’s trustworthiness, making it indispensable to stay vigilant and proactive in managing your online presence. Viral Complaints and Backlash When negative customer complaints go viral, they can create immediate and notable challenges for a brand’s image. These complaints often escalate quickly on social media, leading to PR crises that can damage your reputation and considerably impact your revenue. Studies show that up to 60% of consumers are deterred by negative reviews, meaning viral backlash can severely hinder customer acquisition and retention. Furthermore, legal troubles or data breaches can exacerbate issues, haunting your online presence and eroding trust. To combat these challenges, consider online reputation repair services focused on reputation restoration. Reading Reputation Defender reviews can guide you in selecting effective services to manage your brand’s online image and mitigate the harmful effects of viral complaints. Fake Reviews and Scams Negative customer complaints can escalate into a full-blown PR crisis, but another significant threat to your brand’s image comes from fake reviews and scams. Malicious reviews, often posted by competitors or disgruntled employees, can deter up to 60% of potential customers, even though they’re unfounded. Since 90% of consumers trust online reviews as much as personal recommendations, the impact can be severe. Fraudulent reviews mislead potential customers and may lead to a 22% drop in revenue. Addressing these fake reviews swiftly is crucial; otherwise, you risk declining customer trust and a tarnished reputation. To combat this issue, consider services like Norton Reputation Defender, though it’s important to evaluate the Norton Reputation Defender cost in relation to your needs. Legal and Regulatory Issues Legal and regulatory issues can pose significant threats to your business’s standing and trustworthiness in the eyes of customers. Legal troubles, like lawsuits or regulatory violations, can quickly become public knowledge, severely damaging your online reputation. Negative press from these issues can lead to a significant revenue decline, as 97% of consumers research businesses online before making purchases. Regulatory scrutiny may expose your vulnerabilities, making it essential to manage your online presence effectively. Furthermore, data breaches can erode customer trust, with negative mentions lingering in search results. Scandals involving executives or unethical practices likewise tarnish your brand perception, underscoring the need for robust reputation management strategies to address and recover from such incidents swiftly. Signs Your Business Needs Reputation Repair If you notice a drop in your business’s overall rating, it’s a clear sign that you might need reputation repair, as many customers avoid businesses with ratings below four stars. Furthermore, an increase in negative mentions online can further damage your brand’s image and deter potential customers from choosing your services. Recognizing these signs early is essential to addressing issues before they impact your bottom line. Decrease in Ratings When your business ratings drop, it can signal serious underlying issues that need urgent attention. A decline in ratings not only affects customer trust but can lead to significant losses. Here are four signs that indicate you should consider reputation repair: Ratings below 4 stars: Over 60% of potential customers are put off by negative reviews. Decreased website traffic: A sudden drop may suggest negative sentiment is driving customers away. Declining sales or conversion rates: These often indicate reputation problems, leading to substantial revenue loss. Negative content on search results: With 97% of consumers researching online, this can actively repel customers. Addressing these issues swiftly can help restore your business’s reputation and regain consumer interest. Increased Negative Mentions A noticeable increase in negative mentions can serve as a red flag for your business, signaling that reputation repair is necessary. If your overall rating drops below four stars, consumers may start avoiding your brand, leading to potential revenue loss. You might likewise notice a significant decrease in website traffic, indicating that negative online content is impacting your visibility. A decline in sales or conversion rates without clear causes often points to urgent reputation issues. Furthermore, if negative content appears on the first page of search results, it can actively deter potential customers. Frequent negative media coverage or poor employee reviews can further damage your reputation, making it difficult to attract and retain talent. Addressing these issues swiftly is vital for recovery. Overview of Top Reputation Repair Services In today’s digital environment, choosing the right reputation repair service can greatly impact your online presence. Various services offer customized solutions to manage and improve your brand’s image. Here’s an overview of some top reputation repair services you might consider: NetReputation: They use a five-step process, including content suppression and monitoring, to boost your online visibility effectively. NP Digital: This service combines local SEO with reputation management strategies, helping enhance your brand visibility and consumer trust in local markets. Better Reputation: Specializing in content removal and suppression, they focus on eliminating negative content from online platforms. Reputation Rhino: Offering affordable packages, they cater to small businesses and solo entrepreneurs, ensuring cost-effective solutions. These services can help you effectively manage your online reputation and build a positive digital presence. Strategies for Effective Reputation