Everything posted by ResidentialBusiness
-
Mamdani wins New York as Democratic US electoral sweep deals blow to Trump
Republicans defeated in New Jersey and Virginia as voters rebuke president’s partyView the full article
-
I have to co-manage with my husband, coworker talks with his mouth full, and more
It’s five answers to five questions. Here we go… 1. I have to co-manage with my husband My husband and I work for the same organization and live in a VERY small tourist town in the U.S. (~600 year-round residents and we live about an hour from a Wal-Mart or big box store). Our organization receives (received) a lot of federal funding. Most of that funding has been cut so we’re looking at downsizing and layoffs. Right now, my husband and I are managers in related but separate departments (think: youth outreach vs. adult education). His department is him and another full-time manager who supervise three full-timers and some seasonal employees, and my department has slightly more staffing. The most likely restructuring would combine our departments, and he and I would likely be the remaining managers for four full-time and around 10 seasonal staff. Hence, my letter because I have Concerns. While we are very good at keeping our work and relationship separate (we’ve been together for nine years, worked for the org for eight years, and people are routinely surprised when they see us holding hands when out and about in town), the logistics and optics are concerning. If one of us has conflict with an employee, will they feel comfortable going to the other person? When one of us makes an unpopular decision, will they think we have a united front because we’re married and not because we think it’s the best interest of our organization? Do you have any advice on how to mitigate potential issues and how to establish trust with our seasonal workers or new full-timers? We may have some (very limited) input in how our departments are restructured, so any ideas there? (And if you’re curious, “Why keep the married couple?” One, we are both very good at what we do, having both received regional awards and been nominated for national recognition in our respective fields. Two, my co-manager is retiring and his co-manager, while kind and lovely, struggles with some of the more intricate parts of the job and has expressed interest in moving back to his former position. Three, our jobs involve delivering various services to vulnerable local and satellite communities, and it takes years to build relationships with those communities. He and I have spent years building up trust and only now are able to connect in the way that we need. Firing one or both of us could have long-lasting impacts in the community and our org’s ability to efficiently fulfill its mission. And, we don’t want to leave. We love this org, we love what we’ve built, and because we’re in a small rural town, there just aren’t that many other options so we want to try to make this work.) The biggest thing you can do is to deputize someone for people to go to with concerns about either of you — someone who is not one of you and someone who it’s understood has real capital and influence (so that people are confident that this person is well-positioned to actually raise the concerns with you or someone above you). There should also be a clear pathway for people to go over your heads if something is serious, such as by having your own boss cultivate relationships with your team and be deliberate about creating avenues for ongoing conversations with them (both formally and informally), so people feel comfortable approaching her if something about the Couple Set-Up makes them uneasy approaching either of you. You could be clear about what topics would warrant that (for example, concerns about harassment, discrimination, significant management issues, or ethics). It will also help to have very clear delineations of responsibility for each of you — so you’re not both responsible for XYZ, but rather you are responsible for X and he is responsible for YZ — and try to keep clear boundaries there as much as you can. Last, give some thought to how this will impact your relationship! That is a lot of life overlap, so find ways to ensure that when you’re not at work you’re relating to each other as a married couple, not as colleagues. 2. Lunch with a coworker who talks with his mouth full Very low stakes question: I have a colleague who I used to work with (he’s since moved teams but still in the same building) and we have had a lunch due for a while. We went last week and it was AWFUL: he talks with his mouth full CONSTANTLY. He talks a lot and he takes big bites. It was really not nice and very obvious, we had a table very close by and the two guys eating there even noticed. If relevant, this person has enough work experience to have learned social cues on eating in public at least in a professional setting. And it’s not a cultural thing. The lunch was informal but still during working hours close to the office. He paid and said next it’s on me. I am dreading having to spend again an hour seeing food in his mouth. I don’t want to offer a coffee as it feels like being cheap. Since he moved teams we don’t interact anymore work-wise but I feel, out of politeness, that I need to eventually return the invite. What would you advise? There are some relationships, even work ones, where you could say, “Dude, you’re talking with your mouth full!” But assuming this isn’t one of them (and I’m guessing it’s not or you wouldn’t be asking) … suggest coffee next time. Most people aren’t keeping track of this kind of thing closely enough to feel deep resentment if they paid for a lunch and then you returned the favor with a coffee. It would be different if he were buying multiple lunches and you kept reciprocating with just coffee (assuming you were peers), but him paying for a single lunch does not obligate you to undergo another display of terrible table manners. 