Why do smart people do dumb things?

What does it mean to be “smart” or “dumb”? Few questions are more deceptively complex.

Most of us have strong opinions about what those words mean, but scratch the surface and it becomes clear that “smart” and “dumb” are slippery, subjective constructs.

What seems smart to one person may strike another as naive, arrogant, or shortsighted. Worse still, our own perception of what’s smart can shift over time. Yesterday’s clever decision can look like today’s regrettable blunder. Take Jay Gatsby, for instance. His grand plan to reinvent himself, amass a fortune, and win back Daisy once seemed like the height of romantic intelligence; but in the end, it revealed itself as delusional folly, built on illusions as fragile as the dream he chased.

For a famous path reversal (from allegedly dumb to obviously smart), consider Forrest Gump, whose simple, seemingly naive choices (e.g., running across America or investing in “some fruit company”) looked foolish to everyone around him. Yet his lack of overthinking and unpretentious sincerity led him to happiness, wealth, and a kind of quiet genius that outsmarted all the so-called smart people.

In hindsight, we often discover that our supposed genius was merely luck, and our “dumb” mistakes were actually learning opportunities in disguise.

In short: Being smart isn’t a fixed trait; it’s a moving target defined by outcomes, context, and time. In line with that, we tend to withhold judgment until we’ve seen enough evidence. After all, anyone can have flashes of brilliance or moments of foolishness—what matters is the overall pattern. That’s why we evaluate intelligence not by a single act, but by the consistency of choices and behaviors over time.

The science of adaptability

Charles Darwin famously noted, “It is not the strongest of the species that survives, nor the most intelligent, but the one most adaptable to change.”

Along the same lines, psychologists (who are often largely footnotes to Darwin) have a relatively simple and more objective way to define smart versus dumb behavior: adaptability. In that sense, what we call “intelligence” is largely the capacity to adjust one’s behavior to achieve desired outcomes in a changing environment. In other words, smart behavior increases your chances of success, survival, or well-being. Dumb behavior does the opposite.

When faced with different options, the smartness of your choice can be judged by its consequences. If your decision enhances your opportunities, relationships, reputation, or resilience, it’s smart. If it narrows your prospects or makes your life worse, it’s dumb.

Crucially, this definition also accommodates social consensus. One person’s opinion may be biased, but when many independent observers agree that an action was wise (or foolish), that consensus is usually a good proxy for truth. You can fool some people some of the time, but not everyone all the time.

IQ vs. EQ: 2 pathways to smart behavior

When it comes to predicting whether people will behave intelligently or not, two psychological constructs stand out: IQ and EQ.

IQ (intelligence quotient) reflects cognitive ability—that is, how effectively you learn, reason, and solve abstract problems. It’s the single best predictor of performance in well-defined, rule-bound contexts such as school exams, technical analysis, programming, or chess. People with higher IQs tend to make better decisions when the problem has a right answer.

EQ (emotional quotient), on the other hand, captures the capacity to understand and manage emotions, both your own and others’. It predicts success in less structured, interpersonal domains: leading teams, negotiating, managing conflict, or handling stress. In these fuzzy, ambiguous situations, there are rarely clear “right” answers, and emotional intelligence helps navigate the gray zones.

Both forms of intelligence matter. IQ helps you see patterns; EQ helps you see people.

False stereotypes: book-smart vs. street-smart

Part of the reason people resist IQ is that they equate it with cold, academic, or impractical intelligence: the “book-smart but clueless” archetype. Think of high-IQ figures who made disastrous real-world choices: the Enron executives with MBAs from top schools who engineered their own collapse, or Nobel laureates who lost fortunes day-trading because they overestimated their models. Brilliant analysts but poor decision-makers.

Conversely, high-EQ individuals (likable, empathetic, persuasive) are often celebrated as “street-smart.” They can read a room, defuse tension, and influence others. Yet this doesn’t mean they always make wise choices either.

Importantly, research shows that IQ and EQ are largely uncorrelated. You can be high on both, low on both, or excel in one and lag in the other. They’re complementary tools—like having both a hammer and a screwdriver. One won’t replace the other, but together they let you handle a wider range of problems.