Management Effective reputation management involves a strategic blend of monitoring, engagement, and content optimization, ensuring your brand maintains a positive online presence. Begin by regularly monitoring brand mentions and feedback across various platforms. This practice helps you identify negative sentiment early, allowing you to manage potential crises before they escalate. Next, engage with customers by thoughtfully responding to reviews. This approach can improve your overall ratings and reduce potential customer loss by 60% because of negative feedback. Furthermore, employ SEO techniques to suppress unfavorable content, effectively pushing it off the first page of search results, where 95% of users won’t venture beyond. Lastly, establish a proactive review generation strategy, as positive reviews greatly influence 17% of how search engines rank local businesses. Pricing and Guarantees in Reputation Repair Services How much should you expect to pay for reputation repair services? The costs can vary greatly based on the type of service you need. Here’s a breakdown: One-time removal services: Typically range from $500 to $5,000 for negative content removal. Monthly retainer packages: These can cost between $1,500 and $10,000, depending on the services provided. Crisis intervention: Full-blown scenarios can run from $5,000 to over $20,000, reflecting urgency and complexity. Guarantees: Some providers offer specific guarantees, like content removal, whereas others might promise satisfaction or performance-based outcomes. Keep in mind that guarantees should be approached with caution. Absolute guarantees on search rankings or content removal aren’t realistic because of the constantly changing digital environment. Always look for transparent contracts outlining deliverables, timelines, and refund policies to understand what to expect from these services. Maintaining a Positive Online Reputation After Repair After addressing the immediate challenges of negative content, maintaining a positive online reputation requires ongoing effort and strategy. First, continuous monitoring of your brand mentions is essential; tools like Google Alerts can help you stay informed about any new negative content that may arise. Next, implement a proactive review generation strategy to encourage satisfied customers to leave positive feedback, which bolsters your online presence. Regularly publishing fresh, positive content not just reinforces your brand’s good reputation but also improves search engine rankings, as online reviews greatly influence local business visibility. Furthermore, training your employees in customer service and social media policies guarantees they engage effectively with customers, preserving a positive image. Finally, establishing a content calendar for consistent posts and updates keeps your brand relevant, nurturing trust and loyalty among your audience. Frequently Asked Questions Which Component Is Essential for Online Reputation Management? To effectively manage your online reputation, continuous monitoring is crucial. It allows you to detect negative content or emerging threats before they escalate. By regularly checking online mentions and reviews, you can respond swiftly to potential issues. This proactive approach not just safeguards your brand image but likewise helps maintain customer trust. What Are Online Reputation Management Services? Online reputation management (ORM) services help you improve and restore your digital presence. They use strategies like content removal, positive content promotion, and SEO suppression to elevate your brand perception. ORM professionals monitor brand mentions across platforms to identify reputation threats early. By employing techniques like reverse SEO, they push negative search results down, ensuring positive content ranks higher. Engaging with experts can lead to quicker recovery from reputation issues, often within 3-6 months. What Are the 7 Dimensions of Reputation? The seven dimensions of reputation are credibility, reliability, trustworthiness, esteem, admiration, respect, and transparency. Credibility guarantees customers view you as trustworthy, whereas reliability reflects your consistency in delivering quality. Trustworthiness builds on this by influencing how much people rely on your reviews. Esteem and admiration indicate how others perceive your value, whereas respect shows recognition for your contributions. Finally, transparency nurtures open communication, enhancing relationships and accountability, especially during crises. How Much Does Online Reputation Repair Cost? Online reputation repair costs vary greatly based on the complexity of the issues you’re facing. One-time content removal services typically range from $500 to $5,000. If you opt for ongoing management, monthly retainers can cost between $1,500 and $10,000. For severe reputation damage, crisis intervention services might exceed $20,000. It’s essential to assess providers for expertise and clarity in pricing, as commitments often extend for a year or more. Conclusion In summary, prioritizing your online reputation is vital for business success. By utilizing fundamental reputation repair services, you can effectively address negative content, improve customer trust, and promote a positive brand image. Monitoring your reputation continuously and employing proactive strategies will help you maintain this positive perception over time. Investing in these services not only reduces damage but furthermore positions your business for future growth and success in an increasingly digital marketplace. Image via Google Gemini and ArtSmart This article, "7 Essential Online Reputation Repair Services You Need" was first published on Small Business Trends View the full article