3. How do I explain my predecessor’s poor work quality to clients? I am a manager of managers at a job that essentially comes down to writing extremely lengthy technical reports. While we are a private company, the reports are depended upon by numerous state and federal agencies, nonprofits, and others. It would not be an exaggeration to say people’s lives depend on the reports. Before I started this position, the person who managed this unit was full of passion but not great at the job, and the reports from that era are sloppy and full of errors and don’t provide what is needed. My predecessor was let go, and I was brought in to get the department in shape. I’ve been leading the unit now for several years, and there has been an enormous turn-around and now we are nationally known in our field for the quality of our work. (Yay!) However, I still get calls occasionally from people needing one of the older reports. I feel like I should give a disclaimer, and usually I do, that the work isn’t reflective of who we are now and that I would be happy to redo the report at no cost. At the same time I am nervous about exposing us to liability by saying, “Hey when we did this job for you? We may have totally screwed up.” What are your suggestions for how to navigate this? Could you say something like, “We’ve made some changes in our methodology for doing these so if you’d like us to rerun it using our current process, we’d be happy to”? Or even, “We’ve made some changes in our methodology, which has made these more precise, so if you’d like us to rerun it using our current process, we’d be happy to”? 4. Is it a risk to work for a very small company? I’ve been reading your column for a long time and it’s really helped me with workplace norms in a decidedly abnormal field. However, I have a question about small companies. A lot of times people write in asking if such-and-such is legal or not — and it seems like, a lot of the time, what’s illegal for a large company is legal for a small company. If I understand correctly, in many states, companies with under 50 employees can basically get away with anything, including wage discrimination, age discrimination, gender discrimination, not providing healthcare to full-time employees, not providing certain accommodations … the list goes on. This makes it seem like a significant risk to accept work with a small company. For those applying to jobs, should this play into the calculus? For those (like me) who already work for small companies, how do we navigate these issues when we’re exposed to them, especially if we can’t use the law as leverage? That’s not entirely correct, although sometimes it is. The federal laws against discriminating based on race, sex, religion, pregnancy, disability, and other protected classes, as well as the federal laws against harassment, kick in at 15 employees. (You said 50, but that’s just the number of employees where FMLA applies.) But many states have similar laws that kick in at lower thresholds (often at one employee). Not all do, though — so yes, if you’re in a state that doesn’t and you’re at a company with 14 or fewer employees, you will have substantially fewer legal protections than at companies with 15+ employees. And yes, that should play into the calculus when considering a job at a very small company — along with all the other potential issues with working for very small companies, like that any dysfunction tends to be magnified. Without legal protection, your only real leverage is your willingness to leave (or to band together with colleagues and push for change). 5. When should I start job-searching? I have been laid off from my software development job at a manufacturing company. My last day is eight months away. When should I start applying for new jobs? Now. You don’t know how long a job search will take, particularly in this economy. You can be choosy if you start the search now, whereas the longer you wait, the more pressure you’ll feel to take whatever is offered. The post I have to co-manage with my husband, coworker talks with his mouth full, and more appeared first on Ask a Manager. View the full article
-
Elite bank Coutts increases fees for its least wealthy customers
Clients with less than £500,000 in assets will be charged £100 a month from JuneView the full article
-
Carmakers warn UK crackdown on Motability scheme will hit sales
Programme helps fund vehicles for disabled people View the full article
-
Deutsche explores hedges for data centre exposure as AI lending booms
Executives discussing options including shorting basket of artificial intelligence stocks or using derivatives to transfer riskView the full article
-
Bond markets are winning the Budget stand-off
Gilts investors have long suspected that Labour would abandon its manifesto promises View the full article
-
Will higher defence spending boost the European economy?