Why high-IQ people do dumb things

So why do objectively intelligent people sometimes behave foolishly? A few recurring patterns explain it.

1. Overconfidence in reasoning. High-IQ individuals often trust their logic too much, ignoring emotional or contextual cues. This “cognitive arrogance” leads to blind spots, especially in social or moral dilemmas.
2. Complexification. Smart people can overcomplicate simple problems, mistaking verbosity or abstraction for insight. They build intricate arguments to justify poor decisions. True intelligence is making complex things simple, rather than vice versa.
3. Confirmation bias. The cleverer you are, the better you become at rationalizing your mistakes. Intelligence amplifies self-deception when ego is at stake. Too often, smart people are more interested in lubricating their egos than in making the right decision—their desire to feel smart may surpass their appetite for getting to the solution of a problem.
4. Risk illusion. Intelligent people often feel they can “outsmart” uncertainty, taking reckless bets (financial, professional, or personal) under the illusion of control. In particular, when intelligence combines with narcissistic tendencies, it may lead to intellectual underperformance at the expense of grandiosity.
5. Narrow optimization. They focus on optimizing a specific variable (e.g., efficiency, profit, prestige) while ignoring broader consequences. A “smart” business strategy that erodes trust or well-being isn’t smart in the long run.

In short, high IQ can make you better at justifying dumb ideas, as well as defending your arguments and actions against others, leading to the “smartest person in the room” syndrome.

When emotional intelligence backfires

EQ provides no immunity against stupidity either. In fact, its virtues can become liabilities when taken too far.

1. Empathy surplus. Being too attuned to others’ emotions can make you overly accommodating or reluctant to deliver hard truths.
2. Agreeableness overdrive. High-EQ people often avoid conflict, even when confrontation is necessary to prevent bigger problems later. And people who focus on avoiding conflict end up causing a great deal of conflict in the long run.
3. Emotional manipulation. The dark side of EQ is Machiavellian charm, using emotional awareness to manipulate rather than connect.
4. Compassion fatigue. Caring too much can lead to burnout, especially in leadership or caregiving roles. In any job or organization, especially in competitive settings, if you optimize for getting along, you will impair people’s appetite for getting ahead.
5. Emotional suppression. Some emotionally “mature” individuals regulate so well that they disconnect from their authentic feelings, losing spontaneity and creativity.

In essence, EQ without boundaries can make you a “nice fool”—liked by everyone, exploited by many.

The meta-skill: coachability and learning

If IQ and EQ help you make smart choices, what helps you stay smart? The answer is coachability, the willingness and ability to learn from mistakes. This meta-skill distinguishes the chronically dumb from the progressively smart. Everyone makes errors; only the adaptable learn from them.

Here are five evidence-based ways to improve your decision-making intelligence.

1. Seek feedback relentlessly. Smart people solicit criticism before failure makes it unavoidable. The goal isn’t to be right; it’s to actually get better (evolve, develop, grow, etc.).
2. Distinguish process from outcome. A good decision can lead to a bad result, and vice versa. Evaluate how you decided, not just what happened.
3. Question your certainties. Treat your beliefs as hypotheses to test, not truths to defend.
4. Balance emotion and logic. Before major decisions, ask: Am I thinking clearly and feeling right about this? IQ and EQ can actually work together to improve outcomes, but you will need to manage this tension and turn them into allies.
5. Study your own patterns. Keep a decision diary, record choices, predictions, and outcomes . . . or at least reflect, get feedback, assess, and recalibrate. Over time, you’ll see which biases or emotions trip you up.

In short, the smartest people aren’t those who never err; they’re the ones who systematize their learning from errors. What ultimately separates wisdom from folly isn’t intellect or emotion alone, but the capacity to adapt—to learn, recalibrate, and improve.

As author and Harvard professor Amy Edmondson compellingly illustrates: In the end, smartness is less about having the right answers and more about asking better questions after you’ve been wrong. The truly intelligent person is not the one who avoids dumb mistakes, but the one who refuses to repeat them.

View the full article