In today’s digital world, your online reputation can make or break your business. Negative reviews, poor search results, and damaging content can deter potential customers. Comprehending and addressing these issues is vital for your brand’s success. Many effective services exist to help you repair and manage your reputation. From content suppression to local SEO integration, these strategies can greatly improve your online image. Let’s explore the fundamental services that can help restore your reputation and elevate your business credibility. Key Takeaways NetReputation: Offers a structured five-step process for effective content suppression and ongoing monitoring of your online presence. NP Digital: Combines local SEO with tailored reputation management strategies to enhance visibility and brand perception. Better Reputation: Focuses on the removal and suppression of negative online content to improve overall brand reputation. Reputation Rhino: Provides affordable reputation management packages, making it accessible for small businesses and solo entrepreneurs. Crisis Intervention Services: Specialized services to manage urgent reputation crises, often costing between $5,000 and over $20,000 for comprehensive solutions. Understanding the Importance of Online Reputation Repair Grasping the importance of online reputation repair is fundamental for any business today, especially since negative information can considerably impact customer decisions. A damaged online reputation can cause you to lose up to 22% of potential customers, which highlights the financial implications of negative search results. With about 97% of consumers searching for local businesses online, managing your online presence becomes significant. You need effective reputation management for individuals to guarantee your business stands out positively. Remember, negative online reviews can deter 60% of potential customers, so proactive steps to repair personal reputation are crucial. Trust plays a significant role in consumer choices, as 90% of people value online reviews as much as personal recommendations. As a result, engaging in reputation repair not only protects against revenue loss but likewise helps build strong customer relationships and promotes brand loyalty, making it a fundamental strategy for success in today’s digital scenery. Common Causes of Reputation Damage Reputation damage can stem from various sources, and comprehension of these causes is vital for your business’s longevity. Viral complaints can quickly escalate, creating significant public relations challenges if not addressed immediately. Furthermore, fake reviews and legal issues can mislead customers and tarnish your brand’s trustworthiness, making it indispensable to stay vigilant and proactive in managing your online presence. Viral Complaints and Backlash When negative customer complaints go viral, they can create immediate and notable challenges for a brand’s image. These complaints often escalate quickly on social media, leading to PR crises that can damage your reputation and considerably impact your revenue. Studies show that up to 60% of consumers are deterred by negative reviews, meaning viral backlash can severely hinder customer acquisition and retention. Furthermore, legal troubles or data breaches can exacerbate issues, haunting your online presence and eroding trust. To combat these challenges, consider online reputation repair services focused on reputation restoration. Reading Reputation Defender reviews can guide you in selecting effective services to manage your brand’s online image and mitigate the harmful effects of viral complaints. Fake Reviews and Scams Negative customer complaints can escalate into a full-blown PR crisis, but another significant threat to your brand’s image comes from fake reviews and scams. Malicious reviews, often posted by competitors or disgruntled employees, can deter up to 60% of potential customers, even though they’re unfounded. Since 90% of consumers trust online reviews as much as personal recommendations, the impact can be severe. Fraudulent reviews mislead potential customers and may lead to a 22% drop in revenue. Addressing these fake reviews swiftly is crucial; otherwise, you risk declining customer trust and a tarnished reputation. To combat this issue, consider services like Norton Reputation Defender, though it’s important to evaluate the Norton Reputation Defender cost in relation to your needs. Legal and Regulatory Issues Legal and regulatory issues can pose significant threats to your business’s standing and trustworthiness in the eyes of customers. Legal troubles, like lawsuits or regulatory violations, can quickly become public knowledge, severely damaging your online reputation. Negative