Deindustrialising regions hope for investment and jobs, but much will depend on how the extra money is spentView the full article
-
Russia adds jet engines to Soviet-era ‘dumb bombs’
Russian glide bombs are now capable of hitting Ukrainian targets up to 200km awayView the full article
-
New York voted for a new digital, citywide map. Here’s what it will do
There are many, many maps of New York City. There are the decor maps, sold on Amazon, and the tourist maps, which mostly focus, erroneously, only on Manhattan. There’s the iconic subway map, as well as the MTA’s new version. There’s the Eater and Grubhub maps, which tell us where to eat. And then there’s the map that really matters: the official legal map for the city, which quite literally rules the streets of the city, complete with boundaries and widths. It’s also the map that doesn’t currently exist, at least in one singular and easy-to-use form. That’s changing, though. On Tuesday night, New Yorkers appeared poised to approve Proposal 5, a measure that will push the city to create a unified official map representing its five boroughs for the first time. The effort should help officials finally catch up with unification efforts, which began more than a century ago in 1898, when areas throughout modern-day Queens, Brooklyn, Staten Island, Manhattan, and the Bronx were combined to form one city government. While the city has streamlined most operations, New York’s maps were never synthesized into one document, scattering authority over these official charts across the city and resulting in thousands of paper topographical documents. Today, the diffuse nature of these official maps slows down housing construction, adding another hurdle to solving the city’s extreme housing crisis, advocates argue. The passage of the proposition means that these paper maps will finally be distilled into a single visualization and eventually digitized. The goal is to speed up any city process that typically requires verification with an official city map or updating a city map to mark a change to street geography. The creation of a unified city map should also help officials more accurately represent the city’s waterfront, particularly as climate change alters the coastline. Plus, it should help eradicate the problem of “paper streets”– streets that are still recorded on official paper maps, but no longer exist in real life. Fast Company chatted with Casey Berkovitz, who is on staff at the Charter Revision Commission, which was charged with considering New York’s official city charter and putting forth ballot initiatives, including the now-passed map proposal. Earlier this year, the group found that changes to the current map were, in their words, “overdue.” This interview was edited for clarity and length. Rebecca Heilweil: Can you explain what people voted for? Casey Berkovitz: Today in New York City, we have a very archaic system in which the official city map is spread out across five separate borough offices. On paper we think it’s about 8,000 paper maps across the five boroughs. This is really an artifact of a time before, not just digitization, but also borough consolidation. The five boroughs became one city in 1898, but the borough presidents maintained jurisdiction over things like street maintenance through the middle of the 20th century. The city just never updated to consolidate its official city map into one unified map. Certainly as digitization and the internet have become more widespread in recent decades, the city never moved to modernize, either. This measure would do both. Rebecca Heilweil: Growing up here, I was familiar with all sorts of New York City maps. There’s the lot numbers maps, there areConEdison maps, and there’s school zone maps. Will all of those kinds of functions that the city provides, and which are mapped spatially, end up on this map? Will it show everything related to municipal activity? Casey Berkovitz: When we talk about the official city map, we refer to a pretty specific function, which is the map of things like street borders, street widths, property lines, in some cases, waterfront borders, which hasve to do with construction and infrastructure. There are other maps like you mentioned. There are school district maps and city council districts and community districts all on down the line that are obviously important and frequently interact with the official city map, but that are their own distinct maps and that wouldn’t be affected by this proposal. Rebecca Heilweil: Can you talk a little bit about the digital aspect of it? What is that going to look like when people hear “digital map”? They might think Google Maps. Casey Berkovitz: We actually already have the vast majority of what a digital city map would look like online, but doesn’t have any binding authority because it is not the official city map laid out in the city charter [Editor’s note: This unofficial map is available here]. In terms of what it would mean for New Yorkers today, if you want to build housing infrastructure, or any number of things, many of those functions require either confirming on the city map or updating the city map. These are things like property lines or the width of a street or the grade of a street that have impacts on what you can build. Those functions can take months or years because they require going to each individual borough map office, finding the