Why hope is not a strategy, and what leaders should do instead

With uncertainty as the new norm, leaders are understandably searching for psychological anchors. They’re looking for ideas that can steady people and sustain energy through change. One of those anchors is hope.

Across corporate mission statements, fresh publications from thought leaders, and HR manifestos, corporations have elevated hope from a state of being to a strategic imperative. But what happens when an emotion becomes a business model?

How to define hope in an organizational context

Psychologically, hope is a cognitive and motivational state defined by three elements: agency (belief in your capacity to shape outcomes), pathways (the ability to identify routes toward goals), and goals themselves. Psychologist C.R. Snyder conducted research in the 1990s that reframed hope as a measurable construct. Snyder correlated the concept with performance, well-being, and perseverance.

Hope’s modern strategic allure has deep cultural roots. In ancient philosophy, hope oscillated between virtue and vice. The Greeks saw it as both a comfort and a trap. When they opened Pandora’s box, hope was the last thing left inside, which they ambiguously positioned between salvation and delusion.

By the 20th century, hope became a secular virtue central to progress and humanism. In psychology, post-war theorists viewed hope as a coping mechanism that could inoculate individuals and societies against despair. More recently, the positive psychology movement of the early 2000s further codified hope as a measurable, trainable mindset.

Today, in a world shaped by disruption—technological, social, and ecological—hope has reemerged as a leadership commodity. In the absence of predictability, it’s a currency of cohesion.

The upside of hope at work

In organizational life, hope can offer the following tangible benefits:

• Motivational fuel: Hope maintains focus on goals when there are distant or ambiguous outcomes.
• Resilience amplifier: Employees with strong hope scores typically recover faster from setbacks and see alternative routes when plans fail.
• Cultural glue: Hope-based narratives can create psychological safety. This allows people to see themselves as coauthors of a positive future rather than passive recipients of corporate fate.
• Innovation driver: Hope enables experimentation by reframing failure as learning, not loss.

In these ways, hope can act as a psychological lubricant, reducing the friction caused by doubt, fatigue, and fear. So why does hope in a corporate setting leave a bad taste in my mouth?

Hope’s hidden downsides

Hope’s fierce glow can be blinding. When hope decouples from reality, it risks morphing into delusion or denial. This is particularly dangerous in workplace cultures that prize positivity over honesty.

Untampered, hope can produce three organizational distortions:

1. Deferred reality: Leaders may avoid confronting hard truths, preferring to “hope things improve.” This delays critical decisions about restructuring, investment, or strategic pivoting.
2. Toxic positivity: Teams pressured to “stay hopeful” may feel unable to surface legitimate concerns or dissenting views. The result is conformity disguised as belief.
3. Chronic stress and burnout: Sustaining high levels of hope in the face of repeated setbacks can exhaust employees, which produces emotional dissonance when one’s lived experience doesn’t match the optimistic messaging.

In essence, hope without realism becomes institutionalized avoidance.

Why hope isn’t strategic

The current corporate positioning of hope as a strategy often stems from crisis communication.  During market downturns, layoffs, or rapid transformation, hope becomes both a message and a salve. Yet, when you wield hope as a rhetoric rather than a practice, it erodes trust. Employees can sense when a message from leadership is inconsistent with conditions on the ground. The gap between them declaring hope and observable action breeds cynicism. This is a core component of workplace burnout, and a form of psychological corrosion that is far more damaging than pessimism.

The case for realistic optimism

A more sustainable alternative is realistic optimism—a mindset that balances hopeful vision with clear assessment. Martin Seligman, one of positive psychology’s founders, described optimism as the expectation that “good things can happen,” while realism ensures those expectations align with evidence and constraints.

Realistic optimism doesn’t deny difficulty: it contextualizes it. Leaders who embody realistic optimism model three habits:

• Evidence-based hope: They openly acknowledge setbacks and uncertainties while identifying genuine paths forward.
• Transparent communication: They link belief with action by showing how they’re addressing challenges, not merely stating that “things will get better.”
• Adaptive goal-setting: They recalibrate expectations when circumstances change, preserving motivation through clarity rather than blind positivity.

For example, a startup facing funding shortfalls might cultivate realistic optimism by acknowledging fiscal pressure while outlining tangible cost-saving measures and revised growth trajectories.

Realistic optimism transforms hope from sentiment into discipline. It requires intellectual honesty, emotional agility, and the courage to engage with uncertainty without succumbing to fantasy. In cultivating this balance, leaders create cultures that are not only hopeful, but credible.

A quick guide to leading with realistic optimism

If you’re a leader and you want to know how to go about leading in a way that combines optimism and reality, start with the following steps below:

• Start with the facts. Before inspiring your team, ensure the data supports your message. Sustainable morale begins with credibility.
• Name the challenge, then the path. Hope grows when people see a route forward, not just a reason to believe. Pair optimism with concrete steps.
• Model uncertainty tolerance. Encourage dialogue about what’s unclear. When leaders admit they don’t have all the answers, hope becomes collective rather than performative.

In an era when “believing in better” has become a hollow corporate refrain, leaders who master realistic optimism stand apart. They demonstrate that the most enduring form of hope is not a declaration, but a practice. And it’s one that they build with clarity, accountability, and shared ownership of reality.

View the full article