press from these issues can lead to a significant revenue decline, as 97% of consumers research businesses online before making purchases. Regulatory scrutiny may expose your vulnerabilities, making it essential to manage your online presence effectively. Furthermore, data breaches can erode customer trust, with negative mentions lingering in search results. Scandals involving executives or unethical practices likewise tarnish your brand perception, underscoring the need for robust reputation management strategies to address and recover from such incidents swiftly. Signs Your Business Needs Reputation Repair If you notice a drop in your business’s overall rating, it’s a clear sign that you might need reputation repair, as many customers avoid businesses with ratings below four stars. Furthermore, an increase in negative mentions online can further damage your brand’s image and deter potential customers from choosing your services. Recognizing these signs early is essential to addressing issues before they impact your bottom line. Decrease in Ratings When your business ratings drop, it can signal serious underlying issues that need urgent attention. A decline in ratings not only affects customer trust but can lead to significant losses. Here are four signs that indicate you should consider reputation repair: Ratings below 4 stars: Over 60% of potential customers are put off by negative reviews. Decreased website traffic: A sudden drop may suggest negative sentiment is driving customers away. Declining sales or conversion rates: These often indicate reputation problems, leading to substantial revenue loss. Negative content on search results: With 97% of consumers researching online, this can actively repel customers. Addressing these issues swiftly can help restore your business’s reputation and regain consumer interest. Increased Negative Mentions A noticeable increase in negative mentions can serve as a red flag for your business, signaling that reputation repair is necessary. If your overall rating drops below four stars, consumers may start avoiding your brand, leading to potential revenue loss. You might likewise notice a significant decrease in website traffic, indicating that negative online content is impacting your visibility. A decline in sales or conversion rates without clear causes often points to urgent reputation issues. Furthermore, if negative content appears on the first page of search results, it can actively deter potential customers. Frequent negative media coverage or poor employee reviews can further damage your reputation, making it difficult to attract and retain talent. Addressing these issues swiftly is vital for recovery. Overview of Top Reputation Repair Services In today’s digital environment, choosing the right reputation repair service can greatly impact your online presence. Various services offer customized solutions to manage and improve your brand’s image. Here’s an overview of some top reputation repair services you might consider: NetReputation: They use a five-step process, including content suppression and monitoring, to boost your online visibility effectively. NP Digital: This service combines local SEO with reputation management strategies, helping enhance your brand visibility and consumer trust in local markets. Better Reputation: Specializing in content removal and suppression, they focus on eliminating negative content from online platforms. Reputation Rhino: Offering affordable packages, they cater to small businesses and solo entrepreneurs, ensuring cost-effective solutions. These services can help you effectively manage your online reputation and build a positive digital presence. Strategies for Effective Reputation Management Effective reputation management involves a strategic blend of monitoring, engagement, and content optimization, ensuring your brand maintains a positive online presence. Begin by regularly monitoring brand mentions and feedback across various platforms. This practice helps you identify negative sentiment early, allowing you to manage potential crises before they escalate. Next, engage with customers by thoughtfully responding to reviews. This approach can improve your overall ratings and reduce potential customer loss by 60% because of negative feedback. Furthermore, employ SEO techniques to suppress unfavorable content, effectively pushing it off the first page of search results, where 95% of users won’t venture beyond. Lastly, establish a proactive review generation strategy, as positive reviews greatly influence 17% of how search engines rank local businesses. Pricing and Guarantees in Reputation Repair Services How much should you expect to pay for reputation repair services? The costs can vary greatly