right paper map, confirming what it looks like, and changing what it looks like. That’s a long process. There are frequently long queues at those borough offices to do those sorts of things. That adds, again, months or years to the process of building important infrastructure and housing. Not all of those functions would become instantaneous with the digital map, but they would be significantly faster than the process today of finding the individual paper fragment of a map and updating or confirming the information that’s on it. Rebecca Heilweil: How long is switching to a unified map system going to take? Casey Berkovitz: Taking that many paper maps […] unifying it, confirming the information, will take time as well from five borough offices to one central office. Granting it the official status as a city map will require essentially a zoning action to grant it that official status. That’s another benchmark in the timeline moving forward over the next couple of years. Rebecca Heilweil: What are some of the design considerations or, I don’t want to say aesthetics, but things that in terms of what this map should actually look like that you’re thinking about? There are so many different types of maps and so many different ways of representing things. Casey Berkovitz: The important thing here is that street and property lines are clear, that street widths are clear, and that changes over time are visible. In the preview map today, we have overlays of where there have been changes to the city map over time so that New Yorkers who are interested can see where streets have been remapped or de-mapped over time. Rebecca Heilweil: Can you talk a little bit about what you anticipate the biggest challenge being, moving forward? Casey Berkovitz: It is a lot of paper maps to unify and to make sense of. They are amazing historic documents and certainly, we’ll want to take good care of them and preserve them, even if they’re no longer the official binding government document. Balancing care for the physical maps with efficiency of unifying them and digitizing them is going to be relatively important. It’s going to take a dedicated effort from city staff. Rebecca Heilweil: What should I have asked you that I didn’t about New York’s upcoming digital map? Casey Berkovitz: This is pretty in the weeds, but it may be interesting to people who are interested in maps is that New York City actually has a number of what are called paper streets that are streets that exist on the city map today, but are not real streets in real life. A number of the construction or zoning actions that would be sped up by the unified and digitized map related to, if you either want to get rid of a paper street in order to do construction there or if you want to otherwise change the street kid. The other thing that is maybe a little more broadly applicable is how the map modernization intersects with the climate crisis. New York City has 520 miles of waterfront, along the bay and then along the rivers. Particularly as the climate has changed, waterfront borders have changed […] This proposal might make a big difference … either in development or resiliency efforts, where the paper maps when they were created genuinely do not reflect where the actual waterfront border is today. View the full article
-
Global stocks fall as US sell-off over AI valuations spreads
Decline in Asian markets led by companies most exposed to demand for artificial intelligenceView the full article
-
Finance of America reports 3Q loss, nine-month profit
Home price modeling changes hurt FOA's third-quarter interim results but it was in the black between January and September on a continuing operations basis. View the full article
-
Reeves to urge insurance bosses to increase investment in London
Chancellor due to meet representatives from Lloyd’s of London, Hiscox and ConvexView the full article
-
JPMorgan discloses US inquiry into alleged debanking practices
Political flashpoint emerged during Biden administration as clients claimed they were denied service for political reasonsView the full article
-
All schoolchildren in England to be taught financial literacy
Major changes to curriculum also include teaching about fake news and climate changeView the full article
-
NYC mayoral election: How to track the race between Mamdani, Cuomo, and Sliwa in real time
Voters are filling in their ballots today to choose who will lead America’s largest city for the next four years. New York being a center of global finance and business means that its local elections will always attract some degree of attention outside of the five boroughs, but the city’s mayoral race this year has garnered far more national interest than usual. That’s in large part thanks to Zohran Mamdani, the assemblymember from Queens who was virtually unknown outside of New York before he launched his campaign a year ago. Mamdani went viral early in the race with entertaining person-on-the-street videos in the wake of Donald The President’s second presidential election victory. With support from an energized base of younger voters, he rode that wave to a primary election victory against former Governor Andrew Cuomo in June. Since then, the national headlines about Mamdani and the broader race for mayor haven’t stopped, which is to say that no shortage of eyeballs will be focused on New York’s election results as they begin to pour in on November 4. Most polls have shown Democrat Mamdani with a comfortable lead over his two main opponents: Cuomo, who is running as an independent, and Guardian Angels founder Curtis Sliwa, the Republican on the ballot. If Mamdani coasts to victory as expected, he would be the first Muslim mayor of New York and, at 34, the youngest person to lead the city in more than 100 years. How can I track the New York City mayoral election results? News outlets with real-time decision desks offer the fastest way to see how the election is unfolding. We’ve rounded up some resources below: NPR (via Associated Press) New York Times CNN Decision Desk HQ Election polls close at 9 p.m. ET. This story is developing… View the full article
-
You Can Vote in TikTok's First-Ever US Awards Show
For me, part of the appeal of TikTok is seeing smaller, less polished videos from people who don't fashion themselves as influencers. But what do I know? The company has announced it is holding its first U.S. awards show later this year. It seems the Oscars-ification of short form video is here. In a blog over on the TikTok site, the company said the show, fittingly called the TikTok Awards, will be held in the Hollywood Palladium in Los Angeles on Dec. 18, 2025, and will "honor the creators who have inspired, entertained, and connected communities across the country." To that end, the site also says it will invite users to "vote for their favorite creators" starting on Nov. 18. So, how will all of this go down? Who is nominated for the TikTok Awards?TikTok says it will have announce nominees in 14 categories, including Creator of the Year, Video of the Year, Breakthrough Artist of the Year, and Muse of the Year, whatever that means. But don't assume you can put forward any old channel for an award. Towards the end of its announcement post, TikTok included a "Meet the Nominees" section that makes it clear the company has already chosen the competitors—and it might not be anyone you recognize. As someone who has spent a total of 13 hours on TikTok over last week (the things I admit for this job), I only recognize one of them. To be fair, the company says there are "more to come," so it's possible someone I recognize will get added to the list of options. Regardless, it seems like the nominees are being chosen by some internal board, so your mileage may vary on whether you agree with the picks. Personally, I'll admit that a lot of my favorite channels are journalists, spicy comedians, and political commentators, so it's possible they're not showing up here due to an effort to appear apolitical and family friendly. (Justice for Dave the cat, though). You can vote Voting for the TikTok Awards will start on Nov. 18, and the company says you can cast your votes using the in-app TikTok Awards hub. While it's currently unclear how you'll find the hub, my guess is it will show up as a pop-up over your feed when you first open the app, as it did with prior TikTok giveaways. I'm sure nominated creators will also be quick to link users to the hub. It's unclear at the moment how many votes users will get to cast. Some sites, like Crunchyroll, like to let users vote on their awards once per day, likely to encourage engagement or discourage dummy accounts. Whether TikTok will implement a similar system remains to be seen. How to watch the TikTok AwardsIf all you want to know is who wins, then you'll be able to watch the TikTok Awards themselves live on Dec. 18 starting at 6 p.m. PT, with a "red carpet livestream" starting an hour before. If you're comfortable watching from your phone, you'll be able to tune in via the TikTok app, but for better TV integration, TikTok says Tubi will also host the program. If you happen to show up late, Tubi will also have an archive of the Awards available to watch on demand "the next day." Can I go to the TikTok Awards In Person?While TikTok is promising "an immersive IRL experience with interactive moments," it's not posting any links to purchase tickets, which means the event is likely invite-only. That's probably important for creator safety, but a bummer for anyone looking to help bring "the For You Feed to life," as TikTok puts it. Are these really the First TikTok Awards?While 2025 is the first year the U.S. has had TikTok Awards, prior years have seen them come to countries including Korea, Japan, Australia, and Brazil. Likely, the delay has been due to the app's uncertain future in the U.S., but with a final deal now reached transferring control of the company to U.S. entities, it's likely TikTok is looking to make up for lost time by amping up its presence in the country. So, will you be watching the TikTok Awards? Personally, I'm not sure they jibe with what I like most about the app—there's a whole category celebrating people who sell via commission with the TikTok shop, something I immediately scroll by whenever I see it—but it could be a funny way to spend an evening, I suppose. So, basically the same approach I take with the Oscars—and at least it should make for some good hot takes on the accounts I do watch. View the full article
-
USDA email warns stores: discounts for SNAP users could violate federal law