based on the type of service you need. Here’s a breakdown: One-time removal services: Typically range from $500 to $5,000 for negative content removal. Monthly retainer packages: These can cost between $1,500 and $10,000, depending on the services provided. Crisis intervention: Full-blown scenarios can run from $5,000 to over $20,000, reflecting urgency and complexity. Guarantees: Some providers offer specific guarantees, like content removal, whereas others might promise satisfaction or performance-based outcomes. Keep in mind that guarantees should be approached with caution. Absolute guarantees on search rankings or content removal aren’t realistic because of the constantly changing digital environment. Always look for transparent contracts outlining deliverables, timelines, and refund policies to understand what to expect from these services. Maintaining a Positive Online Reputation After Repair After addressing the immediate challenges of negative content, maintaining a positive online reputation requires ongoing effort and strategy. First, continuous monitoring of your brand mentions is essential; tools like Google Alerts can help you stay informed about any new negative content that may arise. Next, implement a proactive review generation strategy to encourage satisfied customers to leave positive feedback, which bolsters your online presence. Regularly publishing fresh, positive content not just reinforces your brand’s good reputation but also improves search engine rankings, as online reviews greatly influence local business visibility. Furthermore, training your employees in customer service and social media policies guarantees they engage effectively with customers, preserving a positive image. Finally, establishing a content calendar for consistent posts and updates keeps your brand relevant, nurturing trust and loyalty among your audience. Frequently Asked Questions Which Component Is Essential for Online Reputation Management? To effectively manage your online reputation, continuous monitoring is crucial. It allows you to detect negative content or emerging threats before they escalate. By regularly checking online mentions and reviews, you can respond swiftly to potential issues. This proactive approach not just safeguards your brand image but likewise helps maintain customer trust. What Are Online Reputation Management Services? Online reputation management (ORM) services help you improve and restore your digital presence. They use strategies like content removal, positive content promotion, and SEO suppression to elevate your brand perception. ORM professionals monitor brand mentions across platforms to identify reputation threats early. By employing techniques like reverse SEO, they push negative search results down, ensuring positive content ranks higher. Engaging with experts can lead to quicker recovery from reputation issues, often within 3-6 months. What Are the 7 Dimensions of Reputation? The seven dimensions of reputation are credibility, reliability, trustworthiness, esteem, admiration, respect, and transparency. Credibility guarantees customers view you as trustworthy, whereas reliability reflects your consistency in delivering quality. Trustworthiness builds on this by influencing how much people rely on your reviews. Esteem and admiration indicate how others perceive your value, whereas respect shows recognition for your contributions. Finally, transparency nurtures open communication, enhancing relationships and accountability, especially during crises. How Much Does Online Reputation Repair Cost? Online reputation repair costs vary greatly based on the complexity of the issues you’re facing. One-time content removal services typically range from $500 to $5,000. If you opt for ongoing management, monthly retainers can cost between $1,500 and $10,000. For severe reputation damage, crisis intervention services might exceed $20,000. It’s essential to assess providers for expertise and clarity in pricing, as commitments often extend for a year or more. Conclusion In summary, prioritizing your online reputation is vital for business success. By utilizing fundamental reputation repair services, you can effectively address negative content, improve customer trust, and promote a positive brand image. Monitoring your reputation continuously and employing proactive strategies will help you maintain this positive perception over time. Investing in these services not only reduces damage but furthermore positions your business for future growth and success in an increasingly digital marketplace. Image via Google Gemini and ArtSmart This article, "7 Essential Online Reputation Repair Services You Need" was first published on Small Business Trends View the full article