Restaurants, food banks, nonprofits, and other organizations have stepped up to offer assistance to the 41 million Americans who have been thrust into limbo this month regarding SNAP benefits that have been halved. But retailers are prohibited from offering discounts on groceries. The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) has sent notices to retailers alerting them that they can’t offer special discounts to customers affected by the lapse in funding. Despite skepticism about the authenticity of these reports, the USDA confirmed the veracity of the notice to Fast Company, though a spokesperson didn’t provide any additional comment. “You must offer eligible foods at the same prices and on the same terms and conditions to SNAP-EBT customers as other customers, except that sales tax cannot be charged on SNAP purchases,” the notice reads. “You cannot treat SNAP-EBT customers differently than any other customers.” The USDA has sent out these notices despite the government shutdown that began last month. ‘EQUAL TREATMENT RULE’ The USDA appears to be invoking the “equal treatment rule” in an unprecedented way: The rule was intended to ensure that retailers couldn’t discriminate against SNAP recipients by charging them more for eligible items. Now, the USDA wants to ensure that grocery stores don’t charge these customers less for eligible items. What’s also unusual is that grocery stores, at their discretion, regularly offer discounts to customers for a variety of reasons — including designated discount days for seniors. ACTION FOR SNAP VIOLATIONS It’s unclear what penalties, if any, the USDA will impose on retailers who ignore this rule and offer discounts to SNAP beneficiaries. However, a discount apparently is considered a SNAP violation, and the Food and Nutrition Service within the USDA is tasked with monitoring such violations. “FNS takes immediate administrative action to ensure stores that violate SNAP rules no longer participate in the program,” reads a March 2025 fraud notification letter sent to retailers and posted on the USDA website. “Retailers that commit program violations will face consequences, including losing the ability to accept SNAP benefits. Retailers who commit program violations may also be subject to monetary penalties, fines, and/or criminal prosecution.” RETAILERS THRUST INTO LIMBO Some locally-owned grocery stores had promised discounts to SNAP recipients, along with DoorDash and Instacart, which deliver groceries for hundreds of grocery store chains. DoorDash sees no issue in waiving or reducing service and delivery fees for SNAP beneficiaries, as the company announced it would do previously, a company spokesperson told Fast Company. The company is among a group of pilot retailers for online SNAP that received a blanket regulatory waiver issued by FNS that waives the equal treatment requirement, said the spokesperson, who shared a copy of that notice. Instacart also received a similar waiver from FNS and had offered SNAP customers a 50% off their next grocery order, though a company spokesperson didn’t explicitly confirm to Fast Company whether it would continue with this offer. At least two retailers had offered discounts to struggling customers and retracted them after receiving the notice from the USDA, according to Catherine Rampell, an MSNBC anchor, in a post on the X platform. View the full article
-
Chrysler recalls 320,000 Jeep plug-in hybrids over battery fire risk
Chrysler is recalling more than 320,000 Jeep plug-in hybrid vehicles due to a faulty battery that can fail and lead to a fire, U.S. traffic safety regulators said. Chrysler, which is owned by Netherlands-based Stellantis, is aware of 19 reports and 1 injury potentially related to the issue. Owners of the vehicles, which include 228,221 Jeep Wranglers model years 2020-2025 and 91,844 Jeep Grand Cherokees model years 2022-2026, are being advised to park the vehicles outside and away from structures until a remedy for the problem is determined. Vehicle owners are also being told not to charge their vehicles, the National Highway and Traffic Safety Administration said. Interim notification letters are expected to be mailed to vehicle owners by December 2, 2025, with additional letters to be sent once the final remedy is available. The number for the recall is 68C and owners may contact Chrysler customer service at 800-853-1403. Vehicle Identification Numbers for this recall will be searchable on NHTSA.gov beginning November 6, 2025. Vehicles that were previously recalled for the same issue under previous recalls will need to have the new remedy performed, the NHTSA said. The batteries were manufactured by Auburn Hills, Michigan-based Samsung SDI America. View the full article
-
All the New Features Coming to iOS 26.2
Apple dropped iOS 26.1 on Monday, introducing some small but meaningful changes to iPhones. But just one day after changing how alarms work, and adding options to adjust the look of Liquid Glass, the company is back at it with another update: iOS 26.2. To be clear, iOS 26.2 is not currently available to the public. Instead, Apple is now beta testing this version of iOS, allowing developers to trial the software against their apps, and report any and all issues back to Apple. While anyone can technically download this new software, I wouldn't recommend it. iOS 26.2 is not intended for public use, and, as such, it might introduce problems on your device. If you'd like to beta test iOS 26.2, I'd encourage you to at least wait for Apple to ship the public beta version, which should arrive soon. As to be expected, iOS 26.2 doesn't appear to be a major update. Apple clearly added most of the features and changes it had in mind with iOS 26, and a handful of new features and adjustments with iOS 26.1. Still, iOS 26.2 does bring some changes, even with the first beta. Here's what's new, at least at this time: Liquid Glass slider for the Lock Screen clockWith iOS 26.1, Apple added an option to adjust the look of Liquid Glass. With it, you can choose from two options: "Clear," the iconic Liquid Glass look, or "Tinted," which increases opacity of the elements, and turns Liquid Glass into more of a Frosted Glass. While this is a helpful addition for users who didn't like the look of Liquid Glass, some wanted Apple to go a step further, and add a slider to more finely adjust the look of the glassy design. It seems Apple has done just that with iOS 26.2, but not for the system-wide Liquid Glass UI. Instead, with this new version, you get a slider to adjust the look of your Lock Screen clock: This Tweet is currently unavailable. It might be loading or has been removed. Alarms for remindersReminders are an indispensable part of my iPhone. I rely on them on a daily basis to make sure I keep up with important tasks. However, reminder alerts are as present as any other notification on your iPhone. If you frequently watch your notifications, that's just fine, but if you don't check your iPhone so much, or you use Focuses or Do Not Disturb, it can be easy to miss a reminder—and easy to forget to do the thing you were reminding yourself to do. iOS 26.2 has a solution: alarms for reminders. When you set a reminder as "Urgent" while running iOS 26.2, you'll see a pop-up asking for permission to to schedule alarms and timers. The idea is, rather than rely on a simple alert, the Reminders app can play an alarm when your reminder is due. I imagine that will help avoid forgotten reminders: You might miss a short ping, but you probably will hear if your iPhone is continuously blaring. Sleep Score updatesIf you have an Apple Watch running watchOS 26, you can take advantage of Apple's new Sleep Score feature. Sleep Score looks at your sleep duration, bedtime, and sleep interruptions to assign you a score to summarize how well you slept. Duration can go up to 50 points, bedtime up to 30, and interruptions up to 20, culminating in a highest possible score of 100. With iOS 26.2 and watchOS 26.2, Apple is adjusting the Sleep Score metrics, which should hopefully make it a bit more accurate for users at a glance. Here's how it changed, as noted by MacRumors: Very Low: 0–40 (previously 0–29) Low: 41–60 (previously 30–49) OK: 61–80 (previously 50–69) High: 81–95 (previously 70–89) Very High: 96–100 (previously 90–100) In addition, "Excellent" is now "Very High," to keep the naming scheme more consistent. Podcasts changesApple is introducing three new changes for the Podcasts app in iOS 26.2. You'll see all three in a pop-up menu the first time you open the app post-update. First, all Podcasts in English will come with chapters by default. Podcasters can include these chapters themselves, or, if none are available, the app will generate them automatically with AI. If podcasters don't want their episodes to have chapters, they can disable the feature on their end. The app will also collect any podcasts mentioned during the show you're listening to in one location, so you can easily find those other podcasts if interested. Similarly, podcasters can roundup any links they want to share in one place, including with timestamped entries in the transcript of the episode. The app may automatically create these links too, based on the contents of the episode. EU users are getting Live TranslationLive Translation is a promising new feature for AirPods owners running iOS 26. When you're wearing your AirPods, and you start talking to someone who speaks a different language than you do, your iPhone will translate their words on the fly, and you'll hear what they're saying in your target language through your AirPods. Apple isn't the first company to offer this feature and it isn't perfect, but it's great to have it nonetheless. However, EU users running iOS 26 or iOS 26.1 can't use Live Translation. Apple cited the region's Digital Markets Act as the reason it couldn't bring Live Translation to the EU, but the company seems to have sorted out whatever logistical and bureaucratic issues it had been dealing with: Once iOS 26.2 drops, AirPods users in the EU will be able to use Live Translation, too. View the full article
-
Transportation Secretary warns of ‘mass chaos’ in the skies if the shutdown continues
Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy predicted Tuesday that there could be chaos in the skies next week if the government shutdown drags on and air traffic controllers miss a second paycheck. There have already been numerous delays at airports across the country—sometimes hours long—because the Federal Aviation Administration slows down or stops traffic temporarily anytime it is short on controllers. Last weekend saw some of the worst staff shortages and on Sunday, flights at Newark Liberty International Airport in New Jersey were delayed for several hours. Duffy and the head of the air traffic controllers union have both warned that the situation will only get worse the longer the shutdown continues and the financial pressure continues to grow on people who are forced to work without pay. FAA employees already missed one paycheck on Oct. 28. Their next payday is scheduled for next Tuesday. “Many of the controllers said, ‘A lot of us can navigate missing one paycheck. Not everybody, but a lot of us can. None of us can manage missing two paychecks,’” Duffy said. “So if you bring us to a week from today, Democrats, you will see mass chaos. You will see mass flight delays. You’ll see mass cancellations, and you may see us close certain parts of the airspace, because we just cannot manage it because we don’t have air traffic controllers.” Most of the flight disruptions so far during the shutdown have been isolated and temporary. But if delays become more widespread and start to ripple throughout the system, the pressure will mount on Congress to reach an agreement to end the shutdown. Major airlines, aviation unions, and the travel industry have been urging Congress to end this shutdown as soon as possible by voting to support the clean funding resolution that Republicans have proposed. The U.S. Travel Association said in a letter to Congressional leaders this week that the economy has already lost more than $4 billion because of the shutdown, and the industry worries the impact will get significantly worse if the shutdown continues into the holiday travel season. “With Thanksgiving, the busiest travel period of the year, imminently approaching, the consequences of a continued shutdown will be immediate, deeply felt by millions of American travelers, and economically devastating to communities in every state,” the U.S. Travel Association said. Normally, airlines strive to have at least 80% of their flights depart and arrive within 15 minutes of when they are scheduled. Aviation analytics firm Cirium said that since the shutdown began on Oct. 1, the total number of delays overall has not fallen significantly below that goal because most of the disruptions so far have been no worse than what happens when a major thunderstorm moves across an airport. But on Sunday, only about 56% of Newark’s departures were on time, and the Orlando airport reported that only about 70% of its flights were on time, according to Cirium. As of midday Tuesday, there have been 1,932 flight delays reported across the United States, according to www.FlightAware.com. That is lower than what is typical although the FAA did say that flights in Phoenix were being delayed Tuesday morning because of staffing shortages. Strong winds are also causing delays at the Newark and LaGuardia airports Tuesday. —Josh Funk, AP transportation writer View the full article
-
Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac housing goals need revisions: MBA
While FHFA reduced most of the single-family low-income goals, the MBA wants the refinance target for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac cut as well, its letter said. View the full article
-
Elections in US to give voters’ verdict on Trump
Results from New York to Virginia will give signal of electorate’s mood in president’s second term View the full article
-
Big Tesla investor will reject Elon Musk’s $1 trillion pay package
Norway’s sovereign wealth fund, one of Tesla’s biggest investors, said Tuesday that it will vote against a proposed compensation package that could pay CEO Elon Musk as much as $1 trillion over a decade. There will be more than a dozen company proposals up for a vote Thursday during Tesla’s annual meeting, but none have generated more division than Musk’s potentially massive pay package. “While we appreciate the significant value created under Mr. Musk’s visionary role, we are concerned about the total size of the award, dilution, and lack of mitigation of key person risk consistent with our views on executive compensation,” said Norges Bank Investment Management, which manages the country’s Government Pension Fund Global. “We will continue to seek constructive dialogue with Tesla on this and other topics.” The fund has a 1.16% stake, the sixth largest holding among institutional investors. Baron Capital Management, which holds about 0.4% of Tesla’s outstanding shares, said Monday that it will vote in favor of the compensation package. “Elon is the ultimate ‘key man’ of key man risk. Without his relentless drive and uncompromising standards, there would be no Tesla,” wrote founder Ron Baron. “He has built one of the most important companies in the world. He’s redefining transportation, energy, and humanoid robotics and creating lasting value for shareholders while doing it. His interests are completely aligned with investors.” Musk is the company’s largest investor, holding 15.79% of all outstanding shares. Tesla management has proposed a compensation arrangement that would hand Musk shares worth as much as 12% of the company in a dozen separate packages if the company meets ambitious performance targets, including massive increases in car production, share price, and operating profit. View the full article
-
Newrez faces another zombie-seconds class action filing
The latest case comes after at least three other zombie lawsuits in the past year, with the owner of the loan in question claiming $173,000 in past-due interest. View the full article
-
US stocks slide as investors fret over high valuations for AI companies
Cautious comments from top bank executives add to jittery sentiment on Wall StreetView the full article