Stop being invisible to AI search. These 5 strategies will get your brand cited and recommended by AI engines. The post 5 GEO Strategies To Make AI Search Engines Recommend Your Brand In 2026 appeared first on Search Engine Journal. View the full article

Transfer of planes to Teruel airport signals airline is preparing for ongoing Gulf conflict View the full article

Standing up to US president has boosted Mette Frederiksen’s chances of winning third termView the full article

From oil threats to ultimatums, the US president has a decades-old view of how to confront Tehran View the full article

Mark Rowley issues warning during US visit and also accuses ‘hostile states’ of spreading false claims that UK capital is unsafe View the full article

Some Labour officials hope bill will provoke Brexit dispute with Tories and Reform UKView the full article

World has come to depend on capital from the region more deeply than many realiseView the full article

The country’s underlying strengths are absorbing his erratic choices, including the war on IranView the full article

Gulf states’ reliance on jets to battle waves of cheap Shaheds is testing their finances, pilots and planesView the full article

CEO of private hire group says cab drivers need protection against ‘predatory pricing’View the full article

UN World Food Programme says millions more people may be pushed into acute hunger if disruption continuesView the full article

Enterprise AI spending hit $37 billion in 2025—a 200% jump from the year before. The message from the C-suite couldn’t be clearer: AI is no longer a competitive advantage. It’s table stakes. So why are three-quarters of enterprises still stuck in pilot mode? Budgets have been approved, platforms deployed, and centers of excellence stood up. Yet few AI initiatives meet expectations for revenue impact. The technology isn’t the problem. The problem is that no one actually taught your people how to use it. The knowledge gap is enormous Enterprises are running an average of 200 AI tools. However, only 28% of employees know how to use their company’s applications, and only 7.5% have received what could be called extensive AI training. And when employees don’t get trained on sanctioned tools, they route around IT, quietly using whatever works, hidden from view. The behavior that follows is predictable: 57% of American employees are reluctant to admit to their managers that they use AI at all. Nearly half admit to pretending they know how to use it just to avoid looking incompetent. Leaders, meanwhile, use AI at double the rate of individual contributors, meaning the people doing the most hands-on work are the least supported. This isn’t a motivation problem. Employees want to use AI. They’re already using it. They just don’t know how to use it in ways that generate real business value, and most organizations haven’t given them a meaningful opportunity to learn. Building AI fluency requires practice Most enterprise AI training follows a familiar script: a video module, a PDF of prompt examples, maybe a vendor demo. Employees watch, nod, and return to their desks, where they proceed to use Claude or ChatGPT as a slightly smarter search engine. The most durable professional skills, sales, negotiation, clinical procedures, public speaking, are learned through practice and real-time feedback, not passive consumption. AI fluency is no different. Yet the overwhelming majority of enterprise training isn’t built this way. We’re expecting behavior change from an experience designed to check a compliance box. The result is predictable: 42% of companies abandoned most of their AI initiatives in 2025, up from 17% the year before. Not because the tools failed. Because the humans were never really brought along. What experiential learning actually looks like The organizations closing the adoption gap are treating AI fluency the way every other high-stakes skill gets built: through practice, feedback, and measurement. Flight simulators don’t exist because pilots lack motivation, they exist because repetition in a realistic environment is how competence actually forms. The same logic applies to AI. A video module watched once doesn’t change behavior. Guided practice, applied in context, does. Leading organizations are acting on this. Some embed AI coaching directly into workflows so employees receive guidance at the moment of use. For example, Morgan Stanley built a GPT-powered assistant that helps financial advisors retrieve research and insights during client conversations. Still others cultivate internal AI communities of practice, shared spaces where employees troubleshoot, trade prompts, and develop organizational norms around responsible use. For example, PwC has a firmwide AI upskilling initiative that has led to grassroots “prompting parties” and brainstorming sessions where employees experiment with generative AI and share use cases together. Google Cloud took a structured certification approach to train 15,000 sales reps on go-to-market strategy, producing not just trained employees but a measurable, consistent standard for how AI gets used across the field. The data supports the investment: companies with a formal AI strategy report 80% adoption success, compared to 37% for those without one. The zombie center of excellence problem In 2021, zombie companies were created, businesses valued at billions with little revenue to show for it. I worry we’re now creating zombie centers of excellence inside enterprises: teams that have spent hundreds of millions on platforms that nobody uses in their day-to-day work. The companies that win the AI era won’t be the ones with the biggest budgets. They’ll be the ones with the most skilled users. Mandating a tool doesn’t make people use it. Buying a license doesn’t create fluency. Real adoption requires meeting employees where they are, building confidence through practice, and measuring whether behavior is actually changing—not just whether someone completed a module. The $37 billion question isn’t whether your company is investing in AI. It’s whether that investment is landing. View the full article